Thread: TRUMP TRANSITION: Trump names Scott Pruitt

Originally Posted by Newmexican

I looked at the source of this article. Our Future. org The articles have titles like;

Sorry, Donald. Taxes in the United States Are Actually Very Low.

DC Rally Wednesday With Bernie Sanders, Danny Glover, Keith Ellison

How We Won the ‘No’ in #NoDAPL – And What We Must Take On Next

DECEMBER 5, 2016

Will Trump Bring the Robot Apocalypse?


In my opinion, it is a Socialist Progressive, fear mongering trash site that glorifies and feeds the Socialist Communist agenda. It appears to display a venomous and seditious attitude toward our newly elected President and anyone that supports him. JMO

Regardless of where the information comes, facts are still facts. Is there an argument about any of the specific information in the article?

I don't limit myself when researching information to specific sites. Most sites are bias and have their own agenda in one way or the other. If you want to criticize the specific information in the article, I'm fine with that.

Well, I was right on North Carolina's. Did California repeal their state referendum that capped utility rates? Maybe they did. Well if so, they sure screwed the pooch!!! That's what 20 million Democrats will do to your state. Wow, look what the Democrats did to New York!! And Hawaii!! And poor little Massachusetts and New Hampshire. GEEZ!!!!

Don't worry!! Trump and his Billionaires Cavalry are coming, they're going to turn this around and drive down electric rates. He talks about it at all this rallies, grow energy development, all forms, and get these electric bills down so you all have more of your hard-earned money to buy more nice American Made Products and create great jobs for American Workers.

Originally Posted by MW

Regardless of where the information comes, facts are still facts. Is there an argument about any of the specific information in the article?

I don't limit myself when researching information to specific sites. Most sites are bias and have their own agenda in one way or the other. If you want to criticize the specific information in the article, I'm fine with that.

What makes you think anything in those articles is "fact"?

“This is not the leadership America needs. Mr. Pruitt’s confirmation would ensure we are left behind as we move toward a global clean energy economy,” said Krupp. “A majority of Americans of both parties support the vital safeguards that keep our air and water clean. We at EDF will continue fighting for America’s environmental protections, because they improve all our lives.”

And that is the fact -- thanks for the post.