Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. 09-12-2008, 11:31 PM #11
    Captainron
    Captainron is offline
    Senior Member Captainron's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,279
    There was an article by Juam Mann on VDARE which provided a brief overview of significant (I'm trusting Mann;s judgement on this, since he is an attorney, I am not) court rulings, including US Supreme Court. They do indeed go back a long way.


    From the Chae Chan Ping v United States Decision---in 1889-- laws that oppose federal policy are invalid. Very strong language to that effect, too. Of course immigrant advocates are always trying to establish new trends.
    I wonder what subsequent decisons reinforce Ping?

    In view of the Supreme Court's rule in Ping how do sanctuary cities exist?
    "Men of low degree are vanity, Men of high degree are a lie. " David
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 09-20-2008, 03:54 PM #12
    cynthiatweedle
    cynthiatweedle is offline
    cynthiatweedle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    142
    1700's
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules