Thread: Meet the 46 United States Senators who were willing to sign over your 2nd amendment

[WATCH] The REAL War on Women: Liberals Disarming Law-Abiding Women

Posted on Monday, October 20th, 2014 at 9:45 am.by: Conservative Infidel


Democrats continue to use the plight of women as a political weapon. They bloviate and posture as if women are victims of a supposed “Republican War on Women” when lawmakers assert that women who are responsible enough to have sex are responsible enough to purchase their own contraceptives.

These same Democrats, however, continue to leave law-abiding women (and men) vulnerable- not in some figurative sense, but in the very-real, physical sense.

Each day in America, women are assaulted and while Democrats strive to make employers buy birth control, they overlook how their efforts to disarm law-abiding men and women are affecting real, flesh-and-blood human beings.

In the below ad, a victim of sexual assault speaks out and tells of her encounter with evil. While sleeping and minding her own business in her room, a man came in and repeatedly sexually assaulted her. Her ordeal was horrific and like so many women who have suffered similar outrages, Kimberly Weeks decided to make a difference.

How has she opted to do that? By stepping-up and using her experience to tell Michael Bloomberg and the rest of the civilian disarmament brigade that she, not them, knows how to best defend herself and that the method she prefers is a loaded gun.

Liberals, in cooperation with the dutiful leftstream media, have worked very hard to maintain a narrative that paints guns as inherently dangerous and placing a burden on gun owners to explain why they need firearms.

The onus is not upon any citizen to explain why they should be able to exercise their constitutional rights. However, in this instance, Ms. Weeks appears willing and able to articulately explain her reasoning.

Take a look at the below ad that tells Michael Bloomberg what’s what.



http://www.tpnn.com/2014/10/18/video-the-real-war-on-women-liberals-disarming-law-abiding-women/


Related posts:

1. Obama Plans To Completely Ban Christianity From The Military By 2017
2. [Watch] Hannity Takes on Radical Imam: ‘You Say You Should Be Proud to Be a Terrorist’

http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/u...abiding-women/

Here’s the Sneaky Way Obama’s FBI Is Lying to You about Gun Crimes

|


Liberals hate guns. They hate the very idea of gun ownership, and they believe that the benevolent, all-knowing, and all-good government with guns is the best way to keep you and me safe.
And it’s all a lie.
Dr. John R. Lott, Jr., author of More Guns, Less Crime and The Bias Against Guns: Why Almost Everything You’ve Heard About Gun Control is Wrong, reviewed a recently released FBI report and found that the statistical analysis of the data was misleading.
In other words, they’re lying. And they’re lying in a way that makes guns and gun ownership look bad.
The problem is that the statistical analysis used by the FBI to support their anti-gun position changes the definition of terms when comparing time periods. This is the same kind of dishonest analysis that the current administration uses to say that unemployment is better than it really is.
The Feds say that people who have been unemployed too long or who are underemployed (i.e. working part time but not making as much as they need to make to survive) are not considered unemployed. This is a change that came with this administration to make the situation look better than it really is.
In the same way, the FBI has redefined “mass shootings” to a much lower level than previously. For example, the FBI previously had defined mass shootings as four or more people killed. However, in their review of 160 incidents since 2000, 31 of their cases did not have a single death or wounding and 35 of the cases had fewer than two people killed. This on top of the fact that that they conveniently left out the 1990s which had a high number of mass shootings, so you only have data relating to the past 14 years.
This neglect denies the reader of the report access to a context in which the put the statistics so you can’t tell if the numbers are as bad as they say or actually better than it used to be. Compounded with shifting definition for terms like “mass shootings” and you set up a situation where people can’t tell how things really are.
Of course, they conveniently left out data showing that 92% of mass shootings are in “gun free zones” and that gun murders are at their lowest since 1981.
How’s that for transparency from this administration? They’re lying to us, and most people don’t know how bald-faced the lie really is.

http://teapartybulletin.com/how-obam...-lying-to-you/

Judge Nap: Cop's Actions Against Beheading Suspect Illustrate Importance of Gun Rights



Judge Nap: Cop's Actions Against Beheading Suspect Illustrate Importance of Gun Rights


by Fox News Insider // Sep 30 2014 // 12:10pm

As seen on Fox and Friends


Alton Nolen's alleged murderous rampage at a Moore, Oklahoma, food processing plant was stopped by the quick action and two gunshots of company COO Mark Vaughan, who is also a sheriff’s deputy.


Vaughan's heroics spared "untold" lives, according to the Moore Police Department.

---

CAUGHT ON TAPE: Pistol-Packing Pastor Apprehends Package-Stealing Grandma

---

After yet another example of how guns can save lives, Judge Andrew Napolitano joined Steve Doocy on Fox and Friends to discuss why President Obama and his administration continue to wage a war on the Second Amendment.
Judge Nap said that despite any other philosophical, constitutional or legal ramifications about the right to bear arms that this might touch off, Vaughan, as a part-time sheriff's officer, was licensed to carry a gun.

---

NY Gun Shop Owner Ordered to Turn Over Customer Records

---

"The practical argument is ... more guns equals less crime," Judge Nap said. "Why? Because the bad guys fear reactive violence from the victim or someone around the victim more than they fear getting caught."
"That will at least give them pause, or it will stop them in their tracks, as happened here."
Judge Nap added that the problem is that Obama continues to impair gun rights and thinks he knows how to protect us better than we know how to protect ourselves.
"If more people were legally armed, there would be less violence, period. Whether it's monsters trying to destroy us or whether it's a crackpot in the workplace or a nutjob in the street."
Watch the clip from Fox and Friends above.

---

Pro-Gun Control Group: Most Schools Don't Want Their Teachers to Have Guns

video at link below

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2014/09/30...nce-gun-rights

Police Department Requesting Facebook Passwords From Gun Permit Applicants

~ Read more: http://bit.ly/1rOnPoI








Police Department Requesting Facebook Passwords From Gun Permit Applicants

By The Free Thought Project on October 18, 2014

Request violates Constitution & Facebook’s Terms of Service


The Watervliet, N.Y., Police Department is asking pistol permit applicants for access to their Facebook accounts.

Kit Daniels | Infowars.com




Cal A. Feit @tazcat2011
Follow
Watervliet, NY Asks Pistol Permit Applicants for Facebook Passwords. http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/10/robert-farago/watervliet-new-york-asks-pistol-permit-applicants-facebook-password/ … #gunsense #2a #nra
2:18 PM - 16 Oct 2014


The department recently sent an applicant a form which asked for his Facebook username and password, and after the applicant complained, the department claimed the form was sent to him by mistake and was only used during face-to-face interviews when the department asks applicants for access to their Facebook accounts.
“It is… a common practice to view social media as a means to identify and determine character of a pistol permit applicant, in addition to other investigatory methods,” the department’s spokesperson told the applicant. “Typically all we ask is that an applicant access their account during an interview.”
But if the police dept. gets the applicant’s login credentials as requested on the form, and the applicant does not change his password afterwards, the police and the court reviewing the application can theoretically access his Facebook account as much as they want.
“It is what it is,” the Chief of Police, Ron Boisvert, told gun rights advocate Robert Farago after Farago told him the request was unconstitutional.

So essentially, the Watervliet Police Dept. and the court are violating the First, Second and Fourth Amendments by strong-arming applicants into a warrantless search, which allows the court to deny applicants their Second Amendment rights based on their views expressed on Facebook.

“…If you decline – such information is no doubt handed up to the judge deciding yes or no on your application,” reported nyfirearms.com. “The question remains – How many people actually gave into this blatant violation of their rights when applying for a pistol permit?”

The request is also a violation of Facebook’s terms of service which prohibits users from sharing their passwords.

“…We’ve seen a distressing increase in reports of employers or others seeking to gain inappropriate access to people’s Facebook profiles or private information,” Erin Egan, the site’s chief privacy officer, wrote. “This practice undermines the privacy expectations and the security of both the user and the user’s friends.”

“If you are a Facebook user, you should never have to share your password, let anyone access your account, or do anything that might jeopardize the security of your account or violate the privacy of your friends.”
Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/pol...Aw8vru0QpFF.99

There is much talk of universal background checks for gun purchases. But, this is one of the stories you won't hear.
How a mass shooting was thwarted by intuitive gun owners without the use of a background check.

Mass Shooting Thwarted Without A Background Check


Published on Nov 12, 2014
There is much talk of universal background checks for gun purchases. But, this is one of the stories you won't hear.
How a mass shooting was thwarted by intuitive gun owners without the use of a background check.

TX GUN STORE OWNER CATCHES MAN PLANNING MASS MURDER - http://www.infowars.com/tx-gun-store-...


TX GUN STORE OWNER CATCHES MAN PLANNING MASS MURDER - http://www.infowars.com/tx-gun-store...g-mass-murder/

Help create a dialoge of liberty in your community by becoming a subscriber to www.infowarsnews.com and sharing your password with up to 11 friends. 



http://www.infowars.com/tx-gun-store...g-mass-murder/

Girls Just Wanna Have Guns



The Real War on Women

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States Film
INTRODUCTION

Girls Just Wanna Have Gunszeros in like a bullet on the truth about guns…. and the real war on women.


Today if you want to empower a woman, put a gun in her hand. The confidence from learning to shoot a firearm is far superior to anything one could ever imagine and it’s genuinely better than any gender studies course taught on college campuses today.

Fact…

Guns save more lives than they take.

Fact…

As many as 2 million times each year law abiding citizens use guns to defend themselves against criminals.

That’s almost 7000 times each and every day.

Fact…

As many as 200,000 women use a gun every year to defend themselves against sexual attacks.

Fact…

Women are the fastest growing demographic purchasing firearms today.

Those are the facts… and a gun in a woman’s hand is her best chance of survival.
Despite government attempts to institute greater gun control on American citizens we’ve seen a dramatic increase in gun ownership, especially among women… women who have taken it upon themselves to rely upon no one but themselves.
A team of acclaimed filmmakers are producing this movie with Regis Giles, who has the website of the same title. “Girls Just Wanna Have Guns” will be a 90-minute documentary motion picture, intended for all audiences that will serve as a wake-up call to all Americans.

What We Need & What You Get

Our budget is $500,000. This production will take about 1 year from start to completion. It will take thousands of man hours for research, filming, editing and distribution.
Activists in the grassroots, like you, who donate for the rewards of advance purchases: DVDs, The Book, Free Tickets, Signed Copies, Bulk Pre-sales, Movie Credits and even an opportunity to get credit in the film.



The Impact

Your contribution will allow us to dedicate a full year into making a high quality film that will change minds and motivate people to get involved!



About Film Makers

Regis Giles- Narrator & Host
Regis Giles is the creator and owner of Girls Just Wanna Have Guns.com and is a leading voice for Second Amendment rights, self-defense and conservation. Unafraid to speak her mind, Regis takes no prisoners. Her media appearances include: ELLE Magazine, Variety, The Daily Mail, ABC, CNN, CBS Miami, & Fox News.
Judd Saul- Director
Judd Saul is a film producer, director and political activist. He has produced many projects for Discovery and HDNet. He is an award-winning filmmaker who has produced various videos and commercials for national and local nonprofits and community organizations. His most notable project, prior to his work on UnFair: Exposing the IRS, was FRAG, a documentary which exposes the true life of professional video gamers; which won several festival awards and changed the professional gaming industry.
He is vice president of Patriots for Christ and has drawn the national spotlight on many issues, including Agenda 21 and Lock Box Ordinances. He is a renowned whistle blower on corruption.
Beverly Zaslow- Producer
Beverly Zaslow brings with her over 30 years of experience in theatrical film and television to today’s new media and online distribution. She has produced, distributed and marketed thousands of hours of film, television & video worldwide, and her shows have been broadcast on PBS, Discovery, Fox, The History Channel, CNBC, and are available these days on Amazon, Comcast, Breitbart.com, youtube and well, just about anywhere there’s an internet connection.
Having served also as president of one of the first IPTV/Video-On-Demand networks, she has a visionary perspective of new media and understands how to fully leverage digital platforms.
Starting back in 1980 as an accountant with Jerry Weintraub’s Management III and Concerts West, Beverly has worn many hats working at major studios and networks such as HBO, Lorimar-Telepictures and PBS.

Craig Bergman- Producer

Craig Bergman, an author, speaker, nationally syndicated radio talk show host, and producer of UnFair: Exposing the IRS, has extensive political campaign and grassroots organization experience at both state and national levels serving as campaign manager, senior staff, or in a consulting role for multiple candidates, including: Five Presidential races, six Gubernatorial races, eight U.S. Senate races, dozens of Congressional races and innumerous state and local races.
He has worked multiple ballot initiatives across the country and served as a consultant for national organizations such as The Christian Coalition, Focus on the Family and Americans for Prosperity. He is a Gulf War I Era veteran, who prior to his political consulting, worked as a vice president in banking for several major banks, including Wells Fargo.


Other Ways You Can Help


Please share this campaign with all your friends. Copy and paste this link on your FaceBook and twitter threads. Ask your local media to interview Regis about the film. Like the Facebook page and share it with everyone you know.
Find This Campaign On
Facebook Twitter YouTube Website

Targeting the Anti-Gun Indoctrination Party

Posted by Lee Culpepper on October 19, 2014 at 10:41 am


Thanks to the last 50 years of public education, millions of Americans no longer appreciate the difference between facts and feelings.

Consequently, when facts hurt their feelings, many Americans just brush off the irrefutable evidence and attack anyone who points out the facts that expose illogical feelings.

When it comes to supporters of the Second Amendment, we see this irrational behavior play out among pro-gun Americans who religiously support the Democrat Party. Now, before anyone feels offended, just think about the following questions first…

…Which party had 94 percent of its senators support the last gun-control bill voted on in Washington? (Hint: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid voted against the bill for procedural purposes only.)

…Which party does President Obama–who called this anti-gun bill’s failure to pass “a shameful day for Washington”–represent? (Hint: Although Senator John McCain is indeed shameful, McCain’s vote this day was just part of the .09 percent of the pro-gun party that jumped ship and supported the anti-gun party’s 94 percent.)

…Which party ushered in the anti-gun laws that changed the face of Colorado in 2013? (Hint: It’s the same party of anti-gun nut Michael Bloomberg.)
[Bloomberg ran for Mayor of New York as a Republican only to differentiate himself from the other candidates on the ballot - ed.]

…Which party claims to champion the rights of women and minorities while simultaneously working to infringe on their Second Amendment right and their fundamental right to defend themselves in public? (Hint: This party supports a woman’s right to urinate on herself to fend off potential rapists. Unfortunately, packing pee probably won’t stop a murderer aiming to cut off ladies’ heads.)

…Finally, which party targeted Stand Your Ground (SYG) laws for repeal in the wake of the George Zimmerman trial–which did not even feature a SYG defense? (Note: SYG laws simply remove a victim’s duty to retreat when attacked. Yes, in states that do not have SYG, victims have a legal requirement to retreat if–“and the ‘if’ is important,” according to Attorney General Eric Holder, “no safe retreat is available.” As Holder explains, “…we must examine laws that [eliminate] the common-sense and age-old requirement [concerning] a duty to retreat.”)

The irrefutable fact that the Democrat Party is the answer to all of the above should cause pro-gun Democrats to pause this election period. However, anyone who has been held hostage in the public school system is vulnerable to ignoring indisputable facts when the facts do not jive with their feelings.

Yes, having public schools indoctrinate students in bizarre beliefs and practices where feelings trump facts has been the Democrat Party’s secret weapon for half a century. The brainwashing that occurs under the guise of education also explains why the Democrat Party opposes school choice like it opposes the Second Amendment.

Allowing its hostages to escape the indoctrination camps would hamper all the lessons on how feelings negate facts–so long as the Democrat Party approves of the feelings. You know, like how public schools teach children that boys and girls can be whatever gender they feel like being despite psychiatric evidence and chromosomal facts to the contrary.

Now, when it comes to anti-gun indoctrination, forcing children to attend schools where their primary lesson regarding firearms comes from twelve years of staring at a symbol of a little black gun with a red line running through it is a great way to convince impressionable minds (of children and adults) that stickers, signs, and other anti-gun propaganda keep our society safe.

Despite all the evidence of blood-thirsty lunatics bent on killing defenseless victims turning theoretical gun-free zones in to deadly fields of fire, millions of Americans still feel that law-abiding teachers armed and trained with guns cannot make schools safer.

Granted, 68 percent of the National Education Association (a liberal bastion) opposes measures that would arm teachers. On the other hand, 61 percent of the nation’s largest non-union teacher organization, the Association of American Educators, supports intelligent and selective efforts to arm teachers for school protection.

If only the Democrat Party supported school choice, perhaps then anti-gun parents could choose to send their children to schools that offer free-fire zones to homicidal nuts and that discipline children for chewing pop-tarts in to gun-shaped symbols or violate other demented anti-gun policies.

Meanwhile, normal parents could choose to send their children to schools where teachers are willing to carry guns to protect their students should a madman or terrorists interrupt the lesson plan about how thinking requires facts, not feelings.

Author: Lee Culpepper Lee Culpepper is a former United States Marine Corps officer and reformed high school English teacher. Through his interest and training with firearms and concealed carry, Lee Culpepper works to empower responsible, law-abiding adults with knowledge and training that can help to keep them physically and legally safe. Additionally, Lee Culpepper has shared his passions for writing and wrestling among youths from nearly every walk of life across the country. During his last stand in public education, Lee Culpepper invested in the lives of teens and young adults from a town that lists among the most dangerous and most impoverished cities in the nation. In the face of broken homes, government addiction, and rampant crime, Lee Culpepper has fought to plant a flag for America's empowering message of self-reliance, competition, and persistence. Follow Lee Culpepper on Twitter at @drcoolpepper. Read other articles by Lee Culpepper at Townhall.com.

http://bearingarms.com/targeting-ant...ination-party/

New Texas Bill Would Ban Enforcement of Federal Gun Control

AUSTIN, Tx., November 13, 2014 – A Texas state representative has introduced a bill to thwart enforcement of virtually all federal gun control measures within the state.

Introduced by newly re-elected Representative Tim Kleinschmidt (R-Lexington), House Bill 176 (HB176) declares all federal restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms to be “invalid” and “not enforceable” within the state of Texas. It reads, in part:

A federal law, including a statute, an executive, administrative, or court order, or a rule, that infringes on a law-abiding citizen’s right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution or Section 23, Article I, Texas Constitution, is invalid and not enforceable in this state.

If passed into law, all government agencies and employees within Texas would be banned from enforcing any federal law in violation of the act. The prohibition on enforcement includes any federal act that:

(1) imposes a tax, fee, or stamp on a firearm, firearm accessory, or firearm ammunition that is not common to all other goods and services and may be reasonably expected to create a chilling effect on the purchase or ownership of those items by a law-abiding citizen;
(2) requires the registration or tracking of a firearm, firearm accessory, or firearm ammunition or the owners of those items that may be reasonably expected to create a chilling effect on the purchase or ownership of those items by a law-abiding citizen;
(3) prohibits the possession, ownership, use, or transfer of a firearm, firearm accessory, or firearm ammunition by a law-abiding citizen;
(4) orders the confiscation of a firearm, firearm accessory, or firearm ammunition from a law-abiding citizen.

State employees who knowingly violate the act would risk a suit for damages for helping the federal government violate a person’s right to keep and bear arms in Texas. A defense of sovereign immunity would also be prohibited in such a suit.

Kleinschmidt, starting his 4th term in January, has developed a reputation as a strong defender of the right to keep and bear arms. In the 2013 session, he worked to get a law passed that “prohibits public and private colleges and universities from adopting administrative rules banning the possession, transportation and storage of lawfully-owned firearms and ammunition in private motor vehicles by students and visitors with Concealed Handgun Licenses (CHLs).” He was also heralded by the NRA-ILA for his 2011 employee/parking lot protection bill that was signed into law that year.

“With this bill, Texas could help lead the country forward,” said Scott Landreth, campaign lead for ShallNot.org, a project of the Tenth Amendment Center. “Passage would have serious impact on the federal government’s ability to carry out its unconstitutional gun control measures already on the books.”

Recognizing that the federal government would always require cooperation on a state and local level, James Madison, writing in Federalist #46, advised state “legislative devices” and a “refusal to cooperate with officers of the Union” as a strategy to push back against unconstitutional or merely unpopular federal acts.

Last year, Judge Andrew Napolitano said that if a single state stop participating in the enforcement of federal gun laws, it would make those laws “nearly impossible” to enforce within the state.

Landreth suggested that this could create a domino effect.

“If a few other states follow Kleinschmidt’s lead, it’ll also give Washington D.C. pause before even trying to pass new restrictions on our right to keep and bear arms,” he said.

The approach is on sound legal footing, with notable Supreme Court opinions backing the view that the federal government cannot require a state to expend manpower or resources in the enforcement of a federal act. The 1997 case, Printz v. US serves as the cornerstone. In it, Justice Scalia held:

The Federal Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States’ officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program.

As noted Georgetown Law Constitutional Scholar Randy Barnett has said, “This line of cases is now 20 years old and considered well settled.”
In 2013, similar legislation was passed in Idaho, although not as far-reaching as the bill from Kleinschmidt. Another bill was signed into law in Alaska, but lacked the specifics of which federal acts the law addressed. And another law was signed in Kansas, but is currently not being enforced due to a court challenge from the Brady Campaign over provisions that include criminal charges for federal agents.

HB176 will first be assigned to a committee, where it will need to pass before the full state house can consider it.

TAKE ACTION IN SUPPORT
Even though the legislative session doesn’t officially begin for nearly 2 months, activists in support of this bill are encouraged to take the following actions:

1. Find your state representative at this link: http://www.house.state.tx.us/members...epresentative/
2. Call him or her – a phone call has far more impact than an email. Strongly, but politely ask them to co-sponsor and support HB176.
3. If they do not commit to a YES, ask them why and let us know.
4. If they’re undecided, let them know you’ll give them some time to review the legislation and that you will call back in a week to follow up.

http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com...l-gun-control/