Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member TexasCowgirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,571

    It's time to pawn the anchor babies again!

    Kids Taking Immigration Quest to Washington

    July 17, 2007
    Casey Woods -- The Miami Herald

    Nora Sandigo, leader of a South Florida advocacy group, is surrounded by children whose parents are undocumented immigrants. Carl Juste/Miami Herald Staff

    With no immigration overhaul in sight in Congress, immigration advocates have joined a South Florida activist's quixotic quest to persuade the U.S. Supreme Court to stop deporting the undocumented parents of American-born children.

    Today, Nora Sandigo and a passel of kids -- including 8-year-old Saul Arellano, who has drawn international attention since his mother took refuge in a Chicago church last year to escape deportation -- will march on Washington. They will rally in front of Congress and the White House and stand on the steps of the Supreme Court in an effort to draw attention to the American children of illegal immigrants.

    Sandigo, executive director of Sweetwater-based American Fraternity, has filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of more than 600 children, arguing their right to have their parents with them outweighs the government's prerogative to deport those who violated U.S. immigration law.

    "There are so many people detained, so many destroyed marriages, so many children without fathers and mothers," Sandigo, 42, said before heading to Washington. "It is completely destroying the base of society, which is family."

    Several immigration lawyers said they are skeptical the justices will hear the case -- much less rule in the children's favor.

    Close-the-border advocates, meanwhile, point to it as another example of undocumented immigrants overstepping their rights.

    "I think it's sad that these advocates would use the children as pawns to push their agenda through a scheme that is nothing more than a publicity stunt," said Carlos Espinosa, spokesman for U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., a vocal advocate for increased immigration enforcement. "This case will get laughed out of the courts."

    Even if the case's legal merits appear on shaky ground, Sandigo, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Nicaragua, remains undeterred.

    "She has such a big heart, and is so positive," said Honduran immigrant Bilma Rivera, 36, whose Nicaraguan husband was deported to his homeland last year. "My son's future is here, and I want to find a way for our family to be together."

    Rivera's 5-year-old son, Roger Castillo, is a plaintiff in the lawsuit.

    The case argues that the deportation of undocumented parents is often de facto deportation of their children, and asks the court to establish the children's legal standing to request a stay of those deportations.

    "We believe the constitutional right of children to their parents outweighs the statutory rules and regulations handed down by immigration," said Donald Schlemmer, a Washington-based lawyer who helped draft the motion. "We're not saying this is going to be an easy case, but these children have the right to have this question answered in the Supreme Court."

    Other immigration lawyers say the case faces a hard road.

    Miami attorney Ira Kurzban thinks it would be difficult to convince the Supreme Court to hear the lawsuit because it was filed directly with the high court, rather than rising through the lower courts first. "It's very tough to win a case like this," he said.

    Sandigo and her legal team -- led by American Fraternity President Alfonso Oviedo -- first filed the case last year in federal court in Miami, but then withdrew it to file directly to the Supreme Court, believing only the high court has jurisdiction.

    Miami immigration lawyer Tammy Fox-Isicoff said the lawsuit is fundamentally flawed.

    "I'm sure this was motivated by the attorneys wanting to do something for people in a helpless situation, but . . . there is not a shred of legal merit to this case," she said. "Maybe this was a last-ditch effort to get publicity for the situation."

    Sandigo is a petite woman, armed with three cellphones and an inexhaustible capacity to hawk her cause. She prods local officials to declare their cities immigrant sanctuaries, verbally flays Republican and Democratic lawmakers for their failure to pass immigration revisions and attends local immigration events -- often with a handful of the children she's representing in tow.

    She also occasionally hijacks other people's news conferences. At a February event called by U.S. Reps. Lincoln and Mario Diaz-Balart to push for immigration changes, Sandigo appeared with several children, including a teenager whose mother had recently been detained.

    Sandigo nudged the sobbing boy onto the stage, where a bemused Lincoln Diaz-Balart handed him the microphone to tell his story as TV cameras rolled. (hurry up and cry, the cameras are rolling!)

    Advocates joining Sandigo in Washington today are similarly determined.

    "We have a good case, and this is the best time to do it because there's no other alternative for millions of families," said Emma Lozano, head of the Chicago-based People Without Borders. "If we don't do something, there's going to be massive deportations and separations of families."

    Lozano's husband is the pastor at the church where Saul Arellano's mother, Elvira, still lives, nearly a year after she sought sanctuary there. Lozano is bringing Saul and about 100 other children to the capital by bus to march with Sandigo.

    "It's going to be all children, pure like a song of angels," Sandigo said. "We want the justices to put their hand on their hearts and over their consciences and understand that this country isn't protecting the most fragile American citizens."

    http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/ne ... e-news.asp
    The John McCain Call Center
    [img]http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/815000/images/_818096_foxphone150.jpg[/]

  2. #2
    Senior Member redbadger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The United States Of Invasion
    Posts
    3,005
    desperate people will use children...in some countries they strap bombs on them...whats the difference...it is the caliber of some people
    Never look at another flag. Remember, that behind Government, there is your country, and that you belong to her as you do belong to your own mother. Stand by her as you would stand by your own mother

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Santa Clarita Ca
    Posts
    9,714
    A 3rd word tactic use children, it will work about as well as the illegal bums who show disrespect for Old Glory. Low life freeloaders.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member WhatMattersMost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Illegal Sanctuary, Illinois
    Posts
    2,494
    There are so many people detained, so many destroyed marriages, so many children without fathers and mothers," Sandigo, 42, said before heading to Washington. "It is completely destroying the base of society, which is family."
    If a judge agrees to hear this idiotic nonsense his first question to these illegal aliens should be:

    "How many of you left husbands, wives, children and your own mother's and father's behind?"

    That oughta shut their mouths. They have no problem leaving their foreign born children behind in poverty with the promise of returning some day and many of them never see those children again. Yet many of them meet other men and women and start whole new families in America in order to have an anchor to the taxpayer funded freebies.

    What a bunch of conartists and hypocrits. . . family values my rear end
    It's Time to Rescind the 14th Amendment

  5. #5
    Hapexamendios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    311
    what a load of garbage.

    I care not what their family situation is. You took that risk when you KNOWINGLY crossed the border ILLEGALLY If it were up to the citizens of this country a court would never hear your case, because you are not a citizen of this country you do not have constitutional rights.

    But the government never lets a thing like the constitution get in the way. It would rather subvert us to paying illegals "anchor" ( which the 14th amendment DOES NOT PROTECT) babies along with 2-3 generations of taxpayer leeches. What don't you understand when we say get out?

    High school kids need jobs too in order to get at least a small grasp of what life is going to be like after they graduate. They can't get that competing with illegal labor.

    Solution:

    1st offense: Fine employers 10,000 dollars per illegal alien.

    2nd offense: Seize companys assets, have a tax sale with the proceeds going back into the local treasury to pay for said illegal aliens welfare, hospital care, and countless child care services that get milked to no end. CEO, or company owner spending 5 years per illegal alien. I could care less if these "American citizens" ( aka traitors ) think this is wrong. You sold your sole for a dollar, and expected us to pay for it. Screw em

    there is no 3rd offense. You get 2 strike with me.

    Vote Hapex next November
    "When the Government Fears the People, there is Liberty. When the People Fear the Government, there is Tyranny."

    Thomas Jefferson

  6. #6
    Senior Member pjr40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Redlands, California
    Posts
    1,596
    Who asked these folks to sneak in here and breed anyway?
    <div>Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of congress; but I repeat myself. Mark Twain</div>

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •