Quote Originally Posted by WingedWitch View Post
This is all very entangled and complex. Cruz wants to sell off public lands. Walker wants ‘sponsors’ for WI public parks. What does that entail? If we want to eliminate or severely reduce even legal immigration, is not our environment part of the reason? If Walker is anti-environment, isn’t that a contradiction to the cause? I remain with Trump as being more balanced and I am willing to have people like Ann Coulter and groups like ALIPAC keep pressure on him. Does it bother anyone but me that Walker jumped on supporting the trade deal without reading the bill first which would have severely hurt legal U.S. workers? Actions speak louder than words.
I hear what you're saying, however, my conscience will not allow me to support any candidate that openly supports amnesty for illegal aliens. I, like many others on here, consider illegal immigration and border security to be our #1 issue. IMO, Trump's open support of amnesty is unacceptable and should not be ignored or tolerated. None of us are ever going to find a candidate we agree with 100% of the time, so there are certain things we are forced to overlook (not ignore, just overlook). With that said, I for one absolutely refuse to get behind someone that supports amnesty for illegal aliens. For me right now, Rick Santorum and Scott Walker are the only two choices.