Results 1 to 3 of 3
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By Judy
  • 1 Post By Beezer

Thread: Who Gains the Upper Hand from Judge's DACA Reinstatement Order?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator GeorgiaPeach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006

    Who Gains the Upper Hand from Judge's DACA Reinstatement Order?

    Who Gains the Upper Hand from Judge's DACA Reinstatement Order?

    Dan Cadman on January 14, 2018

    Many readers are already aware that William Alsup, a sitting federal district court judge with progressive activist proclivities, has issued an order not only blocking the Trump administration's phase-out of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program — a misnomer if ever there was one — but actually going so far as to demand that the administration once again begin accepting applications.

    It should be no surprise that this judge's federal court district sits within the San Francisco Autonomous Region, which is in turn part of the People's Democratic Republic of California, both of which only purport to remain an integral part of the United States of America. And then only when federal funds and manpower are at risk — you know, for collapsing dams, rampaging multiple wildfires and the like, and even, mind you, for the cost of incarcerating alien criminals who are then released back to the streets to reoffend until they're picked up again and the incarceration-money cycle begins anew (quite a scam if you can swing it and are indifferent to the repeated victimization of members of your community).
    I'll leave others to speak to the absurdity and legal vagaries of this judge's decision, as Josh Blackman already has done superbly in an article at National Review Online. The article is well worth the read.

    There's no doubt that the administration will vigorously contest this decision, probably having to slog through an equally outrageous decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (see here and here) before the matter lands at the Supreme Court — unless the Solicitor General's office can convince the Supremes to entertain an interlocutory appeal to stay Judge Alsup's deliberately obstructionist decision until the merits are decided at a later hearing.
    But here is the most absurd part: Some pundits claim that the judge's decision actually gives Democrats the edge in dealing with Republicans over whether and how to grant amnesty relief to so-called "Dreamers", which is an expanded pool of illegal aliens that actually reaches beyond the parameters of those given DACA status:

    California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who filed one of the cases, welcomed the ruling and said he thinks it actually strengthens the position of lawmakers seeking to protect the so-called Dreamers in the face of pressure from Trump to offer concessions on funding for the border wall, limits on legal immigration and more.
    "Why would anyone want to negotiate a bad deal to get DACA now that it's become clear the court is saying the Trump administration may have tried to repeal the program in an unlawful way?"

    Becerra is a former Democratic member of Congress from California's 34th District, and presumably a fairly smart guy.

    But try as I might, I can't see any way in this universe that his thinking holds true. As Blackman points out, this judge's track record on having his adverse decisions of Trump White House immigration actions sustained by higher courts is poor.

    More cogently, it's almost certainly the steadfastly pro-immigration enforcement Republicans who are the happy beneficiaries of Alsup's decision.

    They know it's likely to be rescinded up the road, but for the moment Alsup has relieved the pressure that they felt from the White House and congressional leaders in both chambers to knuckle under to a potentially catastrophic immigration bill that, as usual, had a heapin' helpin' of amnesty, with only insubstantial and shadowy commitments to border and interior enforcement to offset it— and quite probably no changes to the dangerous visa lottery or out-of-control chain migration that are symptomatic of the deeply flawed legal immigration system.

    All of that now goes away.
    Last edited by GeorgiaPeach; 01-15-2018 at 12:32 AM.
    Matthew 19:26
    But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    All of that now goes away.
    Yes, it all goes away. It's time to shut-up, move DACA to the back of the line, move on with the rest of the agenda, deliver amazing "RESULTS" to quote Trump, blame the DemoQuacks for all the bad stuff, take full and deserving credit for all the good stuff, campaign our feet and fingers to the bone, so we can win Real Majorities in both Chambers, including the Senate, so we can pass ALL the good needed immigration bills we want in 2019. Then, we don't have to argue with DemoQuacks, there will be no need for '"bipartisanship" bills with these scum bags, and the results we seek to stop illegal immigration and reduce legal immigration will we ours without any amnesty blackmail.
    Beezer likes this.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at

  3. #3
    Moderator Beezer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    This Judge needs to be removed from the Bench!

    DACA needs to be terminated by the is illegal!

    No work permit was illegal to issue them!

    And no applying to stay here while on our soil. They MUST move and go home and get in line!
    Judy likes this.


Similar Threads

  1. Texas judge order to 100,000 immigrants to hand over their personal details
    By European Knight in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-21-2016, 09:40 PM
  2. Liberals Will Always Have the Upper Hand!
    By kathyet in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-08-2011, 11:24 AM
  3. We, the People, have the upper hand, do we have the will to
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-04-2010, 11:46 PM
  4. LaRaza claim to have an upper hand on election
    By mkfarnam in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 11-04-2008, 03:03 PM
  5. Hazelton mayor tough on illegals gains upper hand in rematch
    By FedUpinFarmersBranch in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-17-2008, 11:30 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts