Thread: No-excuse mail-in voting makes election fraud as easy as pie, invites one-party rule

.
See: MAIL-IN VOTING IN 2020 INFRASTRUCTURE RISK ASSESSMENT

Under "KEY FINDINGS" we find:

Integrity attacks on voter registration data and systems represent a comparatively higher risk in a mail-in voting environment when compared to an in-person voting environment. This is because the voter is not present at the time of casting the ballot and cannot help to answer questions regarding their eligibility or identity verification.

Expanding excuse-based mail-in ballots (like absentee ballots allowed for our overseas military personnel) to no-excuse mail-in ballots has expodentially increased the opportunity for vote stealing and election fraud.

The subject of our election process being attacked and undermined with no-excuse mail-in voting is a non-partisan concern, and every freedom loving person ought to be alarmed that mail-in ballots invite vote stealing and government perpetrated election fraud, and if we do not get a handle on it, our voting process will be no better than that of Russian, China and Cuba, where there is one party authoritarian rule with no chance for peaceful change through elections.

JWK


“We often give enemies the means of our own destruction.” -- Aesop.

.
See: Meet the four Dem-picked Colorado justices who kicked Trump off the ballot

Four liberal Colorado Supreme Court justices were behind the landmark ruling Monday night that former President Donald Trump would not be allowed to appear on the 2024 presidential ballot in the state.

As each day passes, the American people are witnessing the Democrat Party Leadership, and I emphatically emphasize “Leadership”, acts in a tyrannical fashion and ignores the rule of law, especially when it comes to their desire to rig elections.

Keep in mind, the Democrat controlled PA Supreme Court imposed the allowance of no-excuse mail-in voting upon the people of Pennsylvanian, in spite of the Constitution’s expressed, and conditional limitations set forth under ABSENTEE VOTING

Likewise, the Democrat Leadership in New York, in spite of a proposed constitutional amendment to allow no-excuse mail-in voting being overwhelmingly rejected by New York voters, see: New Yorkers reject expanded voting access in stunning result, went forward with legislation allowing no-excuse mail-in voting, and Tammany Hall’s new Governor, Governor Hochul, signed the un-constitutional legislation into law.

And, the same essential type crap, an imposition allowing no-excuse mail-in voting took place under the Democrat Leadership in Massachusetts.

The fact is, there is a fatal flaw with mail-in ballots which is, chain of custody is absent, and allows for vote stealing and government perpetrated election fraud, and that is why the Democrat Leadership, and nefarious political groups are behind the push for universal no-excuse mail-in ballot voting . . . they want universal democrat controlled vote rigging which leads to one party rule, as is the case in Russia, China and Cuba.

JWK

“We often give enemies the means of our own destruction.” – Aesop.

It is election interference and an abuse of power for the sole purpose to cheat in our elections.

All these deviant traitors should be facing military tribunals for Sedition and Treason.

Voter ID should be mandatory, end Motor Voter laws wrought with fraud, and no results should be announced until all ballots are counted and locked in. Votes should be counted under surveillance using our National Guard. Make voting two days.

No same day voter registration. If people are not responsible enough to register 60 days before an election, then they forfeit their right to vote in that election.

We need a QR code on our Personal Ballot with our Voter Registration Number embedded in it.

No outside money should be contributed to any campaign.

If you are not a resident of the State, they you cannot contribute to a candidate! Stop California pouring billions of their dirty money into other states elections, that is election interference!

No foreign money buying off these political rats, that is bribery.

Originally Posted by Beezer

Voter ID should be mandatory, end Motor Voter laws wrought with fraud, and no results should be announced until all ballots are counted and locked in. Votes should be counted under surveillance using our National Guard. Make voting two days.

No same day voter registration. If people are not responsible enough to register 60 days before an election, then they forfeit their right to vote in that election.

Hey Beezer, since we are talking about New York, the home of Tammany Hall type election thugs, who perfected the art of election fraud using “absentee” ballots (see: 1931: Tammany Hall, Voter Fraud, and Sullivan County), and that New Yorkers recently rejected a constitutional amendment that would have allowed no-excuse mail in voting, which the communist controlled legislature ignored by then passing legislation allowing no-excuse mail in ballots, which authoritarian Governor Hochul SIGNED INTO LAW, ignoring the N.Y. Constitution and the will of the people, and is now being challenged in court, I thought you might be interested in how Delaware’s Supreme Court dealt with a similar situation where its government thug legislators and Governor ignored their constitution and attempted to force the allowance of no-excuse mail-in voting and same day registration upon the people, without their approval as required by Delaware's Constitution.

See DDOE v. Higgin 342 2022 12-13

In the opinion’s conclusion found on page 68, striking both no-excuse mail in voting and same-day registration down, the Court rightfully points out:

Our decision announced two months ago and explained in this opinion is not intended to reflect the Court’s views on the relative advantages and drawbacks of universal absentee voting or a later registration deadline. The resolution of those issues is within the General Assembly’s province. The Court’s role indeed, our duty is to hold the challenged statutory enactments up to the light of our Constitution and determine whether they are consonant or discordant with it. For the reasons discussed in this opinion, we conclude that the Vote-by-Mail Statute and the Same-Day Registration Statute violate the Constitution’s relevant provisions and thus cannot stand. The changes to our election regime embodied in the challenged statutes must be effected, if at all, by constitutional amendment. Accordingly, the Court of Chancery’s judgment as to the Vote-by-Mail Statute is affirmed; as to the Same-Day Registration Statute, it is reversed.

The question now is, will New York’s Supreme Court, as did Delaware’s S.C., strike down the legislative tyranny imposed upon the good people of New York, and instruct New York’s Tammany Hall type government thugs to go pound sand, and ask the people for their consent as the N.Y. Constitution commands?

JWK

The troubling truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”

Anyone of a state's election officers wanting to rig an election and having access to various state data bases containing personal information on in-state residents, i.e., driver’s license, voter rolls, tax returns, etc., can easily create a few thousand fraudulent mail-in ballots, per urban [populas] voting district, using that information, and introduce them into the system, e.g., ballot drop–box stuffing, with a slim to no chance of these ballots ever being detected when counted.


The truth is, because of the fatal flaw of no chain of custody with mail-in ballots, there is no practical way to verify if a mail-in ballot, when counted, was filled out, and the choices made thereon, were by a qualified voter who was issued the ballot. But when a person presents adequate ID at a polling station and enters the booth, there is certainty that person in that booth is filling out the ballot and checking the choices thereon.


So why is there currently such a movement, especially coming from suspicious political groups and politicians, to have universal, no-excuse mail-in ballot voting?

Considering how government agencies, in just the past few years, have been used by some very notoriously evil folks in government to attack political opponents, and even now, at this very moment, are working to prevent a popular candidate from being on the ballot in a number of states, how can anyone even suggest these government actors would not use the weaknesses in mail-in voting to rig an election?


If this weakness, a lack of chain of custody in mail-in voting, is not addressed immediately, our election process, which is our nation’s way for peaceful change, will be no better than that of Russia, China or Cuba, where there is one party authoritarian rule.


The bottom line is, our election process is at a tipping point headed for total corruption.

Forewarned is forearmed!

JWK

.

The Brennan Center for Justice in New York - home of Tammany Halls historic election riggers - is connected to New York University School of Law, and is on a propaganda mission advocating universal no-excuse mail in ballots, in spite of a glaring chain of custody weakness with mail-in ballots.

In one of their propaganda pieces, The False Narrative of Vote-by-Mail Fraud, Wendy R. Weiser and Harold Ekeh assert:

Ballot drop-off locations help maintain a secure chain of custody as the ballot goes from the voter to the local election office. And when drop boxes are put outside of government offices, one security measure is to equip them with security cameras to monitor ballot traffic and ensure that the boxes are not breached.

Keep in mind they say " . . . help maintain a secure chain of custody . . . "

But they suspiciously fail to acknowledge there is a loss of chain of custody from the time a mail-in ballot is received by a theoretically legitimate recipient of a mail-in ballot, to the time when that mailed-in ballot is counted.

Additionally, these two authors fail to mention the glaring weakness with a mailed in ballot, there is no practical way to scrutinize a mailed-in ballot when counted, to verify that it was actually filled out, and the choices made thereon, were by a qualified voter who allegedly was issued the ballot.

With in-person voting, and the use of appropriate ID before a qualified voter is allowed into the voting booth, there is an extremely high certainty that the one voting in the booth and checking the choices on the ballot, is a legitimate voter and making their choices.


The bottom line is, the lack of chain of custody with mail-in voting is a good indication that mail-in voting ought to be limited to those with a legitimate excuse for being unable to vote in person.

By limiting mail-in voting to those with a legitimate excuse for being unable to vote in person, the total number of mail-in ballots would be greatly reduced to a fraction of what is now the case, and in so doing, even though the opportunity for mail-in ballot vote stealing and government perpetrated election fraud would still exist, their effect on an election would be greatly reduced by the reduction in actual mail-in ballots allowed.

The glaring weakness with mail-in ballots, which is an untenable chain of custody problem and an inability to verify if a mailed in ballot was actually filled out, and the choices made there on, were by a legitimate person issued the ballot, is more than enough to want to restrict mail-in ballots to those legitimately unable to vote in person, and for those who want fair elections to say no to no-excuse mail-in ballot voting.

Is it really a good idea to allow political hacks, like the Brennan Center, to run, or influence our election process?

JWK

The troubling truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

Please note, I just found out John Brennan, former Central Intelligence Agency Director, is not connected with the Brennan Center

.
I’ll bet the election riggers are already at work targeting particular states for the introduction of fabricated mail-in ballots in the 2024 election. Without an unbreakable chain of custody, mail-in ballots have a fundamental flaw and make it as easy as pie to rig an election, and yet, our big media avoids even mentioning this fact.


So, here are the glaring flaws with mail-in ballots:


1. There is a loss of chain of custody from the time a mail-in ballot is received by a theoretically legitimate recipient of a mail-in ballot, to the time when that mail-in ballot is counted.


2. There is no practical way to scrutinize a mail-in ballot when counted, to verify that it was actually filled out, and the choices made thereon, were by a qualified voter who allegedly was issued the ballot.


3. With in-person voting, and the use of appropriate ID before a qualified voter is allowed into the voting booth, there is an extremely high certainty that the one voting in the booth and checking the choices on the ballot, is a legitimate voter making their choices.


4. Any election officer with a desire to perpetrate election fraud and has access to various state data bases containing personal information on in-state residents, i.e., driver’s license, voter rolls, tax returns, etc., can easily fabricate a few thousand fraudulent mail-in ballots per urban voting district [meaning large populous districts] using that information, fill them out and introduce them into the system [e.g. drop boxes or mail boxes] with a slim to no chance of these ballots ever being detected when they are counted.


There is a legitimate need for mail-in voting. But mail-in voting ought to be limited to those with a legitimate excuse for being unable to vote in person, e.g., see PA’s Constitution (ARTICLE VII, ELECTIONS, § 14. Absentee Voting)


By limiting mail-in voting to those with a legitimate excuse for being unable to vote in person, the total number of mail-in ballots would be greatly reduced to a fraction of what is now the case, and in so doing, even though the opportunity for mail-in ballot vote stealing and government perpetrated election fraud would still exist, their effect on an election would be greatly reduced by the reduction in actual mail-in ballots allowed.


Check out: Voting Fraud Is a Real Concern. Just Look Around the World


If the American people do not clean up their election process before the coming election, they will be inviting the kinds of elections held in China, Russia and Cuba, where there is one party authoritarian rule.


JWK


“We often give enemies the means of our own destruction.” – Aesop.

.
Well, isn't this interesting? Another case of vote stealing in New York. This one involves stealing the votes of 118 people using mail-in ballots.

See Queens man forged absentee ballots in Democratic primary as part of voter fraud scheme: DA

Abdul Rahman, 32, of 257th Street in Floral Park, could serve up to seven years in prison after a monster 140-count indictment outlined how he pulled off the voter fraud plot in an attempt to disenfranchise 118 voters.

.
The only reason why Abdul Rahman [mentioned above] got caught is because an unexpected anomaly occurred which triggered an investigation leading to his being caught. Had Sandke, a voter among the fraudulently obtained ballots by Abdul not shown up to vote, no safeguard in place would have prevented Abdul’s clever scheme from being successful, and that shows a glaring deficiency to prevent vote stealing with mail-in ballots.

There are some very notoriously evil doers attempting to undermine our system’s way for peaceful change (our election process) by fighting tooth and nail for universal no-excuse mail-in ballot voting, (in addition to keeping a popular candidate off the ballot LINK) which make government orchestrated election fraud, the big enchilada, as easy as pie. This needs to be addressed before the 2024 election, and if it isn't the American people will regret it for the remainder of their lives.


JWK


We are here today and gone tomorrow, but what is most important is what we do in-between and is what our children will inherit and remember us by.