Thread: SHARIA LAW Has Completely Taken Over Dearborn, Michigan

The real propaganda is the city's press release.

The video is sort of misnamed as it really doesn't talk @ sharia law but a wealth of knowledge @ Dearborn in that, over 50% muslim population, mostly welfare receivers including their 4 wives each they say are relatives. The houses are single homes with lawns, paleeze, give our poor Americans those homes.

This is what obama and his brotherhood have done in many places. Let us not get into the female genital mutilation happening in the tens of thousands nor those that want to travel "home" and want their rent paid for by public assistance while they leave for 3months. Don't think our American citizen poor could afford to travel such distances - airfare is not cheap. Plus welfare payment to a single adult is @$200 a month and can only be administered for a limited period of time. Paleeze, these imports live quite well and receive much more than our citizens in public assistance. Corruption has been rampant in our highest office of the land.

So you will see denials put out by city, state, federal officials - part of the scam. But seeing is believing.

Like the sanctuary city mayors releasing statements of little crime by illegals and we want them to feel friended so they can report crimes happening - do you see illegals turning in the drug cartels that they ALL are connected with? Do you see them turning in fathers living elsewhere so he doesn't have to pay a dime for his children? How @ turning in killers, rapists, child molesters that flee, someone takes them in. Long list of crimes they DO NOT REPORT - yet the propaganda statements keep coming from officials.

Minnesota Senate Wavering On Bill Targeting Female Genital Mutilation Because Immigrant Groups Oppose It

Photo by Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post via Getty Images
By:
Hank Berrien
May 25, 2017

The Minnesota Senate version of a bill passed by the Minnesota House that would punish parents who subjected their daughters to female genital mutilation (FGM) is stalling in the Senate because some members of Minnesota’s immigrant and refugee communities oppose it.
The House bill, introduced by Rep. Mary Franson, would make the crime a felony, with a concomitant loss of custody and a prison term ranging from five to 20 years. It would also increase penalties for anyone performing the procedure. Female genital mutilation has been illegal in the state since Minnesota passed legislation in the 1990's.
On September 30, 1996, Congress criminalized FGM as part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, writing, “Whoever knowingly circumcises, excises, or infibulates the whole or any part of the labia majora or labia minora or clitoris of another person who has not attained the age of 18 years shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.” But the law was not enforced until recently, when a Detroit doctor was arrested for performing the procedure.
But even before that, Minnesota had addressed the issue, and in a more far-reaching way. In 1994, Minnesota was the first state to enact legislation related to FGM. The state amended its criminal code to declare “whoever knowingly circumcises, excises, or infibulates, in whole or in part, the labia majora, labia minora, or clitoris of another is guilty of a felony.” Thus the state did not limit the crime to female victims under the age of 18, but extended the range of victims to include all women.
But now, the Council for Minnesotans of African Heritage, a nonprofit titled Isuroon and other groups assert that the punishment for the crime in the proposed legislation is unduly harsh and thus parents from countries where genital cutting is common would not seek medical care for their children. The Senate bill’s author, Sen. Karin Housley, said she was considering delaying a vote on the legislation, adding, “We all agree this practice is absolutely horrible, and something needs to be done. How can we empower communities to address this practice from within rather than having Big Brother come down and say, ‘This is wrong'? ”
Franson said the Senate was “more concerned with perception than doing the right thing and protecting girls ... Watering down the bill really does a disservice to the little girls who are in danger."
In the House, 124 out of 128 House members voted for the bill, including Rep. Ilhan Omar, the country’s first Somali-American legislator.
Opponents of the bill argue that parents who come to the United States with girls who have already undergone the procedure could be punished because the bill mandates reporting to authorities by health care providers.
Brikti Hiwet, a reproductive health lecturer at the University of Minnesota and St. Catherine University, commented, “How can you protect children when you take them away from their families and put them in foster care?”
But Franson pointed out the language in the bill limits penalties to those residing in the United States when the procedure is executed. She concluded, “America is the land of the brave and the home of the free. Little girls who moved here from other countries have the right to be free from the oppression of female genital mutilation.”
http://www.dailywire.com/news/16851/...aign=position6

May 27, 2017 By Kirsty Jane
ALERT: Muslim Sues Little Caesars Pizza Over Sharia Law

A Muslim man is suing Little Caesars for $100 million after he says he was served and then accidentally ate pepperoni made with pork, a food prohibited by Islamic law.

From Detroit Free Post

The complaint says Mohamad Bazzi of Dearborn ordered halal pizza twice from the shop on Schaefer in Dearborn. The boxes were labeled “halal,” but the pies inside were topped with regular pepperoni.
Majed Moughni, Bazzi’s attorney, said he rushed to file the lawsuit Thursday, the eve of Ramadan, so no other Muslims would accidentally eat pork from the pizza shop during the holiday.
“It’s really upsetting,” Moughni said. “My clients want the public to know. Especially during Ramadan, it would be a travesty if Muslims … in Dearborn bought pizza from Little Caesars and discovered they were eating pork.”
He added that for a Muslim, consuming pork is “one of the worst sins you can do.”
Jill Proctor, a spokeswoman for Little Caesars said in a statement that the company believes the claim “is without merit.”
“Little Caesars cherishes our customers from all religions and cultures, and the communities we serve are very important to us. While we can’t comment on pending litigation, we take this claim very seriously,” Proctor said.
The lawsuit, filed in Wayne County Circuit Court, says the first incident happened March 20. Bazzi and his wife were midway through eating a pizza he had brought home from the shop when they realized it had pork pepperoni.
Bazzi knew it was pork because he used to work in a pizza place and knows the different types of pepperoni, Moughni said. He also said Bazzi’s wife could tell because she is a Catholic convert to Islam who grew up eating pork.
They “became sick to their stomach,” according to the lawsuit. Three days later, they filed a police report.
The second incident happened May 24, the day before the lawsuit was filed.
When Bazzi confronted the shop manager, according to the lawsuit, she told him at one point that Bazzi had asked an employee to put a halal sticker on the pizza box, a claim Moughni disputes. Bazzi secretly recorded the conversation.
Halal is the Muslim equivalent of Judaism’s kosher and requires that meat be prepared according to Islamic guidelines, such as reciting a prayer while the animal is cut.
“There’s different schools of Islamic law that allows for the eating of chicken and beef, but there is no such thing as halal pork. The pork itself is forbidden,” Moughni said.
The lawsuit alleges breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment and fraud. The case is against Little Caesars Pizza, Little Caesars Enterprises and the employees of the shop.
Moughni is seeking class-action status for the case.
The issue of non-halal food labeled as such has landed in court before. In 2011, McDonald’s was sued over claims that the fast-food restaurant was selling non-halal chicken it claimed was halal.
In some cases, employees at the Ford Road location in Dearborn were mistakenly giving non-halal products to customers who asked for halal ones.
The case was settled for $700,000. However, some Muslims, including a group led by Moughni, said the settlement money should have gone to the Muslims affected, not to organizations that were based in Detroit or not affiliated with Islam.
A judge at one point issued an injunction ordering Moughni not to talk about the settlement, but it was eventually lifted.
http://eheadlines.com/alert-muslim-s...er-sharia-law/

Protesters say genital mutilation doesn't happen just to girls, boys need protection too

USA TODAY NETWORK Tresa Baldas, Detroit Free Press Published 7:12 p.m. ET April 17, 2017 | Updated 6:51 a.m. ET April 18, 2017


(Photo: Detroit Free Press)


DETROIT — Protesters outside of the U.S. federal courthouse in Detroit argued Monday to outlaw circumcision of boys in the wake of last week's announcement of a highly publicized criminal case of female genital mutilation. The demonstrators say such mutilation doesn't just happen to girls and that boys need protection too.

The protest came as Dr. Jumana Nagarwala, 44, of Northville, Mich., appeared in court for a detention hearing at which she was ordered to remain locked up without bond on charges she mutilated the genitals of two Minnesota girls. She was charged last Thursday with genital mutilation following an FBI investigation into allegations that the two girls came to metro Detroit in February with their mothers and had their genitals cut at a Livonia clinic by Nagarwala.

While the case has triggered international headlines and sparked public outrage, the protesters said boys also need protection from this type of procedure, as they likened circumcision to genital mutilation.

“All babies should be protected and be able to keep their whole bodies,” said Julie Colon, 26, who attended the protest with her toddler son on her back. “There’s just no reason for any child to be altered at birth or, really, anytime.”

Read more:

Doctor accused of genital mutilation on girls

A doctor is charged with female genital mutilation. What is it?

Jody Farrugia, 35, a registered nurse at the Detroit Medical Center, said she has long been opposed to circumcision and tries to talk new parents out of it, but nobody seems willing to listen. “I see the risks and harms daily. I always encourage mothers to keep their sons intact but they don’t think twice. They think it’s gross, they think it’s cleaner.”

“I still hear their screams from down the hallway. It haunts me.”
Faruggia said circumcision can cause a certain number of health complications, including too much skin being taken off, which can lead to painful and tight erections as an adult. It can contribute to male erectile dysfunction and sometimes a jagged cut means repeating the surgery, she said.

She was holding a sign that said "Only quacks cut healthy children." She noted that her son has not been circumcised and he is healthy.

Volunteers and organizers of NOCIRC of Michigan hold a demonstration outside of Theodore Levin Courthouse to express their concerns about male circumcision on Monday, April 17,2017 in Detroit. Dr. Jumana Nagarwala, who is charged with mutilating the genitals of young girls at a Livonia clinic, was in court for a bond hearing. (Photo: Elaine Cromie, Detroit Free Press)


Another protester was Jerry Boor, 70, of Rochester Hills, who believes both science and the Bible are against circumcision.

He noted that his mother had him circumcised but he chose not to circumcise his son after researching the issue and concluding it wasn’t a medical necessity. “I love her, but she didn’t know any better,” he said of his mother.

According to organizers of the protest, the genitals of 49,000 baby boys are cut in Michigan every year at the request of parents, denying a boy's right to intact and normal genitals.

They say they are upset that doctors are legally allowed to cut the genitals of boys, without any medical necessity, but that a federal law prohibits cutting the genitals of girls and makes it a five-year felony.

"The genitals of both girls and boys needs to be protected from the harm of any genital cutting practice," says Norm Cohen, executive director of NOCIRC of Michigan, a non-profit, consumer-rights advocacy group that researches circumcision effects. “Michigan has one of the highest rates of circumcision in the world. This unnecessary custom violates a child’s right to bodily integrity and normal functions.”

According to the group, in Michigan, 83% of newborn boys are circumcised at a cost of more than $11 million per year. The group said it believes that male circumcision is driven by the same reasons used to justify female genital mutilation: Tradition, cleanliness, appearance, medical myths, and sexual moderation.



A Detroit area physician faces federal charges for allegedly performing female genital mutilation on multiple 6- to 7-year-old girls as part of a religious and cultural practice at a medical clinic in Livonia. Detroit Free Press


Opponents of female genital mutilation disagree and argue there are key differences in the procedures, specifically: there are more serious short-term and long-term health consequences for girls who undergo genital mutilation, where boys typically do not have those consequences; and the procedure is often performed on women with no anesthesia and in unsanitary conditions, where most circumcisions are performed in hospitals and with anesthesia.

As some medical experts on the topic stated in a 2015 article by The Atlantic:

"Male circumcision does no harm. Female gender mutilation does. Male circumcision cuts the foreskin, FGM cuts the clitoris — the two things cut are not even remotely the same.

For male circumcision to be equivalent to FGM, the entire tip of the male’s penis would need to be cut off ... Constantly trying to claim they are equivalent practices when they are not takes away from the unique seriousness of female 'circumcision/mutilation,' as most cases are performed during a traumatic developmental period and remove most sexual sensation, which is not true with male circumcision."

Circumcision opponents, however, argue that polls indicate that most parents decide to circumcise their sons for reasons other than health care, but physicians profit by promoting it and convincing insurance companies to pay for it.

“Doctors and hospitals profit by perpetuating the myth that infant circumcision is health care. It is not," Cohen states. "It is a harmful custom that removes a normal, functioning part of a child’s genitals at the request of parents."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ase/100582718/

There is no comparison, they are just trying to have their way re females. Would not consider circumcision mutilation as it enhances hygiene but what they do to females is mutilation and devastating.