Page 496 of 574 FirstFirst ... 396446486492493494495496497498499500506546 ... LastLast
Results 4,951 to 4,960 of 5732
Like Tree97Likes

Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

  1. #4951
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Feds Willing To Destroy Millions Of Vital Records Just To Protect Obama

    Written on May 12, 2012 by V2A

    There are numerous reasons for law enforcement and professional organizations to request copies of records from the Selective Service System. Sometimes the request is for a background check for a job or security clearance. Other requests are made because of individuals who have made unsubstantiated claims about their backgrounds and qualifications. Yet others are prompted by someone running for political office.

    For decades the Selective Service has readily complied with the requests and furnished the desired documents. That is until they heard that they would be receiving an official subpoena for copies of Barack Hussein Obama’s records.

    On September 20, 2011, The Selective Service System announced new policy changes to the privacy rules, handling and preservation of existing documents. Under the new guidelines, draft registration records would be considered as nonrecord copies instead of record copies. Record copies must be kept on file, but nonrecord copies can be disposed of and destroyed. That means that any and all draft registration cards and microfilm copies are now subject to being destroyed, including the one belonging to Obama.

    Feds Willing To Destroy Millions Of Vital Records Just To Protect Obama*|*Vision to America
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #4952
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Obama’s Father Was Blacklisted as an “Anti-American, Anti-White” Terrorist in 1959, U.S State Department and British Secret Service Documents Reveal

    April 18, 2012 12:30 am104 comments

    Stephenson Billings

    Barack Obama’s controversial and legally-contested hold on the executive office just got a great deal more complicated. Documents released this week by the British Foreign Secretary reveal that the president’s father, Barack Hussein Obama, Senior, was the target of an international investigation due to his ties to Kenyan terrorists groups. The top secret files, which had been suppressed for decades, were privately condemned by administration officials who feared they would undermine the president as polls show him trailing Republican contender Mitt Romney by at least five points. They also highlight the mounting public evidence tying Barack Jr. to communist sleeper cells and long range plots to undermine American democracy.

    (In other disturbing Obama news, it was leaked today that the President frequenty ate dog meat as a child. He is the first and only United States President to have ever eaten a family pet. Apparently, such an act is a ritualistic part of Muslim religious training, and the young Obama found the meat, “quite satifsying.”)

    The shocking dossier on Obama Sr. came to light after a lengthy case in the British High Court brought by a team of professors at Oxford University. The records hark back to a time when Kenya was still a British colony and Obama Sr. was a Kenyan national who traveled to Hawaii for a college education, despite his political radicalism and poor academic record. The suspicious move prompted a closer look by security agents who worried about the young man’s sudden fixation on entering the United States. Barack Jr. hatched a very similar scheme to network his way from academia to the Halls of Congress, despite his equally mediocre educational record.

    On September 1, 1959, one British ambassador penned a highly classified communiqué that stated, “I have discussed with the State Department. They are as disturbed about these developments as we are. They point out that Kenya students have a bad reputation over here for falling into the wrong hands and for becoming both anti-American and anti-white.”

    Despite the warnings, Obama Sr. was allowed to stay in Hawaii were he met and married Stanley Ann Dunham. Sometime afterward, the couple traveled to Indonesia where the President was born and raised with a traditional Muslim upbring, complete with Imans and Madrasas. While this is not the story told by the mainstream media, far too many questions have been raised about the incredibly fraudulent birth certificate the Washington insiders tried to pass off on the public a few years back.

    Despite this long string of earth-shattering revelations, the U.S. State Department does not appear likely to release any FBI or CIA files they have on the President’s father. It is imagined that under Director J. Edgar Hoover, such a dangerous man would have been watched closely and the evidence against him would be exhaustive.



    Curiously enough, Barack Jr.’s avowed anti-white, anti-American policies appear to be a continuation of his father’s very own radical socialist ideology. Obama Sr. was an agent of the African American Students Foundation (AASF), a trade unionist agitation group which fronted for foreign socialist interests. Just like his father, Barack Jr. went from Hawaii to Harvard, with the assistance of many leftwing political organizations (such as ACORN, the Weather Underground and the Fabian Socialists).

    Will the mainstream media continue to hide this vital information about Obama’s presidency? Will the State Department ever release Barack Sr.’s file? By no stretch of the imagination should this man he trusted with one ounce of power, yet somehow he has schemed his way to the very top of our body politic. This is nothing less than the greatest crime America has ever known.

    The evidence released this week suggests that the Obama plot to undermine Christianity through socialism may indeed stretch back half a century. While this comes as a shock to many, others have been worried about the Barack Obama Jr. since his early days in the Senate. There are just too many questions swirling around this President for the U.S. public to trust him. For people of faith, it reminds us to be weary of false prophets and those who push the heinous terrorism of Islam on our homeland. The Bible warns us repeatedly about such a man who rises to power and begins a series of events prophesized as the End Times. Could Barack Obama be that cloven hoofed creature we have been warned about? Tragically, most citizens are simply too moronic to worry about this very real possibility.






    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #4953
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Enough of the Blame Game

    theoldguy44 wrote,
    "...we should be ashamed, because we have allowed it to happen on our watch."

    No, no shame, because it's not on us what the dark side has done in the darkness. We did not allow it, because we are not in control of what the anti-Americans, communists, and Is|amists do. That shame and guilt is on them, not on us. We were probably not even present to prevent it. "It happened on our watch" does not mean "we watched it happen." We have no means wherewith to stop the lamestream media from broadcasting half-truths, intrigues, confusion, cover-ups, and just plain lies.

    That "we should be ashamed, because we allowed it" meme has been hurled at us on the right to make the right feel as guilty as the wrong already feel for their crimes, sins, and lack of knowledge and understanding of what is right. That "we should be ashamed, because we allowed it" tripe has been used to trip up and get back at the opponents of abortion and euthanasia, homosexual acts and homosexual unions, child sexual abuse and human trafficking, open borders and smuggling of illegal aliens and illicit drugs, secularization of public schools and the public square, and everyone from the homeless unemployed to parents disciplining their own children by appropriately spanking them. "We should be ashamed, because we allowed it," is a "one size fits all" cheap shot to make both victims and standard bearers of righteousness look like bad guys - if not as bad as the perpetrators, then at least on the same tier of moral equivalence.

    No, we are NOT ashamed because someone else did wrong. That is what apologists for Is|am are saying when they blame the genuine, manifold evils of capitalism for the murder of nearly 3000 persons at the Twin Towers. No, the criminal culpability, the personal accountability to the Lord at the Judgment, and the blame for the murders of thousands of non-combatants are entirely upon the 19 Saudis who committed the attacks, upon Al Qaeda which commissioned and paid for the suicide attacks, and upon the demagogues of Wahhabi Is|am, who pumped those men full of vile hate and pointed them at the infidels to murder them.

    I am sick and tired of otherwise right-minded Christian preachers and teachers using 2 Chronicles 7:14 to blame Christians for drought, locusts, plagues, famine, and defeat at the hands of their national enemies, supposedly because God's people - the people of faith, not non-believers - were
    1) proud and exalted themselves against God by disobedience,
    2) prayerless, or not continuing faithfully in prayer,
    3) godless, rejecting the Lord, or turned aside and
    distracted (apathetic), or tempted and straying (corrupt),
    4) or intent upon continuing in sin, refusing to repent.

    It's not my fault that UN regulators ban DDT, the only insecticide against locusts
    truly effective in open spaces, so that locusts have stripped everything green except the house paint from several countries in sub-Saharan or equatorial Africa, for several years running now. It's not my Christian friends' fault that HIV/AIDS infects 1 in 4 adults (age 15-49) in Botswana, Lesotho, and Swaziland, all in or adjoining South Africa, where the HIV/AIDS infection rate is not quite so bad - only 17½%. It's not my church's fault that Europe, Great Britain, Canada, and the U.S. cower and tremble before the menace of Is|amist terrorism, while countries of Asia - Russia east of the Urals, India, and China's neighbors to the south and east - don't put up with no stuff; they just take care of business, kickin' and taking names.

    Conjugation of "It's not ___ fault."

    It's not my fault.
    It's not your fault.
    It's not his fault.
    It's not her fault.
    It's not its fault.

    It's not our fault.
    It's not your fault.
    It's not their fault.

    This conjugation demonstrates that it is correct, at least grammatically, to say,

    It's not Bush's fault.

    The refusal to judge righteously and assign responsibility for wrongdoing to the guilty party or parties is part of the debased "no fault" culture, where justice has ceased to exist, possibly because there remains no one free of wrongdoing who has the strength of character to winnow out the guilty from the "not guilty this time." In practice, "no fault" means "everyone shares the guilt," so that "we are ashamed" of the communal crime against ourselves, disgraced and humiliated not because we were victims, not because we were part of "universally guilty" humanity, but because "we allowed it" to happen... how socially irresponsible of us (!) to bring commonly shared guilt upon everyone, all because we made ourselves accessible or available to be victimized: duped, ripped off, defrauded, raped, pounded, slashed, or executed.

    People who don't know better watch/hear/read the LSM and believe what they're told. Those who learn that they have been deceived turn to FOX NEWS, Lou Dobbs, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, etc.. Among these millions of exiles from the LSM, many are somehow awakened, enlightened, or made aware that even an R or a conservative has an agenda, a spin, a slant on the truth that twists it or conceals it from plain view of the public. As a result, they go looking for the God's Truth - Jesus, Who is the Truth, the Way, and the Life - or they look for the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So they find us... not always because WE try to lay out the facts before THEM, those blinded by the darkness.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 05-15-2012 at 03:12 AM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  4. #4954
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Every one of us reasons as if normal chains of authority, organization charts, channels, and procedures are still operative. We assume that an orderly transfer of power, through free, fair, and honest elections, will save the day... and the nation. But WE MUST FIND OTHER AVENUES FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES. Here's why.

    Unlawful, unconstitutional authority is a lawless bully and an outlaw
    and does not submit to Constitutional authority and the rule of law.


    An ENEMY COMBATANT, a communist dictator with Is|amist sympathies and loyalties to nearly every major power that opposes the U.S., has usurped a great, but limited, degree of power.

    He has seized de facto control of the armed forces, law enforcement, and government at all levels in the U.S.. This enemy, foreign and domestic, of the U.S. Constitution naturally defies its Article ii that restrains the Executive Branch from tyranny, and the separation of powers that restrains the federal government from totalitarianism.

    Under the guise or excuse of racial "justice", he has overthrown the U.S. Constitution, Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5, the "natural born Citizen" clause, and he has thereby debased the authority of every other clause and brought the Constitution into contempt.

    This man of lawlessness will neither submit to Constitution and laws, nor will he subject his Constitutionally-illegitimate authority to the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court as the checks and balances assigned by the Constitution. We see AG Eric Holder expressing only the exact same defiance and contempt which he has in common with the Criminal-in-Chief. Were Mr. Obama not similarly defiant, he would have slapped down such misconduct by his subordinate, AG Holder, faster than Sheriff Joe Arpaio stops a drunk-driving illegal alien.

    Do not be so naive as to think that AG Holder will allow the Congress, the Courts, the Constitution, or the U.S. Code of Laws to bring down his reign of terror as Mr. Obama's Enforcer, and Chief Inquisitor of the DOJ. Even less may you imagine that his boss, Mr. Obama, has any more intention of being unseated on Nov. 6th or Jan. 15th than he had on the date of each and every court challenge to his rule and reign.. No communist dictator has ever let elections or a Constitution stand in the way of his staying in office.

    From the beginning of the 2009-2010 Session of Congress (and before), liberals and RINOs have governed and voted in such opposition to We the People's interests that the Congress has enjoyed approval ratings in single-digit territory for much of the past 3 years and 4½ months. As P.T. Barnum and/or H.L. Mencken were wont to say, "No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people," or their attentiveness to the voting records of their Representatives and Senators, either. But neither was anyone ever elected to public office based upon rubbing the electorate's faces in the dirt.

    I am no prophet, but IMO, there will not be free, fair, and honest elections in 2012, and probably no elections at all. The likelihood of terrorist attacks inside the U.S. if and when Israel defends herself against Iran, along with a continued collapsing economy and reduced government ability to borrow trillions for operating funds because of reduced credit ratings, rising interest rates, devaluing dollars, and China's increasingly impatient T-bill holders, may be a 1-2 punch to the U.S. way of life.

    The consequences - higher taxes and even higher gas prices, reduced health and welfare benefits, more unemployment without more unemployment compensation, and increased police state abuses of authority - all point to widespread civil disorder, rioting, burning, looting, shooting, racial violence, overpowered law enforcement, and a well-armed civilian militia attempting to restore law and order.

    Mr. Obama can be expected to use this anticipated chaos as a Cloward-Piven event, an excuse to suspend the elections by declaring martial law per NDAA § 1022 and E.O. NDRP, enforced upon U.S. citizens and legal residents by U.S. armed forces who have recently returned home from combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, with vigilantes the most recent villains on the watch list. Results are predictable.

    Come quickly, Lord Jesus, come soon. If ever we needed You to rescue us, we sure do need You now.

    Holder: 'There Are E-Mails That We Have Not - And Will Not - Produce' On Fast and Furious | CNSNews.com

    Linked at http://www.alipac.us/f9/anyone-speak...ml#post1282237
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 05-24-2012 at 04:14 AM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  5. #4955
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    6 in 10 want to know candidates' eligibility

    Interest in issue surges as Obama campaigns

    Published: 3 hours agoby Bob UnruhEmail | Archive







    Just as Barack Obama’s 2012 presidential campaign is hitting high gear, a new poll indicates that a strong majority of Arizona voters wants affidavits from presidential candidates affirming their eligibility.
    The results are from the Arizona State University-based Morrison Institute for Public Policy.

    The poll shows 6 of 10 Arizona voters “would support a ‘birther bill’ requiring presidential candidates to sign an affidavit affirming they are American citizens.”
    “Support is highest among registered Republicans (76 percent support the idea) while 58 percent of Democrats oppose it,” said the Morrison Institute’s report of the poll results, which were released Thursday.
    “The legislature passed the bill in 2011, but the governor vetoed it, saying that such a law ‘could lead to arbitrary or politically motivated decisions,” the report said.
    Sign the petition now to show members of Congress just how many Americans demand constitutional integrity.
    The poll asked: “How about the so-called ‘birther bill’ that would require presidential candidates to come to sign an affidavit that they are an American citizen?”
    Thirty-four percent strongly supported the idea; another 26 percent supported it and 11 percent opposed it. Twenty-five percent strongly opposed it and 4 percent were uncertain.
    The results reveal growing concern over Obama’s eligibility, even though the poll question reflected the mainstream media’s general misunderstanding that the issue is Obama’s “citizenship.” The concern actually is over Obama’s status as a “natural born citizen,” a special requirement in the U.S. Constitution for a president.
    The Founders probably would have considered a “natural born citizen” to be the offspring of two citizens. Some of Obama’s critics say by that standard, he would be ineligible, because his father was a Kenyan citizen.
    The Morrison Institute’s survey also found 84 percent of Arizona voters oppose allowing religious organizations that provide health insurance for workers to ask female employees if they use birth control. In addition, support is split on a requirement that abortion businesses post notices that it is against the law to coerce a woman into having an abortion. Also, three-quarters of Arizona voters oppose allowing people to carry firearms in public places such as libraries, and 40 percent support the idea of an “armed volunteer citizen militia to patrol the Arizona-Mexico border.”
    The poll was assembled through 488 live telephone interviews April 10-14 and 16-20. The results were weighted to be 36 percent Republican, 30 percent Democrat and 34 percent independents. It carries a margin of error of 4.4 percent.
    It comes just as a petition to Congress to investigate Obama’s constitutional eligibility is surging forward.
    Spurred by the findings of Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who has found probable cause that the birth certificate posted one year ago on the White House website is a fraud, the petition represents a last-ditch effort to clear the air on Obama’s legitimacy before the November election. Nearly 60,000 people have sign on so far.
    “Can you believe Obama is still playing games with his identity six months before the next presidential election?” asks Joseph Farah, chief executive officer and editor of WND. “As I have long predicted, no court in America is going to take this hot potato of a case. It is the sworn duty of Congress to uphold the Constitution and hold the executive branch accountable to the people. It’s time to turn up the heat on the timid, fearful Republicans and the see-no-evil Democrats.”
    Arpaio himself, whose office has conducted the only law enforcement investigation of Obama’s birth documents and eligibility, has asked for assistance from Congress. But his requests have fallen on deaf ears.
    Arpaio recently told WABC radio host and WND senior staff reporter Aaron Klein that the media and politicians alike are afraid to touch the issue.
    “Why didn’t someone investigate this? I mean, where is everybody?” Arpaio asked Klein. “How come the federal agencies aren’t investigating? We’re dealing with federal issues here. So everybody’s hiding, and they’re still hiding.”
    The few members of Congress who tentatively have broached the subject of the constitutional eligibility of the president retreated when the establishment media pulled out a well-worn repertoire of “birther” jokes.
    WND reported that Jerry W. Mansfield, an information research specialist in the Knowledge Services Group of the Congressional Research Service, issued a memo to prepare members of Congress to rebut and defuse questions constituents were asking regarding Obama’s presidential eligibility under the natural-born citizen requirement of the Constitution.
    Many members of Congress were found to have quoted from the memo to turn away inquiries about eligibility.
    Arpaio said to Klein that he told his Cold Case Posse team his aim was to settle the matter.
    “My instructions were this: ‘I want you to clear the president. I want to get to the bottom of this and get it off the table forever,’” he said. “Didn’t happen that way.”
    The dispute has been around since before Obama was elected in 2008, when the first cases were filed in courts, based on a long list of missing documents and other evidence.
    The petition cites Arpaio’s investigation into Obama’s documentation.



    It’s addressed to “All members of the U.S. Congress” and states:
    Whereas, the first official U.S. law enforcement investigation into Barack Obama’s legal eligibility for the presidency, led by Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio and involving a six-month investigation by three professional criminal investigators and two attorneys, established “probable cause” that the document released with great fanfare by the White House April 27, 2011, as Obama’s “long-form birth certificate” is a forgery;
    Whereas, specifically, these investigators, after interviewing dozens of witnesses, examining hundreds of documents, and taking numerous sworn statements from witnesses around the world, including multiple document experts, concluded that said “birth certificate” did not originate in a paper format, but was created – that is, forged – as an electronic file on a computer;
    Whereas, the Arpaio-led law-enforcement investigation cited numerous experts demonstrating that an additional fraud was allegedly committed in the forgery of Barack Obama’s Selective Service registration card;
    Whereas, the investigation also found that, according to a sworn affidavit by the longtime mailman for the parents of ex-Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers, Ayers’ mother enthusiastically claimed she had helped pay for the Harvard Law School education of “foreign student” Barack Obama;
    Whereas, Arpaio’s lead investigator Michael Zullo explained at a March 1 press conference that the 1961 Hawaiian newspaper “announcements” of Barack Obama’s birth confirm nothing, since the investigators “can prove beyond a doubt” that these newspapers also announced arrivals of foreign babies as well as native-born; and that the investigators even possess “documented evidence of two adopted individuals who were breathing three years prior” to their supposed Hawaii “birth” and subsequent newspaper “birth announcements”;
    Whereas, the investigation determined that immigration files in the National Archives recording overseas arrivals into Hawaii are missing from one particular week – the week of Obama’s birthday, August 4, 1961;
    Whereas, , lead investigator Mike Zullo also said his team believes the Hawaii Department of Health has engaged in a systematic effort to hide from public inspection any original 1961 birth records for Obama it may have in its possession;
    Whereas, investigators have advised Sheriff Arpaio they believe at least two crimes of fraud were committed: 1) The White House allegedly created a forgery it claimed was an officially produced governmental birth record; and 2) the White House allegedly presented to the residents of Maricopa County, Ariz. – and to the entire American public – a forgery represented as “proof positive” of President Obama’s authentic 1961 Hawaii long-form birth certificate;
    Whereas, Sheriff Arpaio said March 1: “The president can put all this to rest quite easily. All he has to do is demand the Hawaii Department of Health release to the American public and to a panel of certified court-authorized forensic examiners all original 1961 paper, microfilm and computer birth records the Hawaii Department of Health has in its possession”;
    Whereas, Arpaio concluded: “Absent the authentication of Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other proof he was born anywhere within the United States”;
    Whereas, despite a virtual media blackout on the issue, repeated national polls show that almost half of registered U.S. voters remain unconvinced that Barack Obama’s birth certificate is authentic:
    The signatories demand that Congress launch an investigation, because “not to finally resolve this monumental and unprecedented constitutional issue would be intolerable, and would constitute the most extreme disrespect and contempt for the U.S. Constitution.”
    See the image released by Obama:


    In the Phoenix Times, a headline noted that the issue “is a favorite of Arizonan Voters.”

    The progression of interest in Obama’s eligibility, as tabulated by various polls, has been clear. Just weeks ago, A WND/Wenzel poll by Wenzel Strategies showed almost 40 percent of registered voters think the nation is facing a constitutional crisis because of a lack of documentation regarding Obama’s eligibility.

    Nearly 26 percent of respondents say they strongly agree with the statement that the country now is facing a constitutional crisis on the issue of Obama’s eligibility. Another 13.7 percent say they somewhat agree.
    The poll showed 11 percent of voters are very familiar with the conclusions in Arpaio’s report, and another 19 percent are somewhat familiar. Nearly 70 percent were not very or not at all familiar.
    The poll also showed that because of Arpaio’s report, 40 percent now concede they are more likely to believe Obama in ineligible to hold the office of president. Another 20 percent said they weren’t able to express an opinion on the question.

    Also, more than 46 percent said they agree that now there needs to be more extensive investigative work done into Obama’s eligibility to determine the facts, while 39 percent said they disagreed.
    And then there was the key question about the nation facing a constitutional crisis.

    At issue would be consequences such as the fallout of court decisions made by judges appointed by Obama. There are two new U.S. Supreme Court judges, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, who owe their lifelong appointments to Obama.
    But if Obama was ineligible from the beginning, what would happen to the decisions in which the justices have participated?
    Respondents also are divided over the minimal media coverage. About 30 percent say the coverage of the Arpaio report was favorable to Obama and another 25 percent say it opposed him. Significantly, 30 percent are “not sure.”
    Other recent polls have indicated that 37 percent of Republican primary voters in Ohio, 38 percent in Georgia and a startling 45 percent in Tennessee don’t believe Obama’s affirmations of eligibility.
    Some 1 in 5 cannot say for sure they believe him.
    The results were obtained by Public Policy Polling, which asked “Do you think Barack Obama was born in the United States, or not?”
    Freshly updated! Find out what Obama’s story truly is, in “Where’s the REAL Birth Certificate?” by Jerome Corsi. Or join in the billboard campaign that seeks the answer to “Where’s the Real Birth Certificate?”
    When the Iowa caucuses were being held, a Public Policy Polling report noted that 1 in 3 Iowa GOP members did not believe Obama was born in the United States – an indication of their disbelief about his eligibility to be president.
    WND reported that another poll showed half of registered voters would like to see Congress investigate Obama’s eligibility. It also showed that nearly that many believe the definition of the constitutional term “natural born citizen” means both parents must be U.S. citizens.
    Just days after the White House released the “birth certificate” image, Gallup reported that only 47 percent thought Obama was definitely was born in the U.S. and 18 percent said he “probably” was.
    It was only a few months after Obama’s inauguration that a WND/Wenzel Poll showed that 51.3 percent of American voters said they were aware of the questions raised about Obama’s constitutional eligibility for office. Only 18.7 percent said they were not and another 30 percent were unsure.
    At that point, 58.2 percent of Republicans said they were aware of the controversy.
    Polls later revealed Americans to be increasingly skeptical of Obama’s official narrative:

    • A survey by Angus Reid Global Monitor, a division of Vision Critical Group, in October 2009 found three in 10 people in the U.S. believed Obama to be a foreigner.”While only 13 percent of Democratic Party supporters believe Obama was not born in the U.S., the proportion rises to 25 percent among independents and 51 percent among Republican Party backers,” the report said.


    • Then in January 2010, another WND/Wenzel Poll showed on the one-year anniversary of Obama’s inauguration that fully one-third of Americans refused to believe Obama was a “legitimate president,” with another 15.8 percent saying they were not sure. Barely half the voters, 51.5 percent, said they believed the president legitimate even though he had not produced documentation proving his constitutional eligibility. Even 14.6 percent of the Democrats said they did not consider him legitimate.


    • In May 2010, a WND/Wenzel Poll showed that 55 percent of American voters wanted Obama to release all records relating to his childhood and his education, including “college records, Harvard Law School papers, passport records, travel records, and other similar documentation.” Asked what should be done should it be found that Obama does not meet the qualifications to be president, 59 percent said he should be removed from office, and 35 percent said all bills signed into law by Obama should be repealed,” the poll’s analysis revealed.




    • In later 2010, a poll by CNN said 6 of 10 people were uncertain Obama was born in the U.S. The poll said only 42 percent believe Obama “definitely” was born in the U.S. The CNN report said, “Hawaii has released a copy of the president’s birth certificate – officially called a ‘certificate of live birth.’ And in 1961 the hospital where the president was born placed announcements in two Hawaiian newspapers regarding Obama’s birth.”



    Amazing number want to know candidates’ eligibility
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #4956
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,266
    Quote Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC View Post
    Every one of us reasons as if normal chains of authority, organization charts, channels, and procedures are still operative. We assume that an orderly transfer of power, through free, fair, and honest elections, will save the day... and the nation. But WE MUST FIND OTHER AVENUES FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES. Here's why.

    Unlawful, unconstitutional authority is a lawless bully and an outlaw and does not submit to Constitutional authority and the rule of law.

    An ENEMY COMBATANT, a communist dictator with Is|amist sympathies and loyalties to nearly every major power that opposes the U.S., has usurped a great, but limited, degree of power.

    He has seized de facto control of the armed forces, law enforcement, and government at all levels in the U.S.. This enemy, foreign and domestic, of the U.S. Constitution even defies the checks and balances that restrain the Executive Branch from tyranny and the separation of powers that restrains the federal government from totalitarianism.

    Under the guise or excuse of racial "justice", he has overthrown the U.S. Constitution, Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5, the "natural born Citizen" clause, and has thereby brought the Constitution into disrespect and debased the authority of every other clause.

    This man of lawlessness will not submit to Constitution or laws, nor will he subject his Constitutionally-illegitimate authority to the checks and balances the Constitution assigns to the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. We see AG Eric Holder expressing only the exact same defiance and contempt which he has in common with the Criminal-in-Chief. If Mr. Obama were not similarly defiant, he would have slapped down such misconduct by AG Holder faster than Sheriff Joe Arpaio stopping a drunk-driving illegal alien.

    Do not be so naive as to think that AG Holder will allow the Congress, the Courts, the Constitution, or the U.S. Code of Laws to bring down his reign of terror as Mr. Obama's Enforcer and head of the DOJ. Even less may you imagine that his boss, Mr. Obama, has any more intention of being unseated on Nov. 6th or Jan. 15th than he had on the date of each and every court challenge to his rule and reign.. No communist dictator has ever let an election or a Constitution stand in the way of his staying in office.

    From the beginning of the 2009-2010 Session (and before), liberals and RINOs have governed and voted in such opposition to the interests of We the People that Congress has enjoyed approval ratings in single-digit territory for much of the past 3 years and 4½ months. True, "No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people," as P.T. Barnum and/or H.L. Mencken said. But no one was ever elected to public office based upon rubbing the electorate's faces in the dirt, either.

    IMO, and I am no prophet, there will not be free, fair, and honest elections in 2012, and probably no elections at all. The likelihood of terrorist attacks inside the U.S. if and when Israel defends herself against Iran, along with a continued collapsing economy and reduced government ability to borrow trillions in operating funds because of reduced credit ratings, rising interest rates, China's increasingly impatient T-bill holders, and devaluing dollars, may be a 1-2 punch to the U.S..

    The consequences - higher taxes and even higher gas prices, reduced health and welfare benefits, more unemployment without more unemployment compensation, and increased police state abuses of authority - all point to widespread civil disorder, rioting, burning, looting, shooting, racial violence, overpowered law enforcement, and a well-armed civilian militia attempting to restore law and order.

    Mr. Obama can be expected to use this anticipated chaos as a Cloward-Piven event, an excuse to suspend the elections by declaring martial law per NDAA § 1022 and E.O. NDRP, enforced upon U.S. citizens and legal residents by U.S. armed forces who have recently returned home from combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, with vigilantes the most recent villains on the watch list. Results are predictable.

    Come quickly, Lord Jesus, come soon. If ever we needed You to rescue us, we sure do need You now.

    Holder: 'There Are E-Mails That We Have Not - And Will Not - Produce' On Fast and Furious | CNSNews.com
    MinutemanCDC_SC very good post...

  7. #4957
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Quote Originally Posted by 'Tired of lying socialists politicians' at impeachobamacampaign.com
    Someone above said that Obozo will be re-elected. I hope they're wrong, but I can see it happening again IF the conservative vote is divided AGAIN by a strong 3rd party candidate like Ron Paul which is exactly what happend in '08.. In '08 Dr Paul garnered approx.9 1/2 million votes. Obozo won by approx. 5 1/2 million. I can't think of any better candidate than Dr. Paul, but please don't let this happen again. Don't waste your vote on ANY 3rd party candidate untill they show in the primaries, that they can pull around 50-55 million votes in the general election. If Dr. Pauls votes had gone to McCain/Palin we wouldn't have been . . . losing our freedoms the last 3 1/2 years.

    Way to blame Ron Paul and other adherents to the Constitution for Mr. Obama's treachery, sedition, and t_____n. 'Tired', do you also blame the admittedly genuine evils of capitalism for causing Al Qaeda to murder nearly 3000 non-combatants on Sept. 11, 2001?

    The globalist CFR and CCR (Country Club Republicans) are to blame for putting forward RINOs instead of Patriots, candidates that stand just to the right of the Democratic Socialists, but not enough to the right for the mixed multitudes of occasional voters to recognize as worth driving to the polls and waiting in line to elect. So long as the CFR/CCR fat cats reject Christian values*, conservative principles, and government "by the Constitution, subject to the Constitution, and according to the Constitution," they can expect to be ruled by a communist dictator who robs them blind and who blocks the way to investing in world-renowned American productivity.
    * Christian values such as "Others" and "service over self," replacing "Greed is good."

    So far as the international crime syndicate Alinsky, Obama, Jarrett, Holder, Clinton, Napolitano, Soros & Co. is concerned, the usurper must be arrested (not impeached) by the Secret Service (or whoever else can apprehend him) for IMPERSONATION OF AN OFFICER OF THE UNITED STATES which post the Constitution restricts to and reserves for a natural born Citizen. An nbC is one who is born in the country of parents who are citizens, according to the unanimous decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett (1875). AFAIK, Mr. Obama has never even claimed to be a natural born Citizen, leaving it to DNC Chair Rep. Nancy Pelosi and DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond to perjure themselves on his behalf.

    Just arrest the communist infiltrator already, and put him on the next innertube to GITMO.

    Will Obama Attempt To Declare Martial Law Before November Election?
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 05-16-2012 at 11:28 PM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  8. #4958
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Arizona official to Hawaii: Show birth verification
    Eligibility dispute elevated to formal inquiry from state elections office

    Published: 8pm EST, May 16, 2012

    by Jerome R. Corsi

    A state official in Arizona has asked Hawaii for verification of the information on Barack Obama’s birth certificate, the document that Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s special investigative team has concluded may be a forgery.

    Members of the Surprise, Ariz., Tea Party, who petitioned Arpaio to investigate Obama’s eligibility, say they are awaiting word from the state secretary of state regarding whether Obama’s name will be on the 2012 presidential ballot in Arizona.

    Secretary of State Ken Bennett had promised to ask Hawaii officials for verification of Obama’s documentation, vowing that if answers are not forthcoming, Obama’s name will not be on the ballot.

    The assurance came in an email to various constituents in Arizona who had contacted Bennett’s office expressing concern that the name of an ineligible candidate would be presented to voters in November.

    “Because of the importance and profile of the president’s case, and at the request of many constituents, I have gone the extra step of asking the state of Hawaii to verify the facts contained in his birth certificate,” Bennett wrote in response to concerns last month. “Hawaii is bound by their own statutes to provide such verifications to other state officials in their official duties.

    “With all due respect, the [Arpaio] investigation has not proven anything other than raised probable cause that the birth certificate posted on the White House website ‘may be’ a forgery. The next lawful step would be for the sheriff’s office to turn their findings over to the county attorney for prosecution,” he continued. “Evidence would be brought on both sides and a judge should issue a decision.

    “Whether or not that happens, if Hawaii can’t or won’t provide verification of the president’s birth certificate, I will not put his name on the ballot,” he wrote.

    “I can tell from the tone and language of your letters that the only acceptable outcome for you is that his name not be on the ballot, period. That may be what happens, but under my watch, it won’t happen based on opinions, petitions, probability or pledges to support or oppose me in the 2014 governor’s race. My oath of office is to uphold the Constitution and laws of our state and country, and I’m going to do that by following the law,” he said.

    Amen, said Brian Reilly, the Surprise Tea Party member who originated the idea of asking Arpaio for an investigation.

    He also was part of the group that sought from the state legislature this year a requirement that presidential candidates document their eligibility. The proposal that fell by the wayside despite some 3,000 signatures of people endorsing the plan.

    Reilly told WND that those who contacted Bennett are concerned about the integrity of the state ballot and “whether their votes mean anything.” He argued, as have others, that having an ineligible candidate on the ballot destroys the integrity of the entire election process.

    Reilly said he’s confident the system will produce the truth eventually. And Tea Party members are awaiting word on whether Hawaii has provided the information Bennett has sought.

    “In my mind, no way can (Hawaii) certify or confirm what that is,” he said, referring to the birth certificate image posted online by Obama. “We actually need to see the hard copy.”

    One constituent message to Bennett said, “There is a great deal of weight that has been placed onto your shoulders, base[d] on the requirements that your office has and can impose … on anyone that wishes to run for president. All that we ask is that you do your absolute best, to [e]nsure that everyone who[se] name appears on the ballot in the 2012 president election, is eligible to become president if elected.”

    Bennett’s communications director, Matt Roberts, told WND today that the secretary of state indeed has asked Hawaii for the answers. In fact, he said, there was a conversation about proper procedures to submit the request.

    “We are awaiting their response,” he said.


    Boilerplate text continues at Arizona official to Hawaii: Show birth verification.
    __________________________________________________ ____________

    ED note:
    Arizona Sec. of State Ken Bennett still makes no mention of the Kenyan father of record.

    Surprise Tea Party member Brian Reilly says, “We actually need to see the hard copy.”

    But Arizona Sec. of State Bennett is only asking Hawaii officials to verify Obama’s documentation.

    Verification is not an original document or even a certified copy of an original document, only a statement, but it is a statement which officials of other states must accept as made in good faith, even with no other proof. Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle, Hawaii Dept. of Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino, and (I think) DOH Public Information Officer Janice Okubo have verified it two or three times already, vouching for the authenticity of the counterfeit Certificate. That proves something about their own character, integrity, and honesty (or lack thereof), but nothing about Barack Obama, without independent counterfeiting experts and forensics inspectors examining, testing, and otherwise validating the hypothetical, imaginary, "original, hard copy document."

    Don't hold the presses waiting for that to happen. That will never happen, even per a court order; not because of stonewalling, but because the document is not there (wherever "there" is supposed to be). And we don't know where "there" is,
    even if we knew that there is a "there" there. But because we do know that there is no genuine article "there", we can safely assume that there is no "there" there either for the mythical document to be.

    Even the Creator can't examine a document which doesn't exist... although He could create an historically valid and verifiable document after the fact... but then He couldn't lie about it to recommend it for validation... and etc..
    What a tangled web they wove...
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 05-17-2012 at 10:50 PM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  9. #4959
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,266
    Obama Impeachment Bill Goes Viral!
    Wednesday, May 16, 2012 7:37

    Published on May 16, 2012 by TheAlexJonesChannel

    Alex speaks with Congressman Walter B. Jones, Jr. about H.CON.RES.107 -- a bill that deems the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
    jones.house.gov/
    Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!




    Before It's News

  10. #4960
    Senior Member florgal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,386
    The Vetting - Exclusive - Obama's Literary Agent in 1991 Booklet: 'Born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii'


    243
    46
    3



    Email Article
    Print Article Send a Tip


    by Joel B. Pollak 29 minutes ago 118 post a comment

    Note from Senior Management:
    Andrew Breitbart was never a "Birther," and Breitbart News is a site that has never advocated the narrative of "Birtherism." In fact, Andrew believed, as we do, that President Barack Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on August 4, 1961.
    Yet Andrew also believed that the complicit mainstream media had refused to examine President Obama's ideological past, or the carefully crafted persona he and his advisers had constructed for him.
    It is for that reason that we launched "The Vetting," an ongoing series in which we explore the ideological background of President Obama (and other presidential candidates)--not to re-litigate 2008, but because ideas and actions have consequences.
    It is also in that spirit that we discovered, and now present, the booklet described below--one that includes a marketing pitch for a forthcoming book by a then-young, otherwise unknown former president of the Harvard Law Review.
    It is evidence--not of the President's foreign origin, but that Barack Obama's public persona has perhaps been presented differently at different times.
    ***
    Breitbart News has obtained a promotional booklet produced in 1991 by Barack Obama's then-literary agency, Acton & Dystel, which touts Obama as "born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii."
    The booklet, which was distributed to "business colleagues" in the publishing industry, includes a brief biography of Obama among the biographies of eighty-nine other authors represented by Acton & Dystel.
    It also promotes Obama's anticipated first book, Journeys in Black and White--which Obama abandoned, later publishing Dreams from My Father instead.
    Obama’s biography in the booklet is as follows (image and text below):

    Barack Obama, the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review, was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii. The son of an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister, he attended Columbia University and worked as a financial journalist and editor for Business International Corporation. He served as project coordinator in Harlem for the New York Public Interest Research Group, and was Executive Director of the Developing Communities Project in Chicago’s South Side. His commitment to social and racial issues will be evident in his first book, Journeys in Black and White.
    The booklet, which is thirty-six pages long, is printed in blue ink (and, on the cover, silver/grey ink), using offset lithography. It purports to celebrate the fifteenth anniversary of Acton & Dystel, which was founded in 1976.

    The Vetting - Exclusive - Obama's Literary Agent in 1991 Booklet: 'Born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii'

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •