Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010

    Reid Schedules September Vote to Amend Constitution -

    By Ramsey Cox

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has set up a procedural vote for September on a constitutional amendment to limit money in politics.
    Before adjourning for a five-week recess on Friday, Reid filed cloture on the motion to proceed to S.J. Res. 19, which is designed to overturn two recent Supreme Court decisions that allowed corporations, labor unions and wealthy individuals to spend more money on federal elections.
    The procedural vote on the constitutional amendment is set for 6 p.m. on Monday, Sept. 8.The amendment is certain to fail in the Senate because Republicans generally support the high court’s decisions in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and McCutcheon v. FEC, arguing they removed limits on free speech.
    “This partisan effort to weaken the First Amendment is the clearest proof yet of how out of touch the Democrat Majority has become from the needs and concerns of ordinary Americans and how ill-equipped they are to lead in these challenging times,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Friday. “Washington Democrats have forgotten that the First Amendment is meant to empower the people, not the government.”
    The 2010 Citizens United ruling struck down restrictions that had barred corporations and unions from spending money from their general treasury funds to support or oppose candidates. In McCutcheon, the court struck aggregate limits on individual contributions to candidates.
    The amendment from Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.) would authorize Congress and the states to regulate and limit fundraising and spending on federal candidates.
    It would also prohibit the Supreme Court from reversing any future campaign finance legislation passed by Congress.
    The amendment would need to be passed by two-thirds of the Senate and the House and then be ratified by three quarters of the states.
    McConnell said the vote is a political stunt by Democrats ahead of the midterm elections.
    “This latest Democrat effort to abridge political speech is little more than a craven attempt to substitute the incumbent-protection desires of Washington Democrats for a fundamental right that the Constitution guarantees to all Americans,” McConnell said.
    — Alexander Bolton contributed to this article.

    Read more:
    Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
    All Countries have bordersÂ* and laws must be respected

  2. #2

Similar Threads

  1. Dems: Hey, Let's Amend the Constitution to Limit Political Speech
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-01-2014, 12:21 AM
  2. House committee schedules contempt vote against Attorney General Eric Holder
    By Newmexican in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-12-2012, 03:46 PM
  3. Senate Proposal Would Amend Constitution to Birthright
    By Reciprocity in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-28-2011, 05:12 PM
  4. September 17th is Constitution Day: Save our Constitution
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-13-2009, 10:37 AM
  5. Amend the Constitution NOW!!
    By Federali in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 04-16-2006, 05:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts