Results 31 to 39 of 39
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
05-30-2006, 10:45 PM #31
2ndamendsis
secession wasn't in the Constitution, but neither was it prohibted. They formed the union for our 'common defense and general welfare' -- now it does everything except what it was created for. Our founding fathers did not want future generations to have to fight for independence with bloodshed.
When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security."Whether we remain in one confederacy, or form into Atlantic and Mississippi confederacies, I believe not very important to the happiness of either part. Those of the Western confederacy will be as much our children & descendants as those of the Eastern.""Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it" George Santayana "Deo Vindice"
-
05-30-2006, 11:52 PM #32
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- NJ
- Posts
- 12,855
You're the expert, MAMIE I always learn something from you about the Constitution.
The included something in it because a couple of dudes threatened not to ratify , didn't they?Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
05-31-2006, 12:20 AM #33Originally Posted by swtncgram
I think not, since Hawaii was not a stand alone country prior to statehood, it was a territory or possession.
I used to live there. There are a few movements to succede and restore the monarchy; one is the Nation of Hawaii, led by Dennis (Bumpy) Kanahele of Waimanalo. According to a front page Honolulu Advertiser article a few years ago, Bumpy would mandate that Banks and Mortgage companies would have to leave; haoles who rent would have to leave, haoles who own property would be allowed to stay, all government land would revert to the Nation of Hawaii, and a bunch of other stuff. Bumpy Kanahele is a convicted felon, convicted of harbouring federal fugitives in Waimanalo.
Another effort is led by the Tras (not sure of spelling) sisters of Maui, both are attorneys and PhDs ; they have different ideas to restore the Monarchy, and there's a few other groups.
The basis for restoration of the monarchy is argued to be Bill Clinton's apology for the overthrow of the monarchy, never mind that Pauline Bishop stated that the overthrow was probably for the best anyway. I think it was Pauline Bishop that made that statement; somebody correct me.
To muddy the water even more, there's a lot of consternation over who is eligible to vote in such an election; ie. only people of Hawaiian ancestery, but not haoles, and whether or not it would be legal to exclude haoles (or whether or not even such an [expensive] election would be legal in the first place).
What part of "We don't owe our jobs to India" are you unable to understand, Senator?
-
05-31-2006, 02:14 AM #34
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- Mexifornia
- Posts
- 265
When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
http://www.dixierising.com/webring.phtml
-
05-31-2006, 04:04 AM #35
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- HAWAII
- Posts
- 277
Hawaii one day WILL break away from the united states....
As I am from there, there has been numerous efforts to do so from different leaders of the hawaiian community.
but we are not prone to the "invasion" there has been a number of illegals mostly from the phillipines and samoa that come here.
PLUS...hawaiians DO look like Mexicans. I go to college in vegas...and more than once have i been thought to be spanish/hispanic/latino.
-
05-31-2006, 06:04 AM #36Originally Posted by socal
The people in the south seem to be the only sensible ones theses days, i hope the south does rise again !“In questions of power…let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” –Thomas Jefferson
-
05-31-2006, 07:40 AM #37Originally Posted by 2ndamendsis
Originally Posted by SoCalOriginally Posted by Reciprocity
use to it was only the south that said that, I'm glad to know other folks want to join in this time!"Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it" George Santayana "Deo Vindice"
-
05-31-2006, 08:32 AM #38
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- NJ
- Posts
- 12,855
SOCAL
Lincoln was a CRIMINAL
Someone said, Southern states are the only ones with sense these days? LOL, they're the ones that started this sanctuary city crap and for the most part, doing everything to avoid putting laws into place to stop this mess. No different than the rest of us........all these states are loony, except for Georgia's governor, that is. At least he's got some courage to step out of the pack.Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
06-01-2006, 03:50 AM #39
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- Mexifornia
- Posts
- 265
Originally Posted by Reciprocity
BRUTAL! Bill Melugin Throws Down Against Jim Jordan and GOP...
05-10-2024, 04:20 PM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports