Thread: Judges Revive Catch-and-Release For Migrants With Children

Originally Posted by Judy

Apparently this is what Obama did. I don't know what GW Bush did, probably the same thing. If you can't legally detain them because of a court order, there really aren't too many options except rapid deportation which so far DOJ hasn't figured out how to do.

Not necessarily true where asylum claims are concerned. AG Jeff Session's has cut down on a lot of these cases by narrowing the claims of credible fear at their initial hearing. Those not meeting the new credible fear guidelines set forth by Sessions are eligible for rapid deportation. Sessions is doing everything he possibly can, within the law, to remedy these situations. Unfortunately the DOJ and DHS are limited to the letter of the law, which includes court rulings. I personally commend our U.S. Attorney General for rewriting policies to take us away from the Obama era program which was full of loopholes. To actually change law will take an act of Congress.


AG Sessions Reforms Asylum Rules to Exclude Gang-Violence, Abuse Claims


LEILA MACOR/AFP/Getty Images11 Jul 2018321

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has directed border officers to reject migrants’ asylum requests at the initial “credible fear” stage whenever migrants claim to fear non-political gang crime or spousal abuse, according to a CNN report.

The asylum reform comes as tens of thousands of migrants try each month to join the roughly 500,000 Central Americans who have already flowed into U.S. blue-collar jobs, public schools, and working-class neighborhoods since 2009 because of migration-friendly rules set by former President Barack Obama and his elite-left aides.

The new rules also counter the migration-friendly judges who are forcing border officials to release migrants who bring children with them in just 20 days.

The reform raises the bar in the initial credible-fear interviews conducted by border officers. Under Obama’s rules, roughly 80 percent of migrants got through this stage, often just by saying they fear persecution by criminal gangs and violent spouses. Once past this “credible fear” stage, migrants can use a single child to exploit many legal loopholes and courtroom appeals which trigger the “catch and release” rules that have allowed at least 400,000 pending asylum-seekers to get work permits in 2017.

Sessions’ higher bar at the credible-fear stage allows officers to immediately send migrants and children home, or back over the border, without allowing them to begin filing for asylum. The reforms will apply to parents who bring children with them to the gates at the border, and will work alongside the zero-tolerance policies being applied to migrants who cross the border illegally.

According to CNN:

The new guidance from US Citizenship and Immigration Services … instruct[s] the officers who conduct the initial interviews at the border to reject asylum claims based on those [crime and spousal abuse] fears. Beyond that, the officers are told to evaluate whether an illegal border crossing should also be grounds for rejection, as Sessions had also argued.

The guidance also places the burden on the newly arrived immigrant to articulate their asylum claim to the fullest extent of the complex legal standard during their initial interview.

“Claims based on … the members’ vulnerability to harm of domestic violence or gang violence committed by non-government actors will not establish the basis for asylum, refugee status, or a credible or reasonable fear of persecution,” the guidance states.

The rules still allow migrants to immediately appeal their claim to an immigration judge, but the process is complex. Also, the immigration judges work for Sessions, and they will also implement his new directive.

Many migrants are coached on the immigration rules by smugglers, pro-migration lawyers, or their relatives who successfully reached U.S. cities. For example, the New York Times reported June 22:

“This is the reason I brought a minor with me,” said Guillermo T., 57, a construction worker who recently arrived in Arizona. Facing unemployment at home in Guatemala, he decided to head north; he had been told that bringing his 16-year-old daughter would assure passage. He asked that only his first named be used to avoid consequences with his immigration case.

“She was my passport,” he said of his daughter.

Immigration lawyers oppose the Sessions reforms, which will likely reduce the number of cases for immigration lawyers.

(((Greg Siskind)))

✔@gsiskind


Outrageous.


Dara Lind



✔@DLind


Welp, this final guidance on implementing Sessions’ asylum ruling in Matter of A- B- appears to go a bunch further than the interim guidance I posted a few weeks back. Going to be very interesting to see how this goes. https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/11/polit...ons/index.html …


12:28 AM - Jul 12, 2018 · Tennessee, USA

• 
  2
• 
  See (((Greg Siskind)))'s other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


Sessions can set the new policies because he is in charge of the immigration courts and write the rules.

For more than a year, he has been rewriting the Obama-era regulations step-by-step, even as he also fight many lawsuits launched by pro-migration groups.

Sessions is preserving the traditional asylum rules, ensuring protection for people who are being persecuted for their religion or politics or membership in a particular social group.

https://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...olence-claims/

I was referring to use of the ankle bracelets.

Originally Posted by Judy

I was referring to use of the ankle bracelets.

Yet you didn't mention them anywhere in your post!

It was the point of the article I was commenting on.