Thread: Hispanosupremacists Infiltrate Evangelical Movement

Recently, the brick & mortar churches have made it abundantly clear they care little about our laws 'cuz they abide by a higher law. And they have little interest in sovereignty 'cuz their primary interest is in bolstering their collection plates. I wonder if they've actually been infiltrated or if our holier-than-thou tax exempt syndicates welcome them.

Originally Posted by Frederick Meekins, The American Chronicle (click masthead)

Hispanosupremacists Infiltrate Evangelical Movement
Frederick Meekins, July 05, 2008

Minority activists and other guiltmongers often whine that 11 am Sunday morning is often the most segregated hour of the week. I wonder what the we-are-all-one-big family agitators have to say about the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, which bills itself as the National Hispanic Association of Evangelicals. While prominent Christian leaders are correct that all of mankind descends from one set of parents, interesting, isn´t it, how these speakers only expect Whites of a more Northern European extraction to abide by such radical color-blindness. For if a group of Caucasians a little to wrapped up in their pigmentation ratios established the Nordic Christian Association, it would not be tolerated in contemporary Evangelical circles, and rightfully so.

Yet, in browsing the NHCLC´s website, one finds alliances and linkages with a virtual who´s who of American religion today. On their main page at one time or another have been inks to prominent ministries such as Promise Keepers, Christianity Today, Franklin Graham´s Samaritan´s Purse, and Rod Parsely´s Center for Moral Clarity. Unless otherwise stated, usually such prominent banner placements denote a high degree of fellowship between the partners. As one probes deeper into the site, one discovers this outfit has conducted theological dialogue with arch apostates such as T.D. Jakes (denier of the Trinity) and Benny Hinn, known for endorsing epilepsy-esque convulsions in the name of the Holy Spirit. Ted Haggard, the former head of the National Association of Evangelicals caught in a scandal involving a gay male prostitute dealing drugs, at one time also came bowing and scrapping before the group in an effort to curry its favor.

But before most weak-willed pew fillers simply shrug their shoulders and flippantly remark, "Well it´s simply God´s will we don´t look at color" perhaps they should be told that it´s doubtful the concerns of the NHCLC are as broadminded and universal in nature as they seem to be giving their socioecclesiastical imprimatur to the Hispanic conquest of the United States. For in a letter addressed to the President and Congress and in a "Statement of on Comprehensive Immigration Reform", the NHCLC calls for aliens already living here to be granted permanent legal status, an increase in the numbers of visas granted, and a "viable guest worker program that will strengthen the economic vitality of both employer and employee". So basically, to use Biblical vernacular, to Sheol with the American people so long as the elites and their new indentured servants are pleased. All you are to any of these people, both in the government and in the clerical class is either someone that pays taxes or tithes.

In their statement, the NHCLC calls for end to all illegal immigration. For those unable to decipher socialistic doublespeak, what this group is calling for is really not all that different than what Communist front groups such as La Raza has called for or the Tri-Lateralists at the highest levels of the State Department.where no one will be illegal anymore when the United States, Mexico, and Canada are merged into a broader hemispheric union where Mexican corruption will pervade, Canadian anti-hate speech tribunals will reign supreme, and America´s constitutional liberties will have been flushed down the sewer pipe like last nights half-digested refried beans. One of the verses tolerancemongers love to rip out of its original context and toss around the most is "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." If one´s highest loyalty in this life is to be found with one´s tribe above all else as these ethnocentric ministries seem to insinuate, Hispanics have a lot of cleaning of their own house to do before they go about pointing out the faults of broader America.

Since the NHCLC has now set its sites on condemning the shortcomings of the broader American society, I guess they have finished evangelizing their own community and brought just about all of them to Christ. I guess they have convinced their kinsmen to forsake their carousing ways characterized by public boozing and raucous music and persuaded them to pick up after themselves and not to let their liter lie where it falls. However, from the appearance of many of our suburban neighborhoods, such is clearly not the case. Another Biblical injunction the Hispanophiles love to invoke is "Oppress not the stranger". But in comparison how Mexico treats immigrants to that nation, Americans pretty much treats those wantonly violating our borders like virtual kings.

In an April 4, 2006 piece appearing in the Washington Times, Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy exposes the rank hypocrisy of highlighting America´s alleged "mistreatment" of those who don´t even have the right to be here in comparison to how poorly Mexico even treats immigrants there playing by the rules. For example, according to Gaffney, the Mexican constitution forbids foreigners from expression political opinions on domestic affairs in public (no mass demonstrations as the human debris is allowed to wallow in here in America) and non-native born Mexicans can´t even become lawmakers or cabinet officers (thus no Henry Kissinger or Madeleine Albright). And though we are to fundamentally alter our Constitution in order to stroke Arnold Schwarzenegger´s ego so he can become President, a natural born Mexican citizen cannot become president unless his parents are also natural born Mexican citizens.

Yet in the spirit of multiculturalism and inclusion, we should not be so quick to dismiss all Mexican ways and in a spirit of international brotherhood, perhaps we should adopt some of the policies implemented by the Mexican government. According to Gaffney, Article 11 of the Mexican constitution guarantees protection against undesirable alien residents and Article 16 grants permission for citizens to detain illegals and hand them over to police who in turn authorized to expel them from the country without additional legal action. And if the NHCLC feels it must speak out against the abuse of the innocent, perhaps they should address the civil rights violations that go in the organization´s beloved cultural homeland. According to Larry Elder, Black Mexicans (Afro-Mexicans?) can be stopped by police and forced to sing the Mexican national anthem as a test of citizenship. But since they are not part of the "la raza" translated as "THE RACE", the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference probably doesn´t really care.

And those simply made to sing the Mexican Anthem are the lucky ones. Though Hispanics of the world claim to be unified against the United States, they hate one another almost as much as they hate the Yankee. For while the United States is expected to allow anyone in that pops through the door, Mexican officials regularly shoot, abuse, and sexual molest other Latin Americans coming into their nation for the purposes of, to borrow a phrase, "do jobs Mexicans themselves won´t do". This animosity among ethnic kinsman raises another interesting point. It is known that eventually most revolutions consume their own. Elitists in radical Hispanic organizations such as in the National Hispanic Leadership Conference, who could be accepted as Caucasians as many are as light complected as Italians or any other kind of White person with a suntan but just can´t pass up those affirmative action and racial preference spoils, should stop and wonder who the swarthier masses are going to turn against when the dreaded gringos no have finally been eliminated and no longer roam the earth?

American Christians concerned about their own futures since we will have to look after ourselves (since obviously no one else, not even our own church leaders intend to anymore) as well as the well being of their own children should think long and hard about who their religious dollars are going to support and under whose teaching they are going to sit. For the motto of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference is "Empowering the Hispanic Church, Engaging the Hispanic Vision and Enriching the Hispanic Dream." Where in that is any room for a common American dream, not to mention anyone that is not Hispanic? And if there isn´t, why should the average White Christian, heralded as the bane of earth by every malcontent from Guadalahara, to Los Angles, to Bejing to Baghdad participate in his own demise by either financing it through the collection plate or have to sit there every Sunday morning and be forced to smile about it? Source (click here)

For the motto of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference is "Empowering the Hispanic Church, Engaging the Hispanic Vision and Enriching the Hispanic Dream." Where in that is any room for a common American dream, not to mention anyone that is not Hispanic? And if there isn´t, why should the average White Christian, heralded as the bane of earth by every malcontent from Guadalahara, to Los Angles, to Bejing to Baghdad participate in his own demise by either financing it through the collection plate or have to sit there every Sunday morning and be forced to smile about it?

Exactly.

Originally Posted by crazybird

For the motto of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference is "Empowering the Hispanic Church, Engaging the Hispanic Vision and Enriching the Hispanic Dream." Where in that is any room for a common American dream, not to mention anyone that is not Hispanic? And if there isn´t, why should the average White Christian, heralded as the bane of earth by every malcontent from Guadalahara, to Los Angles, to Bejing to Baghdad participate in his own demise by either financing it through the collection plate or have to sit there every Sunday morning and be forced to smile about it?

Exactly.

DITTO for me too. If my baptist church (who are very active in helping the homeless) start aiding and abetting IA's, that will be the day I quit.

Elitists in radical Hispanic organizations such as in the National Hispanic Leadership Conference, who could be accepted as Caucasians as many are as light complected as Italians or any other kind of White person with a suntan but just can´t pass up those affirmative action and racial preference spoils, should stop and wonder who the swarthier masses are going to turn against when the dreaded gringos no have finally been eliminated and no longer roam the earth?

Like parts of Africa where they kill you because you aren't "black enough".
Where in some countries you are a 2nd class citizen because you look like a "half-breed". I mean we had soldiers who fathered children in other countries and those children in many cases were doomed to a life of poverty because they weren't "pure breeds" anymore. (Korea, Vietnam)

They had an insert in the paper a week ago about race. Guess recently they've done DNA tests on alot of black people who signed up for this. It was amazing how many had polynesian blood, asian blood, indian blood on down the line. "White" relatives in New Zealand......not the dreaded "rape" of the evil "white American/English guy" and slavery, like many assumed because maybe they had straight hair or slightly different bone structure or lighter skin. Seems that genetic change took place long before they got here and a "white guy" didn't have anything to do with mudding the blood line.......their asian side was showing dominate after a few generations. They have a lighter complexion as well. It was a very interesting read because of the reactions many unexpectedly felt. Here many were gung-ho Africa, when in reality, they had minimul Africian DNA. Some were totally angry to find they had Indian blood in them. Others felt guilty for feeling pleased to find they were 1/2 polynesian and that they were betraying the black race for thinking that. Some even found out they weren't brought here as slaves. They came through the islands with the French and slavery wasn't a part of their history, but here they were assuming they must have been because they were black and without question jumped on the slavery wagon and took up the cause.

Fact is they won't know and when they're done with one they'll go after another and it just might be their own. Or they might be saving one who isn't one of them based on nothing more than skin color. You wouldn't know. That's why I literally dispise this "hispanic" business....they are a blend just like almost everyone else and they are hating their own when they try and make them different or more special than anyone else.

If my baptist church (who are very active in helping the homeless) start aiding and abetting IA's, that will be the day I quit.

I just got the yearly request for faculty at my university to contribute to UNITED WAY. I will not contribute to any group that helps illegals in this country--but I would contribute to help Americans. Does anyone know if my contribution to UNITED WAY would go to illegals?

For the motto of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference is "Empowering the Hispanic Church, Engaging the Hispanic Vision and Enriching the Hispanic Dream." Where in that is any room for a common American dream, not to mention anyone that is not Hispanic?

It's all about "EMPOWERING THE HISPANIC". Thank goodness I left the Catholic church. I am going to send this article to my old parrish and in my spare time to other churches. Maybe I'll even email a copy to Rome.

A great and revealing article...well done.

Does anyone know if my contribution to UNITED WAY would go to illegals?

Can't say for sure.....but I'm not a United Way fan anyway.

If my baptist church (who are very active in helping the homeless) start aiding and abetting IA's, that will be the day I quit.
_________________

I agree!. I will say I find this article a bit over the top.

I was going to an "emerging" Evangelical church because I couldn't relate in the neo-con or the mega church environment, either. They have been dabbling in a lot of liturgical traditions---not too harmful... yet. But I asked the (young) pastor if he would make any statements on Memorial Day, and that I also had a very inspiring video. He answered, "We follow the liturgical calendar, not the national one." They also have a couple, from some liberal group, who went to Italy to work with refugees (read: illegal aliens) and had stated in a message that the US "should just open the border up." Those people are going to find that Italians are also upset with illegal immigration in a very big way. I couldn't keep from raising my voice to this stupid comment right then, that the US was already doing plenty to help people.

But this is the trend in young evangelicals: they are taught in public schools now that Dr. Martin Luther King--not Washington, not Lincoln, not Churchill---is the outstanding hero. They are cringing from embarrassment from the religious right and battered by "progressives" who hound them on environmental issues, gay rights, and now immigration. They are hounded from liberal religious groups (who want to get in on the relaxed atmosphere and inspiring music) to accept their bogus doctrines and take them in just the way they are. Then these can start pushing their agendas in the "emerging" churches, too.

I stopped going to this group and now don't go anywhere. Evangelicalism is thriving is in the Global South, disgusted with traditional faiths, but now also adapted to American values. I predict we will expect a big influx of this group to the US, too. The South Koreans are already doing it with their "maternity tourism."