Thread: WILDERS TELLS DUTCH PARLIAMENT REFUGEE CRISIS IS ‘ISLAMIC INVASION’

John McCain, Luis Gutierrez and numerous other globalist politicians would have this here. JMO

WILDERS TELLS DUTCH PARLIAMENT REFUGEE CRISIS IS ‘ISLAMIC INVASION’




by REUTERS10 Sep 2015391

Dutch far-right leader Geert Wilders called the wave of refugees pushing into Europe an “Islamic invasion”, during a parliamentary debate on Thursday that exposed deep divisions over how the Netherlands should respond to the crisis.

European Commission chief Jean-Claude Juncker on Wednesday appealed to EU members to share out refugees arriving on the bloc’s fringes. Several EU countries oppose the idea of mandatory quotas, as supported by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and the conservative Dutch government says it is only willing to take in more if all EU states agree.

At the start of the debate, Wilders called the wave of refugees passing through Hungary and other countries “an Islamic invasion of Europe, of the Netherlands.”

“Masses of young men in their twenties with beards singing Allahu Akbar across Europe. It’s an invasion that threatens our prosperity, our security, our culture and identity,” he said.

Tens of thousands of people, many fleeing war and Islamic State in Syria, are trying to get to Germany where Merkel has said they will be allowed to stay. Wilders said the fact that they were pushing northwards through the EU from the Mediterranean indicated many were economic migrants, not refugees.

“Turkey, Greece, Macedonia, Serbia are safe countries. If you flee them then you are doing it for benefits and a house,” said Wilders, whose Party for Freedom leads Dutch opinion polls.

Roughly 54 percent of Dutch voters are opposed to accepting more than roughly 2,000 refugees previously agreed, a poll from last week showed. Under the latest proposals that figure is seen rising to more than 9,000.

Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s government said on Friday it was willing in principle to accept a larger share of asylum seekers, but only as a “temporary solution”.

In the long term, the Dutch want better shelters for refugees near conflict zones and will donate 110 million euros ($123 million) this year to improve capacity in and near Syria.

Jesse Klaver of the opposition GreenLeft said: “We should agree with the request of the European Commission unconditionally and without differentiating between the short and long term.”

Rutte’s fragile coalition government nearly split in April over asylum policy. The government plans to toughen its stance by cutting off food and shelter after a few weeks for those whose claims for refugee status are turned down.

It was not clear whether lawmakers would vote on the issue after their debate.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/09/10/wilders-tells-dutch-parliament-refugee-crisis-is-islamic-invasion/

And he's exactly right. It is an invasion and one you'll regret allowing by having risked everything you held dear.

The drama directed by GWB is unfolding and taking stage. We must not forget that Jeb is proud of his brother George.

Originally Posted by kevinssdad

The drama directed by GWB is unfolding and taking stage. We must not forget that Jeb is proud of his brother George.

Don't leave Dad out.

Was'nt George famous for claiming to be compassionate conservative? I think he lied, he not his father ever shoed me any compassion about Kevin's death. I cannot tell you where to find or what is a compassionate conservative!

Originally Posted by kevinssdad

Was'nt George famous for claiming to be compassionate conservative? I think he lied, he not his father ever shoed me any compassion about Kevin's death. I cannot tell you where to find or what is a compassionate conservative!

The term "compassionate conservative" has no meaning, it's an oxymoron.

I hope more Republican candidates in this election choose to drop the "conservative" label because that word in our language does not define our party, not our history, not our achievements, not our goals, and not our future. I know that many Republicans and Americans who have become Republicans in recent years like this label because they're thinking about fiscal conservatism, balanced budgets, lower taxes, limited government, and there's nothing wrong with that. Fiscal conservatism which is just another phrase or term for words like prudent and responsible has its place. It should be the law of the land with a balanced budget obligation with rare temporary exceptions for war, disasters, and economic collapse.

But conservatism in general means traditional, status quo, no or slow change, no progress, no correction of errors, no fix of things not working, keeping things are they are and THIS is the complete opposite of what the Republican Party was created to do and what this once wonderful political party has achieved. We are the big bold ideas people, we are big spenders for big projects that benefit our people and nation. The proof of this is when you look at our nation and select what some of the most important changes, improvements, and actions have been, they are all Republican projects from ending slavery, keeping our nation together, building railroads, the interstate highway system, establishing the national parks system, EPA to protect our environment, OSHA to protect our workers, women's rights, civil rights, protected trade to promote our industries and good jobs for our people, immigration controls, these are all Republican ideas, Republican projects.

Then came the "compassionate conservative" that wanted free trade, massive immigration, wars, picking on women, picking on gays, trapping blacks in poverty-ridden ghettos, and on and on and on. This is not compassion in our language, this is national destruction.

Labels are important, especially when they're wrong. The "conservative" label for Republicans is just simply a mislabel for Republicans as wrong as putting a 100% polyster label on a 100% silk garment.

It's just wrong.