Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #31
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,717
    Rockfish wrote:

    We must be sure.
    We're sure, his name is not on the list. Furthermore, why would a CFR member vote against NAFTA and CAFTA? IMHO, that would defy all logic. I feel confident in saying we have identified Hunter, Tancredo, and Paul as non-CFR members.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    12,855
    Quote Originally Posted by MW
    Rockfish wrote:

    We must be sure.
    We're sure, his name is not on the list. Furthermore, why would a CFR member vote against NAFTA and CAFTA? IMHO, that would defy all logic. I feel confident in saying we have identified Hunter, Tancredo, and Paul as non-CFR members.
    Agreed.

    Btw, I'm very serious about the CFR. I've been researching them for more than a few years.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #33
    Senior Member cvangel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    4,450
    Quote Originally Posted by 2ndamendsis
    So far as we've been able to find out....
    Hunter is NOT a member of the CFR.
    I don't think he is Sis. From what I've heard he opposes the NAU.

  4. #34
    Senior Member cvangel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    4,450
    I found this article from WND on what Hunter is doing about this:




    WND THE NEW WORLD DISORDER
    Congressman moves to block Mexican trucks
    Bill would not allow free access to U.S. until safety, security ensured
    Posted: March 30, 2007
    1:00 a.m. Eastern


    © 2007 WorldNetDaily.com


    Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif.
    Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., introduced legislation barring Mexican trucks from operating freely in the U.S. until certain conditions are met to ensure safety and security.

    The North American Free Trade Agreement Trucking Safety Act is a response to a pilot plan to allow 100 Mexican companies to run their rigs anywhere in the U.S.

    "There are considerable safety and security risks involved with providing Mexican truckers complete and unrestricted access to American roadways," Hunter said in a statement. "It is important that these issues are thoroughly addressed before Mexican motor carriers are permitted to freely operate beyond established commercial zones along the Southern land border.

    As WND reported, the Department of Transportation pilot test designed to has encountered opposition, both in Congress and in Mexico.

    Hunter, a candidate for president, said the nation's roadways and motorists must be protected from potentially dangerous and unsafe vehicle traffic.

    "The NAFTA Trucking Safety Act rightfully applies to Mexican truckers the same rules and regulations applied to American truckers, preventing unqualified and inexperienced motor carriers from traveling the highways and roads within our communities," he said. "If Mexican truckers cannot meet these requirements, then they should not be granted access into the United States."

    Submitting Mexican truckers to the same background checks and inspection requirements as their American counterparts has an important security element, he said.

    "Unrestricted cross-border trucking presents potential terrorists, drug smugglers and other criminals the opportunity to quietly enter the United States with unidentified cargo and contraband," Hunter pointed out. "This is unacceptable in today's security environment and further underscores the safety and security risks involved with providing cross-border truckers direct access to our roadways."

    Specifically, the NAFTA Trucking Safety Act requires that no Mexican motor carrier be granted authority to operate in the U.S. beyond commercial zones until:

    * The Secretary of Transportation: publishes in the Federal Register a list of all Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations and how Mexican carriers, trucks and drivers will be required to comply; a list of the enforcement tools and conditions required by law that will be made available to federal and state motor carrier safety enforcement personnel; and implements a plan in partnership with the Secretary of Homeland Security to monitor and enforce immigration and customs regulations;

    * Law enforcement personnel have the ability to access driver, criminal and security databases to verify a cross-border drivers' identification, driving record, criminal history and risk to homeland security;

    * The Department of Transportation's Office of the Inspector General has independently verified compliance with each condition in Section 350 of P.L. 107-87 and submitted a report to Congress detailing compliance.

    * The Secretary of Transportation has submitted to Congress a plan to enforce English language proficiency as already required.

    The NAFTA Trucking Safety Act has been referred to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and the House Committee on Homeland Security.

    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=54944

  5. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    390
    I'm liking this man more and more, the more I hear about him!
    He ain't heavy, he's my Brother
    Â*http://www.alsa.org/

  6. #36
    Senior Member SOSADFORUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    IDAHO
    Posts
    19,570
    * The Department of Transportation's Office of the Inspector General has independently verified compliance with each condition in Section 350 of P.L. 107-87 and submitted a report to Congress detailing compliance.
    I wll bet you this is a report not backed with any proof that these are not lies, every bit of it , this report should be double checked and if this guy is caught lieing he should be fired on the spot. I do not believe hm for a minute!
    Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)

  7. #37
    Senior Member Rockfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    From FLA to GA as of 04/01/07
    Posts
    6,640
    Yea, you're right, SOSAD, its nothing but a pack of lies. That kind of confirmation couldn't have been done that quickly and be complete.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •