Laying a $50 billion apportioned tax among the states to cover the national costs of illegal immigration would be in compliance with our Constitution's fair share tax formula, and would require California to pay $5.6 billion while other states would only pay a fraction of that figure.

A number of states now pay a higher per capital share of our federal tax burden than does California which has an overwhelming representation in Congress. As a matter of fact, the seven votes California gets because of its illegal immigrant and non-citizen population, cancels out the representation in the House of 38 other states!

We really need to have a conversation about the merits, wisdom and protection involved with the rule of apportionment being applied totaxation as our founders intended!

Why are none of our "conservative" media personalities, such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and others not having this conversation?

JWK


"If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?"___ Justice Story