Results 1 to 8 of 8
Like Tree4Likes

Thread: Unequal Exchange: How Taxpayers Shoulder the Burden of Fossil Fuel Development on Fed

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    4,815

    Unequal Exchange: How Taxpayers Shoulder the Burden of Fossil Fuel Development on Fed

    Unequal Exchange: How Taxpayers Shoulder the Burden of Fossil Fuel Development on Federal Lands

    Janet Redman, May 24, 2017
    Oil Change International
    With 350.org, WildEarth Guardians, Center for Biological Diversity, Clean Water Action, Food & Water Watch, and Public Citizen
    May 2017
    Download PDF Briefing
    Key findings of this report include:

    • Fossil fuel production on federal lands – onshore and offshore territories – was subsidized to the tune of at least $7 billion in 2014. This number is likely a low estimate, as it does not account for the many subsidies that we identified, but did not include, for which reliable cost estimates were not available. It also does not include subsidies from the federal government and in the tax code not explicitly directed to fossil fuel production on federal lands.


    • The ability of oil, gas, and coal producers to shift potential future liability onto taxpayers is also a major subsidy, but because it is difficult to calculate precisely, it is not included in the subsidy totals presented here. U.S. taxpayers’ contingent liability for decommissioning and cleanup of oil and gas projects in the Gulf of Mexico alone is estimated to be $35.3 billion by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM).


    • Incorporating climate damage caused by fossil fuels produced on federal lands makes the economic argument for ending new leases on federal lands and waters even stronger. In the case of coal from the Powder River Basin, an area of active federal coal leases, every short ton of coal produced has a net cost to American taxpayers of $49 dollars. That means that Powder River Basin coal production alone – only a small sliver of fossil fuel production on federal lands nationwide – had a net cost to taxpayers of $17.8 billion in 2015, dwarfing the supposed economic benefits of allowing new fossil fuel leases on federal lands and waters.


    • Removing these subsidies would save taxpayers money while also reducing greenhouse gas emissions from oil, gas, and coal production. The $7 billion in subsidies to fossil fuel companies could nearly double current support levels for mandatory computer science education programs for all public school students. It could pay for fixing the lead-contaminated water system in Flint, MI, and still cover the cost necessary for researchers to accelerate the development of new cancer detection and treatments – more than six times over.

    http://priceofoil.org/2017/05/24/une...federal-lands/

    photo of wild horses cruelly rounded up even though a designated land for them in this basin - they are held in pens and eventually sold for inhumane slaughter in mexico
    This is what opening up our federal lands to for profit industries does! To mistreat, abscond land from our great American symbol of the West, the wild horse, is UN-AMERICAN and dastardly.
    Last edited by artist; 06-03-2017 at 02:53 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Solar Inconvenient Truth: Ivanpah Plant a Big Fossil Fuel User
    By Newmexican in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-24-2017, 04:30 AM
  2. State AGs Tried to Hide Climate Probe Geared to Punish Fossil Fuel Companies
    By Newmexican in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-05-2016, 10:53 AM
  3. Major fossil fuel companies see need for climate action
    By JohnDoe2 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-23-2014, 01:09 AM
  4. Overpopulation: America Part 15: Fossil fuel energy--finite
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-14-2010, 11:37 PM
  5. Discovery backs theory oil not 'fossil fuel'
    By minnie in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-11-2008, 02:16 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •