Thread: WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE???

Write a comment...


Nation In Distress


NEVER FORGET BENGHAZI ~D DOG JR~
Join Us ► Nation In Distress



Like · · Share · 3,9151042,553 · Yesterday at 7:00am ·

Extremely Pissed off RIGHT Wingers 2


F ALL RINOCRATS AND COMMIETRAITORS ~D DOG JR~ Extremely Pissed off RIGHT Wingers 2

HILLARY CLINTON AND THE SUSPICIOUS DEATH OF VINCE FOSTER


January 14, 2014 / Clark Kent

AMERICAS FREEDOM FIGHTERS IS COMMITTED TO EXPOSING THE TRUTH! VINCE FOSTER IS ONE OF MANY ‘CLOSE FRIENDS’ OF THE CLINTON’S THAT HAVE ENDED UP DEAD. DID HE KNOW TOO MUCH? YOU BE THE JUDGE…

On a Monday night in July 1993, a 48-year-old lawyer called Vince Foster was found dead in a park near Washington DC. He had died from a gunshot wound to the mouth and his father’s .38-caliber revolver, dating from 1913, was at his side. It was the same method of suicide used by a Marine officer in the film A Few Good Men – which Foster was known recently to have watched. In the movie, the officer had killed himself because he was distraught about testifying against his commanding officer. In real life, Vince Foster was distraught at the prospect of being grilled about the shady affairs of Hillary Clinton. A clear case of suicide, then. Or was it? As the months passed, wild rumors began to grow that a ‘hit-man’ had murdered him because he knew too much. Tall and handsome, Vince Foster was one of Hillary’s closest colleagues and best friends.
In Little Rock, Arkansas, they were partners in a law firm while Bill Clinton was governor of the state. And, naturally, when the Clintons moved to the White House, Vince Foster came, too. It was unusual for Hillary to have such a close friendship with a man. Since her school days, she had operated most easily among women; and when it came to appointing her own staff at the White House, she chose 29 women and one man. Her subordinates – who called her “The Big Girl” or later “Big Mama” and wore badges saying “Hillaryland” – had a starry-eyed devotion that was almost cult-like. One of Hillary’s friends said: “They were all afraid to say no to her.” She was overly demanding and would call her staff at home after hours and make them keep working.
According to White House chronicler Bob Woodward, she “frequently reduced her personal travelling aide to tears” when the assistant failed to produce something Hillary needed. She had a temper, but instead of “making nice” afterwards, as Bill did, Hillary withdrew in cool silence. ”One time, Hillary said: ‘Mel, your problem is you just aren’t mean enough,’” recalled her friend Mary Mel French. ”I couldn’t work for her and keep our friendship. She is too dogmatic. She gets so into it that she ends up being mean. That is why she has to have such a young staff. They take it, and they bow and scrape.”
According to one commentator, the reason Hillary surrounded herself with women was because she found men too complicated. Indeed, she once told former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who owed her appointment to Hillary’s support: “We both know what a**holes men can be.”
The one man who was definitely not an a**hole was Vince Foster. Hillary used to say he reminded her of Gregory Peck as Atticus Finch in To Kill A Mockingbird – reserved, upright and dependable. ”People gravitated to Vince because he was a world-class listener,” recalled a former Little Rock lawyer. “Women were drawn to him not just because he was smart and handsome, but because he seemed to keep secrets.” At the funeral for Hillary’s father, who died during the Clintons’ first term at the White House, it was on Foster’s shoulder that the First Lady rested her slightly over-large head.
Inevitably, this intimate gesture added fuel to rumors that they were – or at least had been – romantically involved. After all, Bill Clinton had been seeking his pleasures elsewhere – so why not Hillary? Aware of all the talk even before his arrival in Washington, Foster himself raised the subject in his first meeting with the man who would be his immediate boss, White House counsel Bernie Nussbaum. There was no truth in the rumor, said Foster. And when his wife, Lisa, was asked about it later, she insisted: “I don’t think Hillary would do it. I think, in a lot of ways, he felt sort of protective of her.” Hillary had long relied on Foster as a confidant, telling him before Bill’s inauguration that, despite being an unelected spouse, she was going to “take command” and be “involved in this presidency” – a conversation he recorded in a journal. In turn, he idolized her.
Did that admiration make him cross a line that would normally have stopped him short? In the weeks before the inauguration, he had worked intensively with another Arkansas lawyer to expunge Bill and Hillary’s financial records of a shady land deal – a scandal later known as the Whitewater affair. Later, there were several official investigations into the Clintons’ complex web of financial and real estate dealings, which culminated in criminal convictions for some of their associates, though Hillary and Bill were never prosecuted themselves. Whitewater was later seen as symptomatic of the culture that existed in Arkansas during Bill’s governorship, when the Clintons’ connections helped them to enrich themselves. For example, to augment her $110,000 salary, Hillary had earned large sums from seats on local corporate boards, including Wal-Mart. One company chairman explained Hillary’s presence on his board as “making sure he was in good grace with the people in power.” In that atmosphere, Bill and Hillary developed a sense of entitlement, borrowing from banks operated by political friends and accepting favors from individuals and corporations, such as the free use of private planes.
Was some of this weighing on Vince Foster’s mind when he became both White House deputy counsel and attorney for both Bill and Hillary? What is certain is that he was unsettled by the First Lady’s increasingly uncompromising demands. In March 1993, he told a colleague that she had “snapped at him” – a rebuke that “hurt him deeply.”
It was clear that Foster was having difficulty being ordered around by the woman who had recently been his equal. One of his first jobs in the White House was to try to make sense of the Clintons’ false tax returns concerning the Whitewater land investment. A note in his hand-writing, found much later, warned that Whitewater was “a can of worms you shouldn’t open.” Another “can of worms” that landed on his desk concerned the collapse of a bank called Madison Guaranty. To his consternation, allegations were being made that funds from the bank had been illegally diverted to Bill Clinton’s campaign for governor in the mid-Eighties – and that Bill and Hillary had intervened with state regulators to help keep the bank solvent. Foster was also fretting over the “excessive” sums Hillary was lavishing on redecoration of the White House. In the end, though, it was the firing of seven staff – following pressure from the imperious First Lady – that “drove Vince batty,” according to White House counsel Bernie Nussbaum. Hillary had become convinced that the staff in the travel office that served the White House press corps were guilty of “financial mismanagement and waste.” Foster was asked to help get rid of them. In a meeting with him on May 13, 1993, Hillary asked him if he was “on top of” the travel office situation. He assured her that his team was working on it. Afterwards, Foster noted that Hillary’s mood was “general impatience … general frustration.” Other White House aides later confirmed that she wanted her own “people” in the office, and that everyone felt “there would be hell to pay” if her wishes were defied.
On May 19, the travel office’s seven employees were fired – and there was immediate uproar. Allegations of cronyism hit the headlines when it emerged that a distant cousin of Bill was to be put in charge of the office, while a friend of a friend was being promoted to take over some of the White House’s air-charter business. Worse still, none of the charges against the original travel office employees stood up, and their precipitous dismissals became a damaging test of Hillary’s honesty. She now insisted that the firings were not her fault. Others had misconstrued an “off-hand comment”: she had meant only to suggest that the staff should “look into” questions about mismanagement. Hillary also insisted she didn’t know the “origin of the decision” to remove the employees, and that she “did not direct that any action be taken.” An official report issued seven years later concluded that her statements had been “factually false.” At the time, Vince Foster felt deeply responsible for the imbroglio and was worried that Congress might investigate. White House aide David Watkins remembers Foster saying to him “My God, what have we done?” and expressing concern that Hillary’s role in the firings would come to light. He urged Watkins to protect “the client” at all costs. Foster knew that in shielding Hillary, he might have to mislead congressional investigators under oath – a grim prospect for a man who took pride in being a straight arrow.
By mid-July, he had lost more than a stone in weight and seemed unusually subdued. He twice told his wife that he felt under pressure and was thinking of returning to Arkansas. Talking to a colleague about his dealings with Hillary, he said: “It’s not the same.” On one matter after another, he confided, she would bark “Fix it, Vince!” or “Handle it, Vince!” and leave him to pick up the pieces. On July 16, Foster and his wife drove to an inn in Maryland for the weekend. At dinner that night, Foster cried when Lisa asked him “if he felt trapped.” Three days later, he called his doctor, who gave him a prescription for the antidepressant Desyrel. The following night, July 20, he was found dead. Hillary burst into tears when she was told. But her behaviour, as well as that of staff and associates, in the days following Foster’s death was to haunt the administration for years, raising questions about what the Clintons had to hide – about Whitewater, “Travelgate,” the failed Arkansas bank and more besides.
The night after the tragedy, White House staff – including Hillary’s Chief of Staff – searched Foster’s office for a suicide note. Under the noses of the police and FBI, they took away a number of sensitive files. Later, it was alleged but never proved that the Clintons had combed through these files during the five days before they were handed over. Other key papers – records for Hillary’s legal work on the failed Arkansas bank – appear to have gone missing, too. Although later the subject of a subpoena, the records were not retrieved for more than two years. Whatever the truth behind all the activity that followed Foster’s death, the appearance of concealment was enough to trigger five separate federal inquiries. There were also three official investigations into Foster’s death, all of which concluded that he had committed suicide.
After Foster’s funeral in Arkansas, Hillary had difficulty getting out of bed for several days. Her friend’s death had “ripped a hole” through her, according to Ann McCoy, a friend from Arkansas. On the day she returned to her office, a torn-up note on yellow paper was found at the bottom of Foster’s briefcase. It was a list of grievances and concerns about life in the White House that he had jotted down in the days before his death. Nussbaum went to Hillary’s office to tell her he’d “found something Vince wrote that may help explain why he did what he did.” Hillary “looked startled,” Nussbaum recalled. She glanced at the note, said “I can’t deal with this,” and abruptly left the room. The contents of Foster’s note were tantalising. At one point, the man who knew so many of the First Couple’s secrets had written: “The public will never believe the innocence of the Clintons and their loyal staff.” It was a comment that can be interpreted to mean that he believed the Clintons were blameless – or that he was worried about some unspecified information that could destroy Bill and Hillary’s reputation.At the very least, the note revealed just how hard working for Hillary had become. ”I was not meant for the job in the spotlight of public life in Washington,” Foster had written. “Here, ruining people is considered sport.”
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk


CLARK KENT @ AMERICAS FREEDOM FIGHTERS

Trey Gowdy Challenges the Press on Benghazi



Published on Jan 20, 2014
Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) challenges the press' knowledge of the events surrounding the Benghazi Embassy attacks on September 11, 2012.

January 16, 2014 How will latest Benghazi report impact Hillary Clinton?



How will latest Benghazi report impact Hillary Clinton?
Jan 16, 2014 06:08 pm

Go To Full Post: How will latest Benghazi report impact Hillary Clinton?

OMG America shared Wayne Dupree Show's photo.

Watch: Judge Jeanine Destroys Hillary Over “Criminal Negligence” (VIDEO)


On last night’s installment of “Justice,” Judge Jeanine Pirro completely tore into the Obama Administration — and particularly then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton — over their “slow and uncertain” delivery of justice and their outright lies. “If you didn’t know, you’re incompetent,” she blasted. “If you did know, you’re guilty of criminal negligence.”
Just last week, the Senate Republicans and Democrats on the Intelligence Committee came together and released an investigative report of Benghazi wherein they concluded the attacks were preventable. The same administration that for so long tried to pin the blame of the murders on a YouTube video, were recently forced to admit that — a year and a half later — they have a couple of suspects. Subsequently, it was confirmed the Obama Administration knew within minutes that the planned attacks on the anniversary of September 11 were spurred from terrorism, not a protest of a cartoon.
In other words: They bold-faced lied to the world, the American people, and the families of the victims. Even still, accountability has not been held, responsibility remains to be taken, and justice has yet to be served.

From Free Patriot:

According to the Judge, justice should be swift and certain, but in the Obama Administration, justice is slow and uncertain. She highlighted that the Obama Administration puts lies over American lives time and time again. The American people have been waiting for Benghazi justice since September 11, 2012. The Congressional report blamed Hillary Clinton’s state department for deaths that were preventable and for the inadequate security that was provided to her “friend” Chris Stevens and other Americans.
The report also states that the intelligence community provided “ample strategic warning” that U.S. facilities and personnel were at risk in Benghazi. Further the report states that malicious and terror affiliated groups had both the capacity and the intent to strike U.S. interests. There were 20 separate incidents at that compound in the months before September 11, 2012.
Everyone knew there wasn’t a protest, except the New York Times who would never let the facts get in the way of the Obama Administration. Further the Obama Administration and Hillary Clinton persisted in the narrative about the video. The word “video” is mentioned once, and it is in connection with a protest in Cairo. The administration had to have collude about the narrative for a false narrative to be repeated so many times.
The narrative was intended to mislead the American people just before the election.
Then the Judge takes on Hillary Clinton for negligence. She calls her lack of action a gross deviation from the standard of care that any Secretary of State would have observed. Clinton disregarded the grave risks to the lives of brave Americans.

You can watch Judge Jeanine’s scathing smackdown here:



Here is the transcript via Fox News Insider:

Justice is about accountability and consequences.
Justice occurs when truth is put to the lie. When the facts, and not the politicians, tell the story.
Justice should be swift and certain, but in the Obama administration, it is slow and uncertain.
And as we found out this week, the Obama administration puts political lies over American lives.
We have been waiting for Benghazi justice ever since September 11th 2012. And this week, a bi-partisan Senate committee – Democrats joining Republicans – issued a scathing report blaming Hillary Clinton’s State Department for deaths that were preventable, and for the inadequate security provided to her “friend,” Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
The report makes clear that in the months before the attack on Benghazi, the intelligence community provided quote, “ample strategic warning that U.S. facilities and personnel were at risk in Benghazi, that militias and terrorist-affiliated groups had both the capacity and intent to strike U.S. interests.”
This from the pentagon, AFRICOM, CIA, DIA, Stevens’ security detail, Stevens himself, not to mention 20 separate security incidents at the compound in the months before September 11th.
But we already knew this, didn’t we?
There was no protest, and everybody knew it. Except of course the New York Times – who would never let the facts get in the way of shielding the Obama administration!
The truth? The FBI and the CIA admit they knew it from the surveillance cameras, yet two weeks later the president goes to the United Nations to blame the massacre on that despicable anti-Muslim video.
Folks, I read this report. The word video is mentioned once. That’s it, and that’s in connection with protests in Cairo, Egypt. But President Obama and Secretary Clinton take out an ad to apologize to the Arab world for this hateful video.
And the narrative continues. Susan Rice is given her marching orders to talk about an anti-Muslim video. Think about it. They blame an unconnected video, but they had to agree to this narrative. They knew it was not a spontaneous demonstration. And yet, the talking points, the speeches, the words whispered in the ears of the families of the dead Americans were all about a despicable video in order to mislead us just weeks before a presidential election.
Where I come from, that’s called a conspiracy.
When the intelligence committee said the deaths were preventable they were saying the attack was foreseeable, that the deaths did not have to happen, and that they should not have happened. In doing so, the committee put the responsibility directly in the lap of the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton.
You remember her – the woman who was going to get to the bottom of this by appointing an accountability review board that would never interview her.
Come on – you remember her – that secretary of State logging all those miles – unable to appear before congressional committees because she was traveling, because she had the flu, because she fell, and because she had a concussion.
And when she finally does show up, she says she never saw the cable sent to her, personally signed by the ambassador, foreshadowing not only how they would die, but the very groups that would kill them.
And then, Madame Secretary, you show up four months later – after everyone else has given their version – so that all your ducks in a row. And your efforts that night?
On the phone with Tunisia? What did I miss? Who died in Tunisia?

But then again, you like phones, don’t you…
As the secretary of State, your job was to protect the people in your charge.
You are responsible for their safety and wellbeing. You knew they were receiving danger pay. You knew how dangerous this part of the world was.
Hell! When you went to Benghazi, you had the Defense Department preposition assets off the Libyan coast in case you needed rescue.
You understood the danger to yourself, but ignored it when it came to others.
That’s called negligence.
You failed to perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk. That the danger of death existed to the people in your charge. Your conduct was a gross deviation from the standard of care that any reasonable secretary of state would observe.
You disregarded the grave risk to the lives of Americans.
You knew it – that’s why you didn’t go on the Sunday shows.
You knew it – which is why you waited until everyone else had spoken – so you could get your ducks in a row.
You knew it – because of the cables from your friend and the deteriorating security situation in Benghazi.
You knew it – which is why you appointed your friends to an accountability review board. Which friends never even called you to testify.
You knew it – which is why no one was fired in your department.
You knew it – because the only one who has suffered consequences is the whistleblower, who went against your dictates.
So which is it?
If you didn’t know, you were incompetent.
And if you did know, you were guilty of criminal negligence.
People are so afraid of you, that your name is not even mentioned in the review by the Senate committee. And yet you say that you take responsibility.
But how do you take responsibility when there are no consequences to anyone in your department.
Like Susan Rice, everyone in on the conspiracy was promoted. But what happened in Benghazi was clearly foreseeable.
You had a duty and responsibility. They relied on you.
You breached not only that duty, but the public trust that we have in our government.
I am a prosecutor. I have spent my career in the assignment of blame.
And I know you won’t be prosecuted for this. And your boss won’t be impeached.
But remember this: justice is about accountability and consequences. The facts have now been told.
The consequences have yet to be determined. In the meantime, we continue to wait for justice.

Pat Smith, the mother of Sean Smith, one of the four men murdered in Libya, appeared on national television and said that her son’s blood is on Hillary’s hands. She warned that if this scandal goes unchecked and “no one cares enough to do anything about it,” then “it’s going to happen again and again and again… to your sons, and your daughers.”
Demands for a special investigation of Benghazi are ever-increasing. We are all tired of waiting for justice. We are all tired of being lied to. Help us spread the word by sharing this article.

http://www.capitalisminstitute.org/j...torys-hillary/

Media Research Center


Attention liberal media:

Today marks the 1-year anniversary of Hillary Clinton's infamous "what difference, at this point, does it make?" remark about the deadly Benghazi terrorist attack.

‪#‎ItMakesADifference‬

One Million Mothers for Gun Rights



~D-DOG One Million Mothers for Gun Rights





Nation In Distress



Hey Uncle Ted, don't forget about the Progressive RINOS too!!!
LIKE, COMMENT and SHARE ~Ace~ Join ► Nation In Distress

OMG America added a new photo.




OMG America added a new photo.




TheBlaze
"We would gladly embrace Sen. McCain if he stood behind us and represented us."

Arizona GOP Censures Sen. John McCain for Supporting Issues ‘Associated With Liberal Democrats’
theblaze.com
The Arizona Republican Party formally censured Sen. John McCain on Saturday, citing a voting record they say is insufficiently conservative. The resolution to censure McCain was approved by a voice-vote during a meeting of state committee members in Tempe, state party spokesman Tim Si...


OMG America added a new photo.





Liberty Calling With Judy Morris shared Young Americans for Liberty's photo.
Love it!



OMG America added a new photo.





Extremely ***** off RIGHT Wingers 2

RINO GARBAGE ~D DOG JR~ Extremely ••••••••• off RIGHT Wingers 2
http://www.americasfreedomfighters.c...et-to-go-home/




Capitalism Institute

Last night, John Boehner went onto Jay Leno and blamed the GOP for the government shutdown... even though Obama is the one who REFUSED to compromise. Please SHARE.

John Boehner has become one of Obama's most important "allies" in the GOP. He's one of the reasons Obama isn't being stopped. He's got to go.

Do YOU support firing John Boehner?

Wow... John Boehner Blames GOP for Government Shutdown (VIDEO)
capitalisminstitute.org
This is why people want him fired... if you want him gone, then help and SHARE:



OMG America added a new photo.



OMG America added a new photo.










OMG America added a new photo.




Image Blitz added a new photo.





OMG America added a new photo.