Thread: THEY'RE COOKING the VOTE on HR4437

my sister voted Yes.

i forwarded the link and explanation to Glenn Spencer of Americanpatrol.com.

Sunday Feb 19th, 6:00 PM EST

yes 65% 180 votes (we gained 108 since 2AM)

no 35% 97 votes (they gained 15 votes since 2AM)

ha ha ha ha ha ha
They must be out trying to scare up some votes

They must have gotten more people to vote no. It's now 225 no, 191 yes. It's sad when these people lie about calling illegal aliens "immigrants". What would Mexico do if we got a million US citizens in poverty to cross over the border into their country and live off their land. Hey, I think that would be a great idea...

I have personal experience going through the immigration process, and I would have to say that a good majority of the illegals coming here would NOT be accepted. For one thing, you have to sign papers saying that you have a sponsor that will take care of you. And you will not be a burden on the American society. There is also an interview process, how many of these illegals can even speak english?

Below is the API report for Fresno County. All you have to do is look at the score, and you can quickly find the schools that have children who are english learners. Why the heck do we have so many children that can't speak english? There are many other common factors, and they all describe the problems of having illegal aliens in our communities. By the way, some of these schools are nothing but children of illegals.

http://api.cde.ca.gov/reports/API/2005G ... =10,FRESNO

Yes - 225

No - 194

Way to go, folks!

voted
53.6% no
46.4% yes

FLOOD THAT POLL!!!!

How did they turn that around in 20 minutes? Somebody's doctoring the figures.

It is 12:20 central time and this is what they are showing.



Should the Senate committee vote YES on HR 4437?
NO
236 53.9%

YES
202 46.1%

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:33 pm Post subject:

Yes - 225

No - 194

Strawguy, is it possible you looked at the position of the percentage lines, just assuming that yes was still the one on top. I have done that a few times over there. They change the top dog to the upper position.

The poll looked like that before I went to bed last night. But the 194 was the YES vote and they had the 225 for no. They went from 100 to 225 during the night sometime between 8:00 Pm est, when I checked it, and 3:00AM when I went to bed. I do't THINK they cn doctor it, because they lead by so little when they do lead. If they could doctor it, you'd expect them to lead by alot, wouldn't you?

I posted the link at other anti-illegal sites. Maybe you guys could do the same for some sites you know?

That would explain it. I must have not paid enough attention. OOPS

Should the Senate committee vote YES on HR 4437?
NO
236 52.9%

YES
210 47.1%


Number of Voters : 446
First Vote : Thursday, 16 February 2006 02:51
Last Vote : Monday, 20 February 2006 14:20