Thread: Texas House Oks bill to deport illegal entrant foreign migrants, is constitutional.

See:
New bill would allow Texas to deport migrants


"AUSTIN (Nexstar) — Texas lawmakers on Thursday gave initial approval to legislation that would create a new state-level offense for illegally entering the state from a foreign nation and allow officers to order migrants to leave the country, effectively deporting them."


It’s about frickin time! The unfortunate truth is, the American people have been led to believe that our federal government has been delegated an exclusive power to regulate immigration.

What may come as a surprise to many is, nowhere in the text of our constitution is the word “immigration” to be found! As a matter of fact, a review of historical documentation with regard to immigration confirms the limited power delegated to our federal government by our constitution is to set a uniform rule for “naturalization” of foreign nationals who have already immigrated to one of the United States and wish to become a citizen of the United States.

There is nothing to even remotely suggest from historical documentation that our federal government has been delegated an exclusive power to regulate immigration or force upon an unwilling state a flood of foreign nationals.

So, just what was the specific intention for our framers and those who ratified our constitution to delegate a power to Congress to establish a “. . . uniform Rule of Naturalization . . . ”[Article 1, Section 8, Clause, 4]? And, exactly what does the power encompass?

According to our very own Supreme Court, “Its sole object was to prevent one State from forcing upon all the others, and upon the general government, persons as citizens whom they were unwilling to admit as such.” PASSENGER CASES, 48 U. S. 283 (1849). And, the Court’s statement is confirmed by the following documentation!

REPRESENTATIVE SHERMAN, who attended the Constitutional Convention which framed our Constitution points to the intentions for which a power over naturalization was granted to Congress. He says: “that Congress should have the power of naturalization, in order toprevent particular States receiving citizens, and forcing them upon others who would not have received them in any other manner. It was therefore meant to guard against an improper mode of naturalization, rather than foreigners should be received upon easier terms than those adopted by the several States.” see CONGRESSIONAL DEBATES, Rule of Naturalization, Feb. 3rd, 1790 PAGE 1148

In addition, REPRESENTATIVE WHITE while debating the Rule of Naturalization notes the narrow limits of what “Naturalization” [the power granted to Congress] means, and he ”doubted whether the constitution authorized Congress to say on what terms aliens or citizens should hold lands in the respective States; the power vested by the Constitution in Congress, respecting the subject now before the House, extend to nothing more than making a uniform rule of naturalization. After a person has once become a citizen, the power of congress ceases to operate upon him; the rights and privileges of citizens in the several States belong to those States; but a citizen of one State is entitled to all the privileges and immunities of the citizens in the several States……all, therefore, that the House have to do on this subject, is to confine themselves to an uniform rule of naturalization and not to a general definition of what constitutes the rights of citizenship in the several States.” see: Rule of Naturalization, Feb. 3rd, 1790, page 1152

And, REPRESENTATIVE STONE … concluded that the laws and constitutions of the States, and the constitution of the United States; would trace out the steps by which they should acquire certain degrees of citizenship [page 1156]. Congress may point out a uniform rule of naturalization; but cannot say what shall be the effect of that naturalization, as it respects the particular States. Congress cannot say that foreigners, naturalized, under a general law, shall be entitled to privileges which the States withhold from native citizens. See: Rule of Naturalization, Feb. 3rd, 1790, pages 1156 and 1157

And, let us recall what Representative BURKE says during our Nations` first debate on a RULE OF NATURALIZATION, FEB. 3RD, 1790

Mr. BURKE thought it of importance to fill the country with useful men, such as farmers, mechanics, and manufacturers, and, therefore, would hold out every encouragement to them to emigrate to America. This class he would receive on liberal terms; and he was satisfied there would be room enough for them, and for their posterity, for five hundred years to come. There was another class of men, whom he did not think useful, and he did not care what impediments were thrown in their way; such as your European merchants, and factors of merchants, who come with a view of remaining so long as will enable them to acquire a fortune, and then they will leave the country, and carry off all their property with them. These people injure us more than they do us good, and, except in this last sentiment, I can compare them to nothing but leeches. They stick to us until they get their fill of our best blood, and then they fall off and leave us. I look upon the privilege of an American citizen to be an honorable one, and it ought not to be thrown away upon such people. There is another class also that I would interdict, that is, the convicts and criminals which they pour out of British jails. I wish sincerely some mode could be adopted to prevent the importation of such; but that, perhaps, is not in our power; the introduction of them ought to be considered as a high misdemeanor.

So, as it turns out, allowing the kind of foreigners who are now invading our borders to stay here should be considered as a “high misdemeanor” which happens to be an impeachable offense!

CONCLUSION:
Naturalization involves the process by which a foreign national, who is already in our country, is granted citizenship. Immigration, on the other hand involves a foreign national traveling to and entering the United States . . . two very distinct activities!

Now, with respect to Texas protecting itself from the consequences of an ongoing tsunami of unwanted foreign nationals flooding across its border, our Constitution states the following:

“No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.” ___ Article 1, Section 10.

So, it is perfectly within the text of our federal Constitution, and its documented legislative intent which gives context to its text, that the current situation in Texas will not admit of delay, and that its Governor and Legislature not only has authority to protect against the current invasion of unwanted foreign nationals flooding across its borders, but it would be a dereliction of duty of both to not take action to stop the invasion in its tracks.

JWK

“If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges." - Joseph Story

See:Texas Senate moves border bill that allows state police to arrest migrants at U.S.-Mexico border

From the article:

"Senate Bill 4, sponsored by state Sen. Pete Flores, R-Pleasanton, would increase the minimum sentence from two years to 10 years for smuggling immigrants or operating a stash house. SB 4 passed with bipartisan support in a 29-2 vote."

Hopefully, Texas will start arresting federal employees for engaging in these very acts.

See: 8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens


(A)Any person who—

(iii)knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;


(II)aids or abets the commission of any of the preceding acts,
shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B).


JWK

There is no surer way to weaken, subdue and bring to its knees a prosperous and freedom loving country than by flooding it with deadly drugs, an inflated currency and the poverty stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled, criminal and terrorists, of other countries.

All states need to have a Task Force to round them up and deport them out of here.

Use our National Guard and our Stadiums to process them, fingerprint them, and ship them back!

They are destroying our cities, our schools, our healthcare system, our housing, and bankrupting us!

Originally Posted by Beezer

All states need to have a Task Force to round them up and deport them out of here.

Use our National Guard and our Stadiums to process them, fingerprint them, and ship them back!

They are destroying our cities, our schools, our healthcare system, our housing, and bankrupting us!

Speaking about a "Task Force" and one in connection with our Democrat Leadership's importation of millions of foreign nationals who are adult males and suitable for use in military operations, do you remember Obama's call to create a "civilian security force"?
.

.


Now, let us recall the Tiananmen Square Massacre of 1989 in which the Communist Chinese Party decided to end a Chinese student led demonstration for democracy.

The CCP brought in a couple of divisions of the People’s Liberation Army from remote provinces to crush the demonstrations for democracy, and they did so because the CCP anticipated local divisions of the army may not fire upon the demonstrators who were likely to be family members, and the troops could actually be supporters of the uprising.

Bidens open border policy has introduced about 10 million foreign nationals into our country, which reflects the same tactic as the Communist Chinese Party's bringing in a couple of divisions of the People’s Liberation Army from remote provinces to deal with protesters wanting their freedom.

When will the American People realize that former President Trump was absolutely correct when he referred to the Democrat Leadership open border immigration policy as a "Trojan Horse"?

JWK

There is no surer way to weaken, subdue and bring to its knees a prosperous and freedom loving country than by flooding it with deadly drugs, an inflated currency and the poverty stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled, criminal and terrorists, of other countries.
.

.


JWK

America citizens and their children will, and are, paying a very dear price for their apathy in allowing the Democrat Party Leadership to ignore our immigration laws, and their country to be invaded by millions upon millions of poverty-stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled, criminal, and terrorist foreign nationals.

.
According to ARIZONA v. UNITED STATES Texas Law Enforcement Officers may arrest suspects for violating § 1325(a), and also investigate for evidence of illegal entry.


From ARIZONA v. UNITED STATES:

Accordingly, in our hypothetical case, the Arizona officer may arrest the driver for violating § 1325(a) if the officer has probable cause. And if the officer has reasonable suspicion, the officer may detain the driver, to the extent permitted by the Fourth Amendment, while the question of illegal entry is investigated.

And . . .

In our hypothetical case, therefore, if the officer, after initially stopping the car for speeding, has a reasonable suspicion that the driver entered the country illegally, the officer may investigate for evidence of illegal entry.

So, as it turns out, not only may the State of Texas law enforcement officers arrest suspects for violating § 1325(a), State Law Enforcement Officers may investigate for evidence of illegal entry.

.

I think it's time for Texas to take the gloves off and arrest anyone, including federal employees who have taken our oath of office, who are found to be assisting an illegal entry of foreign nationals, and have the court settle the charge.

JWK


When will our apathetic Republicans in Congress adopt a resolution, confirming the Democrat Party Leadership is actively participating in an ongoing and planned invasion of the United States of America?

Arrest them, drive them to a Port of Entry and HAND THEM over to Mexican authorities by the thousands!

Impound the vehicles and sell them at auction for the deportation funds!

Hand their UACs over to Mexican authorities and they can transport them to their Embassy to send back home!

Originally Posted by Beezer

Arrest them, drive them to a Port of Entry and HAND THEM over to Mexican authorities by the thousands!

Impound the vehicles and sell them at auction for the deportation funds!

Hand their UACs over to Mexican authorities and they can transport them to their Embassy to send back home!

See:


Largest migrant caravan in year heading to US – as leader mocks Biden’s border policies


From the article:

"The largest migrant caravan in a year, estimated to include some 7,000 people, is heading toward the US — and its leader claims President Biden has “dropped the ball” on immigration and allowed Latin American countries to “gang up” on his administration."
.

Seems to me the America people, and by that I mean its citizenry, has lost the will and desire to protect the United States from invasion.


.

JWK

I never thought I would live to see the day when American Citizens would stand idle and allow the United States to be invaded by millions of foreign nationals without a shot being fired.

Here is a peek into our future . . .



Here is a video from ten years ago showing how Muslim immigrants thanked Italy for being inviting into the country:






And here is a video from eight years ago showing how Muslims have repaid Germany for opening its arms to hundreds of thousands of Muslim immigrants.





And let us not forget the following video, from fourteen years ago, showing how Muslim immigrants thanked the people of Athens Greece for inviting them into their country






JWK

We are here today and gone tomorrow, but what is most important is what we do in-between and is what our children will inherit and remember us by.

Seems to me the State of Texas is doing what it can to protect its border, but other border states ___ New Mexico, Arizona and California, each of which has a disloyal, un-American and subversive Democrat Leadership ___ is working with Biden to flood our country with millions upon millions of the worlds poverty-stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled, criminal, and terrorist foreign nationals.


Let us recall what Representative BURKE says during our Nations` first debate on a RULE OF NATURALIZATION, FEB. 3RD, 1790

Mr. BURKE thought it of importance to fill the country with useful men, such as farmers, mechanics, and manufacturers, and, therefore, would hold out every encouragement to them to emigrate to America. This class he would receive on liberal terms; and he was satisfied there would be room enough for them, and for their posterity, for five hundred years to come. There was another class of men, whom he did not think useful, and he did not care what impediments were thrown in their way; such as your European merchants, and factors of merchants, who come with a view of remaining so long as will enable them to acquire a fortune, and then they will leave the country, and carry off all their property with them. These people injure us more than they do us good, and, except in this last sentiment, I can compare them to nothing but leeches. They stick to us until they get their fill of our best blood, and then they fall off and leave us. I look upon the privilege of an American citizen to be an honorable one, and it ought not to be thrown away upon such people. There is another class also that I would interdict, that is, the convicts and criminals which they pour out of British jails. I wish sincerely some mode could be adopted to prevent the importation of such; but that, perhaps, is not in our power; the introduction of them ought to be considered as a high misdemeanor.

So, as it turns out, opening our border to the kind of foreign nationals our Democrat Leadership is embracing with open arms, should be considered as a "high misdemeanor," which happens to be a criminal offense!

JWK

Under today’s authoritarian democrat party leadership, our government doesn’t help to fix the nation’s problems. It fixes the people, like Trump, who dare to point to the nation’s problems.