Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

[ED.: Only a week beforehand, the U.S. Congress moved up the date for Congress to confirm the Electoral College vote for President. Most observers were not even aware that the confirmation would be on Jan. 4th rather than on the Monday after Jan. 6th, a Sunday.]

www.archives.gov January 10, 2013

The 2012 Presidential Election View results from the 2012 Presidential Election Summary of Key Dates for the 2012 Presidential Election June through October 2012 The Office of the Federal Register, on behalf of the Archivist of the United States, prepares Electoral College instructional materials for the Archivist to send to the governors of the 50 States and the mayor of the District of Columbia. The materials include: a letter from the Archivist—view a sample letter detailed procedural instructions and a checklist outlining the State’s responsibilities a timeline of key dates for the Electoral College a pamphlet highlighting the Presidential Election provisions in the Constitution and Federal Law Under the 23rd Amendment of the Constitution, the District of Columbia is allocated 3 electors and treated like a state for purposes of the Electoral College. For this reason, in the following discussion, the word “state” also refers to the District of Columbia and the word “governor” also refers to the Mayor of the District of Columbia. November 6, 2012—Election Day Registered voters cast their votes for President and Vice President. By doing so, they also help choose the electors who will represent their state in the Electoral College. Mid-November through December 17, 2012 After the presidential election, the governor of your state prepares seven Certificates of Ascertainment. “As soon as practicable,” after the election results in your state are certified, the governor sends one of the Certificates of Ascertainment to the Archivist. Certificates of Ascertainment should be sent to the Archivist no later than the meeting of the electors on December 17, 2012. However, federal law sets no penalty for missing the deadline. The remaining six Certificates of Ascertainment are held for use at the meeting of the Electors on December 17, 2012. December 11, 2012 States must make final decisions in any controversies over the appointment of their electors at least six days before the meeting of the Electors on December 17, 2012. This is so their electoral votes will be presumed valid when presented to Congress. The deadline for resolving any controversies is December 11, 2012. Decisions by states’ courts are conclusive, if decided under laws enacted before Election Day, November 6, 2012. December 17, 2012 The Electors meet in their state and vote for President and Vice President on separate ballots. The electors record their votes on six “Certificates of Vote,” which are paired with the six remaining Certificates of Ascertainment. The electors sign, seal, and certify six sets of electoral votes. A set of electoral votes consists of one Certificate of Ascertainment and one Certificate of Vote. These are distributed immediately as follows: one set to the President of the Senate (the Vice President) for the official count of the electoral votes on January 6, 2013 (On December 28, 2012, President Obama signed Pub.L. 112-228, as passed by both houses of Congress, moving the day of the vote count from January 6, 2013 (a Sunday) to January 4, 2013.); two packages to the Secretary of State in the state where the electors met—one is an archival set that becomes part of the public record of the Secretary of State’s office and the other is a reserve set that is subject to the call of the President of the Senate to replace missing or incomplete electoral votes; two packages to the Archivist—one is an archival set that becomes part of the permanent collection at the National Archives and Records Administration and the other is a reserve set that is subject to the call of the President of the Senate to replace missing or incomplete electoral votes; and one set to the presiding judge in the district where the Electors met—this is also a reserve set that is subject to the call of the President of the Senate to replace missing or incomplete electoral votes. December 26, 2012 The deadline for receipt of the electoral votes by the President of the Senate and the Archivist is December 26, 2012. States face no legal penalty for failure to comply. If votes are lost or delayed, the Archivist may take extraordinary measures to retrieve duplicate originals. On or Before January 3, 2013 The Archivist and/or representatives from the Office of the Federal Register meet with the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House in late December or early January. This is, in part, a ceremonial occasion. Informal meetings may take place earlier. January 6, 2013 The Congress meets in joint session to count the electoral votes on January 6, 2013. Congress may pass a law to change this date. On December 28, 2012, President Obama signed Pub.L. 112-228, as passed by both houses of Congress, moving the day of the vote count from January 6, 2013 (a Sunday) to January 4, 2013. The Vice President, as President of the Senate, presides over the count and announces the results of the Electoral College vote. The President of the Senate then declares which persons, if any, have been elected President and Vice President of the United States. If a State submits conflicting sets of electoral votes to Congress, the two Houses acting concurrently may accept or reject the votes. If they do not concur, the votes of the electors certified by the Governor of the State on the Certificate of Ascertainment would be counted in Congress. If no Presidential candidate wins 270 or more electoral votes, a majority, the 12th Amendment to the Constitution provides for the House of Representatives to decide the Presidential election. If necessary the House would elect the President by majority vote, choosing from the three candidates who received the greatest number of electoral votes. The vote would be taken by state, with each state having one vote. If no Vice Presidential candidate wins 270 or more electoral votes, a majority, the 12th Amendment provides for the Senate to elect the Vice President. If necessary, the Senate would elect the Vice President by majority vote, choosing from the two candidates who received the greatest number of electoral votes. The vote would be taken by state, with each Senator having one vote. If any objections to the Electoral College vote are made, they must be submitted in writing and be signed by at least one member of the House and one Senator. If objections are presented, the House and Senate withdraw to their respective chambers to consider their merits under procedures set out in federal law. January 20, 2013 at Noon—Inauguration Day The President-elect takes the Oath of Office and becomes the President of the United States. General Authority The Archivist of the United States, as the head of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is responsible for carrying out ministerial duties on behalf of the States and the Congress under 3 U.S.C. sections 6, 11, 12, and 13. NARA is primarily responsible for coordinating the various stages of the electoral process by helping the States prepare and submit certificates that establish the appointment of electors and validate the electoral votes of each State. The Archivist delegates operational duties to the Director of the Federal Register. The Federal Register Legal Staff ensures that electoral documents are transmitted to Congress, made available to the public, and preserved as part of our nation’s history. The Office of the Federal Register Legal Staff reviews the electoral certificates for the required signatures, seals and other matters of form, as specified in federal law. Only the Congress and the courts have the authority to rule on substantive legal issues. Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration

Page URL: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/key-dates.html

U.S. National Archives & Records Administration 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD, 20740-6001, • 1-86-NARA-NARA • 1-866-272-6272

Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC

U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts schedules Noonan et al v. Bowen, regarding Obama’s forged IDs, to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court on Feb. 15, 2013.

[ED.: Note that Justice Roberts' announcement follows close on the heels of the failure on Jan. 4th by the U.S. Congress to voice any objection to confirming a Constitutionally ineligible candidate for the Office of President.]

Posted on | January 9, 2013 |

Noonan referred for full conference by the Supreme Court

Press release!

Law offices of Orly Taitz

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court. The case, titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen, provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-nn-nnnn, which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.

Please keep in mind [that] Richard Nixon was reelected and sworn in but later was forced to resign as a result of Watergate. Over 30 high ranking officials of the Nixon administration, including the Attorney General of the United States and the White House Counsel, were indicted, convicted, and went to prison. ObamaForgerygate is a hundred times bigger then Watergate. More corrupt high ranking officials, US Attorneys, AGs, and judges were complicit, committed high treason by allowing a citizen of Indonesia, and possibly still a citizen of Kenya, Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, to usurp the U.S. Presidency by use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number.

The docket for Noonan (below) is posted at the U.S. Supreme Court website.

No. 12A606 Title: Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State Docketed: December 13, 2012 Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California Case Nos.: (S20707 ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dec 11 2012 Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy. Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy. Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice. Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013. Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Court.

---

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Orly Taitz	29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy	(949) 683-5411
	Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Party name: Edward Noonan, et al.
Attorneys for Respondent:
Kamala Harris	Attorney General	(916) 445-9555
	P. O. Box 944255
	Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State

--

Dr Orly Taitz ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

orlytaitzesq.com

Oh John Roberts again anyone want to make bets on how that will turn out!!!

In September, 2006, accompanying Raila Odinga's campaign for President of Kenya, Sen. Barack Obama II said this to a distinguished crowd, perhaps in Nairobi or Kisumu.

(Beginning at 2:43 . . .)

"There's no doubt that what Kenyans have accomplished since independence is both impressive and inspiring.

"But for all the progress that's been made, we must surely acknowledge that neither Kenya nor the African continent has yet fulfilled its potential. Like many nations across this continent, Kenya's failing is in its ability to create a government that is transparent and accountable, one that serves its people and is free from corruption.

"We all here have to admit, and this is a sensitive point, that here in Kenya, it is a crisis. <applause> It is a crisis. It's a crisis that is robbing honest people of the opportunities they fought for.

"If the people cannot trust their government to do the job for which it exists, to protect them and to promote their common welfare, all else is lost."

RECOGNIZE THE FIFTH COLUMN, PEOPLE OF AMERICA!

It is way past time, nearly a hundred years past time, for the American people to understand, all the way down to the cores of their beings, that for nearly a century, enemies of the U.S., Israel, Christians, and Jews have insinuated fellow travelers, dhimmis, proxies, stooges, and compromised placeholders into positions of authority and responsibility in every area of American life, from the ecclesiastical hierarchy of churchianity to the Girl Scouts, from international politics to municipal animal shelters, from organized crime and intercontinental narcotics and human trafficking to neighborhood street gangs... or probably not... the street gangs, that is... neighborhood associations, probably yes.

These millions of anti-Americans whose true loyalties are to other sovereignties or ideologies, along with anti-Christians who have turned from the Lord Jesus Christ to other spiritual powers and principalities, collectively constitute a FIFTH COLUMN that consistently, even against self-interest, opposes whatever is in the best interests of the United States and We the People. Alternatively, this FIFTH COLUMN proposes, enacts, and carries out activities or agendas which contribute to the demise of America or give aid and comfort to her enemies, actions which skirt the bounds of treason just enough to avoid prosecution or expulsion from the game.

Can the United States count on the U.S. citizens and legal residents among the following groups to stand up for the U.S., to email and make calls, to lobby and FAX and speak truth to power, and to muster and fight as soldiers in defense of her sovereignty as an independent nation? Are you depending on someone to have your back who belongs to any of these groups?

Communists, Democratic Socialists, labor unions, Occupy Wall Street squatters, community agitators, rabble-rousers, and disciples of Leon Trotsky, Saul Alinsky, and Ché Guevara;

Globalists (UN, EU, Agenda 21, SPP) and the European elites (the G8, the Fed and the IMF, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Davos Conference, and the Bilderbergers);

The Mus|im Mafia and Is|amic oil fascists, one-fortieth of whose oil profits must fund Mus|im charities, some of which in turn fund terrorism;

White-collar jihadis who lobby for Shari'a and Dar al'Is|am under the auspices of the Council on American-Is|amic Relations (CAIR), the Is|amic Society of North America, (ISNA), or like-motivated Mus|im advocacy groups;

The Open Borders Lobby, e.g., La Raza, LULAC, MEChA, the Latino Catholic Church, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, in their quest for "Amnesty By Whatever Means Necessary or Other," whether by legislation contrary to the will of the voters, by Executive Order overruling the will of the Legislature, or by mob rule blocking the Executive Branch from enforcing the U.S. immigration laws, 8 USC § 1151 ff., effectively annulling those laws, and this one:

"The United States shall guarantee to every state
in this union a republican form of government,
and shall protect each of them against invasion;"
- the U.S. Constitution, Art. iv, § iv(a).

Predatory Shylock banksters, the "greed is good" successors of Mayer Amschel Rothschild and the robber barons of 19th century America - John D. Rockefeller, Astor, Carnegie, Flagler, Gould, Mellon, Morgan, Schwab, Stanford, Vanderbilt, and others;

QE/QE2/QE3 bailout recipients: Goldman Sachs, General Motors, and others too big to fail, at the expense of the full faith and credit of We the People, who are not too big to fail, but who are too insignificant to succeed and prosper and too easily brushed off to win, people whose incomes, real property, and retirement savings are tied to the U.S. paper dollar and to securities denominated in dollars, the value of which depreciates further with each trillion dollar uptick of the federal debt, $16.4 trillion at present;

Financial establishments with agendas which for profit herd the multitudes toward the mark of the beast (the Fed and the IMF; the pushers of consumerism and the American dream, such as advertisers, credit card bureaus, and predatory lenders; insurance companies, government regulatory agencies, and bureaucrats without number); and

Socialized, single-payer ("no choice") health care, which may require chipping people in order to reduce costs - "No chip, no service!" - embedding patient information, including emergency contacts, medications, contraindications, CT and MRI images, and future appointments, as well as medical and insurance records, creditworthiness, payment records, and account status.

Such conventional groupings fail to understandably differentiate the enemies of America from Christians and traditionally patriotic Americans. But it doesn't take a Sherlock Holmes to figure out that the FIFTH COLUMN largely comes from and consists of these U.S. resident enemies of We the People - communists, globalists, banksters, and Is|amists - no less than the Mus|im oil fascists who govern and regulate their own native nations from their Wall St. offices, for the benefit of their nations' oil holdings and the maximization of other nations' oil payments.


(Edited; originally posted as a comment at WND:
"Hagel: terrorists attack because they lack hope.")

For those who question Atty. Orly Taitz's credentials to argue her case before the U.S. Supreme Court:

scotusbar.jpg (image)

But since she is also one of the plaintiffs, the usual proverb about being one's own attorney applies.

White House yanks petition calling for resignation over birth certificate

January 15, 2013 By: Joe Newby

White House pulls petition demanding Obama resign over birth certificate, allegedly fake IDs.
...
A petition posted at the White House website demanding President Obama resign over his birth certificate and social security number was yanked on Monday, claiming it violated the site's terms of participation.

Here is a video of Obama's Kenyan birth certificate in the image -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=WMF51vXblFI

The petition was started by Dr. Orly Taitz, who is well known for her belief that Obama was not born in the United States.

"We petition Barack H. Obama (aka Soetoro aka Soebarkah) to resign due to his use of a stolen CT SSN, forged BC and SS. On February 15, 2013 Supreme Court of the US will hear in conference Noonan et al v Bowen A12606 brought by Attorney Orly Taitz," the petition read.

"This case deals brings forward undeniable evidence of Barack Obama being listed in his school records in Indonesia as an Indonesian Citizen and using his step father’s last name Soetoro. In his mother’s passport records, as a child he was listed under the last name Soebarkah," Taitz added.

"E-verify and SSNVS show him using in his tax returns a CT SSN 042-68-4425, which was never (assigned) to him and Sheriff Arpaio, former Chief investigator for Coast Guard Coffman declare his Selective Service Certificate a forgery," the petition said. "Multiple experts found his alleged birth certificate a forgery with letters of different fonts and sizes. We call for Obama to resign due to his use of forged IDs."

In a press release, Taitz said the petition was removed because the "Obama regime is running scared."

According to Taitz, nearly 1,000 people signed the petition before it was removed.

"Clearly Mr. Obama did not want to answer to the inconvenient truth," Taitz added.

She also promised to "continue fighting this fight" and encouraged others to meet her in front of the White House visitor entrance at 10 a.m. on Jan. 20, and in front of the Supreme Court at 10 am. the next day.

In another press release, Taitz said that Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts has set a conference of the Court on Feb. 15 to determine the merits of her case.

https://www.examiner.com/article/whi...th-certificate

[Re: court martial of Dr. Lakin - my reply to Redbeard at Examiner.com]

I agree, sort of, with Redbeard that LTC Terry Lakin, M.D., wasn't punished for his political beliefs. He was stripped of rank and retirement benefits, "disboarded" or de-licensed to practice medicine, and dismissed from the Army for making waves and disrupting military order by stirring up a public kerfuffle by his legitimate request for the validation of the chain of command through which he was issued orders to Afghanistan. LTC Lakin thereby shone a spotlight upon:

1. Mr. Obama's ineligibility to the Office of President and illegal occupation of the Office of Commander-in-Chief;
2. Mr. Obama's felonious and seditious overthrow of the U.S. Constitution, Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5;
3. Mr. Obama's unlawful masquerading as and impersonating an Officer of the United States; and
4. the usurpation of the Presidency by a constitutionally ineligible impostor who is not a natural born Citizen, that is, "one [a citizen] born in the country of parents who are citizens."

Dr. Lakin's refusal to deploy when denied verification of his chain of command was hardly a mutinous act. It was an act in support, in defense, and upon the authority of the Constitution of the United States, authority which outranked his superior officers in the U.S. Army and Presidents as well. This was not a violation of his military oath, but rather, a necessary verification of the (most dubious) legitimacy of both the issuing authority and the issuing of his orders to combat. Failing the lawfulness of his orders or the issuing authority, the Geneva Convention would not protect LTC Lakin If he were captured by the enemy; rather, the G.C. would renounce or abandon him for waging a private war without legitimate orders from a legitimate head of state or national authority.

As for "mutinous behavior of refusing to deploy," as an officer, LTC Lakin VOLUNTEERED to serve in Afghanistan, and as an officer, he could have UNVOLUNTEERED at any time before his scheduled deployment. Instead of retracting his request to deploy, he courageously requested verification of his chain-of-command, including the CinC, as a condition for volunteering to deploy to Afghanistan.

When the Army failed to honor his quite legitimate request, he had no choice but to refuse what he KNEW to be orders issued by a KNOWN unlawful authority, by a person KNOWN to be misrepresenting himself as an Officer of the United States and the Commander-in-Chief, a KNOWN counterfeit CinC, a KNOWN impostor unlawfully usurping the authority of the Office of President. It was his duty as an officer, sworn to support and defend the Constitution of the United States (but not sworn to obey the President), to disregard orders from a phony CinC because they were unlawfully issued, issued under "the color of law," that is, the appearance, semblance, or pretense of lawful authority assumed by an unlawful authority masquerading as an officer of the law.
Impersonating a Police Officer Lawyers | LegalMatch Law

However, the courts can come back to bite resisters, sometimes determining that the legitimacy of an otherwise valid order outweighs the illegitimacy of the counterfeit authority that issues it. Sometimes an appropriate, normal, and otherwise plainly lawful order stands even if unlawfully issued under the color of law, especially if the legitimate authority, though absent, would have so ordered if he or she were present.

"Have he and the awful obots passed the point of no return... to attempt total dictatorship thru a made up or staged crisis leading to martial law?"

An absolute dictatorship of the U.S. (or North America) is obviously the goal, subjected to (or at the head of) either a Eurocentric one-world government or the worldwide caliphate. A U.S. dictatorship cannot happen without the complicity of the military, or at least its cooperation. So, unless there is an all-out world war, an environmental holocaust, multiplied illegal alien invasions, or fiscal collapse and the economy slowed to a crawl or a creep, martial law would appear to be the route of choice for the enemies of We the People to seize absolute power.

"The military, at least most of it, must be on our side."

You would think so, but then, remember Colin Powell. Also, LTC Terry Lakin was to be the flight surgeon for General of the Army George Casey's staff and pilots in Afghanistan. LTC Lakin was that close to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and yet none of them did anything visible to support his cause, to defend him from Col. Denise Lind's kangaroo court at Fort Meade, or to rescue him from five months of imprisonment in Ft. Leavenworth. Even though the JCS must know the truth about the Counterfeit Commander-in-Chief (CCinC), they made not even a gesture of support for their own man while he resisted the tyrant-in-training-to-be-absolute-despot.

Certainly most of the military must oppose the present usurpation/occupation and the incipient dictatorship, but that does not guarantee that the military will en masse disobey orders from superior officers, especially if those orders are not pointed directly at themselves or at Christians, conservatives, and Constitutionalists as a bloc, but are instead obliquely worded to target the least popular subgroups. When the media have completely demonized those subgroups, and military units have been identified and selected to take them out, the usurpation can launch a false flag provocation to justify the elimination or internment of the demonized subgroups. The subgroup survivors can be punished, prosecuted, or persecuted, making an example of them in such a way as to discourage others from resisting totalitarian rule.

Anonymous #17 wrote, "None of us 'birthers' want Obama killed, we just want the TRUTH."

The last thing any of us wants is to elevate the image or the memory of a street punk conman, 'hood rabble-rouser, homosexual adulterer, dollar-debasing globalist gangster, Stalinist Alinskyite and Sunni Is|amist Enemy-Combatant-in-Chief, to the company of revered and respected martyrs Abraham, Martin, and John.

But the TRUTH? We already have the truth. Jesus is the Christ.
Barack Hussein Obama II is the anti-president, if not worse.

We need for Mr. Obama to be brought to justice for sedition (overthrow) of the U.S. Constitution, Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5, and for tr_as_n against the United States, giving aid and comfort to her enemies, e.g., Fast and Furious and the betrayal in Benghazi, debasing the dollar to the point of default, insolvency, and third world status for America, with unilateral nuclear disarmament and surrender to Soviet nukes and China's subs in the wings, following the U.S. non-support of Israel against atomic bombs from Iran, rockets from Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, arms-for-jihad shipped from al Qaeda and partners on "relief ships" from Turkey, who-knows-what from the Mus|im Brotherhood in Egypt, Libya, and wherever else in the Middle East that the jihadi in the Situation Room creates a power vacuum for the M.B. to fill.

Except the Lord Jesus Christ snatches us up, up, and away from this world going to hell, we Americans are done. If and when He does catch us up and out of trouble, the Americans left behind are done. Either way, the America that remains is done... scraps and trash for the burning. I know of no one but the Rev. Billy Graham who even has hope that America and the Americans that are left can yet turn back from the brink, repent of sin, trust the Lord Jesus Christ for salvation, and be saved unto eternal life. Otherwise... &

Failed E-verify Letter Sent To Barack Obama From Employer Linda Jordan

Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number Flagged By E-verify

Originally Posted by jollyroger88805 at ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com

Originally Posted by Kevin Davidson

One might ask why it is that the President has a Social Security number from Connecticut. We're left to speculate. The most plausible answer I have heard is a processing error where the leading "9" on the SS application was entered as a zero, thereby converting a Honolulu Zip Code to a Connecticut zip code.

This might be a plausible explanation if there were the slightest possibility it were true.

The Social Security office has VERIFIED [in the e-verify letter above] that the SS# [ending in] 4425 DOES NOT [BELONG to] and HAS NOT BEEN ISSUED to Barack Hussein Obama.

When you obots have to make excuse after excuse after excuse for this usurper, you have no basis in truth as to who this man is. The facts are, you have no idea who he is. And like the king who wore no clothes, you are foolishly accepting this fraud.

August 30, 2011 at 4:48 PM

The Connecticut prefix is irrelevant. Forget about it. It has ceased to be an issue, and it no longer matters.

Why? Because the SSA has officially declared with e-Verify that this SSN ending in 4425 does not belong to Mr. Obama. This SSN ending in 4425 was never issued to Mr. Obama, no matter where he lived, and no matter to which state the SS# was assigned. That is the official and authoritative conclusion of the matter, directly from the SSA by way of e-Verify.

Linda Jordan's letter, related articles, and videos are here.

Saturday, May 22, 2010

Obama guilty of at least one felony punishable by $250,000 fine and up to 5 years in prison, Got Justice!?

Obama Guilty of a Felony !?

by obfelony


Background

It has been reported that Barack Hussein Obama has used various Social Security numbers. These have been derived from national databases. Most of the ones reported are most likely erroneous information. However, there is one that stands out. It is the number nnn-nn-4425 that was issued [for] the state of Connecticut. It is this number that he has fraudulently used (and possibly still uses), and thus he is guilty of multiple felonies.

Evidence

The following pictures show the result of a Freedom of Information request of Barack Hussein Obama's Selective Service registration. The main thing to notice from this is the Selective Service number he was issued : 61-1125539-1.

Now, by going on the Selective Service page and doing a search on :

Last Name: Obama

Social Security number: ***-**-4425 (you know the numbers by now - just fill in the asterisks)

Birth Date August 4, 1961,

you get this resulting record.

The record corresponds to the Selective Service registration number 61-1125539-1, the one issued to Barack Obama as shown per the FOIA request. This is 100 % verifiable proof that an official government record exists in the name of Barack Obama, using the [fraudulent] Social Security number ***-**-4425.

You can do the search yourself ( you may get the message that the record has been accessed too many times, but through persistence you will get the record - go on at different times during the day. (If you try between 12 AM and 3AM EST, you may get it just as they reset the count. They don't indicate how many times the record can be viewed, so it may take some time to get it. It took me about a week of trying).

As you may well know, Social Security numbers are issued to a person corresponding to the state where said person was residing when the number was applied for. Also, the first 3 digits of the number indicate which state that is. The 042 number, the one Barack Obama used in his Selective Service application, indicates the number was issued from Connecticut[, which was assigned all the 3-digit prefixes from 040 through 049].

This begs the question. How can someone who has never resided in the state of Connecticut (especially before the age of 18 ) get a social security number issued [for] that state ? The answer is - he couldn't.

Thus, this is an illegal use of a social security number - a felony.

[But even that is immaterial. The official SSA ruling, through e-Verify, is that this SSN ending in 4425 was not issued to Barack Hussein Obama II, and it is not his SSN - it does not belong to him. So his use of this SSN, which is not his, is illegal, and it would still be illegal even if he did have a mailing address in Connecticut!]

Also by [using] this number [which was not his, officially, according to e-Verify in the previous post], [to register] for Selective Service, he has committed another felony, punishable by a $250,000 fine and up to 5 years in prison. Another question is also posed by this. Why use a fraudulent number when it would be very easy to get a legitimate one issued? Who is this man?

[ED.: Why? Because he may have been unable to obtain a SSN if he had not been naturalized after returning from Indonesia as an Indonesian citizen. Even if he had been naturalized or had his prior U.S. citizenship reinstated, it may have been awkward, a hassle, inconvenient, or a passage fraught with red tape to maneuver the obstacles in the way of getting ID again after having lost one's U.S. citizenship in the past. It would have been so much easier for his grandmother, Toot Dunham, who worked as a volunteer in the Honolulu County Judge of Probate Office, to lift several newly inactive - but not yet deleted - SSN's from dead people's records. ]

Obama guilty of at least one felony punishable by $250,000 fine and up to 5 years in prison, Got Justice!? | Birther Report: Obama Release Your Records

CRIMINAL IMPOSTOR WHO USURPED THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT SWORN IN, AGAIN

By: Devvy
January 21, 2013
NewsWithViews.com


The public inauguration day this round is today because yesterday was a Sunday. The "official" swearing in was yesterday and it has been reported Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama, was to use Lincoln's Bible. Good old Abraham Lincoln:


An African-American Icon Speaks Truth to the Lincoln Cult


"Bennett is especially critical of how the Lincoln Cult uses black historical figures as pawns in its defense of "Father Abraham." For example, he contends that there is no way to get around the fact that Lincoln was a lifelong white supremacist, loudly proclaiming that he was opposed to "making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people." He said far worse things than that, as Bennett documents. The typical response of the Lincoln Cult is to "find a slave or a former slave or, better, a Black officeholder to say that he adores Lincoln and doesn't care what people say . . . "


"Why, one would ask, is such a distinguished African-American journalist so incensed over the Lincoln myth? It is because of his twenty years of painstaking research, resulting in this book, that proves, among other things, what a vulgar racist Lincoln was. Bennett provides quote after quote of Lincoln's own words, habitually using the N-word so much that people in Washington thought he was weirdly consumed by his racism. Bennett tells of first-hand accounts by some of Lincoln's generals of how they left a meeting with him during a crisis in the war in which the president spent most of his time in the meeting telling off-color "darkie" jokes (Lincoln's language). General James Wadsworth, for example, was "shocked by the racism in the Lincoln White House."


The joke is on Barry Soetoro.


For the second time, a criminal who is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office, will be sworn in by turn coat, Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, John Roberts.


Law offices of Orly Taitz


"Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court. The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.


"Please, keep in mind, Richard Nixon was reelected and sworn in, but later was forced to resign as a result of Watergate. over 30 high ranking officials of Nixon administration including Attorney General of the United States and White House Co-counsel were indicted, convicted and went to prison. Obama Forgerygate is a hundred times bigger then Watergate. More corrupt high ranking officials, US Attorneys, AGs and judges were complicit, committed high treason by allowing a citizen of Indonesia and possibly still a citizen of Kenya Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro to usurp the U.S. Presidency by use of forged IDs and a stolen Social security number."

So, on February 15, 2013, three weeks after the usurper is "sworn" into office, once AGAIN justices on the U.S. Supreme Court will look at the evidence millions have already seen! Is this not incredible?


Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama, released a forged birth certificate to the world. There isn't a scintilla of proof he was born in Hawaii. Despite what $16 million dollar a year pimp, Bill O'Reilly says, two ads in a newspaper in Hawaii does not qualify as proof Soetoro was born there. It sure as heck doesn't qualify him as a 'natural born citizen'. But, then, O'Reilly certainly has never let facts stand in his way as he bloviates five nights a week.


There's no question Soetoro's Selective Service Registration Card was altered; a forgery and a felony. It also means he cannot hold any job in the U.S. government: Register for the Draft: It's Still the Law - "Federal Jobs - men born after December 31, 1959 must be registered to be eligible for jobs in the Executive Branch of the Federal government and the U.S. Postal Service." Soetoro should have to pay back his salary and more than a billion dollars in expenses to the American people.


It has already been proven Soetoro's SSN didn't clear with E-Verify, the program designed to check SSNs to keep illegals from obtaining employment in the U.S. E-Verify says Soetoro's SSN doesn't match his name. Now, is he an illegal alien on top of all his other crimes?


There's no question in my mind his passport records were sanitized:

Two Fired for Viewing Obama Passport File


Did CIA pick sanitize Obama's passport records?


February 15, 2013, won't be the first time the U.S. Supreme Court has looked at Soetoro.

Chief Justice John Roberts Meets with Obama in Private (January 15, 2009)


"To say I was floored when I read the news item is an understatement. A 'ceremonial' meeting between a president elect and justices of the Supreme Court is somewhat traditional. HOWEVER, in this instance, it's flat out wrong. Chief Justice Roberts has cases on the docket where Obama is the defendant or is the subject of the litigation. Roberts and the other eight justices have already held two 'Distribution for Conferences' on the Donofrio and Wrotnoski cases on Obama's citizenship ineligibility. They just turned away one of Phil Berg's cases a few days ago; that one is still in the Third Circuit. Tomorrow is the fourth case; another from Phil Berg.


"On Wednesday, Roberts meets with the man at the heart of that case in private. Two days later, he sits down to discuss the case with the other justices after having a closed door meeting with the defendant! There is still the Lightfoot v Bowen case to be heard in conference, January 23, 2009. Again, Chief Justice Roberts will sit in that private meeting to discuss whether the case should go to oral arguments. Does anyone see major conflict of interest here? How can Chief Justice Roberts meet with Obama behind closed doors under such circumstances?"


Think most of those justices don't know at this point and time Soetoro is the biggest fraud (next to the "Federal" Reserve Banking Act of 1913) in the history of this country?


Justice Clarence Thomas: We're 'evading' eligibility


"U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told a House subcommittee that when it comes to determining whether a person born outside the 50 states can serve as U.S. president, the high court is “evading” the issue. The comments came as part of Thomas’ testimony before a House appropriations panel discussing an increase in the Supreme Court's budget earlier this week."


Some joke, Justice Thomas.


During the fake presidential election race in 2008, Barry Soetoro, solicited campaign funds via the Internet, boob tube and radio to the tune of about $700 million dollars. There have been several indepth articles about hundreds of millions being illegal foreign donors and no one, not the FEC or the gutless cowards in the Outlaw Congress has done anything about it. Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Obama, aka Barack Dunham, aka Barry Dunham, is in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1343, wire fraud. The Criminal-in-Chief did the same thing this last fake election; $1.6 billion. Wire fraud is a federal felony. For those crimes alone, if convicted, he would serve the rest of his miserable life in a federal prison where he belongs. Let's not forget using the U.S. Post Office to solicit campagn funds: mail fraud. Also a federal felony.


When Soetoro was sworn in by Roberts in 2008, he committed perjury. He will do the same at the public ceremony today. How many crimes will it take?


Going on five years, judges from several states, several Secretary's of State, the U.S. Supreme Court, former Gov. Linda Lingel of Hawaii and EVERY member of the Outlaw Congress, including Michelle Bachmann, Ron Paul, Jim DeMint, have all allowed this incredible, blatant usurpation of an office never seen in the history of this country. Gutless cowards, all of them. This is an on-going conspiracy that should be either a federal or state RICO case.
Why have they all covered up the truth? It's two fold.


First, Soetoro is bi-racial. Half Negro (black is not a race) and half Caucasian (white is not a race). Apparently, Americans with dark skin like being called black. I don't, because if we're ever going to be a color blind country, stop using colors to define an athlete or the first (race) to win an Oscar or the first (race) to become a mayor. Anyway, the assumption has been that if Soetoro was found to be constitutionally ineligible, which he is because of his dual citizenship, black Americans would burn down the country. However, using the excuse of something that might happen cannot ever be an excuse to allow someone to usurp the office of President of these united States of America.


Second, since Soetoro was and is forever constitutionally ineligible, every bill he's signed is not a law. They are all null and void. Every treaty he's signed is null and void. Every federal judicial appointment, including the U.S. Supreme Court are all null and void. Not to mention his unlawful actions as Commander-in-Chief. A constitutional crisis of immense proportions, but one that can be dealt with rationally.


On January 9, 2009, every member of the Outlaw Congress sat mute, including hot shots like Michelle Bachmann, Ron Paul, Jim DeMint and other so-called leaders, while the electoral college votes were read and accepted. Not one had the courage to stand up for the U.S. Constitution or their oath of office. The issue of Soetoro's eligibility was raging at the time and they knew it.


On January 4, 2013, once again, not one member of the U.S. House of Representatives or one member of the unlawfully seated U.S. Senate, not one had the courage to stand up and stop the vote. Millions of Americans know the truth and Congress knows the truth. Every member of Congress was sent a package with the concrete evidence of Soetoro's crimes. Not one stood up for the truth.


Soetoro cannot be impeached. He has never held the office of president because he usurped the office. Because he was ineligible in 2008 and 2012, no one had the right to vote for him. Period.


The Oval Office has been vacant since George Bush left office.

It is still empty.


Is there any other way the putative president could be removed from office other than a quo warranto action? Mario Apuzzo, is an attorney who has been representing plaintiffs in cases involving the putative president's ineligibility. Mario has raised the issue of standing, a judicial hallucination, in a case, Bond v. United States, 564 U. S. decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, June 16, 2011 [emphasis mine]:


"Applying the Bond decision to a case challenging Obama's eligibility, one would have to be criminally charged or be compelled to pay money under a statute passed by Congress when Obama was President. One would argue that under Article I, Section 7, Clause 2, laws passed by Congress need the action or inaction of the President (the veto power) before they are allowed to become laws. This requirement satisfies separation of powers and checks and balances doctrine. One would argue that Congress passed the charging statute, with the President's action or inaction. One would argue that a legitimate President must satisfy the eligibility requirements of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, which contains the "natural born Citizen" clause. Then one would argue that the law is not valid because it never was presented to a legitimate President for consideration under Article I, Section 7, Clause 2, arguing that Obama is not a legitimate President because he does not meet the requirements of the "natural born Citizen" clause..."


Dr. Edwin Vieira raised this very remedy way back in Dec. 2008:


"For a extensive class of litigants who absolutely do have “standing” to challenge Obama’s eligibility will come into existence, and demand relief as a matter of undeniable constitutional right and practical necessity, as soon as Obama’s Department of Justice attempts to enforce through criminal prosecutions some of the controversial legislation that the new Congress will enact and Obama will sign—such as statutes aimed at stripping common Americans of the firearms to which (in Obama’s derisive terminology) they “cling.”


"For example, in a criminal prosecution under a new statute that reinstates the Clinton “assault-weapons ban” (or some equally obnoxious affront to Article I, Section 8, Clauses 15 and 16 and the Second Amendment), the defendant will undeniably have “standing” to challenge the indictment on the grounds that no statute imposing such a ban even exists, because the original “Bill which passed the House of Representatives and the Senate” was never “presented to the President of the United States”, and therefore could never “become a Law,” inasmuch as the supposed “President,” Barack Obama, being constitutionally ineligible for that office, was then and remains thereafter nothing but an usurper. [See Article I, Section 7, Clause 2 and Article II, Section 1, 4]


"Plainly, a criminal trial arising under a supposed law of the United States is a “Case” to which “the judicial Power [of the United States] shall extend”; and the defense as well will raise a specific issue “arising under th[e] Constitution, [and] the Laws of the United States.” [Article III, Section 2, Clause 1] The defendant will be suffering serious “injury in fact:” namely, a criminal indictment and a compulsory trial, with the possibility of a conviction, imprisonment, and, if the infraction is called a “felony,” the forfeiture of many civil rights even after his release from incarceration. The prosecutor on one side and the defendant on the other will be adversaries espousing diametrically opposed and irreconcilable positions—so the “Case” cannot be deemed in any way collusive. The purported statute's invalidity by virtue of its legal nonexistence will be “ripe” for decision, because the statute is the basis for the indictment, and its invalidity the foundation of the defense to the charge. And, unless and until the prosecutor importunes the court to dismiss the indictment with prejudice, the issue of the putative statute's legal nonexistence and inapplicability to the defendant will be anything but moot."


A federal grand jury could indict him for all the crimes above and probably more, but it will never happen with the racist unlawfully holding the office of Attorney General, Eric Holder. That's right. Biden, Holder - the whole bunch of them were nominated by an impostor who does not hold the office of president. The same for the two socialists on the Supreme Court, Kagan and Sotomayor.


Soetoro is a private citizen and can be indicted and charged for all of the above crimes. Larry Klayman, famed attorney who started Judicial Watch, has been working to use a grand jury; see here. Any Attorney General in any state, I believe, could go for a state RICO:

"Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations or RICO is defined as a pattern of racketeering activity connected to an enterprise. The law defines 35 offenses as constituting racketeering, including gambling, murder, kidnapping, arson, drug dealing, bribery, mail and wire fraud to name a few. These crimes are known as "predicate" offenses. To charge under RICO, at least two predicate crimes within 10 years must have been committed through the enterprise. RICO crimes can be either civil or criminal depending on the type of activity and their punishment is enforced by international, federal and state laws. To consult State Legislation regarding RICO laws and regulations please see the Criminal Code by State page." Also covered is identity theft. We have no idea who Barry Soetoro is and that is a national security threat.

Never in my life have I ever seen anything like this; Watergate pales in comparison. The breadth and scope of this ongoing conspiracy is staggering. The fact that members of the U.S. Supreme Court are going to actually sit in conference and consider evidence of crimes against the fraud the Chief Justice just swore less than a month before is, well, one can hardly find the words.

The hubris of the malignant, narcissist and habitual liar playing our president is unmatched in the history of this country. We are not going away, Barry Soetoro. You and that militant Marxist you're married to will have we the people doing everything in our power to drive your sorry backside out of office. In the meantime, I believe pursuing state Attorney General's to step forward and go for a grand jury and/or a RICO is one we should focus on. If you belong to a large group, gather as many signatures as you can, write a paper outlining the evidence, what witnesses could be called and petition for your Republican Attorney General to go after Soetoro. Here is the list of Attorney General's for all 50 states. Politely remind them about their next election.

Important links:
1- Emergency Motion Filed: National Archives Caught Altering Hawaii Arrival Records For August 7, 1961
2- Dozens of cowardly judges have used the judicial hallucination called 'standing'
3- Sheriff Joe Arpaio Press Conference - Full Video 7.17.12
4- Remove the Tyrant Now
5- Justice Sotomayor: Tax Evasion, Perjury - What Did Obama Know & When?
6- GOP Senators Ignore Sotomayor's Criminal Activities
© 2013 - NewsWithViews.com and Devvy - All Rights Reserved


Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country. She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party.
Devvy's regularly posted new columns are on her site at: www.devvy.com. You can also sign up for her free email alerts.
E-mail is: devvyk@npn.net


Devvy Kidd -- Criminal impostor who usurped the office of president sworn in, again