Thread: REPUBLICANS TO ELECT HILLARY CLINTON PRESIDENT IN 2016 (My title)

H2 Note: The John Boehner, John McCain, and Marco Rubios of the Republican Elitist Party (REP) are about to accomplish the impossible yet ONE MORE TIME. They did it in 2012 by forcing an UNELECTABLE Mitt Romney on Conservatives with a completely stacked deck against Barack Obama and ... BARACK OBAMA won.

The best they have to offer right now are liberal thugs along the genre of Chris Christie and other similar globalist liberals who just love running around calling themselves 'Conservatives' when nothing could be further from the truth. They are every bit as liberal as Hillary Clinton and most have abandoned their core values and accepted abortion and the homosexual lifestyle as 'normal.'

Upon asking yourself the question "What has the REP done for Conservatives in the past ten years?" you will come up with the resounding, undeniable answer of NOTHING. Our country is more dangerous to live in since the Civil War, our jobs are either outsourced overseas, or are being stolen from us with the complete approval of the REP. Our public education is a disgrace, our quality of life is now on 3rd World standards, we have the highest unemployment rates since the Great Depression, our health care system has been socialized and FORCED upon us, and they are STEALING promised benefits from our active duty and retired military and those promised benefits are being GIVEN BY THE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to people who are not even American citizens and are either not even physically residing within the United States or are here ILLEGALLY. And that does not even scratch the surface.

Upon asking yourself the second question of "Can I trust the REP with the political future of my country?" you will also come up the yet another undeniable answer of NO. You cannot trust the REP to represent you if you are a Conservative American. Simply look at the voting records of the REP on the core issues (Country, Family, Sovereignty, Employment, Job Creation, Border Protection, Obamacare, and protecting our Military) and you soon begin to realize there is NO DIFFERENCE between the REP and the Socialist Democratic Party (SDP) of Amerika.

The REP is about to completely annihilate the Conservative movement in the (former) Republican Party (e.g., KILL THE REPUBLICAN PARTY) by passing AMNESTY for tens of millions of illegal aliens on the HOPES THEY WILL SOMEHOW VOTE REPUBLICAN. WHO do they think is going to buy ANOTHER LINE OF CRAP like this and then expect to swallow it whole, be happy, and then just go off in a corner somewhere and just die? They (the REP) are doing this under overwhelming disapproval of the vast majority of the very people who put them in power.

Their actions of betrayal of Conservatives will lead to an end of the REP and the birth of another major Party that is truly Conservative and refuses to be bought and sold like a cheap whore on Wall Street. The great unknown is whether there will still be a democratic political system that is enough intact to allow a democratic political process to occur after 2016.

The REP's abandonment of Conservatives who demand that their borders be secured and illegal aliens NOT BE REWARDED with citizenship are going to give you this in 2016: Communist/Socialist Hillary Clinton.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Clinton, who would become the first female president if elected, shows enormous strength among women in the new poll. She leads Christie among female voters by 59 percent to 34 percent — more than double the 11-point margin Obama held over Romney.

Christie tops Clinton by a slender three points among men, 49 percent to 46 percent; Romney won men by seven percentage points.

For 2016, Hillary Clinton has commanding lead over Democrats, GOP race wide open


Sean Gardner/Getty Images - Hillary Rodham Clinton holds a strong lead over other Democrats in the 2016 race, while the Republican field is wide open, a Washington Post-ABC News poll finds.

By Philip Rucker and Scott Clement, Published: January 29

Hillary Rodham Clinton holds a commanding 6 to 1 lead over other Democrats heading into the 2016 presidential campaign, while the Republican field is deeply divided with no clear front-runner, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
Clinton trounces her potential primary rivals with 73 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents, reinforcing a narrative of inevitability around her nomination if she runs. Vice President Biden is second with 12 percent, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) is third with 8 percent.

Although Clinton’s favorability rating has fallen since she stepped down as secretary of state a year ago, she has broad Democratic support across ideological, gender, ethnic and class lines. Her lead is the largest recorded in an early primary matchup in at least 30 years of Post-ABC polling.

The race for the Republican nomination, in contrast, is wide open, with six prospective candidates registering 10 percent to 20 percent support. No candidate has broad backing from both tea party activists and mainline Republicans, signaling potential fissures when the GOP picks a standard-bearer in 2016.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who was at or near the top of the Republican field in many public opinion surveys last year, appears to have suffered politically from the bridge-traffic scandal engulfing his administration.

The new survey puts Christie in third place — with the support of 13 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents — behind Rep. Paul Ryan (Wis.) with 20 percent and former Florida governor Jeb Bush at 18 percent. The rest of the scattered pack includes Sens. Ted Cruz (Tex.), Rand Paul (Ky.) and Marco Rubio (Fla.), who are at 12, 11 and 10 percent, respectively.

Among strong backers of the tea party — who make up about one-fifth of the Republicans polled — Cruz has a big lead, with 28 percent, followed by Ryan, at 18 percent. But Cruz, an iconoclastic freshman senator who rose to prominence during last fall’s partial government shutdown, registers just 4 percent among those who oppose or have no opinion of the tea party.

Christie is weakest among the strong tea party set, winning 6 percent of that group, but he has the backing of 15 percent of other Republicans. Bush’s base of support comes from self-identified Republicans, while Ryan’s strength comes from white evangelical Protestants, young voters and less conservative wings of the party. Rubio does particularly well among Republicans with college degrees.

Christie has benefited from the perception that he has unique appeal among independents and some Democrats, a reputation the governor burnished with his 2013 reelection in his strongly Democratic state.

But that image has been tarnished, the survey finds. More Democrats now view Christie unfavorably than favorably, with independents divided. Republicans, meanwhile, have a lukewarm opinion, with 43 percent viewing him favorably and 33 percent unfavorably. Overall, 35 percent of Americans see him favorably and 40 percent unfavorably.

Christie’s administration is under investigation for a plot last fall to shut down local access lanes to the George Washington Bridge and cause four days of gridlock in Fort Lee, N.J., in an act of apparent political retribution against a Democratic mayor.

Among the public, 46 percent say they consider the bridge episode a “sign of broader problems” with Christie’s leadership, while 43 percent say they think it was an “isolated incident.”

Most Republicans give Christie the benefit of the doubt, with 57 percent saying the bridge incident is isolated. Sixty percent of Democrats say it is indicative of broader problems, while independents are almost evenly split.

The 2016 presidential campaign is not likely to start taking shape until the end of this year, when candidates are expected to begin declaring their intentions. Among the Republicans, Ryan and Bush appear to be the most ambivalent about a campaign. Other Republicans not named in the poll, such as Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, could gain steam as potential candidates.

On the Democratic side, Warren has said she will not run, although she has a loyal following among some liberal groups hoping to draft an alternative to Clinton.

Polling this far out in the cycle is poor at forecasting winners of party nomination battles, but it offers important clues about current voter attitudes. Major fundraisers and party activists in particular look to such polls as indications of potential candidates’ strengths and weaknesses on the national stage as they begin to pick their horses.

In a theoretical head-to-head general-election matchup, Clinton leads Christie among registered voters, 53 percent to 41 percent. This is a far larger deficit than Republicans had in the popular vote in the past two presidential elections. In 2012, President Obama beat Mitt Romney by 51 percent to 47 percent, and he beat John McCain by 53 percent to 46 percent in 2008.

Christie is hurt by weak support among independents — trailing Clinton by 48 percent to 43 percent — as well as by a less consolidated party base. Although 90 percent of Democrats say they would back Clinton, only 79 percent of Republicans say they would support Christie. By contrast, Romney beat Obama among independents by five percentage points, and he won 93 percent of Republican votes.

Clinton, who would become the first female president if elected, shows enormous strength among women in the new poll. She leads Christie among female voters by 59 percent to 34 percent — more than double the 11-point margin Obama held over Romney.

Christie tops Clinton by a slender three points among men, 49 percent to 46 percent; Romney won men by seven percentage points.

Clinton is buoyed by net-positive favorability ratings and by the intense loyalty of her supporters. Fifty-eight percent view her favorably , including 32 percent who are “strongly” favorable, while 38 percent have an unfavorable view of her.

This marks a decline from a Post-ABC poll last January, as Clinton prepared to leave the State Department. At the time, 67 percent said they viewed her favorably. The drop can be attributed to declining support among independents and Republicans, as Clinton inched back into partisan politics and the news media stopped covering her as a globe-trotting diplomat and focused on her presidential ambitions.

Still, Clinton’s current popularity is as high or higher than at any point during her eight-year tenure as a U.S. senator from New York, when her favorable rating in Post-ABC polling mostly hovered in the high 40s or low 50s.

Although Clinton was the front-runner heading into the 2008 primary season, she barely tipped over 50 percent in two Post-ABC surveys. Clinton’s standing heading into the 2016 Democratic primaries is considerably stronger. The poll shows her with remarkable strength across demographic groups. She wins nearly three-quarters of men and women, whites and nonwhites, young and old, as well as lower- and higher- income voters.

The Post-ABC poll was conducted Jan. 20-23 among a random national sample of 1,003 adults, including interviews on conventional telephones and with cellphone-only respondents. The overall margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...267_story.html

Originally Posted by HAPPY2BME

H2 Note: The John Boehner, John McCain, and Marco Rubios of the Republican Elitist Party (REP) are about to accomplish the impossible yet ONE MORE TIME. They did it in 2012 by forcing an UNELECTABLE Mitt Romney on Conservatives with a completely stacked deck against Barack Obama and ... BARACK OBAMA won.

The best they have to offer right now are liberal thugs along the genre of Chris Christie and other similar globalist liberals who just love running around calling themselves 'Conservatives' when nothing could be further from the truth. They are every bit as liberal as Hillary Clinton and most have abandoned their core values and accepted abortion and the homosexual lifestyle as 'normal.'

Upon asking yourself the question "What has the PER done for Conservatives in the past ten years?" you will come up with the resounding, undeniable answer of NOTHING. Our country is more dangerous to live in since the Civil War, our jobs are either outsourced overseas, or are being stolen from us with the complete approval of the PER. Our public education is a disgrace, our quality of life is now on 3rd World standards, we have the highest unemployment rates since the Great Depression, our health care system has been socialized and FORCED upon us, and they are STEALING promised benefits from our active duty and retired military and those promised benefits are being GIVEN BY THE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to people who are not even American citizens and are either not even physically residing within the United States or are here ILLEGALLY. And that does not even scratch the surface.

Upon asking yourself the second question of "Can I trust the PER with the political future of my country?" you will also come up the yet another undeniable answer of NO. You cannot trust the REP to represent you if you are a Conservative American. Simply look at the voting records of the REP on the core issues (Country, Family, Sovereignty, Employment, Job Creation, Border Protection, Obamacare, and protecting our Military) and you soon begin to realize there is NO DIFFERENCE between the REP and the Socialist Democratic Party (SDP) of Amerika.

The REP is about to completely annihilate the Conservative movement in the (former) Republican Party (e.g., KILL THE REPUBLICAN PARTY) by passing AMNESTY for tens of millions of illegal aliens on the HOPES THEY WILL SOMEHOW VOTE REPUBLICAN. WHO do they think is going to buy ANOTHER LINE OF CRAP like this and then expect to swallow it whole, be happy, and then just go off in a corner somewhere and just die? They (the REP) are doing this under overwhelming disapproval of the vast majority of the very people who put them in power.

Their actions of betrayal of Conservatives will lead to an end of the REP and the birth of another major Party that is truly Conservative and refuses to be bought and sold like a cheap whore on Wall Street. The great unknown is whether there will still be a democratic political system that is enough intact to allow a democratic political process to occur after 2016.

The PER's abandonment of Conservatives who demand that their borders be secured and illegal aliens NOT BE REWARDED with citizenship are going to give you this in 2016: Communist/Socialist Hillary Clinton.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

For 2016, Hillary Clinton has commanding lead over Democrats, GOP race wide open


Sean Gardner/Getty Images - Hillary Rodham Clinton holds a strong lead over other Democrats in the 2016 race, while the Republican field is wide open, a Washington Post-ABC News poll finds.

By Philip Rucker and Scott Clement, Published: January 29

Hillary Rodham Clinton holds a commanding 6 to 1 lead over other Democrats heading into the 2016 presidential campaign, while the Republican field is deeply divided with no clear front-runner, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
Clinton trounces her potential primary rivals with 73 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents, reinforcing a narrative of inevitability around her nomination if she runs. Vice President Biden is second with 12 percent, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) is third with 8 percent.

Although Clinton’s favorability rating has fallen since she stepped down as secretary of state a year ago, she has broad Democratic support across ideological, gender, ethnic and class lines. Her lead is the largest recorded in an early primary matchup in at least 30 years of Post-ABC polling.

The race for the Republican nomination, in contrast, is wide open, with six prospective candidates registering 10 percent to 20 percent support. No candidate has broad backing from both tea party activists and mainline Republicans, signaling potential fissures when the GOP picks a standard-bearer in 2016.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who was at or near the top of the Republican field in many public opinion surveys last year, appears to have suffered politically from the bridge-traffic scandal engulfing his administration.

The new survey puts Christie in third place — with the support of 13 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents — behind Rep. Paul Ryan (Wis.) with 20 percent and former Florida governor Jeb Bush at 18 percent. The rest of the scattered pack includes Sens. Ted Cruz (Tex.), Rand Paul (Ky.) and Marco Rubio (Fla.), who are at 12, 11 and 10 percent, respectively.

Among strong backers of the tea party — who make up about one-fifth of the Republicans polled — Cruz has a big lead, with 28 percent, followed by Ryan, at 18 percent. But Cruz, an iconoclastic freshman senator who rose to prominence during last fall’s partial government shutdown, registers just 4 percent among those who oppose or have no opinion of the tea party.

Christie is weakest among the strong tea party set, winning 6 percent of that group, but he has the backing of 15 percent of other Republicans. Bush’s base of support comes from self-identified Republicans, while Ryan’s strength comes from white evangelical Protestants, young voters and less conservative wings of the party. Rubio does particularly well among Republicans with college degrees.

Christie has benefited from the perception that he has unique appeal among independents and some Democrats, a reputation the governor burnished with his 2013 reelection in his strongly Democratic state.

But that image has been tarnished, the survey finds. More Democrats now view Christie unfavorably than favorably, with independents divided. Republicans, meanwhile, have a lukewarm opinion, with 43 percent viewing him favorably and 33 percent unfavorably. Overall, 35 percent of Americans see him favorably and 40 percent unfavorably.

Christie’s administration is under investigation for a plot last fall to shut down local access lanes to the George Washington Bridge and cause four days of gridlock in Fort Lee, N.J., in an act of apparent political retribution against a Democratic mayor.

Among the public, 46 percent say they consider the bridge episode a “sign of broader problems” with Christie’s leadership, while 43 percent say they think it was an “isolated incident.”

Most Republicans give Christie the benefit of the doubt, with 57 percent saying the bridge incident is isolated. Sixty percent of Democrats say it is indicative of broader problems, while independents are almost evenly split.

The 2016 presidential campaign is not likely to start taking shape until the end of this year, when candidates are expected to begin declaring their intentions. Among the Republicans, Ryan and Bush appear to be the most ambivalent about a campaign. Other Republicans not named in the poll, such as Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, could gain steam as potential candidates.

On the Democratic side, Warren has said she will not run, although she has a loyal following among some liberal groups hoping to draft an alternative to Clinton.

Polling this far out in the cycle is poor at forecasting winners of party nomination battles, but it offers important clues about current voter attitudes. Major fundraisers and party activists in particular look to such polls as indications of potential candidates’ strengths and weaknesses on the national stage as they begin to pick their horses.

In a theoretical head-to-head general-election matchup, Clinton leads Christie among registered voters, 53 percent to 41 percent. This is a far larger deficit than Republicans had in the popular vote in the past two presidential elections. In 2012, President Obama beat Mitt Romney by 51 percent to 47 percent, and he beat John McCain by 53 percent to 46 percent in 2008.

Christie is hurt by weak support among independents — trailing Clinton by 48 percent to 43 percent — as well as by a less consolidated party base. Although 90 percent of Democrats say they would back Clinton, only 79 percent of Republicans say they would support Christie. By contrast, Romney beat Obama among independents by five percentage points, and he won 93 percent of Republican votes.

Clinton, who would become the first female president if elected, shows enormous strength among women in the new poll. She leads Christie among female voters by 59 percent to 34 percent — more than double the 11-point margin Obama held over Romney.

Christie tops Clinton by a slender three points among men, 49 percent to 46 percent; Romney won men by seven percentage points.

Clinton is buoyed by net-positive favorability ratings and by the intense loyalty of her supporters. Fifty-eight percent view her favorably , including 32 percent who are “strongly” favorable, while 38 percent have an unfavorable view of her.

This marks a decline from a Post-ABC poll last January, as Clinton prepared to leave the State Department. At the time, 67 percent said they viewed her favorably. The drop can be attributed to declining support among independents and Republicans, as Clinton inched back into partisan politics and the news media stopped covering her as a globe-trotting diplomat and focused on her presidential ambitions.

Still, Clinton’s current popularity is as high or higher than at any point during her eight-year tenure as a U.S. senator from New York, when her favorable rating in Post-ABC polling mostly hovered in the high 40s or low 50s.

Although Clinton was the front-runner heading into the 2008 primary season, she barely tipped over 50 percent in two Post-ABC surveys. Clinton’s standing heading into the 2016 Democratic primaries is considerably stronger. The poll shows her with remarkable strength across demographic groups. She wins nearly three-quarters of men and women, whites and nonwhites, young and old, as well as lower- and higher- income voters.

The Post-ABC poll was conducted Jan. 20-23 among a random national sample of 1,003 adults, including interviews on conventional telephones and with cellphone-only respondents. The overall margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...267_story.html

To all gov .
get your head out of the sand I for one would Not vote for Hillary Clnton she just as bad as Obama now Gov jan
& many Other I would vote for but no way in hell clinton

I find it sad that the best our country has to offer is Hillary Clinton, if elected the decline will continue.

How the GOP lost Middle America: Pat Buchanan- GOP selling its soul to multinationals

If Bush I had built that border fence back in 1992 and declared a moratorium on legal immigration that fall, as many implored him to do, the party of the Bushes would not be facing its demise well before mid-century.

McCain Adds Another Dubious Honor To His RINO Trophy Case

Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) picked up the most illustrious of the many trophies he’s been collecting for his RINO mantle over the weekend, receiving a formal censure by the Arizona Republican Party for a voting record that betrays conservative values.

RELATED

http://www.alipac.us/f12/republicans...-obama-182899/

3/25/2010

Christie Linked to Knowledge of Shut Lanes (Best GOP has to counter Hillary)

The aide, Bill Stepien, the governor’s two-time campaign manager and former deputy chief of staff, was among those who lost their jobs or resigned when emails about the closings were made public last month. He had just been retained as a consultant to the Republican Governors Association and was poised to head the state’s Republican Party.

Fund-Raising by G.O.P. Rebels Outpaces Party Establishment

By NICHOLAS CONFESSOREFEB. 1, 2014

Meanwhile, insurgent conservative groups like the Tea Party Patriots — emboldened by activists’ fury over compromises that Republican leaders have struck with Democrats on federal spending — now have formidable amounts of cash to augment their grass-roots muscle.

Republicans face 2016 (EXTINCTION) turmoil

The party is divided and in turmoil, with a civil war raging between its establishment and insurgent factions. For the first time in memory, there is no obvious early favorite — no candidate with wide appeal who has run before, no incumbent president or vice president, no clear establishment pick.

The next presidential election is expected to be a testing ground for a new generation of Republican leaders — senators who might include the charismatic Marco Rubio (Fla.), libertarian Rand Paul (Ky.) and tea party gladiator Ted Cruz (Tex.), and much-mentioned governors such as Chris Christie (N.J.), Bobby Jindal (La.), John Kasich (Ohio), Rick Snyder (Mich.), Scott Walker (Wis.) and Mike Pence (Ind.).