Thread: Panic Mode: Khizr Khan Deletes Law Firm Website that Specialized in Muslim Immigratio

Originally Posted by GeorgiaPeach

I just read that he has written articles defending Sharia

Of course he has. He's Muslimism at it's most wicked. The only reason he's not chopping off heads here is because it's illegal and he'd be put in prison with a big bunch of big Bubbas.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/...ald_trump.html

http://dennismichaellynch.com/khan-i...visa-programs/

Khan Is Immigration Lawyer Specializing In Visa Programs

by Team DML/ August 1, 2016

The father of a Muslim-American soldier killed in Iraq, who spoke at the Democrat National Convention, is an immigration lawyer who specializes in a visa program that allows immigrants to effectively buy U.S. citizenship with an E-2 or EB-5 visa.

Khizr Kahn has been blasting Donald Trump for wanting to wanting to halt immigration from Muslim nations that have links to terror. Even House Speaker Paul Ryan has jumped on the band wagon, claiming it is wrong to apply a “religious test” for immigrants.

In reality, Trump’s policy on immigration has the potential to impact Kahn financially. Khan’s website states that he helps clients with the E-2 and EB-5 programs, which allow foreign investors to buy into U.S. companies. The programs also provide green cards for family members. The website also states that he assists with purchase of U.S. real estate and businesses.

Jessica Vaughn, the policy director for the Center of Immigration Studies, said, “The E-2 and EB-5 are two of the most notoriously abused visa categories that essentially allow wealthy foreigners to buy their way to U.S. residency, and possibly citizenship, with a relatively modest investment.”

Washington Examiner reports that there have been multiple scandals surrounding the EB-5 program, and critics are calling for Congress to end it. It allows wealthy immigrants to invest $500,000 in an approved business – in return they get green cards for their spouse and all children under 21 years of age.

Vaughn said, “The EB-5 is literally a ‘citizenship for sale’ program in which a visa for a whole can be bought for as little $500,000. It is literally a ‘citizenship for sale’ program, and it’s an amazing deal. Compared to other countries, America is the Walmart of investor visa programs.”

Kahn’s website reads:

At the KM Khan Law Office we recognize that world economies are rapidly becoming more interdependent and integrated. We advise businesses and business owners from around the globe on a wide range of legal concerns, including:

How to conduct business in the different parts of the world including the United States, Latin America, Asia, Middle East

How to select an appropriate business form – partnership, corporation or joint venture

The purchase or sale of commercial real estate

Issues related to franchise business

Legal representation in litigation and arbitration to resolve business dispute

E2 Treaty Investor and EB5 Investor Services and Immigration Services

http://dennismichaellynch.com/khan-i...visa-programs/

Thank you again, Judy, for posting the articles.

The following mentions that Mr. Khan's former employer was part of WikiLeaks dump from the DNC as it relates to fundraising for the Democratic Party.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016...nc-email-dump/

Seems odd to totally delete your website for business as Mr. Khan did.

Related:
http://www.alipac.us/f9/khizr-khan-l...ative-335593/?

August 1, 2016
Is there a backstory about Khizr Khan and Donald Trump?
By Eileen F. Toplansky

What is one to make of the Democratic Convention speech of Khizr Khan, a Pakistani-born Virginia lawyer whose son Humayun was killed in action in Iraq in 2004?

According to Byron York:

Khan's brief speech wasn't a finely-detailed case. But he suggested that Trump's Muslim ban and Mexican border wall proposals are unconstitutional. Specifically, Khan cited the words 'liberty' and 'equal protection of the law' in suggesting that Trump's policies violate the Constitution.

But, in fact, "there's simply no sense in which a border wall violates the Constitution." There is also "nothing unconstitutional about deporting people who are in the United States illegally."

York emphasizes that "[a]s far as a Muslim ban is concerned, Trump ... amended his proposal to focus on immigration from countries 'compromised by terrorism.' But assume that Khan was addressing Trump's original, more extensive, proposal: a temporary ban on foreign Muslims from entering the United States."

In fact, the 14th Amendment of the Constitution applies to "all persons born or naturalized" in the United States. It does not refer to foreign persons in foreign countries. Trump made it clear that this ban "would not apply to U.S. citizens, members of the U.S. military and others with a legal right to be in the United States." Whether one approves or disapproves of Trump's building a wall, deporting illegal immigrants, and temporarily banning the entry of foreign Muslims, the fact is that Trump's proposals are not unconstitutional.

In an effort toward clarification, Donald Trump released a statement:

Captain Humayun Khan was a hero to our country and we should honor all who have made the ultimate sacrifice to keep our country safe. The real problem here are the radical Islamic terrorists who killed him, and the efforts of these radicals to enter our country to do us further harm. Given the state of the world today, we have to know everything about those looking to enter our country, and given the state of chaos in some of these countries, that is impossible.

Moreover, Trump reiterated that "Captain Khan, killed 12 years ago, was a hero, but this is about RADICAL ISLAMIC TERROR and the weakness of our 'leaders' to eradicate it!"

But is there even more to the story about Khizr Khan? According to Theodore Shoebat and Walid Shoebat, Mr. Khizr Muazzam Khan is a promoter of Islamic sharia law and a co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law (sharia). In fact, in the past, Khizr Khan has shown "his appreciation for an icon of the Muslim Brotherhood" by the name of Said Ramadan, who "wrote material for the Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia, an organization that has been promoting Islamic revivalism and indoctrination to recruit young people in Malaysia to jihadism." Mr. Said Ramadan was the son-in-law of Hassan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood including Ahmad Bahefzallah, the boss of Huma Abedin (Hillary Clinton's aide)[.]"

Should this connection give us pause?

Shoebat writes that "Khizr Khan currently runs a law firm in New York called KM Khan Law Office, a firm that specializes in 'immigration services.'"

According to Shoebat, "[t]o understand the inception of Muslim immigration one must study the Muslim Minority Affairs, a paradigm created by Saudi jurisprudence which sparked during the times Khan lived in Saudi Arabia while collaborating with the Saudi kingdom. It is likely that Khan is a Muslim plant working with the Hillary Clinton campaign, probably for the interest of Muslim oil companies as well as Muslim immigration into the U.S."

Khizr M. Khan used to work for Hogan & Hartson and Lovells, which has ties to the Clinton Foundation. Accordingly, "Hogan Lovells LLP, another U.S. firm hired by the Saudis, is registered to work for the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia through 2016, disclosures show. Robert Kyle, a lobbyist from the firm, has bundled $50,850 for Clinton’s campaign."

In fact, Shoebat relates how "[m]any lawyers at Hogan Lovells remember the week in 2004 when U.S. Army Capt. Humayun Khan lost his life to a suicide bomber. Then-Hogan & Hartson attorneys mourned the death because the soldier’s father, Khizr Khan, a Muslim American immigrant, was among their beloved colleagues."

Shoebat emphasizes that "Saudi interests with using Khan to advance Muslim immigration and advance Muslim Sharia is a lengthy subject [.]" "Then there are the ... ties to Hillary Clinton’s aide Huma Abedin as well. The House of Saud had used Huma’s father Sayed Zaynul Abedin’s work regarding the Muslim Minority Affairs in the West, published in 1998 as part of 29 works to construct a plan to conquer the U.S. with Islam."

Shoebat maintains that "[i]t is obvious that Khan is upset, that a Trump victory will eliminate and destroy decades of hard work to bring in Islamic immigration into the United States which was spearheaded by agents in Saudi Arabia like Khan and Huma Abedin’s father (Sayed Z. Abedin)."

Huma Abedin has never been properly vetted, and this takes on even greater urgency now that Clinton is running for the presidency. The mainstream media continues to cover up the Muslim Brotherhood's enormous clout in the Obama administration. Each day brings new revelations about the financial influence and "access" the Saudis have exerted on the Clinton team. Patrick Poole, a national security analyst, asserts that "[t]here are massive conflicts of interest. It's beyond comprehension."

So is it wrong to impugn Khan's motives? He appears to be a man in mourning for his son. Was Mr. Khan merely being used by the Clinton campaign to advance Clinton's agenda? Or is there an even larger issue concerning the influence such people as Abedin and Khan exert concerning Clinton's bid for the highest office in the land?

The questions need answers.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/...ald_trump.html

Deleted website: kmkhanlaw.com

Tuesday, Aug 2, 2016 12:00 PM PST

Khizr Khan: U.S. wars “have created a chaos” in Muslim-majority countries

The media amplified Khizr Khan's patriotism—but not his criticism of US foreign policy and the "quagmire" it led to



Khizr Khan, the Pakistani American father of a U.S. soldier who died in Iraq, has become something of a media celebrity in the past week.

At the 2016 Democratic National Convention, Khan and his wife Ghazala denounced Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump for his racist, anti-Muslim policies.

Trump responded by maliciously attacking the Khans, and a political scandal has ensued.

Many media outlets have amplified Khizr Khan’s patriotic sentiments. Significantly less attention, however, has been paid to Khan’s criticism of U.S. wars and his lamentation that “We have created a chaos” and a “quagmire” in Muslim-majority countries.

Khizr and Ghazala Khan spoke on MSNBC’s “Hardball” on Monday, Aug. 1. Fifteen minutes into the program, after Khan harshly condemned Islamist extremists for “hijacking” his religion, host Chris Matthews briefly asked Khan about U.S. wars in Muslim-majority countries.

“What do you think, or feel, when you see us attack Iraq, or go into Afghanistan after Osama bin Laden? Or we go attack, we bombed Libya. We’re bombing Syria now, all Islamic countries,” he said. “What do you feel, as an Islamic man?”

“As a Muslim American I feel that these policies are not in the interest of the United States of America,” Khan replied, with a look of distress.

“And we see the result of it,” he continued. “We are more vulnerable now. We have created a chaos.”

“Well you know, you’re speaking to the choir,” Matthews laughed.

Khan added, “I wish this country would have listened to Chris Matthews when he was talking, when he was preaching. We could have saved ourselves from this quagmire.”

“I didn’t think Iraq made any sense, and I think you agree,” the host responded.

Matthews then segued back to Donald Trump, to whom they devoted much more time.

In total, they only discussed U.S. foreign policy for 50 seconds in the 15-minute “Hardball” interview.

This brief excerpt, in which Khizr Khan criticizes militaristic U.S. foreign policy, is not included in the isolated clips for the episode on MSNBC’s website. One has to watch the full episode to see it.

Khan’s criticisms came on the same day that the U.S. launched a new bombing campaign in Libya. In fact, while Khan was stirring up patriotic sentiment on air, MSNBC’s breaking news lower third below him reported: “U.S. launches a new campaign of airstrikes.”

This new war comes just five years after the previous NATO war plunged the oil-rich North African nation into chaos, empowering extremist groups and allowing ISIS to consolidate its largest regime outside of Iraq and Syria.

The Obama administration dropped 23,144 bombs on six Muslim-majority countries in 2015. Libya is now the seventh country with ongoing U.S. air strikes.
As he noted, Chris Matthews was indeed critical in the lead-up to the illegal U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. He was also somewhat skeptical of the 2011 war in Libya and the Obama administration’s attempt in 2013 to launch a bombing campaign in Syria.

Yet Matthews’ record isn’t entirely consistent. In May 2003, when then-President George W. Bush declared “victory” in Iraq, Matthews commended “the president’s amazing display of leadership.”

“The president deserves everything he’s doing tonight in terms of his leadership,” Matthews exclaimed. “He won the war. He was an effective commander. Everybody recognizes that, I believe, except a few critics.”

Moreover, in 2014, as the U.S. launched new wars against ISIS in Iraq and Syria, Matthews declared, “When it comes down to how we fight this, everybody seems to be for air attacks, airstrikes. Everybody is for drone attacks.”

Likewise, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who has also applauded Khan and used his story to attack Trump, is one of the most hawkish figures in U.S. politics.

Clinton voted and lobbied for the invasion of Iraq, helped lead the catastrophic 2011 war in Libya and pushed for a much more aggressive policy in Syria, contributing greatly to the “chaos” and “quagmire” Khan railed against.

Salon contacted the Clinton campaign with a request for comment, but did not immediately receive a response.

http://www.salon.com/2016/08/02/khiz...ity_countries/

The above article is proof that his statements at the Democratic Convention attacking Trump had nothing to do with Trump's policies, except for the ban on Muslim immigration in which Khan has a deep and long financial connection because he's an immigration lawyer specializing in visas for rich Muslims wanting to migrate to the United States!! His attack on Trump had nothing to do with his son, it had nothing to do with Trump, except the BAN that would cut off Khan's gravy train he's been lining his pockets with for many years.

Khan is a Con.