Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    America
    Posts
    538

    Return-home amendment defeated

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070627/ap_ ... ongress_50

    WASHINGTON - The Senate on Wednesday killed a Republican proposal to require all adult illegal immigrants to return home temporarily in order to qualify for permanent lawful status in this country.

    Also defeated was a Democratic bid to restrict legal status to those who have been in the United States for four years.

    The vote was 53-45 to table an amendment by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, to require that illegal immigrants go home within two years in order to qualify for a renewable Z visa to live and work lawfully in the United States.

    The bill, which could grant lawful status to as many as 12 million illegal immigrants, requires only heads of household seeking permanent legal residency to return home to apply for green cards.

    Senators also voted 79-18 to kill a proposal by Democratic Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., that would have allowed only those who had been in the country for at least four years to gain lawful status. The bill would make anyone here by Jan. 1, 2007 eligible for legalization.

    Both amendments were designed to respond to conservatives who decry President Bush's immigration bill as a form of amnesty.

    Without her amendment, Hutchison said shortly before the vote, "the amnesty tag that has been put on this bill will remain. It is the key issue in the bill for the American people."

    Webb said his proposal would raise the public's comfort level with granting lawful status to illegal immigrants.

    "People in this country who traditionally would be supporting fair immigration policies, but who are worried about the legalization process in this bill, would come forward and support this," Webb said.

    The revived immigration measure, which also would toughen border security and institute a new system for weeding out illegal immigrants from workplaces, is facing steep challenges from the right and left.

    Conservatives call the measure too lenient toward unlawful immigrants, while liberals say it could rip apart families and doom guest workers to exploitation at the hands of unscrupulous employers.

    Votes on key amendments were continuing Wednesday afternoon under a complex and carefully orchestrated procedure designed to overcome stalling tactics by conservative foes. It will allow votes only on a limited list of 26 amendments before a critical test-vote on the bill Thursday.

    "It's going to be a rough ride," said Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., an architect of the bill. "We're in trench warfare."

    Republican framers of the bill were proposing their own, less burdensome return-home requirement for illegal immigrants. It would apply only to heads of household and would give them three years to meet the requirement.

    Also expected to be voted on is an amendment by Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., that would bar illegal immigrants from eventually getting green cards.

    Democratic amendments to give family members of citizens and legal permanent residents more chances to immigrate are also slated for votes.

    Conservatives, irate at a process that has essentially stymied their ability to filibuster, said Senate leaders were trying to rush through a bad bill.

    "The process has not been a pretty one," said Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala.
    "Ask not what your country can do for you --ask what you can do for your country" John F. Kennedy

  2. #2
    Senior Member Mayflowerchick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    543

    Will Va. amnesty team crumble?

    Do ya think that Webb will come on board now?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Oregon (pronounced "ore-ee-gun")
    Posts
    8,464
    Hi Mayflowerchick, welcome aboard!

    Re: Webb, well, if he needed a reason NOT to support going forward with the current bill (set of amendments, is probably more precise), then, now he's got a good one - if he wants to use it.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member CountFloyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Occupied Territories, Alta Mexico
    Posts
    3,008
    The bill, which could grant lawful status to as many as 12 million illegal immigrants
    I have lost track over how many times I've read this. Does this mean that only 12 million illegals will get lawful status?

    I doubt it.

    So why can't these incredibly lazy reporters at least attempt to get something right in their reporting?

    The correct way to report this is "The bill, which could grant lawful status to every illegal immigrant in the country, ....".

    At least that's accurate.
    It's like hell vomited and the Bush administration appeared.

  5. #5
    Senior Member sippy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Posts
    3,798
    Count, I wish they would increase that number as well. Last year during the S. 2611 battle it was the same figures. I wish they'd start saying 20-30 million illegals. Wait, they can't do that, it would most certainly defeat their cause!
    "Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting the same results is the definition of insanity. " Albert Einstein.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Dixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas - Occupied State - The Front Line
    Posts
    35,072
    Thanks Nadys, I was about to post this!!!!!!

    Dixie
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •