Thread: "Obamanation."

#Obama: Dreams From My Real Father (2012)



fair use notice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDQT...&feature=share

Richard Byrd's photos

OBAMA & HOLDER: Doubling Down On Operation Choke Point



Posted on June 27, 2014

Folks like to call Obama an incompetent boob who doesn’t know how to lead. I say he’s an awesome strategist who’s sticking to his guns and is fundamentally destroying our nation on purpose. Check this out …

The sheer evil brilliance of Obama’s minions never ceases to amaze me. They are tenacious in their efforts to find ways to circumvent the Constitution and our laws – they simply never give up. There is no better example of this currently than Operation Choke Point. They were caught in 2013 targeting legal industries they did not approve of by bullying banks and other financial institutions into cutting off funds to those whose activities were not ‘acceptable.’ Specifically, the gun industry:

Last year the Department of Justice partnered with the FDIC and the Federal Trade Commission to put a whole host of industries (and their customers) on a “high-risk” list and urged banks to pay close attention to those industries as part of Operation Choke Point.
…
Storefront gun dealers, online dealers and ammunition dealers are on the “high risk” list, along with porn and other salacious products (as if they’re even comparable, the Second Amendment is constitutional right, yet it’s on the DOJ hit list). DOJ argues the program is needed to stop fraud, but that’s a lie. The program is used to target politically inconvenient industries without the permission of Congress.
…
There has been a great deal of push back on this targeting and persecution of legitimate businesses by the Obama Administration. Conservative financiers have stepped forward to fill the breach. Undaunted and undeterred, if Obama and Co. can’t get to Conservatives through the law or the Constitution, they then turn to cutting off funding. If that doesn’t work, they turn to government agencies and regulation. If that doesn’t work, there is always Obama’s pen and paper. And so it goes until they accomplish their destructive goals.

Read more: Trevor Loudon

Doubling Down On Operation Choke Point


Submitted by Terresa Monroe-Hamilton on June 24, 2014 – 1:22 pm EST2 Comments
By: Terresa Monroe-Hamilton
NoisyRoom.net
The sheer evil brilliance of Obama’s minions never ceases to amaze me. They are tenacious in their efforts to find ways to circumvent the Constitution and our laws – they simply never give up. There is no better example of this currently than Operation Choke Point. They were caught in 2013 targeting legal industries they did not approve of by bullying banks and other financial institutions into cutting off funds to those whose activities were not ‘acceptable.’ Specifically, the gun industry:

Last year the Department of Justice partnered with the FDIC and the Federal Trade Commission to put a whole host of industries (and their customers) on a “high-risk” list and urged banks to pay close attention to those industries as part of Operation Choke Point.
…
Storefront gun dealers, online dealers and ammunition dealers are on the “high risk” list, along with porn and other salacious products (as if they’re even comparable, the Second Amendment is constitutional right, yet it’s on the DOJ hit list). DOJ argues the program is needed to stop fraud, but that’s a lie. The program is used to target politically inconvenient industries without the permission of Congress.

And from Examiner.com:

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), at the behest of Barack Obama, has declared that gun stores are “high risk” businesses. “High risk” businesses have been, up until now, a small category of supposedly disreputable businesses, which have included pornographers, sellers of drug paraphernalia, and payday lenders.
The second step in the process is Eric Holder’s Justice Department’s “Operation Choke Point.” And its function is specifically to choke off any credit or credit card processing for businesses (now including gun owners) who fall in the “high risk” category.

There has been a great deal of push back on this targeting and persecution of legitimate businesses by the Obama Administration. Conservative financiers have stepped forward to fill the breach. Undaunted and undeterred, if Obama and Co. can’t get to Conservatives through the law or the Constitution, they then turn to cutting off funding. If that doesn’t work, they turn to government agencies and regulation. If that doesn’t work, there is always Obama’s pen and paper. And so it goes until they accomplish their destructive goals.
Rand Paul has filed Amendment 3292 to H.R. 4660, which would put a hold on Eric Holder’s “Operation Choke Point.” It was added to the Science Justice Commerce Appropriations bill. However, I would wager even if slows them down, it won’t stop the Progressive/Marxists who are determined to rewrite the Second Amendment and get the guns. They are like demonic ants who swarm and single-mindedly pursue their desired outcome for the collective.
Right on cue, instead of backing up on their fascist Operation Choke Point agenda, the Left is doubling down with help of the opaque Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Under the auspices of Dodd-Frank last week, the CFPB passed a rule that was not publicized and was noticed even less. But, boy… it’s a whopper.
The rule gives the agency unprecedented power to shut down any business, no matter what the reason, at any time it wishes, through a cease-and-desist order. That’s right… no due process, no notice, no recourse… This rule literally puts any business under the thumb and at the whim of the CFPB. Once shut down, the business can’t go back into operation until they get the blessing of the government or a court ruling in their favor. By the time that happens, they’ll go under – a business could and would spend years in the judicial system. Stall and delay until death do us part.
Take a gander:

In a notice published in today’s Federal Register, the CFPB has announced that it has adopted its interim final rule on temporary cease-and-desist orders (C&Ds) without change. The final rule takes effect on July 18, 2014.
The CFPB is authorized to issue temporary C&Ds under Section 1053(c) of Dodd-Frank. That provision authorizes a temporary C&D as an adjunct to a cease-and-desist proceeding brought under Section 1053 against a covered person or service provider. A temporary C&D is effective immediately upon service and remains in effect unless modified or terminated administratively by the CFPB or set aside on judicial review.

This follows Operation Choke Point and is an addendum to those actions. From the United States Consumer Coalition comes a stark warning to businesses and what this could mean for them:

“This unprecedented rule created by the CFPB grants the agency unilateral authority to literally shut down any business overnight. It is a doubling down of Operation Choke Point (OCP), the Administration’s program to target lawful industries by intimidating banks from doing business with them. This rule allows the CFPB to immediately issue a cease-and-desist order, which terminates all business practices — and a hearing doesn’t have to be granted for 10 days, effectively shutting down businesses for at least 10 days. This is a ‘guilty until proven innocent’ tactic of the Administration that goes against every historical notion of justice under the law in America.”
“The Administration got caught with their illegal intimidation tactics in Operation Choke Point, and now they are taking radical steps to ensure the goals of shutting down these lawful businesses are met. This is just the next step in using unaccountable agencies, with their ever-expanding agency powers, to meet the political goals of the Administration. This is a much more efficient way of shutting down lawful industries than just relying on intimidation. It is also no coincidence that this rule was released the day that CFPB Director Richard Cordray finished testifying at oversight hearings on the Hill.”
“This is a direct attack on every free-market business in America, and every single business should be alarmed. No business should have to operate while questioning daily whether or not they will be the victim of a cease-and-desist order. This will cause uncertainty on Wall Street and uncertainty in the job market, leading to a loss of jobs and devastating the families that rely on them, while irreversibly damaging the economy and threatening consumer choice.”

This is the brazen use of political-style Chicago gangster tactics and a blatant violation of Constitutional rights. The rule can be opposed and overturned through legislation and oversight, but who really believes it will be any time soon?
The document explaining this new rule, can be found here…
This is another power grab using regulation. There is not a business out there that can afford to fight this for long and the government knows it. Get on Obama’s naughty list, get a cease-and-desist order, which is actually a business death certificate. It’s a death panel for small businesses and entrepreneurs if you are of the wrong political stripe. What do you want to bet that among the first casualties of this monstrosity will be gun organizations? Closely followed by Tea Party aligned businesses.
How much more will Americans take before saying enough? This has gone way beyond political differences and annoyance now. Hundreds of millions out there are now thoroughly pissed off – stopping them from feeding their families will make it explosive. Doubling down on Operation Choke Point may just strangle the Republic.

Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/06/obama-...YbfBVuir7RV.99

http://www.trevorloudon.com/2014/06/doubling-down-on-operation-choke-point/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campai gn=Feed:+NewZeal+%28New+Zeal+Blog%29

Barack Obama & the Plot to Destroy the West

William Lafferty 2 hours ago

When Obama was first elected, liberal friends of mine often confided that they were mystified by what they perceived as absolute hatred for Obama on the part of many conservatives

Nothing I could say made any sense to these folks. But that was in the early stages of the Obama presidency. What I would say now in answer to their question is this: although there have been a number of periods of reform in the United States, such as the Revolution against Britain, the New Deal, the 60's, none of them have involved a change in the Core Values traditionally represented by the United States and the West generally.
Now we are at the cusp of a different kind of reform in which the issue is whether the Core Values of American culture are to be preserved or changed to values that have been, at best, on the fringes of American life. Obama represents those competing values.
It was apparent in Obama's campaign for the presidency that something was wrong. He appeared detached, enigmatic – he seemed to have another frame of reference, to come from another culture. Nonetheless, he had a mesmerizing effect on his followers. Hundreds of them broke down in tears at his public appearances and many behaved as if they were experiencing a religious awakening. Maybe they were. Some news anchors behaved the same way.
Beyond that, Obama was secretive. He wouldn't release his birth certificate and when he finally did release it in the form of a pdf file on the internet, a number of forensic experts declared it a forgery.
He spoke of hope and promised to effect a profound change in American life. That promise was not an empty one. His first important act of office (apart from sending the bust of Winston Churchill back to the British government from its display in the White House) was to mount a blitzkrieg campaign to pass his signature legislation, Obamacare. The promise was that it would save every family $2500, that everyone could keep their doctors, everyone could keep their health plans "Period," and 30 million uninsured would get insurance.
Of course, none of that was true. What was true was that the entire scheme was impossible simply by way of the fact that adding 30 million people to an existing medical insurance structure cannot result in cost savings or the same quality service for the insured. And it has not. The scheme was a lie intended to obscure the fact that Obamacare is a socialized medicine scheme that is resulting in rationed care, death panels, and reduced service.
On top of that, for those interested in the sustainability of government, Obama orchestrated the passage of this bill with unprecedented arm-twisting and deal-making with insurance companies, hospitals and drug companies, and he did this under cover of the urgent need to act quickly. Just as in making his illegal and unconstitutional interim presidential appointments, bypassing the requirement of the advice and consent of the Senate, in pushing Obamacare through, he was saying "I refuse to take no for an answer."
Obama was right about the need to act quickly. If anyone had paused to think about this bill – a bill that not a single republican voted for – it would have failed because of its obvious shortcomings, not the least of which was that those who voted for it did so without knowing what was in it. Nancy Pelosi, Obama's chief legislative spokesman famously said that we all would find out what was in the bill after it was passed.
This is not the behavior of a president. It is the behavior of an ideologue run amok. It is precipitous, wrongheaded, dangerous, and, as it has worked out, damaging to the economy and to the people.
Even after Obamacare was rammed through, Obama seemed to be from another place, to have an unfamiliar sense of things, to have little or no respect for American values and traditions. He seemed remote, detached.
He seemed that way because he is that way. Dinesh D'Souza, who is Obama's age, who grew up in India as Obama was growing up in Indonesia, who is non-white as Obama is non-white, who attended American ivy league schools, as did Obama, graduating the same year, and who even was married the same year as Obama, sees him as a person profoundly affected by his Indonesian experience and his Kenyan father:

[I]"t is the anti-colonial ideology of his African father that Barack Obama took to heart. From a very young age and throughout his formative years, Obama learned to see America as a force for global domination and destruction. He came to view America's Military as an instrument of neocolonial occupation. He adopted his father's position that the free market is a code word for economic plunder. Obama grew to perceive the rich as an oppressive class, a kind of neocolonial power within America. He began to detest corporations as institutional mechanisms for economic control and exploitation. In Obama's worldview, profits are a measure of how effectively you have ripped off the rest of society, and America's power in the world is a measure of how selfishly it consumes the globe's resources and how ruthlessly it bullies and dominates the rest of the planet."

D'Souza, The Roots of Obama's Rage(Washington, D.C, 2011), 34.

The strength of D'Souza's analysis is that it explains more about Obama than any other theory I have seen. Obama hates the Core Values of the United States because he sees the United States as a neocolonial power, like Britain (remember returning the statue of the infamous neocolonialist Winston Churchill). He views the United States as a plunderer of third world nations and an exploiter of their resources, cheating them and keeping them from realizing their rightful place in the world. Having been taught to hate Western neocolonialism, Obama's mission is to destroy the United States and the Core Values that make it work. His ultimate goal is to destroy Western Civilization itself, for it is the West that is the shameless and evil colonizer.
The Core Values of the United States and the other nations, mostly European, that make up Western Civilization have been well described by Samuel Huntington:

"The West differs from other civilizations not in the way it has developed but in the distinctive character of its values and institutions. These include most notably its Christianity, pluralism, individualism, and rule of law, which made it possible for the West to invent modernity, expand throughout the worlds and become the envy of other societies."

The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York, 1996), 311.

The Western values of Christianity, pluralism, individualism, and the rule of law, which are unique to Western civilization, explain the cohesiveness of our culture. A multi-ethnic people with the same culture (Core Values) will work together; a multi-ethnic people without the same Core Values or culture cannot. If our Core Values are abandoned, their demise will end the United States as a viable political entity and as the foremost exemplar of Western civilization.
To test the idea that Obama hates the West and would destroy its Core Values, resulting in its accelerated destruction, let's consider how he has behaved with respect to each of the Core Values Huntington mentions.
Christianity. Christian teachings are a "core value" of the United States and a major contribution of Western civilization to the world. Obama belongs to Jerimiah Wright's brand of Christianity, the "God damn America" brand because he can simultaneously present himself to white folks as a Christian and to blacks as a militant. However, he has claimed to foreign leaders that his entire family is Muslim.
His affinity for Islam is also apparent in his artful bumbling in Syria and Iran, the result of which will be that these two Muslim nations will soon have nuclear weapons. Beyond that, other nations in the region will purchase their own nuclear arsenal, probably from Iran, creating a situation where the United States, which Obama is now unilaterally disarming, may well be unable to defend itself from nuclear destruction by a combination of rogue Muslim states. Alireza Forghani, a strategy specialist in the camp of the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has said "the Islamic world should rise up and shout that a nuclear bomb is our right, and disrupt the dreams of America and Israel." Apparently Obama agrees.
Obama's pro-Islamic posture is also evident in his insistence on abandoning the GITMO facility, which houses Islamic terrorists who pose a threat to the United States, his bizarre proposal to try war criminals in civilian courts in New York City, his unprecedented recent release of five key Taliban fighters in the midst of a war with Taliban-related groups, his directive that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration will now have the primary mission of reaching out to Muslims, and his insistence that the Islamic Fort Hood shooter who killed thirteen fellow soldiers and wounded thirty-two while shouting "Allahu Akbar," was engaged in workplace violence and not Islamic terrorism.

The significance of Obama's friendliness to Islam is that Islam is poised to do battle with the West and reduce it to third world status or worse:

"[The] 'reaffirmation of Islam, whatever its specific sectarian form, means the repudiation of European and American influence upon local society, politics, and morals.' In this sense, the revival of non-western religions is the most powerful manifestation of anti-Westernism in non-Western societies. That revival is not a rejection of modernity; it is a rejection of the West and of the secular, relativistic, degenerate culture associated with the West. It is a rejection of what has been termed the 'Westification' of non-Western societies. It is a declaration of cultural independence from the West, a proud statement that 'We will be modern but we won't be you.'"

Id. p. 101, footnotes omitted.

Christianity is useful to Obama only as a political tool, but Islam is a kindred spirit in its hatred of the West.
Pluralism. Although one of Obama's major goals is diversity, what he means by that is black, Hispanic and Islamic favoritism.
The founders of our country, as Huntington points out, feared diversity. They created the national motto "e Pluribus Unum," (one out of many) because of their concern that racial, sectional, ethnic, economic and cultural diversity would lead to civil war. Id., 305-306. The founders saw diversity as a threat to the stability of the country.
Before "diversity" made its appearance in the United States, many of us grew up thinking of America as a melting pot, a place where people from many backgrounds came together and blended into one people. Obama appears to prefer the view that Americans are diverse and insular, at each other's throats, divided and hateful, not one people united and strong. Pluralism is not a value for Obama.
Individualism. All of the traditional individual rights guaranteed Americans are an anathema to Obama, for they thwart his socialist mentality, which seeks to impose uniform and centralized plans like Obamacare on the entire country.
Thus, it is no surprise that Obama's NSA eavesdrops on individual Americans without reason or leave of court; that Obama and Holder have worked tirelessly to eliminate individual gun ownership; that Obama's IRS has targeted groups who have individual political views different from Obama's, or that individuals are pilloried if they utter words reflecting their individual beliefs but not acceptable to Obama. One might say that individualism is not an Obama priority.
The rule of law. Even Obama's supporters will admit that Obama has not been long on obeying the law. Although Obama personally controls the State Department (responsible for the Benghazi scandal), the NSA (responsible for the snooping scandal) the IRS (responsible for the suppression of contrary views scandal), and the BATF (responsible for the Fast and Furious scandal), he has refused to order any agency to turn over to congressional investigators critical papers from any of these agencies that they have subpoenaed.
On at least thirty-eight occasions, he has ignored and altered statutory mandates in the Obamacare law. He has allowed his Attorney General to be held in contempt of congress. He has made public statements in local criminal matters in favor of blacks which have the effect of biasing juries; he has flooded the United States with tens of thousands of illegal immigrants, he and his attorney general have refused to prosecute blacks who intimidate whites at voting places; and he has sponsored a health care act which has wrecked the existing system affecting nearly 18% of the economy, without constitutional authority. These lawless acts are so egregious that the Speaker of the House of Representatives has announced that he will sue Obama for his lawlessness.
In sum, Obama has acted and will continue to act to destroy the seminal values of our culture and our civilization, what Huntington calls the "Core Values." He has done this because he believes Western nations like the United States are neocolonial powers which have plundered and exploited third world nations like Indonesia and Kenya, dominating their economies and occupying their land. He correctly believes he can destroy our nation by renouncing our Core Values and substituting the values of "diversity," Islam, collectivism, and extra-legal conduct in the service of a higher morality. If he is successful at substituting his values for those of the West and the United States, he will, indeed, be successful in his determination to destroy our culture and, thus, our country.
The advent of having a president determined to destroy his own country is bad enough, but it also comes at a time when Western Civilization and its leading proponent, the United States, is entering a period of decline. This decline is illustrated not only by the difficulty we have had winning a war with a third world nation like Iraq but also by our declining control of the world's resources:

"To defeat Iraq, the United States deployed in the Persian Gulf 75 percent of its active tactical aircraft, 42 percent of its modern battle tanks, 46 percent of its aircraft carriers, 37 percent of its army personnel, and 46 percent of its marine personnel. With significantly reduced forces in the future, the United States will be hard put to carry out one intervention, much less two.. ..

"[T]he West will remain the most powerful civilization well into the early decades of the twenty-first century. Beyond then it will probably continued to have a substantial lead in scientific talent, research and development capabilities, and civilian and military technological innovation. Control over the other power resources, however, is becoming increasingly dispersed among the core states and leading countries of non-Western civilization. The West's control of these resources peaked in the 1920s and has since been declining irregularly but significantly. In the 2020s, a hundred years after that peak, the West will probably control ... perhaps 25 percent of manufacturing output (down from a peak of 84 percent, and less than 10 percent of global military manpower (down from 45 percent).

Id., 90-91.

The shock of gradually losing our place of primacy in the world has produced confusion, both cultural, economic and military, which Obama has been able to exploit. Novel ideas, like going into debt a trillion dollars a year, unilaterally reducing our military force, and flooding the nation with illegal immigrants ("By the Obama administration's own estimation, 230,000 unaccompanied alien minors are expected to cross through the Rio Grande Sector by the end of next year") float by unnoticed in this time of crisis and are tools of destruction. The realization of any of these ideas -- Driving the nation into insolvency, reducing our military defenses to inadequacy, or flooding the nation with illegal immigrants – would be sufficient to destroy the nation.
No other president in our history, no matter what his politics, has posed this level of threat to our Core Values, to the culture, to the country and to Western civilization. And we haven't even touched on Obama's willingness to squander 100 million dollars on one Roman-emperor vacation to Africa.
The question we began with was why conservatives have such a strong negative view of Obama. I admit it's a puzzle. What's not to like?
Source


Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/06/ba...VFzQlwr52X7.99

Obama Is the Worst President Since WWII, Quinnipiac Poll Finds
Fox News Insider

President Obama is the worst president since World War II, according to a new Quinnipiac University poll.

Fox News Bombshell: Secret Internment Camps and Obama’s Brown shirts

Dean Garrison 17 hours ago

Earlier today, I posted a story by Mac Slavo that came via Todd Starnes' article from Fox News. I want to post something again because this is so important. America has to wake up and they have to wake up now. There is no more time

Alternative Media gets a bad rap for so-called conspiracy theory. It comes with the territory. For those of you who don't know me, I run an independent blog called D.C. Clothesline. We are small and have no ad budget. So, in order to get site traffic I do a lot of sharing on social media. Whenever I share a story that doesn't quite fit in with the mainstream media norm, I tend to get lots of critical comments. One of the most common comments I hear is something like, "This is a blog. This can't be true. Until I hear it on Fox News it isn't true."
Well, I am here to tell you that it is time to wake up because Fox News is now on board.
People should not be shocked if they have been paying attention.
Supreme Court Justice Scalia recently warned of the return of internment camps on U.S. soil.
As for FEMA camps, if anyone would bother to research something called REX-84 they would find that Oliver North spearheaded an effort to make plans for internment of American citizens. If things go south, there are plans in place. Don't fool yourself. Why wouldn't the government have a contingency plan?
That isn't conspiracy. It is common sense.
The latest revelation, however, is frightening beyond belief.
By this time you have likely heard of the contagious diseases coming into this country via the immigration disaster at the southern border.
But Todd Starnes reported earlier today that workers are being threatened with arrest if they open their mouths about this problem:

A government-contracted security force threatened to arrest doctors and nurses if they divulged any information about the contagion threat at a refugee camp housing illegal alien children at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, sources say.

In spite of the threat, several former camp workers broke their confidentiality agreements and shared exclusive details with me about the dangerous conditions at the camp. They said taxpayers deserve to know about the contagious diseases and the risks the children pose to Americans. I have agreed to not to disclose their identities because they fear retaliation and prosecution.

What these workers additionally revealed is a much bigger story, in my opinion. These security officers are calling themselves "Brown Shirts."
"There were several of us who wanted to talk about the camps, but the agents made it clear we would be arrested," a psychiatric counselor told me. "We were under orders not to say anything."

The sources said workers were guarded by a security force from the Baptist Family & Children's Services, which the Department of Health and Human Services hired to run the Lackland Camp.

The sources say security forces called themselves the "Brown Shirts."

"It was a very submissive atmosphere," the counselor said. "Once you stepped onto the grounds, you abided by their laws – the Brown Shirtlaws."

p>For those of you who do not know what the significance of "Brown Shirts" are, let's see what Wikipedia has to say:
The Sturmabteilung (SA) (German pronunciation: [ˈʃtʊɐ̯mʔapˌtaɪlʊŋ] ( listen); Storm Detachment or Assault Division, or Brownshirts) functioned as the original paramilitary wing of the Nazi Party. It played a key role in Adolf Hitler's rise to power in the 1920s and 1930s. Their main assignments were providing protection for Nazi rallies and assemblies, disrupting the meetings of the opposing parties, fighting against the paramilitary units of the opposing parties (especially the Rotfrontkämpferbund) and intimidating Slavic and Romani citizens, unionists and Jews (e.g. the Nazi boycott of Jewish businesses).

Please understand that thanks to a few conscientious whistleblowers, Barack Obama's hand has been shown. Some might say that this is not Obama's work, but rather the responsibility of the contractors.
This is how government officials cover their tracks. We saw evidence of this in Iraq when our government hired Blackwater, now Academi, to do the "dirty work" that they didn't want connected to them. It's a simple yet effective strategy of passing the buck.
This story did not originate on D.C. Clothesline.
Fox News is reporting that Barack Obama has a security force in place that is named after the original Nazi German paramilitary wing.
Why would they call themselves "Brown Shirts?"
Is it because they reportedly wear tan shirts? I doubt it. What kind of a sick joke would that be?
Think about it hard. They know the historical significance. Don't kid yourself.
Do you think it might be time to start paying attention?
This administration is not concerned with "conspiracy theorists" because they know that they won't have to discredit them. The useful idiots will do it for them, as I witness on a daily basis.
But when Fox News runs a story like this, perhaps you might want to start paying attention to what is happening around you.
What are you going to do when the "Brown Shirts" are running your camp and there is nowhere to run and no one to listen?
The time to prepare is now.
Not tomorrow.
Now.
Water, guns and ammo are most important. You can hunt for food if need be. As for the silver and gold thing…
If my family has only 50 gallons of fresh water left, no amount of precious metal is going to barter that away. Think about survival because an economic collapse is coming and when it does things could get really crazy.
Source
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.


Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/07/fo...WBem4D0QwYl.99