Thread: REPUBLICANS TO ELECT HILLARY CLINTON PRESIDENT IN 2016 (My title)

Hillary Clinton might have a pretty hefty scandal brewing.

It turns when she was an attorney working on the Watergate investigation, she was fired by her supervisor for “lying, unethical behavior.”

Jerry Zeifman, who said he is a lifelong Democrat, was a supervisor for 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. When the investigation was complete, Zeifman said he fired Hillary and refused to give her a recommendation.

Clinton: 'Let's Be Clear,' Military Option for Iran 'on the Table'

Likely presidential candidate calls Israeli government policies exemplary as she receives lifetime achievement award from American Jewish Congress.
Commenting on the ongoing talks between Iran and the P5+1 nations over the nation's nuclear program and ongoing western sanctions, former Secretary of State and likely presidential candidate Hillary Clinton told a largely pro-Israel crowd on Wednesday that she is "personally skeptical" of Iran's stated commitments and that, in her eyes, "all options"—including military ones—should be part of U.S. policy towards Tehran if talks fail.
“Let’s be clear,” she said, “every other option does remain on the table.”
Two days of negotiations between Iran, the US, Russia, China, UK, France, and Germany concluded in Vienna on Wednesday with progress, but no final settlement as of yet. Some diplomats leaving the latest round expressed optimism about prospects for a final deal. But Clinton, from her vantage in New York, expressed her continued doubts that diplomatic efforts can succeed.
“The odds of reaching that comprehensive agreement are not good,” Clinton said. “I am also personally skeptical that the Iranians would follow through and deliver. I have seen their behavior over the years. But this is a development that is worth testing.”
According to the Washington Post:
In a 30-minute address at an American Jewish Congress gala — where she was honored with a lifetime achievement award by actress Julianna Margulies and serenaded at the dinner table by Israeli singer Liel Kolet — Clinton presented herself as a tough defender of Israel in the Senate and at the State Department.
“When Americans of all faiths look at Israel, we see a homeland for a people long oppressed and a democracy that has to defend itself at every turn,” Clinton said. “In Israel’s story, we see our own.”
Clinton described in detail her role in shaping the country’s policies with regard to Iran from the earliest days of the Obama administration. This is likely to be a focus of her forthcoming memoir, due out this spring, which she teased in a separate speech earlier Wednesday.
Citing the group's website, the Associated Press describes the the American Jewish Congress is "an association of Jewish Americans seeking to defend Jewish interests through public policy advocacy, using diplomacy, legislation and the court system."
Though undeclared, Clinton remains the likely frontrunner as the next presidential candidate for the Democratic party, holding commanding leads in all polling on the subject thus far.
Though she has largely demurred from speculation about her possible candidacy, the publication of her upcoming memoir is expected to begin the groundwork for her positioning.
Long known as a hawk on foreign policy issues, Clinton's vote in favor of the invasion of Iraq under President George W. Bush is largely credited as the issue that lost her the primary race against then Sen. Barack Obama in 2008, as he cast himself as the anti-war candidate in contrast to her record.

https://www.commondreams.org/headlin...H9TlY.facebook

https://www.facebook.com/ASheepNoMore

https://ASheepNoMore.net

Spin begins in earnest for Jeb Bush presidential run

If you look at the Republican field minus Jeb Bush, you have some potential stars out there, but nobody knows whether they can put together the grand effort needed to win the nomination and go on to win the White House,” he said. “With Jeb, people are immediately struck by his intellectual heft. He is a serious policymaker and you get the sense that he could go all the way.”

Remembering HillaryCare, Benghazi and "What Difference at This Point Does it Make?"

Donald Lambro | Mar 26, 2014



WASHINGTON - The end of Barack Obama's presidency effectively began after the 2010 congressional elections when Republicans took control of the House.
Obama and the Democrats have been tumbling into a political abyss ever since, hurtling toward major Senate losses this fall, if not a decisive Republican takeover of the Democratic-run chamber.
He has been robotically going through the motions of being the president, but he no longer steers the nation's agenda or is seen as a catalyst for change or as a leader who gets things done -- as his job approval polls sink into the low 40s and the lethargic U.S. economy shows no sign of serious improvement.
His grand plan to further push our country in a sharply leftward direction has turned into a disaster for his party. Democrats have been thrown on the defensive as a result of his unpopular healthcare law that is coming apart at the seams, driving up medical insurance costs, and most likely facing some dismantlement in the courts.
Vulnerable, frightened Democrats running for re-election talk now of "fixing" Obamacare rather than preserving it as it is presently shaped -- while Obama orders one year long delay after another in its full implementation in the face of devastating losses in November.
"There is no doubt the Senate outlook has deteriorated significantly in the past six weeks," a Democratic political strategist told the Washington Post last week. "Between the map and the [Affordable Care Act's] unpopularity in the states on the map, it has gone from being a jump ball to advantage Republicans."
The GOP needs to pick up just six additional seats to take control of the chamber, but their odds are now much better than that.
"Eleven Democratic-held [Senate] seats are in peril....a significant expansion even from a few months ago," writes the Post's ace election tracker Chris Cillizza.
If Republicans were to win only in the states that George Romney carried in 2012, "they would be in the majority in 2015" in the Senate, he says.
The newspapers have been filled with stories about how Hillary Clinton is the enthusiastic choice of her party to be their 2016 presidential nominee. Indeed, there is no other serious Democratic candidate on the horizon.
But gushing news stories about her credentials to follow Obama into the White House ignore or downplay a lot of critical issues and political factors that suggest the country may think otherwise.
After two failed terms of a weak, job-challenged, sub-par growth economy, will Americans really elect another liberal Democratic administration for the next four to eight years? One that offers them pretty much the same policies of the previous eight years?
Or will the voters be sick and tired of the Democrats' big government, class warfare, soak-the-rich, jobless policies that call for keeping Obamacare largely as it exists now?
Polls suggest Republicans have either moved ahead, or are running neck-and-neck with Democrats on taxes, the economy and dealing with enormous deficits. Obama's party has clearly lost ground in the last five years on all of them, as the 2010 elections and the 2014 campaign polls now show.
And let's not forget that Clinton was the highest ranking figure in Obama's administration who backed its policies to the hilt -- foreign and domestic. Can she now argue that she disagreed with its economic and foreign policies, but chose to say nothing or quietly backed them?
And what in Hillary's resume makes her fit for taking on the awesome powers of the presidency? It is hard to think of any achievement she led as the senator from New York, which she hoped to use as a spring board to the White House in 2008.
Would the nation look to her as someone who knows a lot about health care and can begin fixing the Obamacare wreckage? Hardly.
You may remember that Bill Clinton put her in charge of designing his failed health care reform plan in the 1990s. It was a Rube Goldberg contraption that was so complicated no one could explain it to the American people.
I remember leading a forum on Hillarycare during that time when the chief lobbyist of the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) told me he never fully understood how it worked.
Neither did Democratic leaders in Congress, because they never held a vote on her health care plan, either in committee or on the House and Senate floor.
Now, flash forward to her role as secretary of State in Obama's administration, a job for which she had little or no experience or in- depth knowledge.
Can anyone point to a major foreign policy achievement during her tenure? For many observers, she seemed to be trying to outdo her predecessor, Condoleezza Rice, in the number of countries she visited, but beyond that did little if anything in the job.
Rice, after all, had served as the White House national security adviser to President George W. Bush, and was a noted expert in Soviet and East European Affairs. Clinton's background was all in politics, as First Lady, and a senator who lost to Obama in the 2008 presidential primaries.
If her four years as secretary of State and chief foreign policy adviser to Obama is remembered for anything, it's the brutal terrorists' attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya where U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other American officials were killed.
For months, her State Department received numerous, fearful pleas from Stevens for additional security leading up to the attacks, which went unheeded. In the immediate aftermath, her staff tried to downplay what happened as merely a protest that got out of control.
Clinton was criticized for not responding to the calls for protection, but in lengthy Senate testimony delivered her now-famous response, "What difference -- at this point, what difference does it make?"
For the answer to that politically combustible question, we will have to await the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. That is, if she runs.

http://townhall.com/columnists/donal...4420/page/full

Bill Clinton Involved In Sex Orgy Lawsuit That Could Crush Hillary’s Presidential Run



2014-03-22 T 03:00:35+00:00 US
98 Comments

Bill Clinton has friends in low places — and it could shatter wife Hillary‘s presidential dreams once and for all! The former philandering president has been named in one-time pal Jeffrey Epstein‘s sleazy sex lawsuit, and the allegations are disturbing.
According to court documents obtained, “Clinton traveled on Epstein’s private jet numerous times and partied on a Caribbean island owned by Epstein, who served 13 months for soliciting a minor for prostitution.”
Epstein was convicted of that crime in 2008, but the details of his raunchy escapades — and the exact nature of his relationship with Clinton — have surfaced yet again as part of an ongoing legal dispute between him and Palm Beach attorneys Scott Rothstein and Bradley Edwards.
Obtained court documents from that case, and “The former president’s name pops up dozens of times in the recently filed papers,” according to the report.
In one section, for example, there is allegedly a transcript of a telephone interview that includes a reference to the former President.
“When you were present with Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton on [Epstein's] island, who else was there?” a woman asked.
Another woman answered naming two other females and said “And there was [sic] two young girls … [at] about 4 or 5 different villas” plus a “main house.”
Asked whether “sexual orgies” were “a regular occurrence on the island,” the woman answered in the affirmative.

http://theuspatriot.com/2014/03/22/b...sidential-run/

Disgusting!! Clinton Caught Having Sexual Relations In A Pedophile Ring

Posted on 28 March, 2014 by Dylan



According to former child sex slave Virginia Roberts and a class action lawsuit against convicted billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, former President Bill Clinton was present during sex parties involving up to twenty underage girls at Epstein’s secluded island in the Caribbean. That flight records show Clinton was flown on numerous occasions to the island on Epstein’s private jet. Clinton had a close relationship with an employee of Epstein’s who compiled thousands of photos of nude young girls posed in lewd positions. And these photos were used as a catalog for Epstein to loan out his girls to powerful politicians and British royalty, including Bill Clinton.
While Epstein was indicted and jailed for his pedophilia, Bill Clinton oddly has remained unscathed, more than likely by having friends in high places.
If Bill Clinton is in fact a pedophile, will the American people demand that he be put away for a very long time so that he can’t hurt any more children? Or will having friends in high places exempt him from the rule of law?




http://gopthedailydose.com/2014/03/2...edophile-ring/

Pedophile Rings & Clinton's Pedophile Pal

https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=I1VSMMFJsLM

http://www.alipac.us/f9/latest-scand...-abuse-280761/

http://www.alipac.us/f9/new-scandal-...ors%92-280717/

GOP donors reportedly working to draft Jeb Bush for 2016 presidential run

A group of top Republican donors have reportedly begun an intense effort to draft former Florida governor Jeb Bush into the race for the GOP presidential nomination in 2016.