Thread: Khizr Khan is a liar and Islamic operative!

Khizr Khan is a political operative and liar! After his speech, if his son was still alive, there is a good chance he would have disowned his own father!

Khizr Khan lied when he SAID"if it was up to Donald trump he [his son] would never have been in America."

The truth is, in 1980 when Khan immigrated to the U.S. there was no reason to object to Muslim immigration. So where is Khan’s evidence that if Trump had his way in 1980, the Khan’s would have been banned from migrating to America?


Khizr Khan also lied when he said that Trump "wants to build walls and ban us from this country". Trump certainly made no mention of banning the Khan family from America. His object is to ban Muslim terrorists from entering the country and Mr. Khan knows this to be true but misrepresents Trump's position in order to support Hillary Clinton.


The good news is, the truth about Khizr Khan is coming out! See for example: HILLARY’S “KHAN MAN”: Who Is KHIZR KHAN? The SHOCKING Truth About His Job, His Ties To Hillary, Saudi Arabia And The Muslim Brotherhood

"Clock Boy…Part II. When you peel back the rotten Clinton onion, you usually find the scary truth. In the case of the poor believed parents Hillary and the DNC held up as model immigrants, the truth could not be any more damning. We published a letter from a US Marine and Navy veteran earlier today. If you want to know how military members feel about this fraud, check out the letter HERE."

JWK




80% of green energy money taxed away from hard working American Citizens WENT TO the Hillary Clinton / Obama Administration’s donors!

Yes, Khan is a fraud, an operative helping Muslims immigrate to the US, and that's why he's upset with Trump and Trump's ban on foreign Muslim immigration. When you know the immigration system, you know its weaknesses, it holes, and obviously as we've learned, there are hundreds of holes in this system, and people like Khan know how to sneak people in through those holes and collect big bucks for achieving it.

It's all going to boil to the top and the truth will come out. It's only been a few days and look what's already come out.

Mr. Khan is going to rue the day he presented himself at the DNC to attack Donald Trump. Too many eyes are on him and his activities now.

The fact is, Khizr Khan used his dead son to attack Donald Trump when he could have used his son as an example of a son of Muslim immigrants who loved this country and gave his life for it. Instead, Mr. Khan used the opportunity to level a vicious political attack on Trump and deserves to be called out for using his son as a political prop.

Mr. Khan is playing the same old stunt that Sara Brady did when she rolled out her husband in a wheelchair as a political prop in order to advance gun confiscation.

THE DEMOCRATE PARTY LEADERSHIP HAS NO FREAKEN SHAME WHATSOEVER!


JWK



The Obama/Hillary Administration has given aid and comfort to our sworn enemies by releasing them from GITMO

The Path of Khan

After Khizr Khan's emotional DNC speech, rumors were circulated claiming the father of a fallen U.S. soldier is a Muslim Brotherhood operative.

Kim LaCapria
Aug 01, 2016



CLAIM: DNC speaker Kzhir Khan, father of fallen Army Capt. Humayun Khan, is a Muslim Brotherhood operative.UNPROVEN

WHAT'S TRUE: Khzir Khan is a Muslim-American.

WHAT'S FALSE: No credible evidence supports the assertion that Khan is an operative of the Muslim Brotherhood.

---

EXAMPLE: [Collected via Twitter, August 2016]

Follow
slone @slone

MUST READ: What The Media Is Not Telling You About The Muslim Who Attacked Donald Trump
http://shoebat.com/2016/07/31/what-the-media-is-not-telling-you-about-the-muslim-who-attacked-donald-trump-he-is-a-muslim-brotherhood-agent-who-wants-to-advance-sharia-law-and-bring-muslims-into-the-united-states/ …
5:22 AM - 1 Aug 2016




What The Media Is Not Telling You About The Muslim Who Attacked Donald Trump: He Is A Muslim...

By Theodore Shoebat and Walid Shoebat The Muslim who attacked Donald Trump, Khizr Muazzam Khan, is a Muslim Brotherhood agent, working to bring Muslims into the United States. After reading what we…
shoebat.com

• 
  
• 
  6868 Retweets
• 
  5252 likes

ORIGIN: An unexpected controversy took root after the July 2016 Democratic National Convention (DNC) involving key speaker Khizr Khan, who took to the convention stage to speak about Donald Trump, Muslims in America, and the loss of his son, U.S. Army Captain Humayun Khan:Khan's speech was preceded by brief introductory footage of Hillary Clinton describing his immigration to the United States, and how his son was killed in action in Iraq while guarding his Army unit. Khan reiterated his son's story and challenged Donald Trump (who has at times proposed barring Muslims from entering the United States) to read the U.S. Constitution:

Like many immigrants, we came to this country empty-handed. We believed in American democracy; that with hard work and goodness of this country, we could share in and contribute to its blessings ... Our son, Humayun, had dreams too, of being a military lawyer, but he put those dreams aside the day he sacrificed his life to save the lives of his fellow soldiers. Hillary Clinton was right when she called my son "the best of America."If it was up to Donald Trump, he never would have been in America. Donald Trump consistently smears the character of Muslims. He disrespects other minorities: women, judges, even his own party leadership. He vows to build walls, and ban us from this country.

Donald Trump, you're asking Americans to trust you with their future.Let me ask you: have you even read the United States constitution? I will gladly lend you my copy. [Waved "Pocket Constitution."] In this document, look for the words "liberty" and "equal protection of law."Have you ever been to Arlington Cemetery? Go look at the graves of brave patriots who died defending the United States of America. You will see all faiths, genders and ethnicities. You have sacrificed nothing and no one.

Trump repeatedly issued comments about Khan via Twitter as the Khans were being interviewed about the speech and about Trump's reaction to it:

Follow
Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump

Captain Khan, killed 12 years ago, was a hero, but this is about RADICAL ISLAMIC TERROR and the weakness of our "leaders" to eradicate it!
5:57 AM - 31 Jul 2016 · New Jersey, USA, United States

• 
  
• 
  15,13015,130 Retweets
• 
  43,28343,283 likes

Follow
Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump

I was viciously attacked by Mr. Khan at the Democratic Convention. Am I not allowed to respond? Hillary voted for the Iraq war, not me!
6:32 AM - 31 Jul 2016

• 
  
• 
  18,84918,849 Retweets
• 
  55,47055,470 likes

Follow
Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump

This story is not about Mr. Khan, who is all over the place doing interviews, but rather RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM and the U.S. Get smart!
4:27 AM - 1 Aug 2016

• 
  
• 
  11,05911,059 Retweets
• 
  30,99630,996 likes

On 31 July 2016, the dispute escalated when Trump suggested to ABC's George Stephanopoulos and theNew York Times' Maureen Dowd that Khan's wife Ghazala was silent during her husband's DNC speech because, as a Muslim female, she was not permitted to speak:

Mr. Trump told Mr. Stephanopoulos that Mr. Khan seemed like a “nice guy” and that he wished him “the best of luck.” But, he added, “If you look at his wife, she was standing there, she had nothing to say, she probably — maybe she wasn’t allowed to have anything to say, you tell me.”Mr. Trump also told Maureen Dowd of The New York Times, “I’d like to hear his wife say something.”

A day earlier, Mrs. Khan told MSNBC that she was unable to bring herself to speak at the convention due to her ongoing grief over her son's death:

Ms. Khan did speak to MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell, saying she “cannot even come in the room where his pictures are.”When she saw her son’s photograph on the screen behind her on the stage in Philadelphia, she said, “I couldn’t take it.”“I controlled myself at that time,” she said, while choking back tears. “It is very hard.”

On 31 July, Ghazala Khan wrote an editorial for the Washington Post addressing the ongoing controversy. The same day Mrs. Khan's editorial appeared, bloggers Theodore and Walid Shoebat published a lengthy polemic stitching together circumstantial evidence to suggest Khzir Khan was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood:

The Muslim who attacked Donald Trump, Khizr Muazzam Khan, is a Muslim Brotherhood agent, working to bring Muslims into the United States. After reading what we discovered so far, it becomes obvious that Khan wanted to ‘trump’ Trump’s Muslim immigration policy of limiting Muslim immigration into the U.S.But not so fast. Trump we have your back.

The Shoebats went on to cite two papers written by Khan in 1983 and 1984 pertaining to the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, described as "an intergovernmental oil company consisting of mainly Islamic countries" and a second titled "Juristic Classification of Islamic Law" (both of which were written prior to the family's move to the United States). With respect to the latter, Shoebat bracketed a not-present "Sharia" in the title and included a snapshot of the only page of the paper freely available (which in no part suggested support for Sharia law or membership in the Muslim brotherhood and appeared to be an academic piece, not an advocacy paper). The Shoebats maintained that in the paper "Khan shows his appreciation for the icon of the Muslim Brotherhood," referencing a citation holding that "The contribution to this article of S. Ramadan’s writing is greatly acknowledged."However, the quoted text was suspiciously elided from the screenshot that appeared on Shoebat and looked far less damning in its actual context as an academic footnote:

The elided citation was offered as support of the assertion that Khan's work was undersigned by the "Saudi Wahhabist religious institution" and cited a "recent report" that Khan had moved from Pakistan to the United Arab Emirates, "a hotbed for the Muslim Brotherhood."That "recent report" was a Politico article that described the Khan "family’s journey from Pakistan to the United Arab Emirates, and from there to Boston," which in turn referenced Khan's 2005 interview with the Washington Post about the recent loss of his son Humayun. In its original context, the interview revealed a very different picture than the one painted by the Shoebats:

[Khan] and his wife would talk often to their three boys about why they decided to come to the United States, he began. It was the 1970s, and Pakistan was under military rule. They came to Silver Spring to have more freedom and opportunity."It sounds cliche," said Khan, 54, "but that is the story."His son was always reading books about Thomas Jefferson; that part of his passion was certainly his father's doing. When the boys were small, Khan would take them to the Jefferson Memorial.

He'd have them stand there and read the chiseled, curving words about swearing hostility against tyrannies over the minds of men ... It was not exactly surprising, he continued, that Humayun quoted Jefferson in his admissions essay for the University of Virginia, a line about freedom requiring vigilance. It was a bit surprising, though, when he signed up for ROTC and told his dad that after graduation in 2000, he wanted to join the Army."He said that it seems only fair and logical to join the Army," Khan said. "Because he wanted to complete the journey — he felt that ROTC had completed him as a person, and he wanted to give back. That's what he wanted to do."It was logical, Khan said, and how was a lawyer going to argue with logic?

Humayun finished his four years of service and was preparing for law school when the Army called him back to duty. As he was moving into Iraq last year, Khan called him and they spoke briefly, a conversation he has turned over in his mind a million times since.His son said, "Remember I wrote that article for admission to U-Va.?" Khan said, pausing, taking the pen cap off and putting it on again, his voice steady. "He said, 'I meant it.' He said that. He wasn't going there through some thoughtless process, or thoughtlessly following orders. He thought he was serving a purpose."

Khan recounted the details of his son's death to the paper in 2005, noting that by all accounts his son sent his unit to safety before running towards a suicide bomber:

Over time, his colonel and his fellow soldiers told Khan how his son died, and that, too, had some sort of horrible logic to it. Humayun's job at the base in Baqubah was to inspect the soldiers at the gates, where crowds of Iraqis would sometimes gather. Humayun went early that morning, which was just like him. He saw a taxi speeding toward the gates, too fast, he thought. He yelled for everyone to hit the dirt. Then, as was his nature, he went running toward it, they said."Ten or 15 steps with his hand outstretched," his father said, stretching his own arm out in front of him almost a year later, telling some ghost taxi to stop in a downtown conference room.The explosives detonated before the car could ram the gates or the mess hall nearby, where several hundred soldiers were eating breakfast.

The Shoebat page was something of a Gish Gallop, patching together a pile of loosely or unrelated details to paint a picture of a Muslim Brotherhood infiltrator in the Army who was killed before he could complete some undescribed subversive mission:

I can go on and on. Is it likely that Khan’s son was killed before his Islamist mission was accomplished?

Only another type of investigation will determine that.

Do they ever mention how many soldiers have died because of Muslim traitors? Do they ever bring up how many Christians in the US military were killed? Yet the modernists and homosexuals continue to attack Christians. But soon everything we need to know will be uncovered. As we say in the Middle East: the snow always melts and the sh*t under it will soon be revealed.

The Shoebats' insinuations about the younger Khan directly conflict with all other published accounts about him. Had Humayun's intent in joining the Army been one of sabotage, there would be no reason to expect he'd ultimately lay down his life to stop a suicide bomber from killing scores of other American soldiers — yet by every telling, that is exactly how Capt. Humayun Khan died.The other big "smoking gun" Shoebat cited to support their theory that Khzir Khan is a Muslim Brotherhood operative is his work as an immigration lawyer. By their rationale, Khan bears a grudge against Donald Trump for the candidate's myriad statements about Muslims and immigration — but although it's true that Khzir Khan and his sons were Muslims immigrants to the United States, none of the "evidence" presented by Shoebat remotely supported the idea that Khan is an operative of the Muslim brotherhood.Not only were most of the points made about Khan by Shoebat unrevealing and tenuous, the heroic death of Humayun Khan flies in the face of claims the family were Muslims operatives seeking to harm Americans or work against U.S. interests. Capt. Khan enlisted in the U.S. Army by choice and died protecting his fellow soldiers; by contrast, the only "evidence" linking his family to the Muslim Brotherhood are irrelevant, decades-old papers written about OPEC and Islamic law by Khzir Khan before he immigrated to America.

ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED: 01 August 2016

http://www.snopes.com/khizr-khan-is-...herhood-agent/

Khan is a lousy immigration lawyer lining his pockets off foreign Muslim immigration into the United States. That's why he attacked Trump over his ban on Muslim immigration. No Muslim immigration, no immigration legal services to line Khan's pockets. He used the death of his son in the Iraq War to PUNK the Media, the VFW, John McCain, Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, and so many other STUPID PEOPLE.

But he didn't PUNK ALIPAC, Breitbart, Kelli Ward, Paul Nehlen or Donald Trump.

VOTE FOR THE SMART ONES.

FEEL CLEAN WHEN YOU VOTE.

SUPPORT KELLI WARD, PAUL NEHLEN AND DONALD TRUMP!

The question is, why is FoxNews not exposing Khizr Khan for the Islamic sympathizer which he is, and is selling visas to Muslims so they may enter the United States?

JWK




Obama’s mission from the very start has been ___ death to America by a thousand cuts.

New Information On Khizr Khan Sheds Light On His Opposition To Trump

"...E2 & EB5 visias notoriously abused ..."

Gerry Urbanek August 1, 2016 at 5:50pm

Featured at the Democratic National Convention as an ardent critic of Donald Trump, Khizr Khan — the father of a Muslim-American U.S. soldier killed in Iraq — has been hailed as a hero as he continues to speak out against the Republican presidential nominee.

However, details about Khan’s background are emerging that might at least partially explain the motivation behind his dislike of Trump, the Washington Times reports.

According to his website, Khan — an immigration lawyer — helps clients gain E-2 and EB-5 visas, which provide green cards to foreign investors along with their families. Yet this particular visa program is highly controversial and has been accused of allowing foreigners to buy residency.

“The E-2 and EB-5 are two of the most notoriously abused visa categories that essentially allow wealthy foreigners to buy their way to U.S. residency, and possibly citizenship, with a relatively modest investment,” said Jessica Vaughan, policy director for the Center of Immigration Studies.

“The EB-5 is literally a ‘citizenship for sale’ program in which a visa for a whole family can be bought for as little $500,000. … It’s an amazing deal. Compared to other countries, America is the Walmart of investor visa programs,” she added.

In exchange for their $500,000 investment, immigrants who opt for this program receive green cards for themselves, their spouses and all of their children under the age of 21.

In addition to complaints about the pay-to-play nature of these visas, there have also been instances where immigrant investors are scammed out of their money.

While there is no indication that Khan has been involved in any shady business dealings, some individuals might see Trump’s stance on immigration as a threat to such lawyers, who undoubtedly stand to profit from our current immigration system.

Furthermore, Khan’s background in Islamic law has raised several questions pertaining to his ideological motivations. Writing in 1983 for the Houston Journal of International Law, Khan said that all judicial systems must be subordinate to Sharia law, otherwise known as Islamic law.

“All other juridical works which have been written during more than thirteen centuries are very rich and indispensable, but they must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims,” wrote Khan in his work, “Juristic Classification Of Islamic Law.”

In other words, all legal systems and juridical works should be open to reconsideration by Muslims and must be subordinate to the law of Islam, including the U.S. Constitution.

To make matters worse, Khan credits Said Ramadan — the head of the Islamic Center in Geneva and a major figure within the Muslim Brotherhood — as a contributor to his writings.

Considering this background, it is interesting that he would question Trump’s support for, or knowledge of, the Constitution.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/new...tion-to-trump/

It is people like Khan, these immigration lawyers, who line their pockets flooding our nation with people we don't need, don't want, can't afford and who threaten us and our country, who let in the terrorists. Someone needs to check what lawyer helped that "fiance" with her "fiance visa" responsible for the terrorist attack in San Bernadino, and who helped the Boston Marathon Bombers, and all the ones who were involved with 9/11, and all the ones on the Terrorist Watch List already in the United States.

Someone with access to the information should indeed check this out. It's my guess there's an "immigration lawyer" behind all these entries and they should be held accountable and liable.

The documents are here, decide for yourself. He is an advocate of Sharia law and his law firm caters to rich middle easterners primarily that want to buy their way into a Green Card. IMO


http://www.alipac.us/f9/what-media-n...ump-he-335574/