Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,714

    OBAMA TO RULE WITH AUTHORITARIAN DECREE

    Obama Declares He Will Rule by Authoritarian Decree

    Kurt Nimmo
    Infowars.com
    February 14, 2010

    The Obama administration has announced it will now rule by fascist decree and ignore Congress and the American people.

    “With much of his legislative agenda stalled in Congress, President Obama and his team are preparing an array of actions using his executive power to advance energy, environmental, fiscal and other domestic policy priorities,â€

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,370

  3. #3
    Senior Member BetsyRoss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,262
    Here is the original New York Times article posted on ALIPAC

    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-188315-.html
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,370

    Re: OBAMA TO RULE WITH AUTHORITARIAN DECREE

    [quote="topsecret10"]Obama Declares He Will Rule by Authoritarian Decree

    Kurt Nimmo
    Infowars.com
    February 14, 2010

    The Obama administration has announced it will now rule by fascist decree and ignore Congress and the American people.

    “With much of his legislative agenda stalled in Congress, President Obama and his team are preparing an array of actions using his executive power to advance energy, environmental, fiscal and other domestic policy priorities,â€

  5. #5
    Senior Member 4thHorseman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Gulf Coast
    Posts
    1,003
    One step Obama has taken is to threaten to use Recess Appointments if Congress delays his appointments to key positions in the executive branch. This is constitutional.

    As far as I can tell, Executive Orders are constitutional as well, as long as they do not violate any specific provision of the constitution. For example, if Obama issued an executive order banning private ownership of guns, that would be unconstitutional. Executive orders that infringe upon, or appear to infringe upon, the prerogatives of Congress probably would not stand a constitutional test, but that would probably require Congress to take the adiministration to court to challenge the orders. For example, the 40+ czars that Obama has appointed without Senate approval. However, a Democrat controlled Congress, with the majorities currently held by the Democrats, is unlikely to challenge most orders issued by a Democrat president (Same would apply I think to a Republican president with a Republican controlled Congress).

    Personally, I would like to see the concept of executive orders abolished by law, either thru a general challenge thru the court system, or by specific legislation.
    "We have met the enemy, and they is us." - POGO

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •