Voter Fraud Information Thread

[kathyet2]

DC Purposely Screws Up Voting Guide


DC Purposely Screws Up Voting Guide

“They’re paying attention. It’s working!”



BY: Stephen Gutowski
October 16, 2014 1:38 pm

The DC election board has issued this year’s voting guide. 305,164 copies of the little booklet have been sent out ahead of this year’s elections. However, there is a bit of a problem with this year’s guide.




Jason Terry @JTinDC
Follow
This upside down flag is why we can't have nice elections.
6:35 PM - 15 Oct 2014

The Washington Post reports that the upside down flag is actually not a typo. The board reportedly made the mistake on purpose.

Rather, Tolliver said, it was an effort to engage voters months after primary elections that saw record-low turnout. The idea, she said, was to put the voter guide on the board’s Web site with the inverted flag, prompt viewers to find the mistake, and “see how many clicks we can get.”

They believe the upside down flag is engaging.

“It’s something we wanted to do to kind of engage people,” said Tolliver, who said the gimmick was “kind of a collective thing” but was ultimately approved by Tatum. “The turnout was just so low in April.”

The purposeful mistake has drawn outrage on Twitter. The board isn’t off put by that though.

“People are responding, aren’t they?” she added. “They’re paying attention. It’s working!”

http://freebeacon.com/politics/dc-pu...-voting-guide/

[kathyet2]

Heads up EVERYONE on mail in ballots , DO NOT FILL out and send in early....more time for fraud to be perpetrated and your ballot to be tampered with. There is codes on the mail back envelopes that state what your political affiliation is. Walk the ballot in on the last day, if you are in a state that only has mail in ballots. Fraud is going to be rampant in November especially in states like Colorado with all mail in ballots. The more time they have to tamper with ballots the more likely that Dems will have the election in the bag.

It sure is, and then we still have crooked politicians to vote on too, doesn't that just warm your little heart...

[kathyet2]

WND RADIO

Whistleblower: Obama blocking voter roll cleanup

'We actually have Obamacare because of fraud'

Published: 4 days ago Greg Corombos



With critical midterm elections less than four weeks away, the failure to scrutinize voter registrations and clean up voter rolls leaves our system vulnerable to voter fraud, and a Justice Department whistleblower says the Obama administration is actively trying to stop states from bringing records up to date and ensure only eligible voters are casting ballots.


J. Christian Adams further asserts that voter fraud does occur and is indirectly responsible for the passage of Obamacare.
Adams is author of “Crimes Against the Republic: How the Democratic Party’s Voter Fraud is Fundamentally Transforming America.” He left the Justice Department early in the Obama administration and has regularly spoken out about what he considers to be partisan actions by Attorney General Eric Holder on voting and other civil rights issues.

Two flash points he frequently mentions are the DOJ’s decision not to prosecute the New Black Panther Party on voter intimidation charges in 2008 and the battle between Holder and several states over requiring photo identification to be presented before being allowed to vote.
However, Adams said there’s a much bigger problem than either of those matters.

“We have millions of people on the voter rolls who are not eligible to vote, millions of people who are not actually valid registrations,” Adams said. “Absolutely nothing is being done about that from the government’s perspective. Only private organizations have done anything about it. Eric Holder, of course, is the attorney general who could do something about it but does not.”

According to Adams, there are all sorts of people influencing our elections who have no business casting a ballot.

“There are dead people. There are foreigners. There are non-citizens. There are people who are duplicate registrations. They registered in more than one state. Sometimes they even vote in more than one state,” said Adams, noting the case of Wendy Rosen, who ran for Congress in Maryland and voted in her own primary there and in Florida.

So why aren’t the rolls cleaned up? Adams said in many jurisdictions, there’s literally no scrutiny of voter registration forms.

“They just get put on the rolls,” he said. “They aren’t verified. When states like Florida tried to do the citizenship verification, or states like Georgia, all these groups, including Eric Holder sprung up to sue them to try to stop them from checking to see if they were really citizens. So the states that do try to check for verification frequently find themselves on the bad end of a lawsuit.”

Adams added, “This is something the Justice Department seems perfectly comfortable with. The status quo is something the department is totally comfortable with. Why that is is not something I have an answer to.”

While Adams said Democrats are especially resistant to cleaning up the voting rolls, Republicans bear their share of guilt as well.

“Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller actually defended this,” he said. “He was sued by Judicial Watch and True the Vote for having dirty voter rolls. The state was sued and he put up a vigorous defense and fought back. So in many places, Republicans are part of the problem.”
Listen to the WND/Radio America interview with J. Christian Adams:

video at link below

What cannot be quantified, however, is just how widespread the problem is and how many fraudulent votes are cast.

“We don’t know how prevalent it is, but we know it does happen. That’s the big point,” Adams said. “Do people cast ballots, who are not entitled to cast ballots? The answer to that question is unequivocally yes. The answer to that problem is to get the voting rolls cleaned up.”

But Adams stresses that a small number of fraudulent votes can make a big difference in key elections and is indirectly responsible for President Obama’s biggest legislative achievement.

“Al Franken (D-Minn.) is in the United States Senate because of voter fraud,” he explained. “He won that contest by 312 votes, but there were 1,099 illegal votes cast by felons. Every single felon who was contacted by the Minnesota media said that he voted for Al Franken.”

He noted, “So we have a senator in the U.S. Senate because of voter fraud, and guess what? That senator was the 60th vote for Obamacare. So we actually have Obamacare because of voter fraud,” he said.

Adams would also like to scrap Election Day registration. He believes it provides a massive opportunity for fraud and was a critical factor in Franken’s capturing of a Senate seat.

“That’s how Al Franken won the election, because all of these felons showed up to vote,” he said. “They registered to vote but they weren’t eligible to. So Election Day registration makes it hard to police the validity of who’s casting ballots.”

Democrats may be leading the charge against update voting rolls, but Adams had a surprising answer when asked about the how much this effort is coordinated among Democrats.

“Not at all. It doesn’t need to be coordinated,” he said. “This is not some sort of centralized, coordinated effort. This is just simply laziness, atrophy and refusal to do your job.”

Adams said many things need to happen to bolster the integrity of U.S. elections, but competent state election officials are a critical first step.

“Awareness is the first step, knowing where the problems are, having elected officials like Colorado Secretary of State Scott Gessler (and) Brian Kemp in Georgia and Tom Schedler in Louisiana,” he said. “Having secretaries of state who know what the problem is and being willing to fix it are Step 1.”


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/10/whistlebl...xVVtMP1Wx2k.99

[kathyet2]

This Film Is Kryptonite For The Obama Administration




Published on Oct 16, 2014
Get Your Exclusive Copy of 'There's No Place Like Utopia' Today - http://store.infowars.com/Theres-No-P...

Alex Jones Introduces the latest film by Joel Gilbert 'There's No Place Like Utopia'.Joel journeys across America to find out what's at the end of the Progressive rainbow - Utopia or something far worse? From the ruins of Detroit to the slums of Chicago's South Side, and from Denver's illegal immigration invasion to Newark's urban removal project, Gilbert pulls back the curtain. He confronts Progressives on his quest, and takes us deep into their political fantasy of paradise on earth.

Get Your Exclusive Copy of 'There's No Place Like Utopia' Today - http://store.infowars.com/Theres-No-P...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KARN...sc-APX6wV1twLg
Can we all say voter fraud, Do you see dead people???? Dirty voter rolls need to be cleaned
up!!

[April]

It sure is, and then we still have crooked politicians to vote on too, doesn't that just warm your little heart...

Turns my stomach....

[kathyet2]

Really so this means any one can vote even if a poll watcher things they are illegal????

[JohnDoe2]

N.Y. Board of Elections records say voter is 164 years old

New York Post

- ‎10 hours ago‎

Luz Pabellon is NOT 164 years old, as the New York City Board of Elections would have you think. The Puerto Rican-native is actually 73, but records say otherwise. Photo: Robert Miller. If city Board of Elections records are to believed, voter Luz Pabellon has ...

[April]

[kathyet2]

The justices split 6 to 3 on the issue.
http://patriotupdate.com/2014/10/div...mber-election/




Divided Supreme Court allows Texas to enforce voter ID law in November election : PatriotUpdate.com #patriotupdate @patriotupdate
patriotupdate.com
Divided Supreme Court allows Texas to enforce voter ID law in November election

Divided Supreme Court allows Texas to enforce voter ID law in November election

Saturday, October 18, 2014


In a 6 to 3 decision, the high court allowed Texas’ controversial voter ID law to be used in the 2014 midterms, with early voting to begin on Monday.
A divided US Supreme Court decided Saturday morning to allow Texas officials to continue to enforce the state’s voter identification law, despite a federal judge’s ruling a week ago that the law was discriminatory and amounted to an unconstitutional poll tax.
The justices split 6 to 3 on the issue. The order, announced shortly after 5 a.m., means that Texas voters will have to show photo identification before being allowed to cast a ballot in the mid-term elections.
Early voting is set to begin in Texas on Monday in advance of the Nov. 4 elections.

Post Continues on www.csmonitor.com


Read the rest of this Patriot Update article here: http://patriotupdate.com/2014/10/div...IMobvkITz01.99



Divided Supreme Court allows Texas to enforce voter ID law in November election (+video)






In a 6 to 3 decision Saturday, the high court allowed Texas' controversial voter ID law to be used in the 2014 midterms, with early voting to begin on Monday.

By
Warren Richey, Staff writer
October 18, 2014



Supreme Court Denies Request To Block Texas Voter ID Law





video at link below

A divided US Supreme Court decided Saturday morning to allow Texas officials to continue to enforce the state’s voter identification law, despite a federal judge’s ruling a week ago that the law was discriminatory and amounted to an unconstitutional poll tax.
The justices split 6 to 3 on the issue. The order, announced shortly after 5 a.m., means that Texas voters will have to show photo identification before being allowed to cast a ballot in the mid-term elections.
Early voting is set to begin in Texas on Monday in advance of the Nov. 4 elections.
Recommended: How much do you know about the US Constitution? A quiz.
The majority justices did not explain their order, which denied a request that the voter ID law be blocked.

In a sharply worded dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg cited the ruling last week by a federal judge in Corpus Christi, who found that the voter ID law was unconstitutional and threatened to “disenfranchise” up to 600,000 registered Texas voters who are believed to lack the required form of identification.
“The greatest threat to public confidence in elections in this case is the prospect of enforcing a purposefully discriminatory law, one that likely imposes an unconstitutional poll tax and risks denying the right to vote to hundreds of thousands of eligible voters,” Justice Ginsburg wrote in a seven-page dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
The high court action stems from a decision issued by US District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos after a two-week trial.
The judge, an appointee of President Obama, ruled that the state’s Republican-controlled legislature enacted the voter ID law with the intent to discriminate against African-American and Latino voters who disproportionately lack one of seven forms of acceptable ID.
She said the photo identification requirement amounted to an unconstitutional poll tax since it could cost those seeking new IDs anywhere from $2 to $37 in document fees.
Judge Gonzales Ramos ordered the state to revert to a more relaxed identification protocol used before the photo ID measure took effect in June 2013.
The tougher photo ID requirement has been used in the last three statewide elections.
In a brief to the Supreme Court, Texas Solicitor General Jonathan Mitchell said the judge’s findings concerning racial motive and discrimination were “preposterous.”
He said the estimate that 600,000 registered voters would be disenfranchised was “concocted” through an uncritical comparison of databases that included new registered voters but did not eliminate registrants who died or moved out of state.
State officials complained that the federal judge’s ruling, issued within days of an approaching election, would result in confusion at the polls.
A panel of the New Orleans-based Fifth US Circuit Court of Appeals agreed and issued a stay on Tuesday that would allow the photo ID law to remain in effect.
Civil rights groups, Texas Democratic officials, and the Obama Justice Department then asked the Supreme Court to reverse the Fifth Circuit and block the photo ID requirement.
They argued that the safest approach to avoid voter confusion would be to allow Texas voters to cast ballots under the state’s old identification protocol.
On Saturday, the high court rejected that approach.
The issue of state-enacted changes to voting procedures has been on the high court’s radar in recent weeks, with the justices being asked to block or uphold election changes in three different cases in Ohio, North Carolina, and Wisconsin.
Of the high court’s actions in the three cases, two supported Republican-favored outcomes, while the third supported the position of Democrats.
On Oct. 9, the court blocked enforcement of a Wisconsin voter ID law that was opposed by Democrats but had been upheld by a federal appeals court. On Oct. 1, the justices permitted full enforcement of Republican-backed changes to North Carolina’s election regulations, including eliminating same-day registration and prohibiting the counting of ballots cast in the wrong precinct. And on Sept. 24, the court upheld enforcement of a Republican-backed law in Ohio that reduced early voting hours in that state.
The stakes in the Texas voter ID case extend far beyond what voters will have to show to cast a ballot in the coming elections. If Gonzales Ramos’ decision is upheld on appeal, it would force Texas to submit all future election changes to the Justice Department or a three-judge panel for pre-approval.
That pre-approval requirement disappeared after the Supreme Court in June 2013 invalidated that portion of the Voting Rights Act. A three-judge panel had earlier ruled against the Texas ID law, finding that it imposed a disproportionate burden on minority and elderly voters.
After the high court narrowed the scope of the Voting Rights Act, the earlier decision no longer applied. Texas moved to enforce the new voter ID law.
Various groups sued to have the ID law, once again, declared invalid.
Gonzales Ramos’ ruling includes a finding that the state violated the Voting Rights Act by passing a law that was discriminatory in both purpose and effect. She said it would be disproportionately harder for African-American and Latino voters to obtain compliant ID.
In her dissent, Ginsburg said the high court’s recent actions in the Ohio and North Carolina election law cases were different than the Texas case. In Texas, a federal judge had conducted a full trial and compiled an extensive record from which the judge found “ballot-access discrimination by the state,” she said.
The appeals court should have shown deference to the judge’s findings and blocked the ID law from being enforced in the current elections, she said.
Requiring voters to show photo ID before casting a ballot has become a divisive political issue. Democrats generally oppose such measures, saying they make it harder for minority and elderly voters. Republicans generally favor such measures, arguing that showing ID helps protect the integrity of elections and boosts public confidence in the outcome.
While many states require some form of identification to vote, only seven will enforce a strict photo ID requirement during this year’s mid-term elections, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
The seven states are Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Virginia, and Texas.
Both Pennsylvania and Arkansas had strict photo ID laws that were overturned in the courts. Wisconsin’s photo ID law has been upheld by a federal appeals court, but it was blocked by the US Supreme Court from being used in the November elections.
North Carolina also has a photo identification requirement in its election law, but it does not take effect until 2016.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice...election-video

[April]

The judges that Obama have handed picked for his agenda will do all they can to promote voter fraud. God help us if the Communist win this November round with voter fraud...country already on a quick ride to demise....could be the nail in the coffin for the former land of the free.