Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Santa Clarita Ca
    Posts
    9,714

    Immigration issue

    Last modified: Monday, December 17, 2007 11:34 AM CST

    Immigration issue


    By PETER A. BROWN

    It has become conventional wisdom that illegal immigration may be the type of political issue that can rile voters, but perhaps not enough to change votes. And besides, the thinking goes, people far from the border really don’t care.

    These skeptics about the power of the immigration issue to change votes and elections ought to think again. The focus on immigration in the TV ads blanketing Iowa should convince any doubters.

    Candidates for the Republican presidential nomination are learning to read the polls - not just the horse race numbers, but the back pages in surveys that get at voters’ gut views.

    Data from the nation’s three most important general election swing states clearly show that not only do voters care but politicians who cross them on this issue are taking a serious electoral risk.

    A Quinnipiac University poll released earlier this month looked at attitudes toward immigration policy in Florida, Pennsylvania and Ohio, the big three battlegrounds of the Electoral College. No candidate has been elected president since 1960 without carrying two of the three.

    What stands out is a consensus that cuts across party lines: Voters want immigration reform focused on stricter enforcement rather than reform that would make it easier to integrate illegal immigrants into American life. And almost a quarter of voters see immigration policy as a potential deal-breaker for them in deciding whom to support for president.

    Although the issue is likely to be a bigger deal in the November election - because in general the likely Democratic nominees are less in favor of strict enforcement than their potential Republican opponents - it has emerged as a key part of the effort to stop former Gov. Mike Huckabee’s fast-rising campaign for the GOP nomination.

    Huckabee has zoomed to the top in the Iowa polls, much to the dismay of former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who had been leading. Romney’s campaign strategy has been built on the idea that he must win Iowa and New Hampshire to create momentum he needs in the larger states that follow. A loss in Iowa would make it very difficult for Romney to win New Hampshire and that would almost certainly doom his candidacy.

    That’s why Romney has come out swinging hard at Huckabee and he has decided that immigration is the former Baptist minister’s Achilles heel. Romney has gone on air with commercials that focus on Huckabee’s support for college scholarships for illegal immigrants and for making them eligible for the in-state tuition break available to Arkansas residents, but not U.S. citizens who live elsewhere.

    Those are not positions that Huckabee has staked out as a presidential candidate; they are part of his record as governor at a time when immigration was not the hot-button issue that it is today. Huckabee has responded with his own ads that proclaim his support for border security measures, but that do not mention the actions he took as governor - doing so would give further credence to Romney’s charges.

    Huckabee and Romney understand which way the wind is blowing on the issue, even in states without large illegal immigrant populations, and that are far from the Mexican border.

    The Quinnipiac survey of Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania provide the evidence for their response. Asked whether U.S. policy on the issue should primarily move in the direction of integrating illegal immigrants into American society or stricter enforcement of the laws against them, there was little difference in the three states. On average 70 percent favored stronger enforcement, 21 percent favored integrating illegal immigrants into American society.

    Voters were then asked if they agreed with a presidential candidate “on other issues,â€
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member miguelina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    9,253
    FINALLY! They get it. Immigration will be THE deal breaker in 2008!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
    "

  3. #3
    Senior Member Sam-I-am's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    santa/diabla ana, CA
    Posts
    1,370
    Quote Originally Posted by miguelina
    FINALLY! They get it. Immigration will be THE deal breaker in 2008!
    Just to be cynical, but doesn't that just mean that more candidates will lie more loudly about their positions on illegal immigration?
    por las chupacabras todo, fuero de las chupacabras nada

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •