Thread: Breaking: US Strikes Venezuela - Maduro Captured! Live Coverage | Nicolás Maduro

BREAKING: Trump announces capture of Venezuela's Maduro




VENEZUELA war begins. Trump unprovoked, full-scale attack. Regime change Maduro. US boots on groun..




Oil: The Real Reason Venezuela matters

U.S. General Declares Global Lithium, Oil, Water “National Security”—People Don’t Matter!




Minimum wage spikes could bring '$5 BILLION IN EARNINGS'




Venezuela 4K - An Immersive Journey




BREAKING! - Exact Moment When US Bombed Venezuela, 7 Explosions Reported | Pres Maduro Captured!!

Russia condemns U.S. capture of Venezuela’s Maduro as “armed aggression”

01/05/2026 // Ava Grace // 90 Views

Tags: big government, capture, chaos, Collapse, condemnation, Dangerous, Donald Trump, intrusion, kinetic strike, national security, Nicolas Maduro, outrage, Russia, sovereignty, United Nations, United States, Venezuela, violence, WWIII

• Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro was seized by U.S. forces in Caracas, with President Trump announcing his arrest and extradition to face charges including narco-terrorism conspiracy.
• Moscow denounced the operation, demanded an urgent UN Security Council meeting, and framed the U.S. justification as baseless, accusing Washington of regime-change motives.
• Venezuela is a key Russian ally, with deep military and economic ties. The capture risks escalating tensions further amid existing disputes over Ukraine and could harden Russia’s stance globally.
• Prior to his arrest, Maduro declared a state of emergency, urging Venezuelan forces to resist U.S. intervention. His removal leaves uncertainty over whether resistance will continue or U.S.-backed leadership will consolidate power.
• The extraterritorial seizure of a foreign leader sets a contentious legal and geopolitical precedent, potentially justifying future interventions by rival powers like Russia and eroding international sovereignty protections.

Russia has denounced the U.S. military's capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro during a targeted operation in Venezuela's capital Caracas – a dramatic escalation of long-simmering tensions between Washington and a close Moscow ally.
On Saturday, Jan. 3, U.S. military forces nabbed Maduro, with U.S. President Donald Trump announcing the Venezuelan strongman's arrest. Trump said the deposed leader had been flown out of the country to face American justice. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi meanwhile detailed charges awaiting Maduro, including narco-terrorism conspiracy, asserting he would face trial in American courts.
The operation, which unfolded with reported explosions in the Venezuelan capital, marks a seismic shift in Western Hemisphere politics. It also risks a direct confrontation between nuclear powers already at odds over Ukraine. Venezuelan officials accused the U.S. of launching an attack to seize control of the nation's resources.
Russia responded furiously to the move, labeling it an "act of armed aggression" and demanding an urgent meeting of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). Moscow declared the U.S. justification for the invasion as "unfounded" and "untenable," arguing that "ideologized hostility" had overridden pragmatic diplomacy.
Venezuela is Russia's most critical strategic foothold in South America. The relationship includes billions in arms sales, energy cooperation, and diplomatic cover for Maduro’s regime. Russia’s statement emphasized that “Latin America must remain a zone of peace,” positioning the U.S. as a hemispheric bully and Russia as a defender of sovereignty—a narrative crafted for global audiences.
This action follows a period where the Trump administration framed a campaign in the region as a necessary crackdown on drug trafficking. However, the broader geopolitical context—including long-standing regime-change ambitions in Venezuela—suggests deeper motives. With Maduro now captured and potentially able to testify, pressure for accountability escalates, underscoring the risks of unchecked military power and interventions justified by shifting narratives.
How Maduro's capture could trigger WWIII

According to BrightU.AI's Enoch, Maduro governed Venezuela as a socialist dictatorship, maintaining power through a large armed militia. He implemented superficial economic measures, like currency re-denomination, that failed to address the country's profound crisis. The decentralized engine ultimately noted that Maduro's rule was characterized by the consolidation of control and the anticipation of external threats.
Saturday's attack did not occur in a vacuum. Recent months saw a dangerous military buildup. Maduro's recent trip to Moscow signaled a tightening alliance, even as he hinted at openness to negotiations with Washington.
This crisis directly collides with the other major flashpoint in U.S.-Russia relations: the war in Ukraine. The Venezuela operation now threatens to poison already fraught dialogue. Moscow will likely view U.S. action against its ally as an unacceptable provocation, potentially hardening its stance in Eastern Europe and complicating any diplomatic off-ramps.
Russia has called for restraint and dialogue but has stopped short of threatening military retaliation. Its immediate demand is for “immediate clarification” on Maduro's status and a UNSC meeting. However, figures in Moscow framed the strike as a classic U.S. "regime change" operation, accusing Washington of imposing its will by force.
In the hours before his capture, Maduro signed a declaration of emergency, urging all forces in Venezuela to mobilize and repudiate the U.S. attack. His government, now presumably led by remnants of his party, faces the monumental task of responding without its central figure. Whether this leads to organized resistance or a swift consolidation of U.S.-backed leadership remains the critical unanswered question.
The U.S. decision to physically capture a foreign head of state and transport him for domestic trial sets a profound and dangerous precedent. The legal basis for such an extraterritorial seizure will be debated intensely. Other nations, including Russia, may now point to this action to justify their own future interventions, further eroding the norms of state sovereignty.
Watch this Fox News report about President Trump announcing possible talks with Venezuelan President Maduro.

This video is from the Cynthia's Pursuit of Truth channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
TheHill.com
RT.com
NDTV.com
BrightU.ai
Brighteon.com

Russia condemns U.S. capture of Venezuela’s Maduro as “armed aggression” – NaturalNews.com

Russia slams U.S. strikes in Venezuela as violation of sovereignty and calls for UN meeting

01/05/2026 // Cassie B. // 320 Views

Tags: big government, chaos, Dangerous, Maduro, national security, outrage, panic, Russia, Trump, Tyranny, Ukraine, Venezuela, violence, WWIII

• The U.S. conducted unilateral military strikes in Venezuela, capturing President Maduro.
• Russia condemned the action as armed aggression and a violation of sovereignty.
• The operation sets a dangerous global precedent for regime change by force.
• It risks broader conflict and distracts from domestic priorities.
• The move may backfire by empowering adversaries and destabilizing international order.

The United States has crossed a dangerous line in Venezuela that should alarm every American who values sovereignty, stability, and the rule of law. Over the weekend, explosions rocked Caracas in what President Donald Trump confirmed were U.S. strikes, culminating in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, who was flown out of the country. Russia’s Foreign Ministry swiftly condemned the act as “armed aggression,” warning against escalation and supporting an urgent UN Security Council meeting. While the corrupt, narco-linked Maduro regime is no friend to freedom, this unilateral American intervention sets a perilous precedent that weakens our global standing and risks broader conflict, all while distracting from pressing domestic crises.
Venezuelan officials accused Washington of attempting to seize control of the nation’s vast natural resources. Foreign Minister Yvan Gil stated the country was “directly attacked” by the U.S. Moscow echoed this, with the foreign ministry stressing that Latin America should remain a peaceful area and that Venezuela must be free from external interference. Leonid Slutsky, chairman of the Russian State Duma’s Foreign Affairs Committee, labeled the strikes a U.S. military operation aimed at changing an “undesirable” regime.
A corrupt ally removed

There is no defending Nicolas Maduro. His socialist regime has bankrupted a resource-rich nation, forged ties with drug cartels, and brutalized his own people. President Trump has repeatedly accused Venezuela’s government of facilitating large-scale drug trafficking, authorizing expanded U.S. military operations in the region. Maduro rejected these allegations, framing them as a pretext for aggression. His removal, however, was executed not through regional coalition or clear legal authority, but by unilateral U.S. force in a move Russia correctly identifies as an “unacceptable infringement on the sovereignty of an independent state.”
This action mirrors a troubling pattern. The U.S. adventures in Iraq and Libya, sold as noble regime-change operations, created lasting chaos, humanitarian disasters, and power vacuaries filled by terrorists. The aftermath in Venezuela remains uncertain, but history suggests imposing outcomes by force rarely yields stable, democratic results.
Geopolitical calculations and consequences

For Russia, the event is complex. Venezuela was a key ally, backing Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and engaging in energy and military cooperation. Analysts note the Kremlin is now weighing the loss of this partner against potential benefits. The crisis provides a distraction from Ukraine, where Russia seeks favorable terms from Washington. Furthermore, some Russian voices see an opportunity. The operation could erode the rules-based international order, moving toward a world where “the law of the strongest” prevails—a model long championed by Moscow.
The precedent is disturbing. Sarah Lenti, a former National Security Council director, warned the move could give Russia carte blanche against leaders it labels criminals, like Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskyy. “He is giving Putin permission to go as far as he wants with Zelenskyy,” Lenti told CNBC. “I think this is setting a very bad precedent for countries that China and Russia are looking to infringe upon.”
The cost of overreach

Beyond principle, there are practical costs. The intervention showcases the vulnerability of Russian military systems like the S-300 air-defense units deployed in Venezuela, which failed to stop the operation. Moscow stands to lose billions in unpaid loans to Caracas. Most critically, U.S. access to Venezuela’s massive oil reserves could depress global prices, threatening a key source of Russian revenue. As Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska noted, if the U.S. controls Venezuela’s oil, the goal may be to cap Russian oil prices.
Yet, for all its public outrage, Moscow’s response is tempered. Bogged down in Ukraine, Russia lacks the capacity or will to challenge the U.S. in its own hemisphere. Analysts note that maintaining a relationship with Trump over Ukraine likely far outweighs the fate of Caracas for Moscow.
America’s strength has historically been rooted in moral authority and strategic alliances, not in acting as a unilateral vigilante. This overreach exacerbates global divisions, validates the worst accusations of our adversaries, and diverts attention and resources from the urgent work of rebuilding our own nation: our infrastructure, our economy, and our social fabric. We must be a nation that leads by example and builds at home, not one that perpetuates endless, legally dubious conflicts abroad.
Sources for this article include:
RT.com
CNBC.com
TheGuardian.com

Russia slams U.S. strikes in Venezuela as violation of sovereignty and calls for UN meeting – NaturalNews.com