Page 571 of 574 FirstFirst ... 71471521561567568569570571572573574 LastLast
Results 5,701 to 5,710 of 5731
Like Tree97Likes

Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

  1. #5701
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    [ED.: Often dissed and despised but never disproven, Dr. Ron Polland. Ph.D., was among the early dissenters against The Emperor Who Has No Birth Certificate. His 2008 videos exposing the fraudulent COLB blew the hinges off the gate of the vault of the castle of The Emperor WHNBC. Here's the current scoop from the document validation expert, the latest words from the horse's mouth, as it were.]

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Ron Poland, commenting as "DRRJP"
    [Posted on January 24, 2015 at 6:24 pm, as a comment to a Jan 23rd article by Norvell Rose, "Here’s How A Furious Obama White House Is Reportedly Freaking Out Over Israel’s Defiant Netanyahu", published at Western Journalism.]

    You’re right on the money, Twiper1. I’ve been saying it since 2008. He has done so much more to confirm what Obama’s lawyers, the DNC. and the media spent hundreds of millions of dollars to keep hidden at the very beginning of the 2008 campaign – that he’s not just someone who was raised in a Muslim country as a child, but has been an active part of Islam all his life.

    The current Muslim plot to destroy America from within had its roots going back to 1973 and two adversarial groups of Sunni Muslims joined forces to formulate this 40-year old plan. Both the Sunnis of Saudi Arabia and the Sunnis of the Muslim Brotherhood put into motion a plan to infiltrate the American government and military with Muslim operatives .

    However, the ultimate plot – the end game – was to raise, train, and groom the mixed racial son of Malcolm X (aka Malik El Shabazz) to be put on the political fast track to the White House.

    This was the brain child of King Faisal – who knew Malcolm X when he was still Prince Faisal. When the Prince became a King, that’s when Malcolm’s plan to Islamicize America, beginning with its 22 million Blacks, found a fervent supporter and financial backer in King Feisal. Obama’s bow to King Abdullah was his way of thanking the Saudi Kingdom for helping him become the President of the United States.

    Faisal realized that the only way to defeat Israel and America would be to make America an enemy of Israel and an ally of Islam. To do that required infiltrating America with operatives from the radical strains of Orthodox Sunni Islam: Wahabbism (from Saudi Arabia) and Salafism (from the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood).

    The other part of the plan was to build thousands of mosques and fund Middle Eastern studies departments in every university to proselytize to the young minds of college students. What was done in higher education was repeated in secondary and primary education via revisionist history and the whitewashing of global Muslim conquests.

    In recent years, other, even more violent and intolerant strains of Orthodox Sunni Islam have been spawned, such as Boku Haram, Ansar al Sharia, and the amalgam of Al Qaeda groups from Iraq and Syria who formed the nucleus of ISIS.

    Although Faisal disliked Communists, too, his hatred for Zionists (the Jews of Israel and the rest of the world) was as pathological as it was irrational.

    It was Faisal who convinced OPEC, the Muslim/Arab conglomerate of oil-producing nations, to use oil as a weapon against America for helping prevent Israel’s destruction during the despicable Yom Kippur War (Israel’s “Pearl Harbor” with Egyptians and Syrians playing the part of Imperial Japan) by raising the cost of crude oil and by cutting back on exports.

    This was tantamount to an act of aggression against the United States by Saudi Arabia that led to the infamous gas crisis of 1973 with its forced gas rationing and long lines of cars waiting at service stations.

    It made Faisal a world-renowned hero and a multi-billionaire to boot. But, it also cost the OPEC nations a lot of lost revenue that it had previously been getting from the sale of oil to America. So, the oil-as-a-weapon idea was scrapped in favor of the plan to destroy America from within.

    Today, history is repeating itself as the Saudis have orchestrated a price war on the US by selling its oil at prices that undercut the cost of American-produced oil and cut into the profits from American-exported oil. That’s why the price of gas has dropped at the pump and it is not a good thing for America’s survival.

    We export 18% of the oil we produce to other countries. We could stop having to buy oil from the Saudis tomorrow if we used our own oil instead. If we did, we’d be cutting out the middle man {in the Middle East} and letting sales volume compensate for an oil company’s net profits – which are only 3% as the vast majority of oil profits are reinvested into the company’s Exploration and R&D Divisions.

    American oil companies do not receive subsidies. That is a bald-faced lie told by the Left. Oil companies receive tax incentives for reducing exports to hostile countries and using its own oil to supplant imports from hostile countries as well.

    However, the environmental lunatics on the Left don’t want America to use anything petroleum-based or to be energy-independent since they actively want us to be under the control of the real New World Order – the oil barons of the Middle East, Asia, and South America.

    What we have been doing flies in the face of logic: we could use our own American-produced energy instead of having to buy it from all the countries that hate us and want to destroy us, too, along with Israel.

    Also just as insane is claiming that “It’s the Zionists” who want to take over more Arab/Muslim land and create a “Greater Israel” in the Middle East when the exact opposite has been happening every year since 1949 and after every defensive war fought in which they captured territory from the aggressors who attacked them and, according to international law, do not have to return.

    If the Left wants to talk about a real illegal occupation that the UN and the rest of the world has done nothing to end, is the occupation of Cyprus by Turkey.

    Israel has been unilaterally giving up pieces of its own land – including land it legally purchased before becoming a state – to people who have no legal right to take it and, as a result, Israel has become smaller while Muslim countries continue to expand their imperial conquests of other people’s lands.

    The Muslim world, with a few exceptions like Egypt and Iran who have legitimate historical claims to its land, acquired all of the land it now occupies by violent conquest or by nonviolent immigration and depopulation. The Muslim world would not exist if not for its conquest and occupation of half of the known world that began in the 7th Century and lasted for 14 centuries until the 20th Century when its empire was cut up into independent countries to satisfy nationalistic desires. However, the conquests have never really stopped and in the 21st Century, they are back with a vengeance.

    Claiming that Israel (“Zionists”) control American foreign policy is a sick joke and one of the Lies of the Century. The Saudi Lobby makes the so-called Israel lobby seem like a lemonade stand. The Left’s slobbering love affair with Islam is behind the constant effort to hide and distort the truth about imperialistic, totalitarian Islam that is an ideology and not a religion.

    It is the world of Muslim invaders who are the ones actively seeking world domination and stifling the ability to speak the truth about it.

    Obama sits back and watches his Muslim terrorist pals terrorize, torture, and butcher men, women, and children who are Christians, Hindus, Alawites, Yazidis, or who belong to another non-Islamic religious group in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia.

    BUT, whenever Israel wants to build a few apartments ON ITS OWN LAND and protect itself from terrorists who are no different than ISIS, Obama goes ballistic and acts as if apartment building is not only far worse than the subhuman atrocities committed in the name of Allah, but it is an “obstacle to peace” with people who want Israel wiped from the face of the earth and every Jew living there to be exterminated. That is what is written in their government’s charters and is repeated daily on local TV and every Friday in their mosques.

    Obama has repeatedly said that, “AS PRESIDENT, IT IS ‘HIS JOB’ TO DEFEND ISLAM.” And everyone else except US citizens. He told the world that the future must not belong to infidels. Nothing “insults” the “Prophet of Islam” more than seeing non-Muslims living their own lives and enjoying personal freedoms and liberties that are non-existent under Sharia Law.

    Non-Muslims “offend” Muslims by the mere fact of NOT BEING MUSLIMS. What “offends” Muslims the most is refusing to submit to Sharia, and refusing to worship a foreign prophet and a foreign god.


    How many times did Obama spit in Netanyahu’s face?

    How many secret meetings did he have with Iran’s mullahs, the Taliban leaders, Muslim Brotherhood, Mohamoud Abbas?

    How about his double violation of the Logan Act when he met with Iran and Maliki of Iraq as a Candidate?

    Obama is constantly spitting on Israel. Whattaschmuck!
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  2. #5702
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    [ED.: off-topic. I will cheerfully remove this
    post upon request by other than an Obot.]

    Muslim Brotherhood Calls for
    “Long, Uncompromising Jihad” 2 Days after Meeting with Obama State Department

    Saturday, January 31, 2015

    People can call the Muslim Brotherhood and their front groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations [CAIR], Islamic Society of North America [ISNA] and others as “harmless” and “peaceful” all they want. However, the reality is quite different. Following a meeting with the Obama State Department, the Muslim Brotherhood [MB] declared an open jihad in Egypt.

    The State Department hosted a delegation of Muslim Brotherhood-aligned leaders concerning their opposition to Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. One of those delegates, Waleed Sharaby, posed for a picture, which he posted on his Facebook page. Note the infamous four finger R4BIA he flashes for the camera, the same hand sign put up by Obama’s former Homeland Security advisor Mohamed Elibiary.

    MB delegate Waleed Sharaby

    [Continued at ]

    Quote Originally Posted by Screeminmeeme at PatriotUpdate . com
    The Mus1im Brotherhood’s goal is to turn the world into an Is1amist empire. Founded in Egypt in 1928, it is a revolutionary fundamentalist movement to restore the caliphate and strict shariah (Is1amist) law in Mus1im lands and, ultimately, the world. Today, it has chapters in 80 countries. It is behind nearly every Mus1im organization in the US, and responsible for promoting jihad worldwide.

    The Mus1im Brotherhood advocates a deceptive strategy in democracies: appear moderate and use existing institutions to gain power. “The civilizational-jihadist process… is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house… so that it is eliminated and [A11ah]’s religion is made victorious over all other religions,” reads a US Mus1im Brotherhood 1991 document. It believes it can conquer Europe peacefully:

    “It is in the nature of Is1am to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its law on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet.” —Mus1im Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna

    And Obama and many in his administration are associated in one way or other to this anti-American organization.
    Quote Originally Posted by Screeminmeeme at PatriotUpdate . com
    Obama is a stealth jihadist on a mission to expedite the reestablishment of the caliphate while destroying the one country that can prevent it. There is absolutely no other logical rationale to explain his treasonous anti-American policies that he has implemented over 6 years. He has been using tactical deceit, practicing al taquiyya, the lying sanctioned and rewarded in Is1am for helping to advance the 'faith' thru duplicity.
    Quote Originally Posted by MuslimLuvChrist at PatriotUpdate . com
    The goal of the Mus1im Brotherhood (MB) is to subjugate the world under the Quran and Sharia Law. Al-Qaeda / ISIS (obama is a [MB] member) is a spinoff of the MB; but its recent actions indicate that it is the military arm of the MB. MB not only meets with obama, but is inside the obama administration. All of the following individuals have deep ties to the MB:

    1 Arif Alikhan – Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

    2 Mohammed Elibiary – Homeland Security Adviser.

    3 Rashad Hussain – Special Envoy to the (OIC) Organization of the Is1amic Conference.

    4 Salam al-Marayati – Obama Advisor and founder, Mus1im Public Affairs Council (and its current executive director).

    5 Imam Mohamed Magid – Obama’s Sharia Czar – Is1amic Society of North America.

    6 Eboo Patel – Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships.

    America’s Anti-Israeli President

    Peter Wehner 01.29.2015 - 5:55 P

    I wanted to add to Jonathan’s post on President Obama and Israel, but perhaps sharpen some points just a bit.

    The Obama administration is unusually petty and sophomoric. The attacks leveled against Israel’s ambassador to the United States, Ron Dermer, are part of a troubling pattern in which officials in the Israeli government–including and especially Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu–are vilified.

    No world leader has been treated by President Obama and his administration with the contempt they have shown Prime Minister Netanyahu–from this snub in 2010 to being called a “coward” and “chicken***** prime minister” by senior administration officials.

    But the problem goes much deeper than a personality clash. President Obama is, quite simply, anti-Israel. In every conceivable situation and circumstance, the president and his aides give the benefit of the doubt not to Israel but to its enemies. This despite the fact that Israel is among America’s longest and best allies, democratic, lawful, takes exquisite steps to prevent civilian deaths in nations committed to destroying it, and has made extraordinary sacrifices for peace. No matter; the pressure that’s applied is always applied most against Israel–even when, as in last year’s conflict with Hamas, Israel was the victim of lethal attacks.

    This is morally shameful. In a world filled with despotic leaders and sadistic and ruthless regimes–North Korea, Iran, Syria, Cuba, Eritrea, Sudan, Somalia, on and on–which nation alone does Mr. Obama become “enraged” at? Which is the object of his disdain? Which provokes his white-hot anger?

    Answer: Israel. Has it struck you, as it has struck me, that with every other nation, including the most repressive and anti-American on earth, Mr. Obama is careful never to give offense, t always extend the olive branch, and to treat their leaders with unusual deference and respect? Except for the Jewish State of Israel. It always seems to be in the Obama crosshair.

    Because this attitude is so detached from objective circumstances and the actions of Israel and the actions of the adversaries of Israel, something else–and something rather disquieting–is going on here. Mr. Obama wouldn’t be the first world leader to have an irrational animus against Israel. He’s not even the first American president to have an irrational animus against Israel. (See: Jimmy Carter.) But it is fair to say, I think, that no American president has been this consistently hostile to Israel while in office or shown such palpable anger and scorn for it and for Israel’s leader.

    Quote Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC on 8-15-2014 View Post
    Six (only six?) examples [in which] Obama
    is purposefully enabling the Is1amist cause

    Written by Allen West on August 13, 2014

    Image: via Pat Dollard

    The only plausible explanation for many actions taken by President Obama and his administration is that they are working counter to the security of the United States of America.

    How else can one rationalize the following:

    1. The unilateral release of five senior Taliban back to the enemy while the enemy is still fighting us.

    2. Providing weapons of support to the Mus1im Brotherhood-led Egyptian government — F-16s and M1A1 Abrams tanks — but not to the Egyptian government after the Is1amist group has been removed.

    3. Negotiations with Qatar and Turkey, two Is1amist-supporting countries.

    4. Negotiations with Hamas, a terrorist group.

    5. Returning sanction money, to the tune of billions of dollars, back to the theocratic regime led by Iran’s ayatollahs, and allowing them to march on towards nuclear capability.

    6. Obama’s evident support of Is1amists in Libya.

    In an operation that was again unilateral with no Congressional approval, U.S. military support and resources were given to Is1amist groups fighting against Moammar Qaddafy — and we know the results of that action. Not long after, one of the groups this administration armed, Ansar al-Sharia, took responsibility for the terrorist attack and murder of our U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Ty Woods, and Glenn Doherty at the Benghazi Special Mission Compound (SMC). Oh, and that same group claims it has established an Is1amic caliphate in eastern Libya, based in Benghazi. Just two weeks ago, the United States of America evacuated the Libyan embassy in Tripoli due to security concerns.

    But I guess it’s all hunky-dory there now, because according to the Washington Free Beacon, “The Obama administration has lifted longtime restrictions on Libyans attending flight schools in the United States and training here in nuclear science, according to a final amendment of the ban recently approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).”

    “Less than two years after the deadly terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is poised to sign off on an amendment reversing the ban, which was enacted following a wave or terrorist attacks in [the] 1980s, and [which] prevents Libyans from studying these sensitive trades in the United States.”

    We just evacuated Libya due to security concerns. There can be no doubt that Libya is an Is1amic terrorist sanctuary state, thanks in no uncertain terms to Obama, and now he wants them to come here and learn how to fly planes and understand nuclear science?

    Ok Lucy, ‘splain this to me.

    The Free Beacon says “the original law effectively disqualified all Libyan nationals and those 'acting on behalf of Libyan entities' from training in 'aviation maintenance, flight operations, or nuclear-related fields,'” according to the ban. “'The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is amending its regulations by rescinding the regulatory provisions promulgated in 1983 that terminated the non-immigrant status and barred the granting of certain immigration benefits to Libyan nationals and foreign nationals acting on behalf of Libyan entities who are engaging in or seeking to obtain studies or training in [
    aviation maintenance, flight operations, or nuclear-related fields],'' the amendment states.”

    DHS spokesperson S.Y. Lee ... told the Free Beacon that the Obama administration is reviewing its policies towards Libya “to see how they might be updated to better align with U.S. interests,” in light of its revolution.

    If I may interject here, Libya is not a stable country, and there can be no alignment with U.S. interests as long as there are al-Qaida affiliated groups freely operating in that country.

    Of course, this action is taken when the House and Senate [are] away on a five-week hiatus from D.C., but at least the House Judiciary Committee responded by acknowledging, “The terror threat continues and numerous news reports document recent terror-related activities coming from Libya.”

    Why wouldn’t [or why doesn't] the Obama administration allow Kurdish Peshmerga members to come to America and receive flight training so they could be given quality helicopter gunships and destroy ISIS? Can anyone explain what the strategy and objective is here in lifting this ban with a nation that is or should be on the terrorist watch list?

    Sorry, but I can only explain this one way: Barack Hussein Obama is an Is1amist in his foreign policy perspectives and supports their cause. You can go back and listen to his 2009 speech in Cairo, where Mus1im Brotherhood associates were seated front and center.

    All the circumstantial and anecdotal evidence points to that conclusion. The pivot away from the Middle East seems to be nothing more than an opportunity to enable Is1amists and their goals. Anyone supporting this Libyan ban being lifted is indeed an enemy of this state [the U.S.].

    The Obama administration’s foreign policy doctrine is self-described as “don’t do stupid [stuff]”. But I guess that all depends on what your ultimate goal is.


    A few of the associated comments:

    Nora Patterson-Vance
    There are 35 known terrorist training camps here in the US. Our Government knows about it and the US Constitution protects them. What’s the plan here, Mr. West?

    Will those in the US and especially… those in the world — who are empowered by this President… also figure out a way to get a similarly compliant US President elected in 2016???


    “Barack Hussein Obama is an Is1amist in his foreign policy perspectives and supports their cause.” Thank you, Sir, for finally stating what [we] “conspiracy theorists” have believed for so long. Obama is out to destroy this country and help his friends, the Mus1im Brotherhood, take over. The American people turn on politicians when a war, with terrorists who attacked our country, lasts too long for their liking. (Even though the military is still an all volunteer force, who gets the big picture.) The terrorist plan and think in centuries. How do we change our collective mindset to fight this?

    Mari Alvarez
    As a 25 year veteran cop, I can say it’s not too often that anyone is convicted on “direct” evidence. If this were a court case, the “circumstantial” evidence of the past 6 years would have convicted Obama as an Is1amic sympathizer 10 X’s over.

    PA Riggs
    Start thinking and looking for people in your local communities who are like-minded, or just open-minded, and start changing the way business is done there, and it must be pushed up. Stop believing the msm propaganda of either party, and use the sense God gave us to sort through the [chaff,] and converse and debate about what’s going on. There are plenty of mccain’s in washington who are working towards the same progressive agenda as john kerry, so how do we get rid of the scum! Oust them all. There should be term limits.

    Alan R. Thomas
    So when are our military leaders going to step in and uphold their oath “to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign AND domestic”?

    Nadine Faber
    Yes, we believe this. You cannot believe otherwise when you listen and watch what he is doing, it is not in the best interest of US, our Nation, our National Security… I heard a general state that the military in the WH are going to have to stand up for the Nation instead of obama at some point, choosing between the president and the Nation. I believe in my heart this is the time they are going to have to choose between obeying the president or defending American and the American People, protecting our national interests and rights and freedoms.

    • gregzimmerman007
      EVERYONE in the military has taken an oath to protect the country against the enemy foreign and domestic. The biggest problem is that Obama is an Alinsky radical where you “blend in” like a spy who has infiltrated a place, our American government.

      And now that Obama holds the reigns to the military, with the horse (military) out in front of [tied behind?] the cart (the POTUS and government), it’s going to be tough for the horse to get things turned around to deal with this.

      Plus, Obama replaced 200 top brass with people who are loyal to him first and the USA second, which means they may be incapable of turning against him because of their promised loyalty (like Hitler and his SS).

      I think it is going to take an Act of God to take out Obama, and Obama has A1lah fully on his side now.

      • Wendy Slafka
        You mean he has Satan fully on his side now, didn’t you?

    Savage Patriot
    How can this not be called what it is TREASON!

    • colint
      Obama has embargoed shipments to Israel of the Hellfire missile which was being used to destroy Hamas missiles before they were fired. He is helping Hamas that is responsible for forcing civilians to be where missiles are being fired.

    And so he should be removed by the the highest level military General asap. Why is this not imminent?

    • Patricia I. Kelley
      He’s replaced generals [with] those who support him.

    I continue to argue Obama’s loyalty leans to Marx more than Muhammad. His chess moves appear deliberately designed to fool the world into thinking it’s all about the Mus1ims. It is not. The Mus1im Brotherhood — like Liberation Theology — entails large chunks of the Communist/Marxist religion. Communism, in fact, is the true culprit of today’s global ills. And Russia is the chess master.
    [ED.: We Americans are more than able to focus on both of America's totalitarian adversaries: global-expansionist Communism and fundamentalist Is1am — which, btw, antedates geC by twelve centuries.]

    I assume Mr. West was short on time so he only came up with 6 examples. He’d probably be stuck at his keyboard for the next 2 weeks if he wanted to do a full list of Obama policies that support and/or enable Is1amists.


    He is worse than Benedict Arnold and should not be impeached, but instead thrown in jail and put on trial.

    I believe it's going to take us, We the People, to do something. I hate to think this crap, but what else is there ???? Seriously, think about it. It will take us to make this happen, and we do not have [as] much fire power as they do, unless we take their tanks, oh well our tanks, and learn how to use them on our government. ???????????????????????????????????????????????


    I know you are right! If you are like me, I have been thinking the very same thing for a couple of, 3 yrs or so. I agree with all of your reasons and there are plenty, plenty more to put on that list. This was all planned before he had his 1st little get together in the terrorists' living room. bho has no background, not a smidgeon of any kind of experience to hold the office & responsibilities that go with it.

    It is just as Dr. [Ben] Carson said at the prayer breakfast. Sit back and plan on paper the different things you would do to ruin this country in every major way possible. Create a 2nd column and plan the best way to uplift, support & run interference for the radical Is1amists so that they can reach their goal of Sharia around the world. Kill all other religions. I would just about bet everything that Lt. Col. West has in his wallet right now that 98% of what you have written, bho has already done or is the process of doing. Try it honestly, and I think you will be very surprised and then very concerned.

    Then think back about history and see if you can find any other time since the beginning of time when there was this much turmoil and danger on this Earth. Close your eyes and touch somewhere on a globe and you will find upheaval.

    Listen to the majority of people say the same thing in regard to bho… ”I don’t understand why he is doing that.” “Why is he doing that?” “Why won’t he do this?” … One reason answers all of the questions. It also answers the questions of why he has put the people he has in high offices, and why he has surrounded himself with the kind of people he [has]. Most of all, it answers why he has gotten rid of the very best and most qualified, capable military officers we had, and why he is currently decimating our military.

    Be honest with yourself, and make those 2 lists, and then really think about it. God be with you, Lt. Col. West, and watch your 6!
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 02-02-2015 at 02:09 PM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  3. #5703
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    [ED.: "First, they ridicule you," (for speaking the truth to power). Honest people would simply provide proof of identity and be done with it. Can you imagine ridiculing the integrity and insulting the intelligence of a patrolman when he asks, "May I see your driver's license and vehicle registration?"

    The following Newsmax article (h/t to Atty. Orly Taitz) quotes the Huffington Post twice as verification, and Talking Points Memo, ABC News, and Rush Limbaugh, once each.]

    Barack Obama Citizenship Scandal: 8 Figures Who Fueled Birth Certificate Controversy

    Thursday, 29 Jan 2015 03:37 PM

    By Alana Marie Burke

    When the Barack Obama citizenship issue became a "scandal," many prominent figures commented publicly about the controversy. While some were diehard "birthers," the name given to citizenship skeptics, others were politicians or media personalities that saw fit to ask for clarification.

    Here are eight key people who asked questions about Barack Obama's citizenship and fueled the scandal:

    1. Donald Trump: Billionaire real estate mogul and host of the NBC reality series, The Celebrity Apprentice, Trump became a vocal skeptic of President Obama's constitutional eligibility to be president. Trump was a potential 2012 presidential candidate and the "birther" issue garnered him significant media attention. In 2011, President Obama released the long-form version of his birth certificate and Trump was quick to credit the public pressure he put on the president for the release.

    2. CNN Host Lou Dobbs: As a TV and radio host, Dobbs jumped headlong into the Obama citizenship scandal and used his media platforms to provide traction to the birther movement. At one point Dobbs responded to his critics calling them, "limp-minded, lily-livered lefties who attacked him only because he had the temerity to inquire as to where the birth certificate was and why the president of the United States would not turn over that birth certificate to the national media and end the noise," reports the Huffington Post.

    3. Orley Taitz: Lawyer, perennial political candidate and dubbed "Queen of the Birthers," Taitz represented plaintiffs in a lawsuit alleging Barack Obama was not a natural-born citizen of the United States. The plaintiffs asserted that Obama "maintains a fraudulently obtained social security number, a Hawaiian birth certificate that is a computer-generated forgery, and that he does not otherwise possess valid U.S. identification papers."

    4. Liz Cheney: Daughter to former Vice President Dick Cheney, attorney, and political commentator, Cheney took heat for defending the birther movement. In an interview with Larry King, she said that the reason the birther movement exists is because, "People are uncomfortable with having, for the first time ever, I think, a president who is reluctant to defend the nation overseas." Talking Points Memo reported Cheney later stated she does not have any question about Obama's right to be president.

