Thread: Obama Plans To Fight ISIS By... Giving More Weapons To ISIS?

World War 2 Lasted 6 Years, U.S. Needs 30 Years to Fight ISIS

Foreign Policy » World War 2 Lasted 6 Years, U.S. Needs 30 Years to Fight ISIS


“This Crusade- this war on terrorism- is going to take a while.” – George W. Bush, September 16th, 2001
Aaron Nelson
October 7, 2014
(TheAntiMedia) The first time many Americans heard of the ‘War on Terror’, the President of the United States referred to it as a Crusade. Three weeks later, the U.S. invaded Afghanistan and terror was unleashed upon the Middle East. Thirteen years after ‘this Crusade‘ began, Americans have signed up for a new war, one with ISIS as an enemy, one that will likely continue for thirty years.
Now, we’re being told the ‘War on Terror‘ isn’t even a war. No no no, you see, the United States is fighting a ‘war on war,‘ to find peace, of course… The bombing is just an ‘Overseas Contingency Operation‘.
Civilian casualties? Not important. The White House specifically exempted ISIS strikes from the civilian casualty restrictions currently in place for U.S. drone strikes. The U.S. is bombing the very same Syrian rebels they’ve been arming for more than 2 years, and somehow that isn’t supposed to be interpreted as perpetual war.
According to Leon Panetta, who headed the CIA and the Pentagon, this ‘30-year war‘ will eventually extend into Nigeria, Somalia, Yemen, Libya and elsewhere. If Panetta’s prediction is accurate, this war will last 5 times longer than the total length of World War 2. Still, the White House prefers to describe this as, you guessed it, an ‘Overseas Contingency Operation‘.


As President Obama explained to the world last month:
“We must declare war on war, so the outcome will be peace upon peace.”
Don’t you see, that’s why the President has bombed seven predominantly Muslim countries since winning the Nobel Peace Prize. Bombing for peace has been wildly successful in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Libya and Iraq. Thanks to the ‘Overseas Contingency Operation’, the number of people in the world living as refugees from war or persecution has exceeded fifty million for the first time since WW2.
This is the ridiculous narrative being fed to the American general public in the year 2014. In the real world, thirteen years of the ‘War on Terror‘ has not magically created peace in the Middle East, it has created chaos. The terribly disgusting foreign policy adopted by the U.S. since 9/11 is why ISIS exists as it does today. The purpose of ISIS is to extend the ‘Overseas Contingency Operation’, aka the ‘War on Terror‘, another thirty years.Whatever the hell you wanna call it, this global battle has already lasted twice as long as all of World War 2. The numbers of refugees will continue to increase by the millions.
Bombing for peace does not work. How many more millions of deaths must we see before we call it for what it is? To much of the world, the battle for our future has already started. The ‘War on Terror‘ is the third World War. The enemy is the ‘New World Order‘ and their Crusade to recapture the Holy Land from the Muslims.
How do you see it?
Read more: This is How We’re Going to Prevent World War 3
Read more: Rand Paul: 600 Tons of Weapons Given to Syrian Rebels Last Year Made ISIS Stronger

This article is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and TheAntiMedia.org. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter to receive our latest articles.


http://theantimedia.org/war-terror-1...rs-fight-isis/



Control of everything, world wide..N.W.O Dead ahead, or so they want!!!!

Barack Obama's Plan to Deal With ISIS Will Put Too Many Young Americans in Body Bags

Richard Anthony 32 mins ago



The more one thinks about Barack Obama's so-called "plan" to deal with ISIS, the more one see's the complete idiocy of it. Obama has about as much military skill and comprehension as Wile E. Coyote, he's nothing more than a slick talking idiot who possesses an Acme Dynamite kit. For the last six years, he's refused to listen to some of the most brilliant military minds in the world, and when they disagreed with him, he ran them out of the service. Once again, we have an idiot president who thinks he knows better than men who have made warfare and military strategy their life's work. What I fear the most - because he's publicly committed himself to action not only in Iraq, but in Syria, as well - is that he's going to set off a chain reaction that will cause the deaths of not only American men and women, but some of the few allies that we have left in the world; and in two years, as this "non-war" drags on, he'll just retire to the golf course and never give it a second glance. Obama has shown us over the last six years that he does not hold American lives dear and doesn't care whom he put in harm's way.

He has surrounded himself with idiotic sycophants who collectively poses as much intelligence as an ounce of goose droppings. A perfect example of this would be our current National Security Adviser to the President, Susan E. Rice. Not only is she the most UN-qualified individual to hold this position, but we all know what an idiot and liar she is when she was the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. Her assessment of the current situation regarding ISIS is (and I'm quoting her): "The President's actions against ISIS are 'very different' than America being at war." She has absolutely no inkling about military strategy, let alone any understanding as to the threat ISIS poses to the world. She's merely been rewarded with her new-found position for services rendered helping get the President re-elected in 2012. I am morally offended by her mere presence. And don't even get me started about John Kerry being Secretary of State - that's a whole new bag of stupid!

Because Obama's has either fired or run-off the best general officers he had, what we have left are nothing but a bunch of second stringers who are nothing but waterboys for the president, and who will do whatever he says…and that will cost us dearly. In fact, most of the officers in command of the military right now are "yes-men" to Obama. I fear the price to be paid in blood will be nothing compared to what we saw in Iraq and Afghanistan in years past.

Right now America stands on a precipice and our commander in chief is an idiot who wouldn't even know what the business end of an M-16 is. I'll take it a step further by saying that Barack Obama couldn't pour piss out of a boot if the directions were on the heel.

Our only hope to put a stop to him would be a complete Republican victory in November in the House and the re-taking of the Senate, then we could impeach him. Oh, but I forgot...John Boehner said he wouldn't do that. Maybe with enough pressure (if we win), we could change his mind, because there's a lot more damage Obama can do in two short years, if he is not stopped. You also need to remember, out southern border is not secure and it's a fact that Islamic terrorists are coming into the country from there and Obama is doing nothing to put a stop to that. Is there any doubt as to whose side he's on?

Maybe it's time the American people took matters into their own hands, because our politicians are a waste of skin.
Either way, you might want to stock-up on ammunition and food....just in-case.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.


http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/09/barack-obamas-plan-deal-isis-will-put-many-young-americans-body-bags/

Obama Has Given ISIS the Keys to Our Country

Posted on October 9, 2014 by Frank Camp


“You either make yourself accountable or you will be made accountable by your circumstances.” – Unknown

Accountability defines leadership; it defines every action in our lives. Accountability determines who has succeeded, and who has failed, who has done well and who has done evil, and it allows us to govern the path we will take going forward. Without accountability, there would be chaos. Leadership without accountability is not leadership at all, rather, it is simply power projected onto others, it is dominion. And that dominion is what the Democrats have over the American people.

As the effective fourth branch of the government, the objective of the American media should be to scrutinize our leaders, no matter their Party affiliation, to keep them on track, and to make certain that they are held accountable for their wrongdoings. But, as we all know, the American media–with few exceptions–is an appendage of the Democratic Party, and as such, it only turns its all-seeing eye on conservatives, leaving the left entirely un-watched. This has caused the left to behave more, and more recklessly. But what happens when an event occurs, the consequences of which are catastrophic, and our leadership is Democratic? What happens when the media has failed to keep us safe from reckless leaders?

According to Breitbart:
“US Representative Duncan Hunter (R-CA) reported that Border Patrol agents told him that ten ISIS fighters were caught trying to cross the southern border on Tuesday’s ‘On the Record’ on the Fox News Channel.”

Once again, according to Breitbart, Rep. Hunter continued, saying:
“ISIS is coming across the southern border…at least ten ISIS fighters have been caught coming across the Mexican border in Texas…if they [the Border Patrol] catch five or ten of them, then you know there’s going to be dozens more that did not get caught by the Border Patrol…if you want to protect Americans from ISIS, you secure them from the southern border…the only way that ISIS is going to harm Americans is by coming in through the southern border, which they already have.”

With the message from ISIS being projected near the White House, the numerous instances of ISIS related graffiti cropping up across the United States, and with this information, it is more than reasonable to believe that members of ISIS are already here. ISIS may have something devastating planned, and they may be planning it right under our noses.

Given all of this, will President Obama, having refused to do his job, which is to enforce the immigration laws of the United States, be ultimately responsible for any attack made on the United States by members of ISIS who entered through the southern border? Yes, because he has acted negligently. Obama has used the southern border as a game piece for years now, as have many Democrats in the Senate, and House. They have refused multiple times to secure the border, and if, because of their refusal to secure the border, a terrorist attack is perpetrated on the American people by members of ISIS who entered through our porous southern border, the blood of thousands, or millions will saturate their hands. But will they be held accountable? They will not hold themselves accountable, certainly, but their circumstances will have made them accountable.

When one’s actions make one indirectly responsible for a crime such as a terrorist attack, criminal prosecution is certainly warranted. Should an attack occur, because of the porousness of our border, Obama, and his colleagues will be prosecuted, because they have been criminally negligent.
I’m fearful of such an attack, and I’m afraid one is imminent. I am ashamed of the President that he has placed political gains above American lives. Through his game, in which he has tried to pressure Republicans into signing off on amnesty, our President has given ISIS the keys to the door. How long will it be before they come knocking?



Read more at http://lastresistance.com/7750/obama...fh6CuIWDOzH.99

'Obama Punching ISIS With Left Hand, Apologizing With Right'




As seen on Special Report with Bret Baier


Judge Andrew Napolitano weighed in on President Obama’s ISIS strategy on “Special Report," suggesting that Obama’s heart is not really in this battle.
“He’s punching with his left hand and apologizing to the gallery with his right for throwing too many left hooks,” Napolitano said.
Napolitano called on Obama to ask Congress for a declaration of war, saying that, at present, this war is illegal.
He added, “If he’s gonna fight a war, he should fight it full-fledged, in a decisive and massive way and win it, or he should not fight the war at all.”

Later, he said that he doesn’t think that ISIS – without a navy or air force – threatens our freedom or safety at home.
“If it does, [Obama] should tell us how and why he came to that conclusion,” he said.
Watch more above.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2014/10/1...zing-his-right