Thread: homemade Hydroxychloroquine recipe

Lawless FDA refusing to repeal past anti-ivermectin statements, despite recent court ruling

09/20/2023 // Ethan Huff // 1.5K Views

Tags: alternative medicine, badhealth, badmedicine, badscience, big government, conspiracy, corruption, court, COVID, covid-19, deception, FDA, Food and Drug Administration, health freedom, infections, ivermectin, medical censorship, medical fascism, Medical Tyranny, outbreak, pandemic, traitors

Despite one of its lawyers recently admitting in court that Americans can, in fact, take ivermectin as a Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) treatment, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is still refusing to change its official stance concerning the prophylactic drug.
Even though a court ruled that the FDA acted well outside of its jurisdictional authority with the whole "horse paste" fiasco, the FDA says it will not change any of its past statements against ivermectin.
A U.S. appeals court ruled that these past statements from the FDA, including one on Twitter (now X) telling the public to "stop" using ivermectin because it is supposedly just for barnyard animals, went beyond the authority conferred on the agency by Congress. And yet, the FDA is still digging its heels in the sand.
"FDA can inform, but it has identified no authority allowing it to recommend consumers 'stop' taking medicine," ruled U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett in a September 1 ruling.
(Related: A quick fact check shows that the FDA first approved ivermectin for human use back in 1996.)
The FDA is an enemy of We the People

It has been about two weeks since Judge Willett's ruling, and the social media post in question, as well as others, is still up on X unchanged.
"You are not a horse," reads the Aug. 21, 2021, X post that got the FDA in trouble in the first place. "You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it."
The webpage that the FDA linked to in this particular social media post also remains unchanged, ordering Americans that they "should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19."

To be fair, the appeals court never actually told the FDA to modify or take down the posts. The case has also been remanded to a lower court for consideration on its standing.
Still, Dr. Robert Apter, the lead plaintiff in the case that ultimately led to Willett's ruling, says the FDA has an obligation to take down these offending posts that are still up in violation of the law.
"From an ethical point of view, the FDA has been told not to do what they are doing," Dr. Apter is quoted as saying. "They have an ethical and moral obligation to follow the court's directive and stop giving advice against using effective repurposed drugs for early treatment of COVID."
When asked by at least one independent media outlet for comment on the matter, the FDA reportedly declined.
The FDA did, however, issue a statement following Judge Willett's ruling. It states that ivermectin is approved by the agency for other uses, but not for COVID, even though Big Pharma companies have been repurposing FDA-approved drugs for decades without consequence.
The FDA stipulated that it "has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19, nor has the agency stated that it is safe or effective for that use."
"Health care professionals generally may choose to prescribe an approved human drug for an unapproved use when they judge that the unapproved use is medically appropriate for an individual patient," the agency added.
This process is known as off-label prescription, and it is common in the United States as drug companies look for new ways to keep the profits flowing once a given drug loses its luster for its officially approved purpose.
"The decision is pretty clear that the FDA is not a physician, and that while it might have authority to inform the public, it can't endorse particular treatments or advise on how to approach any specific illness," commented Jared Kelson, an attorney representing the doctor plaintiffs in the case.
The latest news about the corrupt and criminally run FDA can be found at FDA.news.
Sources for this article include:
TheEpochTimes.com
NaturalNews.com

Lawless FDA refusing to repeal past anti-ivermectin statements, despite recent court ruling – NaturalNews.com

Ivermectin helped people RECOVER FASTER from COVID-19 infections, study finds

03/14/2024 // Ava Grace // 420 Views

Tags: alternative medicine, antiviral, covid-19, faster recovery, goodhealth, goodmedicine, infection, ivermectin, ivermectin science, Pierre Kory, PRINCIPLE Trial, research, SARS-CoV-2, smeared, War on Ivermectin, Wuhan coronavirus



A study has once again attested to the ability of anti-parasitic drug ivermectin against the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), with the said paper finding that it helped people recover faster from infection.The study published Feb. 29 in the Journal of Infection (JoI) involved 8,811 participants who tested positive for COVID-19 in the so-called PRINCIPLE Trial. Of this number, 2,157 were given ivermectin as treatment. The other 3,398 participants received other treatments, while the remaining 3,256 received the usual standard of care for COVID-19 infection.
The study was conducted from June 23, 2021 to July 1, 2022. It ultimately found that the ivermectin recipients had a shorter recovery period – a median of two days – compared to the other two groups. Those who received ivermectin were also less likely to be hospitalized or die, with 1.6 percent of participants in this group suffering from these outcomes. In contrast, four percent of the usual care group died of COVID-19, if not hospitalized.
Moreover, ivermectin recipients also enjoyed a reduction of severe symptoms and sustained recovery. Despite this promising discovery, the study authors absurdly discouraged the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19. (Related: Ivermectin is trending again… New scientific paper released exposing "miracle drug.")
"Ivermectin for COVID-19 is unlikely to provide clinically meaningful improvement for recovery, hospital admissions or longer-term outcomes. Further trials of ivermectin for SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated community populations appear unwarranted," they wrote in the study's interpretation section.
They ultimately concluded: "The results from our trial … support the position that ivermectin should not be used to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection in the community in high-income countries with a largely vaccinated population. We consider that additional studies of ivermectin in this population should not be a priority for research."
According to the Epoch Times, the study authors involved in the PRINCIPLE Trial divulged conflicts of interest in their paper. One co-author received grants from pharmaceutical companies including AstraZeneca, while other disclosed receiving grants from the University of Oxford. Incidentally, the university was instrumental in developing AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine that uses an adenovirus vector.
Study wrongly downplayed how ivermectin improved recovery from COVID-19

Dr. Christopher Butler, the study's corresponding author, said: "Ivermectin is readily available globally [and] has been in wide use for many other infectious conditions. It's a well-known medicine with a good safety profile and because of the early promising results in some studies, it is already being widely used to treat COVID-19 in several countries.
However, the decision of Butler and his co-authors to smear ivermectin in their study despite acknowledging its effects against SARS-CoV-2 has left many scratching their heads. This led to American physician Dr. Pierre Kory to accuse the authors of "setting a new record for ivermectin research fraud." According to him, Butler and his colleagues wrongly downplayed how ivermectin improved recovery from COVID-19.
"PRINCIPLE was a profoundly positive study that was instead analyzed and written up as a negative one," Kory wrote in a March 5 piece on his Substack. The co-founder and president of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) has long promoted ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment over the deadly COVID-19 injections.
"The millions of patients and doctors around the world who know how effective and safe of an antiviral [ivermectin] is will continue to use it for COVID-19, flu, Disease X and beyond."
Watch Dr. Pierre Kory testify to the effectiveness of ivermectin against COVID-19, citing a study that involved more than 500,000 participants to back up his testimony.

This video is from the GalacticStorm channel on Brighteon.com.
Human knowledge is under attack! Concerted global efforts are aiming to wipe out humanity's existing knowledge base about nutrition, herbs, natural medicine, natural immunity, history, science and much more. We are preserving human knowledge using AI technology while building the infrastructure of human freedom. Our goal is to defend and preserve human knowledge while empowering people to bypass the knowledge destruction censorship currently being pushed by corporations, governments and the WHO. Learn about our free, non-commercial AI / LLM project here. Help support our efforts to build the infrastructure of human freedom by shopping at HealthRangerStore.com, offering lab-tested, certified organic, non-GMO foods, superfoods, nutritional supplements and personal care products.
More related stories:

Ivermectin available over the counter in Tennessee.
Ivermectin works, even if the establishment falsely claims otherwise.
Ivermectin smuggled in chocolate bar saves British Covid patient’s life.
Family of woman who DIED after being refused IVERMECTIN speaks out.
FDA now admits doctors can prescribe IVERMECTIN to treat COVID-19
Sources include:
TheEpochTimes.com
JournalOfInfection.com
PierreKoryMedicalMusings.com
Brighteon.com

Ivermectin helped people RECOVER FASTER from COVID-19 infections, study finds – NaturalNews.com

Thread: Ivermectin can “kill cancer cells” and boost immune response, suggest health experts