Thread: Was Iowa RIGGED?! You’ll Never Guess How Many Votes WENT MISSING!

Was Iowa RIGGED?! You’ll Never Guess How Many Votes WENT MISSING!

Blair Patterson

How do you just miss these votes? How do they just magically disappear?

According to reports today, Iowa was missing approximately 90 precincts, or around 5% of all votes for the democratic caucus. My question is, how? How do you miss 5% of all people. There are literally thousands of volunteers around the state at these voting hubs, sometimes having hundreds of people at one stop alone. How can this happen?!
Here’s the full story as we know it.

The Iowa Democratic Party informed the campaigns of Hillary Clinton and Sen. Bernard Sanders late Monday night that it has no results for 90 precincts across the state, which could account for as much as 5 percent of the total vote. And the party has asked the campaigns for help in getting a tally for those missing results.

“We are, right now, calling all our precinct captains on precincts where we have knowledge of what’s missing, to report what we think happened there,” a visibly irate Robert Becker, Sanders’ state director told Roll Call after Sanders’ speech at the Holiday Inn near the Des Moines airport.

Clinton and Sanders were locked in a virtual tie for most of the evening, with the state party announcing early Tuesday morning that Clinton achieved a slight edge in delegate counts.

Attempts to reach the Clinton campaign early Tuesday were unsuccessful.

More on this story as we have it, but it looks like this could be a case of voter fraud in the highest order.
(Source: Roll Call)
http://www.yesimright.com/was-iowa-r...5b027-Facebook

Dust Begins to Settle in Iowa With Clinton Edge

By Jason DickPosted at 1:29 a.m.
on Feb. 2

Becker, right, said “there’s probably going to be squabbles” about the missing votes. (Photo Courtesy Brent Roske)

DES MOINES, Iowa — After a tense night and early morning trying to account for missing votes in errant precincts, the Iowa Democratic Party declared Tuesday that it had received results from 100 percent of the state’s precincts and could confirm a razor-thin victory for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Late on Monday night, the party informed the campaigns of Clinton and Sen. Bernard Sanders that it had no results for 90 precincts across the state, which could account for as much as 5 percent of the total vote. The party asked the campaigns for help in getting a tally for those missing results. Then around noon Tuesday, central time, the Iowa said 100 percent of precincts were reporting, sealing Clinton’s win.

“The results tonight are the closest in Iowa Democratic caucus history,” state Party Chairman Andy McGuire said in a statement. “Hillary Clinton has been awarded 700.59 state delegate equivalents, Bernie Sanders has been awarded 696.82 state delegate equivalents, Martin O’Malley has been awarded 7.61 state delegate equivalents and uncommitted has been awarded .46 state delegate equivalents.”

When the campaigns were informed of the missing votes, shortly after Clinton and Sanders spoke to supporters here Monday night, Sanders aides were highly critical of the party, accusing it of not doing the necessary planning to ensure a competent caucus night.

“We are, right now, calling all our precinct captains on precincts where we have knowledge of what’s missing, to report what we think happened there,” a visibly irate Robert Becker, Sanders’ state director told Roll Call after Sanders’ speech at the Holiday Inn near the Des Moines airport.

“They’ve asked the other campaigns to do the same thing. At the end of the day, there’s probably going to be squabbles on it,” he added.

WATCH VIDEO AT LINK.

An Iowa Democratic Party official disputed Becker’s characterization.

“We are currently getting results from our small number of outstanding precincts, and results continue to be reported on our public website,” an Iowa Democratic Party official told Roll Call. “The reports of precincts without chairs are inaccurate. These outstanding precincts have chairs who we are in the process of contacting to get their results. It is inaccurate to report that these precincts did not have chairs.”

“We have reached out to the campaigns for help in contacting the chairs for our outstanding precincts. We are not taking results from the campaigns. We are taking them from the chairs who are in these precincts,” the official added.

Clinton and Sanders were locked in a virtual tie for most of the evening, with the state party announcing early Tuesday morning that Clinton achieved a slight edge in delegate counts.

“The party has a responsibility to staff 1,681 individual precincts. And what we’re seeing right now is that they had no-shows. People not showing up with the materials, not showing up with the app to report it. And when they’re telling us an hour ago that they have basically lost 90 precincts, it’s an outrage,” Becker said. “It’s insulting to the people who worked their asses off across this state that they can’t come up with people to cover these things.”

Attempts to reach the Clinton campaign early Tuesday were unsuccessful.

“I’m assuming they’re in the same boat. And they should be just as outraged as we are,” Becker fumed.
http://atr.rollcall.com/sanders-campaign-party-lost-5-percent-of-iowa-vote/

Is there any reason to suspect that there was some funny business on the Republican side? There were some powerful anti-Trump people in Iowa so I wonder if this happened on our side as well?

Originally Posted by Judy

Is there any reason to suspect that there was some funny business on the Republican side? There were some powerful anti-Trump people in Iowa so I wonder if this happened on our side as well?

Actually, if there were any hanky-panky on the Republican side it would have gone against Ted Cruz, not Donald Trump. Remember, Cruz was openly branded as anti-Iowa by the governor for his opposition to ethanol.

Originally Posted by MW

Actually, if there were any hanky-panky on the Republican side it would have gone against Ted Cruz, not Donald Trump. Remember, Cruz was openly branded as anti-Iowa by the governor for his opposition to ethanol.

The Governor doesn't have anything to do with the Iowa Caucus. It's all handled by the Republican Party of Iowa. The churches and these radio hosts are deeply involved in the Caucus. Steve Deace and Vander Plaats who both endorsed Cruz. Just wondering if there were any reports about it. I haven't heard any problems with the counting or ballots or anything like that.

Originally Posted by Judy

The Governor doesn't have anything to do with the Iowa Caucus. It's all handled by the Republican Party of Iowa. The churches and these radio hosts are deeply involved in the Caucus. Steve Deace and Vander Plaats who both endorsed Cruz. Just wondering if there were any reports about it. I haven't heard any problems with the counting or ballots or anything like that.

I imagine the governor has a certain degree of influence on almost everything Iowa.

I thought it odd how rubio packed % on in the end - microsoft cannot be trusted and there should be 2 or 3 other checkers to keep it honest...both z/berg & microsoft want much more cheaper foreign labor for their industries....
Trump Supporters Think Microsoft Helped Rubio Cheat in Iowa
Florida Senator makes up double digits, some cry foul play

Paul Joseph Watson Propaganda Matrix Tuesday, February 2, 2016

Donald Trump supporters think that Microsoft's involvement in last night's Iowa's caucus helped Marco Rubio achieve a third place finish that some are predicting could turn the Florida Senator into the Republican frontrunner.

For many, Rubio's far better than expected performance was more noteworthy than Ted Cruz' triumph, leading to suspicions about vote tampering.

"Polling indicated Rubio would be a distant third, trailing by perhaps double digits in the socially conservative state — an afterthought behind the two candidates expected to duke it out for first: Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) and Donald Trump," reported the Washington Post.

However, soon after Rubio captured 23 per cent of the vote, just one per cent behind Trump, the hashtag #MicrosoftRubioFraud began trending on Twitter, with some Trump supporters adamant that Microsoft, who helped tally the votes via their own app, had been involved in foul play.

Noting that Microsoft is Rubio's number two campaign contributor, one meme asked the question, "Nice of them to count the votes, wasn't it?"

@realDonaldTrump should address #MicrosoftRubioFraud pic.twitter.com/bawwZzA1pP
— Universe (@LordPatriot) February 2, 2016

"Members of the 8chan message board (one of the original Gamergate hotbeds) began theorizing earlier on Monday that Microsoft software used for counting votes was going to screw Trump somehow," writes Noah Kulwin. "And when Trump finished behind Ted Cruz and ahead of Marco Rubio, it stunned many Trump supporters online, who turned this Breitbart article connecting Microsoft and Rubio into an anti-Rubio rallying cry."

Here's a sample of the reaction from Trump supporters;

I'm convinced Microsoft (Rubio's #2 donor & vote tallyer- conflict of interest) gave Trumps votes to Rubio! ELECTION FRAUD! @PrisonPlanet
— Lisa Favara (@lisalicious12) February 2, 2016

Rubio never one time polled more than 12 percent yet he gets 23 percent out of no where. #MicrosoftRubioFraud
— RockPrincess (@Rockprincess81 February 2, 2016

#MicrosoftRubioFraud The GOP establishment is trying to set Rubio up as their man. Microsoft committed voter fraud to give him a boost.
— Matt Forney (@basedmattforney) February 2, 2016

Interesting how @FoxNews is going nuts over a 3rd place finish. Could Iowa have been rigged by the establishment?

#MicrosoftRubioFraud
— Josh Raymond (@JoshRaymond1611) February 2, 2016

Gop establishment stole Iowa from Buchanan in 1996. History repeating itself?#MicrosoftRubioFraud pic.twitter.com/GcCtIQYCTl
— Like the Roman (@JuvenalisUSA) February 2, 2016

You don't just somehow triple your poll numbers overnight. This is fraud, plain and simple.#MicrosoftRubioFraud #IowaCaucus
— Chicago Joe (@adudeinaplace) February 2, 2016

#MicrosoftRubioFraud
-Microsoft benefits from H1Bs. Counts vote.
-Microsoft is #2 donor for Rubio.
-Rubio magically gains 10% of votes.
— The Man with No Name (@WesternPaladin February 2, 2016

#MicrosoftRubioFraud because the last thing the heads at Microsoft want is an end to cheap foreign labor.
— JudenPhysikLügen (@deutsche_physik) February 2, 2016

While many Trump supporters used the hashtag to express their suspicions, it was also hijacked by Democrats to make fun of the entire issue.

Rubio's surprisingly strong showing has led many establishment voices to predict that he will now emerge as the main challenger to both Trump and Cruz. If Rubio can beat the other "establishment" candidates in New Hampshire, then a three horse race appears likely.

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/arti...t.htm?AID=7236