Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By Judy
  • 1 Post By artclam

Thread: No Fly List? Confirmed: The Obama DHS hit job on conservatives is real Share

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Heart of Dixie

    No Fly List? Confirmed: The Obama DHS hit job on conservatives is real Share

    Confirmed: The Obama DHS hit job on conservatives is real

    By Michelle Malkin • April 14, 2009 12:01 AM

    Yesterday, Roger Hedgecock and the Liberty Papers posted an unclassified DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis report titled:

    Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment.

    The “report” (PDF file here) was one of the most embarrassingly shoddy pieces of propaganda I’d ever read out of DHS. I couldn’t believe it was real.
    I spent the day chasing down DHS spokespeople, who have been tied up preparing for a very important homeland security event later today: The First Lady is coming to visit their Washington office. Priorities, you know.1

    Well, the press office got back to me and verified that the document is indeed for real.

    They were very defensive — preemptively so — in asserting that it was not a politicized document and that DHS had done reports on “leftwing extremism” in the past. I have covered DHS for many years and am quite familiar with past assessments they and the FBI have done on animal rights terrorists and environmental terrorists. But those past reports have always been very specific in identifying the exact groups, causes, and targets of domestic terrorism, i.e., the ALF, ELF, and Stop Huntingdon wackos who have engaged in physical harassment, arson, vandalism, and worse against pharmaceutical companies, farms, labs, and university researchers.

    By contrast, the piece of crap report issued on April 7 is a sweeping indictment of conservatives. And the intent is clear. As the two spokespeople I talked with on the phone today made clear: They both pinpointed the recent “economic downturn” and the “general state of the economy” for stoking “rightwing extremism.” One of the spokespeople said he was told that the report has been in the works for a year. My b.s. detector went off the chart, and yours will, too, if you read through the entire report — which asserts with no evidence that an unquantified “resurgence in rightwing extremist recruitment and radicalizations activity” is due to home foreclosures, job losses, and…the historical presidential election.

    In Obama land, there are no coincidences. It is no coincidence that this report echoes Tea Party-bashing left-wing blogs (check this one out comparing the Tea Party movement to the Weather Underground!) and demonizes the very Americans who will be protesting in the thousands on Wednesday for the nationwide Tax Day Tea Party.

    From the report, p.2:
    Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.

    From the report. p. 3:
    (U//LES) Rightwing extremists are harnessing this historical election as a recruitment tool. Many rightwing extremists are antagonistic toward the new presidential administration and its perceived stance on a range of issues, including immigration and citizenship, the expansion of social programs to minorities, and restrictions on firearms ownership and use. Rightwing extremists are increasingly galvanized by these concerns and leverage them as drivers for recruitment. From the 2008 election timeframe to the present, rightwing extremists have capitalized on related racial and political prejudices in expanded propaganda campaigns, thereby reaching out to a wider audience of potential sympathizers.
    (U) Exploiting Economic Downturn
    (U//FOUO) Rightwing extremist chatter on the Internet continues to focus on the economy, the perceived loss of U.S. jobs in the manufacturing and construction sectors, and home foreclosures. Anti-Semitic extremists attribute these losses to a deliberate conspiracy conducted by a cabal of Jewish “financial elites.” These “accusatory” tactics are employed to draw new recruits into rightwing extremist groups and further radicalize those already subscribing to extremist beliefs. DHS/I&A assesses this trend is likely to accelerate if the economy is perceived to worsen.

    From the report, p. 5:
    (U//FOUO)Over the past five years, various rightwing extremists, including militias and white supremacists, have adopted the immigration issue as a call to action, rallying point,and recruiting tool. Debates over appropriate immigration levels and enforcement policy generally fall within the realm of protected political speech under the First Amendment, but in some cases, anti-immigration or strident pro-enforcement fervor has been directed against specific groups and has the potential to turn violent.

    And echoing the anti-military bigotry last seen in that disgusting Penn State University training video, there’s this on p. 7:
    (U) Disgruntled Military Veterans
    (U//FOUO) DHS/I&A assesses that rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from military training and combat. These skills and knowledge have the potential to boost the capabilities of extremists—including lone wolves or small terrorist cells—to carry out violence. The willingness of a small percentage of military personnel to join extremist groups during the 1990s because they were disgruntled, disillusioned, or suffering from the psychological effects of war is being replicated today.
    There’s no hackneyed left-wing stereotype of conservatives left behind in this DHS intelligence and analysis assessment. I asked both DHS spokespeople to tell me who, specifically, the report was accusing of “rightwing extremist chatter” and which “antigovernment” groups are being monitored as “extremists.” They say they’ll get back to me.

    In the meantime, be aware of this from the report, p. 8:
    (U//FOUO) DHS/I&A will be working with its state and local partners over the next several months to ascertain with greater regional specificity the rise in rightwing extremist activity in the United States, with a particular emphasis on the political, economic, and social factors that drive rightwing extremist radicalization.
    Better make a few last-minute signs for the Tea Party. Obama’s DHS is watching:
    Honk if you’re a radicalized rightwing extremist!
    Guilty of rightwing extremist chatter
    Anti-government, pro-freedom: Sue me
    Previous: Missouri retracts report linking militias, 3rd party candidates.
    Oh, I’m sure DHS will be issuing its report on self-proclaimed bank terrorists like Bruce Marks of NACA and criminal rackeeters harassing private citizens in their homes to “exploit the economic downturn” any day now.
    Last edited by Newmexican; 12-08-2015 at 11:52 AM.

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Heart of Dixie
    Still in place in 2013.

    72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered “Potential Terrorists” In Official Government Documents

    August 26, 2013

    Are you a conservative, a libertarian, a Christian or a gun owner? Are you opposed to abortion, globalism, Communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations or the New World Order? Do you believe in conspiracy theories, do you believe that we are living in the “end times” or do you ever visit alternative news websites (such as this one)? If you answered yes to any of those questions, you are a “potential terrorist” according to official U.S. government documents. At one time, the term “terrorist” was used very narrowly. The government applied that label to people like Osama bin Laden and other Islamic jihadists. But now the Obama administration is removing all references to Islam from terror training materials, and instead the term “terrorist” is being applied to large groups of American citizens. And if you are a “terrorist”, that means that you have no rights and the government can treat you just like it treats the terrorists that are being held at Guantanamo Bay. So if you belong to a group of people that is now being referred to as “potential terrorists”, please don’t take it as a joke. The first step to persecuting any group of people is to demonize them. And right now large groups of peaceful, law-abiding citizens are being ruthlessly demonized.

    Below is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents. To see the original source document for each point, just click on the link. As you can see, this list covers most of the country…

    1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”
    2. Those that advocate for states’ rights
    3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”
    4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”
    5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”
    6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”
    7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”
    8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”
    9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”
    10. “Anti-Gay”
    11. “Anti-Immigrant”
    12. “Anti-Muslim”
    13. “The Patriot Movement”
    14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”
    15. Members of the Family Research Council
    16. Members of the American Family Association
    17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union'”
    18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol
    19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform
    20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition
    21. Members of the Christian Action Network
    22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”
    23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”
    24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21
    25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps
    26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”
    27. The militia movement
    28. The sovereign citizen movement
    29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”
    30. Anyone that “complains about bias”
    31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”
    32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”
    33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”
    34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”
    35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”
    36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”
    37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”
    38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”
    39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”
    40. “Militia or unorganized militia”
    41. “General right-wing extremist”
    42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.
    43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”
    44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”
    45. Those that are “anti-global”
    46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”
    47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”
    48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”
    49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”
    50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”
    51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”
    52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”
    53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”
    54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”
    55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”
    56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”
    57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”
    58. “Rightwing extremists”
    59. “Returning veterans”
    60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”
    61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”
    62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”
    63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”
    64. “Anti-abortion activists”
    65. Those that are against illegal immigration
    66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner
    67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations
    68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”
    69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr
    70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)
    71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies
    72. Evangelical Christians

    The groups of people in the list above are considered “problems” that need to be dealt with. In some of the documents referenced above, members of the military are specifically warned not to have anything to do with such groups.

    We are moving into a very dangerous time in American history. You can now be considered a “potential terrorist” just because of your religious or political beliefs. Free speech is becoming a thing of the past, and we are rapidly becoming an Orwellian society that is the exact opposite of what our founding fathers intended.
    Please pray for the United States of America. We definitely need it.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    That's really sad that there is such a "list" in the United States government. Yet nothing about pro-Shariah, pro-Jihad, or anti-Americanism.
    Newmexican likes this.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at

  4. #4
    Senior Member artclam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    I find the fact that it isn't a public document less concerning than its content.
    Judy likes this.

  5. #5
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Heart of Dixie
    From 2009. This stuff doesn't go away, they just get it out of piblic view.

    Thursday, March 26, 2009
    SPLC's Missouri Moles Get Their Private Parts Caught in Factual Wringer: MIAC Report Withdrawn.

    How "Cold Fusion" Takes Place: SPLC Stooges Write a "Militia Intelligence Report." (Sorry, we couldn't show private parts, this is a family-friendly blog.)

    As Right Side News reported, the MIAC report is the latest example of the radical polarization of law enforcement through the open sewer of lies and half-truths flowing from the Southern Preposterous Lie Center and the ADL's fact-challenged balloon man, Mark Pitcavage. Only this time they got caught. One wonders just what the Missouri "fusion center" is fusing.

    Here's the story.
    Highway Patrol chief retracts militia report; will change review process for MIAC reports

    JEFFERSON CITY | The Missouri State Highway Patrol on Wednesday retracted a controversial report on militia activity and will change how such reports are reviewed before being distributed to law enforcement agencies.

    The announcement followed a press conference in which Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder suggested putting the director of public safety on administrative leave and investigating how the report was produced.

    The controversy revolves around a report prepared last month by the Missouri Information Analysis Center, a so-called “fusion center” for local, state and federal law enforcement agencies to collaborate on domestic security issues.

    The report concerns militia movements in Missouri and across the United States and describes how they have evolved over the last several years.

    It suggests that domestic militias often subscribe to radical ideologies rooted in Christian views and opposition to immigration, abortion or federal taxes. The report also says it is “not uncommon” for militia members to support third-party political candidates and names former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Bob Barr and Chuck Baldwin specifically.

    The eight-page report is labeled “unclassified” but “law enforcement sensitive” and includes numerous editing and design errors, including a misspelling of President Barack Obama’s name.

    On Wednesday afternoon, Highway Patrol Superintendent Col. James F. Keathley released a memo saying the report did not meet the patrol’s standard for quality and would not have been released if it had been seen by top officials.

    “For that reason,” Keathley wrote, “I have ordered the MIAC to permanently cease distribution of the militia report.”

    The memo says the report was compiled by an employee of the information analysis center and reviewed only by the center director before being sent to law-enforcement agencies across the state.

    In the future, Keathley wrote, reports from the center will be reviewed by leaders of the Highway Patrol and the Department of Public Safety. The patrol will also open an investigation into the origin of the militia report.

    Conservatives in Missouri and nationally have criticized the report for lumping people with conservative political persuasions in with domestic terrorists and potentially opening them to harassment from law enforcement.

    The controversy has been aired on blogs, cable news programs and conservative radio.
    In an earlier response, the center had released a statement reaffirming its “regard for the Constitutions of the United States and Missouri” and expressing regret that “any citizens or groups were unintentionally offended by the content of the document.”

    And earlier this week, Department of Public Safety Director John M. Britt retracted the portions of the report that noted third party and Republican presidential candidates by name. Gov. Jay Nixon, a Democrat elected last year, has publicly defended the report as well.

    Republicans said the earlier statements did not go far enough, and on Wednesday morning Kinder criticized the report for suggesting that only issues championed by conservatives motivate domestic terrorists.

    The report “slanders” opponents of abortion and critics of illegal immigration, he said.

    “Under the guidance of the present director, who apparently must think it is Nixon’s secret service, the Department of Public Safety has taken on the new and sinister role of political profiling,” Kinder said.

    Also troubling Kinder said, the report makes no mention of Islamic terrorists or those who might subscribe to ideologies associated with liberals, such as environmental radicals.

    “Let’s be very clear: There are extremists and ultra extremists in every group mentioned above,” Kinder said, referring to anti-abortion and border security activists. “But not just in these groups.”

    Kinder said Britt should be suspended and that the state legislature should investigate how the report was prepared.

    To reach Jason Noble, call 573-634-3565 or send e-mail to

    To recap, these are Missouri mules:

    These are Missouri Moles:

    Colonel James F. Keathley, Superintendent, Missouri Department of Public Safety

    Democrat Governor Jay Nixon

    (Subordinate SPLC moles could not be shown because they are publicity shy.)

Similar Threads

  1. Share This Massive List Of Post-Election Firings And Layoffs With Everyone You Can
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-15-2012, 11:07 PM
  2. Warning: List of reports of new political violence against conservatives
    By ALIPAC in forum illegal immigration Announcements
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-28-2012, 01:17 PM
  3. Real Conservatives Oppose NAFTA
    By Jean in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-11-2011, 06:01 AM
  4. Michele Malkin:Obama DHS hit job on conservatives is real
    By fedupinwaukegan in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 04-15-2009, 10:00 PM
  5. Real Conservatives Don't Like John McCain
    By zeezil in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-23-2008, 11:55 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts