Thread: Gun Companies: We Don’t Sell To State Gov Who Think They Are More Equal Than Citizens

Gun Companies Holding The States Accountable

by Herschel Smith

Bob Owens discusses the fact that a growing number of companies are refusing to do business with New York and other states over unconstitutional gun laws. More specifically, if a citizen cannot have a particular weapon, then law enforcement doesn’t get it either.

Mountain Guerrilla also weighs in with some direct contact e-mail addresses with the gun companies. I also have some (one for Rock River Arms), and I intend to send notes around on this issue.

I have strongly advocated that Remington relocate to South Carolina (and that other firearms manufacturers relocate to different states, such as Kimber, Rock River Arms, Springfield Armory, etc.), and CBS News did a segment that showed that this kind of thing might be making a difference.

I realize that this is slightly off subject if we’re discussing manufacturers holding the states accountable for double standards, but this isn’t really that far off subject. Most good people are hard workers, and I have put in my share of time for my company, including unpaid time.

But I once worked with a man whom I respect who held that this can and often does turn counterproductive in work, family and church. The more we fill in the gaps for people, the less people feel the effects of their actions and decisions. It keeps people from learning. When we work hard to undo bad managerial decision, management makes the same decisions again. When we block consequences from our children, they don’t grow up. I have begun to take my friend’s view in almost every walk of life.

When states abuse its citizens, they should lose business, respect and revenue. States like New York, with its new assault weapons ban, and Illinois with the continued fight against even concealed carry anywhere in the state, don’t deserve the gun companies, and their states’ law enforcement don’t deserve the best firearms. Bad actions are needful of consequences in order to rectify those actions.

Furthermore, as I’ve pointed out before, the hypocrisy is just rich and a remarkable thing to behold. States that ban weapons because they are “evil and inflict damage to innocent lives” but allow their manufacture because of revenue just aren’t worthy to be taken seriously. This is happening in Colorado as we speak.

At Guns For Everyone, we learn that Colorado wants the ban Magpul’s magazines, but wants their money.

As Colorado state legislators debate HB 13-1224 – a bill that would ban magazines over 15 rounds – an issue arose around Magpul and its base of operations here in Colorado.

Magpul has vowed to leave the state if a magazine restriction is passed in any form.

To appease Magpul, and presumably to keep it’s reported 600 jobs and $85 million in taxable revenue in the state, Representative Joe Salazar announced an amendment to HB 13-1224, L.0.14, that would specifically exempt Magpul from this legislation in as far as they would still be welcome to manufacture and sell these black high capacity ammunition clip death machines to civilians, just not to Coloradans.

When House Republicans pointed out the obvious and blatant hypocrisy of this amendment,House Democrat Rhonda Fields insisted that the amendment was intended to allow Magpul to continue to sell these magazines to law enforcement and to the military because “the military protects the company…Country” (check the record, her slip of the tongue was real and darkly accurate).

This is a preposterous excuse for wanting Magpul to stay in Colorado and we know that she is lying. Selling magazines to law enforcement and the military wouldn’t even come close to the business they do for the civilian market.

Kimber and Remington moving from New York, and Rock River Arms and Springfield Armory moving from Illinois, and Magpul moving from Colorado, is best for the citizens of those states, as well as the country as a whole, even if it causes pain for a while (or otherwise, if they don’t relocate, the laws need to be reversed as a precondition for their staying). Likewise, firearms and ammunition companies shouldn’t be doing business with such states. A principled stand like this also causes increased respect within the firearms community. And we are a paying bunch of people. We put our money where our mouth is.

The Captain's Journal » Gun Companies Holding The States Accountable

http://www.alipac.us/f19/have-any-mo...5/#post1329504

http://www.alipac.us/f19/michelle-ma...9/#post1329822

http://www.alipac.us/f19/50-companie...3/#post1330105

http://www.alipac.us/f19/attention-c...siness-274322/

Citizens of the

BRC - Break Away Republic of Colorado
BRNY - Break Away Republic of New York
BRNJ - Break Away Republic of New Jersey
BRC - Break Away Republic of California

Citizen's of States preparing to join the Break Away Republic's

Missouri - - Break Away Republic of Missouri - BRM Pending
Washington State - - Break Away Republic of Washington State - BRW Pending

Stay Free - MOVE TO TEXAS

Texas Proposal Would Make Police Enforcement Of Federal Gun Laws -- A Crime... <--- LINK

Your State left the Union "A mutual Protection Pact" Consisting of the Bill of Rights; the Constitution and the Second Amendment

It is/was your job to hire competent elected officials and by their oath of Office; they have breached the trust of its citizens and of all other states in the Union; you failed and there are consequences

Basically your state left the Union in all but a declaration ... You didn't leave the Union "Rogue Politicians Did"

Because of this breach of trust "Your State" is the Weak Link in this Union

No aide will be promised; nor will it be coming in the event of something going bad in your state.. at least from citizens ... you have the military to fall back on, so there is some protection

In Essence "You are On Your Own" to make the right choice to protect your family

Stay there neutered or move to a state that has not broken away from the mutual trust and protections provided by the second Amendment

In either event "I and Many Others" have decided it is not in our best Interest to provide protection to your state that cannot protect itself

"No Aid Will Be Coming"

Case in Point - http://www.alipac.us/f19/u-s-governm...ce-way-274347/

http://www.alipac.us/f19/magpul-indu...5/#post1334412

http://www.alipac.us/f19/marlin-fire...nectic-275319/

http://www.alipac.us/f19/beretta-lea...0/#post1336498