    5. Dr. Alan Keyes: Political activist, former diplomat, [Ambassador to the UN,] and perennial political candidate in both senate and presidential races, Keyes filed a lawsuit that included defendants President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and California Secretary of State Deborah Bowen. Keyes demanded that California be "barred from casting its electoral votes for Barack Obama until Obama can show "documentary proof" that he 'is a 'natural born' citizen of the United States and does not hold citizenship in Indonesia, Kenya or Great Britain."

    6. Sen. Richard Shelby, R-AL: As reported by the Cullman Times, Shelby said, "Well his father was Kenyan and they said he was born in Hawaii, but I haven't seen any birth certificate. You have to be born in America to be president." The statement garnered the senator much media attention as a potential "birther." However, according to the Huffington Post, Shelby later said the statement was a "distortion."

    7. Rush Limbaugh: Radio host, entertainer and political pundit, Limbaugh repeatedly discussed Barack Obama's citizenship scandal on his show. At one point Limbaugh said, "Do you think if this was me and they were trying to prove that I wasn't an American and I insisted that I was, but I couldn't produce a birth certificate or wouldn't, and yet the governor of Missouri says, 'Oh, yeah, there's a little notification, somebody wrote down Limbaugh was born here.' Do you think that would fly?"

    8. Gov. Neil Abercrombie: Former governor of Hawaii, Abercrombie was caught up in the Barack Obama birth certificate scandal by virtue of his position in government. ABC News reported that three weeks into his term as governor, Abercrombie claimed ending the conspiracy theories was a priority. "There's no reason on earth to have the memory of his parents insulted by people whose motivation is solely political."

    © 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 02-03-2015 at 02:28 PM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  4. #5704
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    [ED.: Califemme posted at about why Rep. Nancy Pelosi and DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond did not fear prosecution for perjury in their 2008 Certificate of Nomination submitted to the Hawaii Democratic Party Chairman (and subsequently Hawaii Lt. Governor), Brian Schatz. Pelosi and Germond did not dare include a perjurious assertion of Constitutional eligibility in the Certificate of Nomination submitted to the other 49 states. But until they added that false statement for the HDP, Schatz knew better than to sign his name and see it used as a witness to a birth in Hawaii, a birth of which he had no knowledge and no evidence, and which I expect he knew was just DNC wishful thinking.]

    Posted Feb. 17, 2011

    Deny Ignorance! Why the TWO DOCUMENTS? Why did a separate document need to be signed, notarized and sent to the other 49 states?

    I'll TELL you WHY. Because had they sent the "constitutionally eligible" document to the other 49 states, Nancy Pelosi and Howard Dean [ED.: not Howard Dean, but DNC Secy. Alice Travis Germond] would go to jail for perjury in many states. You know what the penalty is for perjury in Hawaii?

    I'll give ya a hint: It's a Misdemeanor.

    Quote Originally Posted by H.R.S. vol. 14 §710-1063 at
    [The offense of perjury, a class C felony, requires
    (a) a false statement which the court determines to be "material,"
    (b) made under an oath,
    (c) in an official proceeding.
    This is the most serious offense and the only felony in this part. Other forms of falsification, whether under oath or not, are graded as misdemeanors or petty misdemeanors. Falsification before a court, legislative committee, administrative agency, or other official proceeding, as defined in §710-1000(12), is deemed more culpable and more socially dangerous than similar falsity in a report, license application, or like matter, especially when these types of statements are often prepared by a lawyer.[3]]

    A false statement made under oath may constitute a misdemeanor if (a) it is made in an official proceeding, or (b) it is made with intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of the public servant's official duty. The statement need not be a "materially false statement." The offense is labeled false swearing to authorities.

    False swearing, a residual offense, makes all other false statements, made under an oath required or authorized by law, a petty misdemeanor. In addition to other cases, this offense would cover falsification in a written statement which, pursuant to a requirement or authorization of law, has been sworn to before a notary, in a strictly private transaction. It would also cover a false affidavit filed with the government but not in an official proceeding, regardless of materiality or intent to mislead.

    The final offense in this quartet does not require that the statement be under oath. Indeed, that statement need not be written; the falsification can be in the form of submission of, or invitation to rely on, false samples, specimens, maps, boundary-marks, or other objects. However, the falsification must be made with intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of the public servant's official duty.

    I have no doubt the truth will come out. It ALWAYS does.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 02-10-2015 at 04:40 AM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  5. #5705
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Quote Originally Posted by rockyvnvmc, commenting at the
    Governor Jindal is no more eligible to run for the Office of the Presidency, than the current Usurper illegally squatting in the People's House and for the very same reason; his parents were Foreign Nationals at the time of his birth, thus forever denying him the requisite Natural Born Citizen status, as our Framers understood it to mean, as well as what four (4) SCOTUS decisions determined.

    Neither, by the way, are Rubio or Cruz, again, because their fathers were not American Citizens at the time of their births.

    Since I do Not believe in circumstances of this order, I'm afraid of the reasons for this many GOP candidates who fail the constitutional requirements for the Presidency. I view them as 'Trojan Horses'. Once a legal precedent has been established, the next thing that we'll see is a totally foreign President, further advancing the goal of the world's wealthiest elites, of establishing a 'New World Order' (GHW Bush) aka a One World Government comprised of a global Oligarchy OF the wealthiest elites, BY the world's wealthiest elites and FOR the world's wealthiest elites.

    If you feel thwarted with our current attempt at self governance, just wait until you have to try to deal with some form of Global Government.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diane, commenting at the
    If you read the comment sections for any op-ed piece recommending Cruz, Rubio, or Jindal for either President or Vice President, you will find a number of people who know that none of them qualify as a Natural Born Citizen. Senator Cruz was born in Canada to an American mother and Cuban father. This gave him potential citizenship in 3 countries. His father eventually became a US citizen (in 2005) and Ted renounced his Canadian citizenship recently.

    Senator Rubio was born in FL to Cuban political refugees. He was born in 1971, and his parents became citizens in 1975. This gave him dual citizenship with Cuba. (He may not have realized it.)

    La. Gov Bobby Jindal [was] born in 1971 to Indian immigrants in La.; his parents were in the country using student visas in 1970. They later became citizens. I think it was in 1975.

    If being a citizen was the same as a NBC, why was it distinguished in the Constitution? I believe them all to be citizens, but not natural born ones.

    Get the Supreme Court to rule on it.
    Quote Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC, commenting at the
    That's already been done.

    Chief Justice Waite rendered the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett 88 U.S. 162 (1875).
    "Additions might always be made to the citizenship of the United States in two ways: first, by birth, and second, by naturalization. This is apparent from the Constitution itself, for it provides that "no person except a natural-born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President," and that Congress shall have power "to establish a uniform rule of naturalization." Thus new citizens may be born or they may be created by naturalization.

    The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens [* BUT NOT AS NATURAL-BORN CITIZENS *] children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens."
    [pp. 167-168].

    In Wong Kim Ark 169 U.S. 649 (1898 ), Justice Gray, opining for the majority, chased the foxes and the hounds throughout all of Britain in pursuit of a definition of "natural-born subjects" that might suffice to interpret the Constitution of the U.S.. But he found none, of course, because
    a) British Common Law does not apply in the United States,
    b) the U.S. has citizens and not subjects, and
    c) the U.S. had warred and won independence from Common Law about "the Crown" and "subjects", not once, but twice (the War of 1812). Between times, warring against the Barbary Pirates, the U.S. Navy had even saved bonnie England from slavery to a different crown, or the sword.

    When Justice Gray ceased from his Tory ramblings and wistful reminiscing about Blackstone and Lord Coke, he acknowledged (pp. 679-680) that the unanimous opinion delivered by Chief Justice Waite in Minor v. Happersett was the operative interpretation of nbC.

    There have been other opinions that similarly explained the U.S. Supreme Court's understanding and interpretation of "natural-born Citizen": Perkins v. Elg (1939), Shanks v. DuPont (1830), The Venus (1814), and others. But Minor v. Happersett, affirmed in Wong Kim Ark, is solid precedent.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 02-13-2015 at 03:19 AM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  6. #5706
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    [ED.: unlike the U.S. lamestream media under the cone of silence, the media in Mexico acknowledge that Atty. Orly Taitz brought to court and pleaded this lawsuit that gained a temporary injunction against Mr. Obama's unconstitutional executive amnesty.]

    Judge Andrew S. Hanen, Obama's nightmare paralyzing Democrat's immigration policy

    Allexia Acosta
    [translated from the original Spanish]

    Tuesday, 17/02/15 - 15:36
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  7. #5707
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Countdown to the end of an error:

    Many, if not most, sentient Americans - those who are not in an MSM-induced stupor - pin their nostalgic hopes
    for a return to the past, to pre-2008 normalcy, on the 2016 elections. Of course, as the above counter calculates, "the end of an error" is on Friday, Jan. 20, 2017, not on Nov. 2, 2016, the day after the scheduled or purported elections.

    Mr. Obama cannot be trusted to immediately give up his pen and his phone - much less surrender the crown, the scepter, and the throne - to another Office of the President-Elect. Such trust would require the large and unwarranted assumption that he will go peacefully, without declaring martial law and suspending "free and fair" democratic elections indefinitely. Though its face may change,

    no communist regime has ever been
    removed from power by a mere election.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 02-24-2015 at 10:42 PM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  8. #5708
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Quote Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC on Aug. 8, 2009 View Post
    I'm encouraged by Dr. Orly Taitz's trip to London, Israel, and wherever else, with a copy of the Kenya registration in hand. It would appear that, in the absence of justice in the U.S. courts, she is asking foreign leaders, e.g., [Israeli PM] Benyamin Netanyahu, to refuse to recognize Mr. Obama as a lawful head of state. The United States has done just that with dictators such as Charles Taylor in Liberia and Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
    5½ years later, on March 3, 2015, Israeli PM Benyamin Netanyahu brings it home to the U.S. Congress. If Mr. Obama refuses to recognize Bibi Netanyahu as he represents Israel's appeal for defense against Iran's atomic bomb(s), PM Netanyahu must unrecognize Mr. Obama as the.Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. armed forces.

    God forbid that
    Mr. Obama, in an act of treachery, disavow the U.S. alliance with Israel - or worse, that Mr. Obama negotiate a retreat to Israel's 1967 (or 1948 ) borders in return for a seven year covenant of (false) peace.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 02-27-2015 at 12:49 AM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  9. #5709
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    3,207 returns

    Most of us would appreciate the honesty of returning this instead:

    No worries. The Wayback Machine had the original article from Nov. 4, 2008:

    The article begins thus:

    Quote Originally Posted by The Nigerian Observer
    WASHINGTON – Americans will today go to the polls to elect their next President with Democratic Party candidate, Senator Barack Obama largely favoured to win.

    The Kenyan-born Senator will, however, face a stiff competition from his Republican counterpart, John McCain...
    Any notion that this article was U.S. RNC-planted misinformation is duly quashed by its next-to-last sentence:

    Quote Originally Posted by The Nigerian Observer
    It is widely believed that the President George Bush administration had alienated a lot of Americans due to its unpopular war campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan where trillions of dollars which could have been used for the benefit of American people, were wasted.
    That bit of propaganda may indicate less about the George W. Bush administration than about what ideology has subjugated The Nigerian Observer.

    This Nigerian Observer article was written by Africans, for Africans, who are not deceived about where their native son was born. The identification of Mr. Obama as "The Kenyan-born [U.S.] Senator" was published not in 2006, not in 2007, but on Election Day in 2008.

    You know we couldn't make these things up. Not the Obama Campaign here.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 03-05-2015 at 09:41 PM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  10. #5710
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    [ED.: such mock surprise one never saw before. Anyone in politics surely knows that county registrars routinely fail to enter names of the deceased into the Social Security Death Index and refuse to cull those names from the voter registration rolls. ANYONE knows that. They don't even try to hide what they are doing. When voters object or protest, they just stiffarm, stonewall, and stall, because that's what county registrars do. If yours doesn't, you are indeed blessed, and you should write him or her a gracious thank you note for standing against nearly universal corruption.]

    IG Audit: 6.5 Million People With Active
    Social Security Numbers Are 113¾ or Older

    March 9, 2015 - 10:39 AM
    By Susan Jones

    ( - Many people are living longer, but not to age [113¾] or beyond -- except in the records of the Social Security Administration.

    The SSA's inspector general has
    An IG audit of the Social Security Administration found that the nation’s database of active Social Security numbers includes more than six and a half million people who are older than [113¾] years of age.
    identified 6.5 million number-holders age [113¾] -- or older -- for whom no death date has been entered in the main electronic file, called Numident.

    The audit, dated March 4, 2015, concluded that SSA lacks the controls necessary to annote death information on the records of number-holders who exceed "maximum reasonable life expectancies."

    "We obtained Numident data that identified approximately 6.5 million numberholders born before June 16, 1901 who did not have a date of death on their record," the report states.

    Some of the numbers assigned to long-dead people were used fraudulently to open bank accounts.

    And thousands of those numbers apparently were used by illegal immigrants to apply for work:

    "During Calendar Years 2008 through 2011, SSA received 4,024 E-Verify inquiries using the SSNs of 3,873 numberholders born before June 16, 1901," the report said. "These inquiries indicate individuals' attempts to use the SSNs to apply for work."

    “It is incredible that the Social Security Administration in 2015 does not have the technical sophistication to ensure that people they know to be deceased are actually noted as dead,” said Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.



    “Tens of thousands of these numbers are currently being used to report wages to the Social Security Administration and to the IRS. People are fraudulently, but successfully, applying for jobs and benefits with these numbers. Making sure Social Security cleans up its death master file to prevent future errors and fraud is a good government reform we can all agree on,” Johnson said.

    Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), the committee's ranking member, called the findings a "major problem" that wastes taxpayers' money, exposes citizens to identity theft and undermines confidence in government:

    "It is simply unacceptable that our nation’s database of Social Security numbers of supposedly living people includes more than six and a half million people who are older than [113¾] years of age, with a few thousand having birth dates from before the Civil War. Preventing agency errors by keeping track of who has died is a relatively simple problem that the government should pursue as a high priority."



    According to the IG, the Social Security Administration matches death reports received from various sources against its payment records, then records the date of a number-holder's death in its Numerical Identification System, or Numident.

    Information from Numident is then used to create SSA's "Death Master File," which is used by financial institutions and various government entities to prevent identity fraud. If a death is not recorded on the Numident, it will not appear in the DMF.

    The IG made four recommendations for resolving the discrepancies and improving the accuracy of the Death Master File to "prevent future misuse of these SSNs."
    Monday, July 02, 2012



    Did the Inspector General Detect Fraud in Barack Obama’s Social Security Number? And yes that is One Of Obama's many SSN's

    This rather lengthy article is something to chew on while I am gone for a couple of weeks…It will give you something to do, plus you might learn something that you didn’t know about your President…Enjoy!

    By de Andréa
    July 3, 2012

    Obama’s Social Security number has a State indicator number of O42, which is a Connecticut State Number. Connecticut retains State Numbers 040-049. O42 numbers would have been issued somewhere between 1937 and 1940. Moreover, the SSN 042-68-4425 was issued to someone born in 1890.

    According to Barack Obama he had is first job in Honolulu in March 1977 at Baskin Robins. Hawaii State codes are 575-576.

    Obama first shows up with this SSN 042-68-4425 in 1986. Obama was 25. Just a little confusing isn’t it:

    Listen to an interview aired on TruNewsRadio with Rick Wiles and Private Investigator Susan Daniels about Obama's fraudulent Social Security number reserved for Connecticut Applicants. As well as the Selective Service Administration now involved in the cover-up to conceal Obama's Social Security number, belonging to someone born in Connecticut in 1890

    So far Obama has a fraudulent Birth Certificate a fraudulent Social Security number and a fraudulent Selective Service Card.

    E-Verify Check:
    Acting as one of Barack Hussein Obama’s 313 million employers, I wanted to check Obama’s “employee” status with the U.S. Government‘s E-Verify System. Was he legally eligible to be employed by me as a citizen of the United States of America, and did he have a valid Social Security Number?

    The Social Security Number that Barack Obama used, 042-68-4425, was [entered] into the government run E-Verify System. This program allows employers to determine if their potential hires or employees are legal to work in the United States by validating their social security number (SSN), name, and birth date.

    When Obama’s SSN was entered into the E-Verify System, the government returned the statement “Notice of Mismatch: SSA record does not verify, Other reason. SSA found a discrepancy in the record.”

    Obama’s SSN FAILED the E-Verify check! Why???…Did the Inspector General Detect Fraud?

    This specific reason means that Obama’s SSN was flagged with a Special Indicator Code (SIC) by the Social Security Administration (SSA) or the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) . The indicator code that Obama’s SSN was flagged with was # 8.

    There are 9 Social Security Administration Special Indicator Codes

    1. False Identity
    2. Non citizen Not in Status
    3. Multiple SSN’s with Different Identities
    4. Scrambled Earnings with New SSN Assigned
    5. SSN Obtained Using Fraudulent Documentation
    6. SSN Assignment Based on Harassment /Abuse/Life Endangerment
    7. Fictitious Identity
    8. Fraud-OIG Investigated
    9. Fraud SSN Misuse

    The SSN that Obama is using was flagged with Special Indicator Code #8, Fraud OIG Investigated based on the following research of government documents.

    The Inspector General’s Report, August 26, 2009,
    Administration’s Numident File, ( A-08-09-19099) ,” states:

    “SSA added two codes in 2007 in response to the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, which required that the Agency add death and fraud indicators to its SSN verification systems for employers, State agencies issuing driver’s licenses and identity cards, and other verification routines that the Commissioner of Social Security determines to be appropriate.”

    SSA Inspector General’s Report, Aug. 26, 2009, Pg 1.
    Page C-2 of the Report reads: SSA “Processed 25 SSN’s with Special Indicator Code 8 on the Numident and 25 SSN’s with Special Indicator Code 9 through SSA’s Enumeration Verification System to determine whether the System generated the proper response (that is, SSN does not verify-other reason).”

    SSA Inspector General’s Report – C-2
    Remember that was the very reason the government failed Obama’s SSN. Therefore, it appears that SIC 8 and 9 are directly tied to “SSN does not verify-other reason”.

    SSA Inspector General’s Report, September 2008, Page 8

    These two reports from the OIG affirm when employers run a verification check on a SSN with E-Verify, and that number gets flagged with a Special
    Indicator Code, the two SIC codes are the numbers 8 and 9.
    SIC#8 appears to be assigned by the OIG only after the indication of fraud is so strong that they choose to investigate and conclude that the SSN number is fraudulent. (They also have the option not to investigate).

    SIC#9 is reserved for people who meet the requirement for getting a new SSN because of “misuse and disadvantage”. If they meet the requirement, SIC#9 is automatically assigned to the allegedly misused SSN. (RM 10205.185 ‘Coding and Certifying an Application for an SSN Card’).

    If Obama was issued a new SSN based on SIC #9, it was given to him after submitting his 2009 IRS Tax Return that showed he used SSN 042-68-4425. When Obama’s tax return was placed on the WH government website for public viewing, the SSN was accidentally revealed. After discovering their error, the WH redacted the SSN, but not before people downloaded the information.

    For Obama to be granted a new SSN based on SIC #9, “misuse and disadvantage,” he needed to prove his case sometime between April, 2010 [date of tax return] and August, 2011 when his SSN was entered into E-Verify. This scenario is not very likely.

    How difficult would it be for Barack Obama to obtain a new social security number? The following information “Protect My ID” describes the process.

    “Although SSA does not routinely assign new numbers, they will do so when a victim requests a new SSN and provides evidence that he/she has tried to resolve the problems brought on by identity theft but continues to be disadvantaged by the SSN misuse. Disadvantaged by misuse of the SSN means that the misuse has caused you financial or personal hardship within the past year.”

    The following information comes directly from the SSA. It shows the strict standards one must meet for consideration as a candidate for a new SSN.

    Examples of disadvantage by misuse of the SSN:Past SSN misuse causes a recent application for a home mortgage to be denied. The IRS questions a tax return because of unreported earnings, a result of someone using another individual’s SSN to work. An individual’s SSN was misused to obtain credit several years ago, but documented attempts to correct his/her credit record have been unsuccessful. Past SSN misuse causes an individual to be arrested whenever he/she is stopped for a traffic violation”.

    Examples that are not disadvantage by misuse of the SSN: “An individual’s SSN was misused to obtain credit 2 years ago. The credit bureau corrected the credit report and/or added a cautionary statement to contact the victim first. The victim’s SSN has not been used subsequently, nor has the victim been denied credit. An individual who has been a victim of identity theft in the past, and has had fraud alerts placed on his/her credit record, has to wait while a store employee verifies his/her credit card with a bank before processing the transaction. A credit card holder, who has had identity theft problems in the past and opened new credit, receives a call from the credit company to verify that he/she charged a large purchase recently.”

    What Must Barack Obama Do to Apply for a New SSN Number?

    Complete an application for a Social Security card: Form SS-5
    Show documents proving U.S. citizenship (or immigration status and work eligibility) and identity.
    Show evidence to support his need for a new SSN. Take the completed application and documents to a local Social Security office. All documents must be either originals or copies certified by the issuing agency. They cannot accept photocopies or notarized copies of documents.

    In conclusion:

    It is my opinion, based on the government information provided above, that the SSN Obama was using on August 17, 2011 was flagged with Special Indicator Code #8 because the Office of the Inspector General had investigated the SSN in question for fraud. It appears they found the indicators of fraud more than credible, and based on their investigation they assigned SIC #8 to the SSN that Obama used.

    An independent investigation and review of the Social Security Application (Form SS-5) that accompanied the issuance of the original Social Security Number, 042-68-4425, as well as records from both the Social Security Administration, and Office of Inspector General concerning the SSN in question could verify and prove my research.

    Below is a report on a General investigation made by Private investigator Neil Sankey - 16 Different Social Security Numbers

    Private investigator Neil Sankey, using Intelius, Lexis Nexis, Choice Point and other public records, found around 25 Social Security numbers connected with Barack Obama’s name.

    However, it may not be as many as 25, since Sankey also searched using closely related names such as: "Barak Obama," "Batock Obama," "Barok Obama," and "Barrack Obama." There may very well be some Kenyans living in America with the same last name and a similar first name. In any case, I will exclude these records for the purpose of this research and focus only on names spelled exactly like his name.

    Moreover, we can verify many of the Social Security numbers as valid since they’re connected to addresses at which we know Obama resided.

    In Obama’s home state, Illinois, Sankey tracked down 16 different addresses for a Barack Obama or a Barack H. Obama, of which all are addresses he was known to have lived at. Two Social Security numbers appear for these addresses, one beginning with 042 from the State of Connecticut, and one starting 364 which is the State of Michigan.

    In California, where Obama attended Occidental College, there are six addresses listed for him, all within easy driving distance of the college in Irvine. However, there are three Social Security numbers connected to these addresses, 537 which is the State of Washington and two others, each beginning with 999, which are not even valid SSN’s.

    There are no addresses listed in New York where he said attended Columbia University and there is no record of Obama ever attending Columbia ‘U’, but there is an address listed for him in nearby Jackson, NJ, with a Social Security number beginning with 485 which is the state of Iowa.

    In Massachusetts -- where Obama attended Harvard Law School -- we find three addresses, all using the 042 Social Security number. After Obama was elected to the United States Senate in 2005, he moved into an apartment at 300 Massachusetts Ave NW; the Social Security number attached to that address is the 042 one. Yet, three years later, Obama used a different Social Security number for an address listed as 713 Hart Senate Office Building. This was the address of his United States Senate office. This Social Security number began with 282, an Ohio State SSN and was verified by the government in 2008.

    All told, there are 49 addresses and 16 different Social Security numbers listed for a person whose name is spelled "Barack Obama." In some cases, the middle initial "H" is listed.

    Finally, the one Social Security number Obama most frequently used, the one beginning with 042, is a number issued in Connecticut, yet there is no record of Obama ever living or working in Connecticut. Indeed, during this time Obama would have been 15-16 years old and living in Hawaii at the time.

    Listen to a radio broadcast of Sheriff Joe on Obama Investigation: We Have Standing and Tons of Information; Media Silent

    Watch a John King USA’s interview with Attorney Orly Taits on CNN TV

    This is interesting Watch a speech by James David Manning chief pastor at the ATLAH World Missionary Church on 123rd Street in New York City.

    THE BOTTOM LINE: The few inquiries listed here may not be enough to bring an indictment or prove fraud in a court of law. But there is as least a 1000 more pages of documented evidence available, some showing faked documents, and certainly enough to begin a grand jury investigation into Obama’s personal documents as well as all the cover-ups in a plethora of government agencies.

    So why doesn’t it happen? Well… who would do it? Every agency that could call for an investigation is involved in the cover-up, even the Senate and possibly some in the House. Nearly all of these Agencies answer to the Department of Justice… Holder’s Department of Justice… Obama’s Department of Justice - already under investigation by the House for allegations of conspiracy to commit murder in the Fast and Furious boondoggle.

    What do you do when the Mayor, the police, the Courts, and the city council in your town are all corrupt? Well… you would go to the County sheriff, or the State police. But, what if it is your Federal Government that is corrupt… now where do you go? Certainly not the United Nations… They are even more corrupt.

    This is not something that is going away real soon, my friend…

    de Andréa
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts