Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member jp_48504's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    19,168

    Why CAFTA is a terrible deal for Minnesota farmers

    http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincitie ... 144332.htm

    Posted on Sun, Jul. 17, 2005


    Why CAFTA is a terrible deal for Minnesota farmers

    MIKE W. HASBARGEN

    You applauded the U.S. Senate for its Central American Free Trade Agreement "compromise that protects Minnesota sugar beet farmers" ("Accord on sugar sweetens trade pact," July 1).

    But the term "compromise" implies two parties come to a mutual decision. And that is simply not what happened. While the two-year "compromise" will postpone the hemorrhaging, America's sugar farmers know what is to come. They cannot support CAFTA and neither should our representatives.

    According to your editorial, the compromise "assures Minnesota farmers that … CAFTA won't cut into their market." But this short-term compromise doesn't apply to the train wreck awaiting sugar farmers in 2008. That's when Mexico has unfettered access to the U.S. sugar market. That sugar, on top of CAFTA sugar, will send thousands of Minnesota farmers and workers to the unemployment line.

    But CAFTA isn't just about sugar. The trade deal is facing an uphill battle in Congress because it is simply a bad trade deal. Take for example the fact CAFTA does little to address Central America's low labor and environmental standards.

    Central American countries already enforce minimal environmental safeguards, and CAFTA contains no standards to encourage progress. Does your editorial suggest we ought to support CAFTA's deterioration of our environment simply because a clause to increase ethanol production has been added? Perhaps you should ask corn farmers who already count on ethanol production to create demand for their crops.

    Your editorial suggests American farmers ought to stand aside and support this dubious trade agreement because "Central American and other foreign sugar producers want the same bountiful harvest and monetary reward." That argument is not only emotionally manipulative, it is also false.

    Proponents of CAFTA argue it will allow Central American countries to increase trade with the United States, and therefore jobs â€â€
    I stay current on Americans for Legal Immigration PAC's fight to Secure Our Border and Send Illegals Home via E-mail Alerts (CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP)

  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    AMERICANS!! Stand up with the Sugar Beet Farmers from Minnesota!!

    We are all brothers and sisters who need to stand up for each other against the ManiaXs and Clueless in DC!!

    DEFEAT CAFTA and end this Madness.

    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •