Results 5,301 to 5,310 of 5732
97LikesThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks-
04-14-2013, 11:20 PM #5301Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
AirborneSapper7, thank you for this recounting of the events leading up to the 2008 Democratic National Convention. Contrary to appearances, the story reposted above is not current; it is five years old, and it is tagged
Who is the woman in the picture, and how was she connected to the murder of FBI witness Lt. Quarles Harris? ("Lt." was his given name, not a rank)
The admin at ItMakesSenseBlog.com thoroughly confused the chronology of these events by omitting the date of publication (April 19, 2008 ) and mixing the copy with links to the current events of Feb. 25, 2013. Allow me to review the timeline of the murders of the bodies who knew where the dirt was buried.
Originally Posted by The Meister at ItMakesSenseBlog.com
Three other homosexuals died who also attended Trinity U.C.C. in Chicago and were members of the Down Low Club (DLC), a match-making service run by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright; two of the three were murdered.
Nov. 16, 2007, Larry Bland - murdered gangland-style by a shot to the back of the head.
Dec. 24, 2007, choir director Donald Young - assassinated in his apartment by multiple gunshots.
Dec. 26, 2007, choir member Nate Spencer - not murdered; died of septicemia and pneumonia resulting from HIV/AIDS.
Originally Posted by 2RogoS, commenter at Western Journalism
Originally Posted by The Meister at ItMakesSenseBlog.com
DIRTY, DIRTY, DIRTY – FBI Witness Murdered [On April 17, 2008,] Who Had Access & Was To Testify In Obama/Soetoro Passport FBI Investigation.
February 26th, 2013 | 
Author: The Meister
Another day, another creepy murder related in some way to Barack Obama. There is something about this guy that leads to unusual murders wherever his name arises. The most recent unusual death involves the fatal shooting of a key witness in the passport file fraud investigation. If you recall, during the campaign it was discovered that Obama, Hillary and McCain’s passport files had been breached.
[QUOTE=on April 19, 2008.]The Legend Of Barry Soetoro As Barack Hussein Obama II
It was Obama’s that was reported first with the implication that Hillary had something to do with it. Then, sort of as an afterthought, it was reported that both Hillary’s and McCain’s files were also violated.
There has been some speculation that Hillary’s and McCain’s files were violated as a cover-up for the real focus of the breach, which was Obama’s passport file. Some people wonder what was removed from his file and if it was part of an effort to make sure no one found out about Obama’s shady past.
Like, when did he actually first get a US passport? What is on that passport? Like maybe his real name? His place of birth? His parentage? (If you think I exaggerate the importance of the birth certificate and other biological information, it has just been reported that Obama’s lawyer, Robert Bauer, was paid $688,000 this year to make sure no one sees any of it).
Anyway, the story is reported in the Washington Times:
Say what? We don’t know if it was connected? Hmmm, somehow, nothing ever gets connected where Barry is involved and somehow the murders always go unsolved. Originally Posted by The Washington Times
The Washington Times reported [on] April 5[, 2008,] that contractors for the State Department had improperly accessed passport information for presidential candidates Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain, which resulted in a series of firings that reached into the agency’s top ranks.
One agency employee, who was not identified in documents filed in U.S. District Court, was implicated in a credit-card fraud scheme after Lt. Harris told federal authorities he obtained “passport information from a co-conspirator who works for the U.S. Department of State.”
Now, somehow, I fail to be convinced that someone violated the law to get into Obama’s passport file to commit credit card fraud. This is not a logical thought.
I’m not sure where the Washington Times got the information for that last paragraph, but are they saying that this Lt. Harris’s name was openly mentioned in a court complaint and they had him wandering around without any type of security protection?
How many dead bodies does it take to figure out something strange is happening here?
Let’s see, we have three at Trinity United Church of Christ (murders never solved):
…the murder of Donald Young, a 47-year-old choir master at former Rev. Jeremiah Wright‘s Trinity United Church of Christ—the same congregation that Obama has attended for the past 20 years. Two other young black men that attended the same church—Larry Bland and Nate Spencer [ED.: Nate Spencer was NOT murdered; he died of complications from HIV/AIDS]—were also murdered execution style with bullets to the backs of their heads—all within 40 days of each other, beginning in November 2007. All three were openly homosexual.
In Arkansas, we have the pre-convention murder of the Dem Party Chairman, who rumor has it, was not going to switch his vote from Hillary to Obama. Someone was attached to this murder, but he is also dead. There doesn’t seem to be any rhyme or reason for the murder; the guy was mentally unstable, but then so are most murderers.
Barrack Hussein Obama The Community Organizer? Not Quite.
The real question is, who is the President of the United States and will we survive his presidency? All that I know is that I am really relieved that I have never met this walking death sentence, seen this walking death sentence, nor talked to this walking death sentence. Otherwise, I would be very worried.
PUMA FOR LIFE
http://itmakessenseblog.com/2013/02/...investigation/ Originally Posted by Kris Zane for Western Journalism
I hope this answers more questions than it raises. If not, blame the perpetrators for the twisted webs they weaved, not the reporters for twisted analyses of the twisted webs. Originally Posted by Kevin Dujan, gay Chicago blogger on HillBuzz, in “Is Obama Gay?”
Alex Okrent
[ Alex Okrent died mysteriously in July of 2012 in the Obama Campaign Offices in Chicago's Prudential Building. Openly gay, he'd been affiliated with Barack Obama in one way or another since Okrent was in college. Obama kept him around, through all those years, on all those campaigns... until he suddenly turned up dead with an inconclusive autopsy. And his death happened just before Obama was headed into a difficult re-election campaign where black support for Obama was wavering and the black community is notoriously anti-gay. Could Alex Okrent have been eliminated because he was going to talk about a relationship with Barack Obama? There sure are a lot of gay men who turn up dead around the current President of the United States. See also: Young, Donald].
Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 04-16-2013 at 11:10 PM.
One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
-
04-16-2013, 04:24 AM #5302Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
On February 14, 2013, Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Prior to this designation, she served as the Deputy Commissioner, having been confirmed by the United States Senate on December 22, 2010 as President Obama’s nominee. [From the official website of the U.S. Social Security Administration.]
[ED.: 2½ months ago, Atty. Orly Taitz filed the following request for a default (uncontested) judgment against Barry Soetoro a.k.a. Barack Obama (Soebarkah). The court did not respond, and 16 days later, a new Obama appointee, Acting Social Security Administration Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin, gained jurisdiction over the incriminating evidence about the true ownership of a SSN ending in "4425", the SSN of Harrison J. Bounel, which Mr. Obama fraudulently used, specifically to file his 2009 federal tax return.]
Jan. 30, 2013 - Defendant Barack Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al.
Notice of Default filed, expedited default judgment requested.
Press Release
Law office of Orly Taitz
Grinols Notice of Default of Defendant Obama
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered by Taitz, Orly on 1/30/2013 at 8:14 PM PST and filed on 1/30/2013
Case Name: Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
Case Number: 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD
Filer: James Grinols
Keith Judd
Thomas Gregory MacLeran
Edward Noonan
Robert Odden
Document Number: 64
Docket Text: NOTICE Notice of DEFAULT of DEFENDANT Obama, request for an expedited DEFAULT Judgment and post judgment discovery by All Plaintiffs. (Taitz, Orly)
2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Edward A Olsen , GOVT edward.olsen@usdoj.gov, karen.james@usdoj.gov, monica.lee@usdoj.gov, teisha.stogsdill@usdoj.gov
George Michael Waters george.waters@doj.ca.gov, lydia.sandoval@doj.ca.gov
Orly Taitz orly.taitz@gmail.com, dr_taitz@yahoo.com
2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Electronically filed documents must be served conventionally by the filer to:
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document description:Main Document Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1064943537 [Date=1/30/2013] [FileNumber=5951932-0 ] [99d8319f28ecde09f487b404ac329fd4f73ab3686d082711ed 46399b174fcfceffa 05bd43535b2382241da21cfca3e458c187091127b9ed9bb688 a5c9f99773e]]
Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, Ca 92688
949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
Orly.taitz@gmail.com
IN THE US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Grinols et al . . . . . . . . . . . . . ) Case # 12-cv-2997
V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .) Honorable Morrison C. England
Electoral College et al . . . . ) Chief Judge Presiding
NOTICE OF DEFAULT OF DEFENDANT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, AKA BARACK (BARRY) SOETORO, AKA BARACK (BARRY) OBAMA SOEBARKAH
REQUEST FOR AN EXPEDITED DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND A PROPOSED DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Case at hand was file[d] on 12.12.2012. Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, AKA BARACK (BARRY) SOETORO, AKA BARACK (BARRY) OBAMA SOEBARKAH was sued in his capacity as a candidate for the U.S. President. Defendant was served by Same Day professional service process[or] on 01.04.2013. Defendant was under an obligation to file an answer or a responsive pleading within 21 days on 01.25.2013. Defendant failed to file an answer or a responsive pleading and is currently in DEFAULT.
Plaintiffs are hereby respectfully requesting a default judgment against the defendant, post judgment discovery, costs and attorney fees. Additionally, Plaintiffs are seeking an EXPEDITED DEFAULT JUDGMENT for the following reason:
Commissioner of Social Security [is] Bush appointee Michael Astrue. He announced that he is leaving office in February, within days. According to evidence provided to this court, Obama made his tax returns public, which show him using a CT [mailing address] SSN xxx-xx-4425, which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Affidavits of investigators Sankey and Daniels already submitted to this court with the complaint, show aforementioned SSN to be linked in a number of databases to a date of birth 1890.
Recently investigator Albert Hendershot found in the database of http://www.acxiom.com/identity-solut...tch-solutions/ the name of the individual whose Social Security Obama is using. Acxciom-batch-solutions showed (Exhibit 1) that Harry J Bounel with the same Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 at 5046 S Greenwood Ave in Chicago, home address of Barack Obama, Database shows Bounel with the same address and Social Security number as Barack Obama himself. According to the databases last changes to the information on Harrison (Harry) J Bounel were made in and around November 2009 by Michelle Obama, who is listed as Bounel’s relative. Database changes can involve entering the information or deletion of information. It appears that changes made by relative Michelle Obama included deletion of information, which was done at a time when Taitz brought to Federal court in the Central District of California before Judge David O. Carter a case of election challenge by her client, former U.S. ambassador Dr. Alan Keyes, and 40 state Representatives and high ranked members of the U.S. military.
Recently obtained results of the 1940 census, Exhibit 2, provided the last missing link, link between Harry J. Bounel and the date of birth of 1890. Exhibit 2 shows the printout of the U.S. census, showing Harry J Bounel, immigrant from Russia, residing at 915 Daly Ave, Bronx, NY, age 50 during the 1940 census, meaning he was born in 1890, as shown in the affidavit of Investigators Daniels and Sankey.
There is a pattern of Obstruction of Justice and tampering with the official records and falsification/forgery of the official records related to Obama. This happens in particular when Bush employees leave their positions and are replaced by Obama appointees.
In March of 2009 one of the clients of Taitz, Major General Carol Childers, arranged for her to meet with the Director of the Selective Service William Chatfield. After Taitz provided Chatfield with evidence of forgery of Obama’s alleged Selective Service certificate, Childers resigned and was replaced by Obama appointee Lawrence Romo. Later, when Sheriff of Maricopa county, AZ, Joseph Arpaio demanded from Romo the original paper registration by Obama, Romo responded that it was destroyed.
Similarly, when the former intelligence officer Pamela Barnett sought passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother, she was given only some of the records and was told that the 1965 passport for Dunham was destroyed.
When investigator Sandler provided Taitz and reporter Corsi with a batch number for the immigration/travel records for Obama for August 1-7, 1961, those records disappeared from the National Archives, even though the records for the other 51 weeks for 1961 could be found with no problem. After an article was written about missing records, there was a falsification of records and another investigator, Montgomery Blair Sidley, found a record, where original date of August 7, 1961, was visibly erased, and August 1, 1961, was written over it (Exhibit 3).
Based on the pattern of the original vital records, which are essential in removing Obama from office and criminally prosecuting him, rapidly disappearing, there is a high probability that the SSA application SS-5 for the Social Security number for Harry J. Bounel will be either destroyed or falsified the moment Bush appointee Commissioner of Social Security Astrue leaves in February and is replaced by the Obama appointee. Due to high probability of essential evidence being destroyed or altered Plaintiffs are asking this court to issue and expedited Default Judgment against the Defendant Obama, aka Soetoro, aka Soebarkah and order expedited post judgment discovery, which should include the production of the original SS-5 for the Connecticut SSN xxx-xx-4425.
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
Attorney for Plaintiffs
CC.
UN Nations committee for civil rights defenders
OHCHR in New York
UN Headquarters
New York, NY 10017
USA
Inter-American Commission for Human Rights
1889 F St., NW
Washington, D.C., USA 20006
Darrel Issa
Chairman of the House oversight committee
2157 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING
WASHINGTON, DC 20515
Congressman Bob Goodlatt,
Chairman of the Judiciary Committee
House of Representatives
2409 2157 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING
WASHINGTON, DC 20515
PROPOSED ORDER
Case at hand was file on 12.12.2012. Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, AKA BARACK (BARRY) SOETORO, AKA BARACK (BARRY) OBAMA SOEBARKAH was sued in his capacity as a candidate for the U.S. President. Defendant was served by SameDay professional service processer on 01. 04.2013. Defendant was under an obligation to file an answer or a responsive pleading within 21 days on 01.25.2013. Defendant failed to file an answer or a responsive pleading and is currently in DEFAULT.
Complaint and 100 exhibits provided by the Plaintiffs provided the following evidence, which was not refuted by the Defendant:
Defendant Obama never lawfully registered with the Selective Service and the selective service registration represents a computer generated forgery and as such defendant is not eligible to work in any position in the executive branch of the U.S. Government, which of course includes the Chief Executive- The U.S. President and the Commander in Chief of the U.S. military. (Sworn Affidavit of Jeffrey Stephan Coffman, the Chief Investigator of the Special investigations Unit of the U.S. Coast Guard (ret) and former special agent of the U.S. Department of the Homeland Security). As such Obama fraudulently submitted his candidacy for the U.S. President, while knowing all along that he is not eligible for any position in the Executive Branch.
Defendant fraudulently ran for the position of the U.S. President while using the last name Obama, while in his mother’s passport records he is listed under the legal name Soebarkah. As such Barack Obama was unlawfully elected, confirmed by the U.S. Senate and sworn in by the Chief Justice John Roberts, as legal entity “Barack Obama” does not exist. Defendant failed to provide any proof of legal change of name from Soebarkah to Obama.
Plaintiffs provided this court with the copy of the School registration of the Defendant from the Assissi School in Jakarta, Indonesia, where his citizenship is listed as Indonesian. Defendant failed to provide any evidence of Change of Citizenship from Indonesian to American. Even if he were to legally relinquish his Indonesian citizenship to American upon his arrival from Indonesia in 1971, he would be a Naturalized Citizen and not Natural born as required by the Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.
OCON, official certification of Candidate signed by the Chairman of the Democratic Party of Hawaii Brian Schatz(recently appointed to the U.S. Senator from HI) and the secretary of the Democratic Party of Hawaii Lynn Matusow was a flagrantly falsified document, as required wording “eligible according to provisions of the U.S. Constitution” was removed from the Certification, whereby there was never a valid certification of the candidate, which showed an intent to defraud and fraud on the part of the Defendant and aforementioned executives of the Democratic Party of Hawaii.
Defendant himself posted his tax returns on the public web site WhiteHouse.gov, one of the most travelled web sites in the world, and did not flatten the PDF file, therefore [the] full, unredacted Connecticut Social Security xxx-xx-4425, which he used in conjunction to his 2009 Tax Returns, became available to millions of the U.S. citizens and citizens around the world. This Social Secuirty failed both E-Verify and SSNVS (Social Security Number Verification Systems), two systems of verification of the Social Security number, showing that the number that the Defendant is using in his tax returns was never issued to him. This represents Social Security Fraud, Identity fraud and Elections Fraud as defendant ran for the highest office in the U.S. government without possessing a valid Social security number, one of the two basic Identification papers used in the United States of America
Plaintiffs provided sworn affidavits of Sheriff Joseph Arpaio, Investigator Mike Zullo, Typesetting expert Paul Irey, Adobe-Illustrator/Computer Graphics expert Felicito Papa, scanning machines expert Douglas Vogt and others, which show that the alleged copy of Barack Obama’s alleged long form birth certificate represents a computer generated forgery, while [the] Department of Health of Hawaii refused to comply with any and all federal and state subpoenas and never provided to any judge or jury or expert an original birth certificate that they claim to possess. At this point there is no reason to believe that the original 1961 type written birth certificate ever existed, as there would not have been a reason to create a flagrant forgery, if an original birth certificate ever existed.
Based on all of the above Default Judgment is GRANTED. This court is forwarding its findings to the Chairman of the Judiciary Commission of the U.S. Congress for determination whether the Articles of impeachment against Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, AKA BARACK (BARRY) SOETORO, AKA BARACK (BARRY) OBAMA SOEBARKAH are justified.
Based on the unrefuted evidence by the Plaintiffs, this court makes a finding and Declaratory ruling that Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, AKA BARACK (BARRY) SOETORO, AKA BARACK (BARRY) OBAMA SOEBARKAH, was not eligible to the position of the U.S. President and Commander in Chief, as he is a citizen of Indonesia, who ran for the U.S. Presidency based on fraud and misrepresentation and using either forged or fraudulently obtained identification papers.
Plaintiff are entitled to their costs, attorneys fees and post judgment discovery.
So ORDERED and ADJUDGED on this ____________________________________ of __________
Chief Judge U.S District Court ofLast edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 04-16-2013 at 07:48 AM.
One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
-
04-16-2013, 01:42 PM #5303Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
[ED.: For nearly five years, Atty. Orly Taitz has been filing lawsuits which assert that Mr. Obama is constitutionally ineligible to the Office of President, not being a natural born Citizen, that is, a citizen born in the country of parents who are citizens.
And her experience shows. Not only do the plaints now include detailed and authoritative rebuttals to the expected arguments for dismissal, but they also include historical quotes from notables and authorities, rhetoric which imbues the plaints with a high and noble quality that alerts the judges that these are no ordinary cases but rather epic rulings of the kind which establishes a judge in history as either a weasel, a quisling, or perhaps even a patriot. The recent plaints also include quotes from judges who might consider the plaints on review in the future, reminding them of the principles by which they have guided their previous decisions.________________________________________________
O Lord, Almighty God, so inspire each judge to rule justly, as will his own Judge on that day. If the judge would cower at the threat of potential harm to his grandchildren, remind him that neither his grandchildren nor his grandchildren's grandchildren's grandchildren have any potential as slaves.
Through Jesus Christ our Lord. ]
Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Phone xxx-xxx-xxxx fax xxx-xxx-xxxx
Orly.taitz@gmail.com
Counselor for the Plaintiffs
US District Court
For the Eastern District of California
James Grinols, Robert Odden, in their capacity . .)Case #12-cv-02997
as Presidential Electors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .)MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
Edward C. Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, )RESTRAINING ORDER
Keith Judd in their capacity as . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . )
candidates for the U.S. President . . . . . . . . . . . . . )
v Electoral College, President of the Senate, . . . )
Governor of California, Secretary of State . . . . . )
of California, U.S. Congress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . )
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . )
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . )
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . )
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs bring this action as Presidential Electors and as candidates for U.S.President, who, having been deprived of lawful process in the statewide election for the national office of U.S. President held in California on November 6, 2012, as a direct and proximate result of the mispersonation and elections fraud perpetrated by defendant Obama, seek redress from this court to enjoin:
1. Secretary of State and Governor from certifying the Certificate of Ascertainment due to lack of legitimacy for office and fraud committed by the citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S. Presidency and position of the Commander-in-Chief, while using a forged short form birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged Selective Service [registration] certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a proof of his legitimacy and fitness for office[.]
2. The Electoral College from tallying their votes due to lack of legitimacy for office and fraud committed by the citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S. Presidency and position of the Commander-in-Chief, while using a forged short form birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged Selective Service [registration] certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a proof of his legitimacy and fitness for office[.]
3. governor of CA from forwarding the Certificate of Electoral Vote to the US Congress due to lack of legitimacy for office and fraud committed by the citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S. Presidency and position of the Commander-in-Chief, while using a forged short form birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged Selective Service [registration] certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a proof of his legitimacy and fitness for office[.]
4. President of the Senate from presenting the Certificates of the Electoral Vote to the U.S. Congress due to lack of legitimacy for office and fraud committed by the citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S. Presidency and position of the Commander-in-Chief, while using a forged short form birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged Selective Service [registration] certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a proof of his legitimacy and fitness for office[.]
5. U.S. Congress from confirming the elections results due to lack of legitimacy for office and fraud committed by the citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S. Presidency and position of the Commander-in-Chief, while using a forged short form birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged Selective Service [registration] certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a proof of his legitimacy and fitness for office[.]
6. Defendant Barack Hussein Obama from taking the oath of office as a U.S. President on the inauguration day due to his lack of legitimacy for office and fraud committed by him, as the citizen of Indonesia Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, due to his run for the U.S. Presidency and position of the Commander-in-Chief, while using a forged short form birth certificate, forged long form birth certificate, forged Selective Service [registration] certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 as a proof of his legitimacy and fitness for office.
Plaintiffs, who are Presidential electors and Presidential candidates have standing to raise these claims as directly interested parties. These claims are justiciable, and as this court has one last opportunity to act, the claims are not moot.
Jacobs v. Clark County Sch. Dist., 526 F.3d 419, 425 (9th Cir. 200.
Plaintiffs incorporate herein the complaint and petition for injunctive relief filed herein on 12.12.2012 and exhibits pp1-107 to aforementioned complaint and petition for injunctive relief[.]
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiffs incorporate herein the complaint and petition for injunctive relief filed herein on 12.12.2012 and exhibits pp1-107 to aforementioned complaint and petition for injunctive relief.
Defendant Obama is not qualified for the office of U.S. President, as he is a citizen of Indonesia operating under an alias.
Defendant Obama is using a forged birth certificate to validate his claim of an American birth. In proffering false documents in order to obtain a federal position, (in this case, the Presidency,) [Defendant Obama] has violated 18 USC § 911 (falsely representing that he is a US citizen); and 18 USC § 1001 (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 749; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–292, § 2, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3459; Pub. L. 108–458, title VI, § 6703(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3766; Pub. L. 109– 248, title I, § 141(c), July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 603) in falsifying his identity as a member of the executive branch of the federal government.
Defendant Obama is using a forged Selective Service [registration] Certificate to demonstrate his claim of a lawful registration for the draft, when no such registration occurred. In proffering a falsified draft registration, Defendant Obama has violated 18 USC § 1001, and is further disqualified from holding any position within the Executive branch of the United States government pursuant to 5 USC § 3328.
Defendant Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security number which was never assigned to him as a proof of his identity.
In proffering a false social security number, Defendant Obama, is in criminal violation of 42 USC § 408, which provides as follows:
(a) In general
Whoever - (6) willfully, knowingly, and with intent to deceive the Commissioner of Social Security as to his true identity (or the true identity of any other person) furnishes or causes to be furnished false information to the Commissioner of Social Security with respect to any information required by the Commissioner of Social Security in connection with the establishment and maintenance of the records provided for in section 405(c)(2) of this title; shall be guilty of a felony and upon conviction thereof shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.
Defendant Obama is not a natural born citizen and is ineligible to hold the office of the Presidency, pursuant to Article II, Section 1, clause 5, which states that “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”
The crimes are egregious violations which vitiated the ability of the plaintiffs in this case to lawful process in the furtherance of the November 6, 2012 election.
In addition, the November 6, 2012 election in California was marked with substantial voter fraud. Over one and a half million invalid voter registrations in California have been discovered, in violation of elections statute 2150. 756,213 records were without a birth place, 685,739 records where instead of a required name of the state of birth, U.S. or U.S.A was entered, there were as many as 141,851 possible duplicate records, 130,019 records with birth date[,] over 100,757 records without a birth date, and 898 records without a first name. (Exhibit[s] 11, 12). Employees of the Registrar's office from Orange County and Los Angeles County have admitted in e-mails to falsification of voter data by entering date 1900, when they found no date, and entering USA or US when the name of the state of birth is missing. (Exhibit 19). The number of registered voters in California went up by over a million since the last Presidential election in 2008 and most of the increase came from on line registration.
EVIDENCE UPON WHICH PLAINTIFFS RELY
Plaintiffs rely on the following evidence, all of which has been provided to this court:
1. Certificate of Nomination for Edward C. Noonan as candidate for the office of President; (Ex. 1).
2. Affidavit of Michael Zullo; (Ex. 2).
3. Affidavit of Douglas B. Vogt; (Ex. 3).
4. Affidavit of Timothy Lee Adams; (Ex. 4).
5. Affidavit of Felicito Papa; (Ex. 5).
6. Affidavit of Felicito Papa; (Ex. 6).
7. Affidavit of Linda Jordan; (Ex. 7).
8. Affidavit of Dr. Ronald J. Polland; (Ex. 8 ).
9. Affidavit of John N. Sampson; (Ex. 9).
10. Social Security Number Verification System report; (Ex. 10).
11. Affidavit of David Yun; (Ex. 11).
12. Affidavit of David Yun; (Ex. 12).
13. Registration of Barry Soetoro in Indonesia; (Ex. 13).
14. Declaration of Christopher-Earl Strunk; (Ex. 14).
15. Affidavit of Susan Daniels; (Ex. 15).
16. Official Report of the National Assembly of Kenya, Mar. 25, 2010; (Ex. 16).
17. Report: The Vetting–Exclusive–Obama’s Literary Agent in 1991 Booklet: ‘Born in Kenya and Raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.’ (Ex. 17).
18. Affidavit of Maricopa County Sheriff, Joseph M. Arpaio; (Ex. 18 ).
19. Emails: Public Records LA County; (Ex. 19).
20. Certificate of Live Birth (Hawaiian exemplar); (Ex. 20).
21. Certificate of Live Birth of Defendant Obama (White House file); (Ex. 21).
POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
The United States Supreme Court revisited the requirements for obtaining a preliminary injunction in Winter v. NRDC, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008 ). "A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits; that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief; that the balance of equities tips in his favor; and that an injunction is in the public interest."
There is a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of the case.
A candidate for office is presumed to hold the qualifications to seek andhold that office, unless and until a party proves to a court of competent jurisdiction that the candidate is not qualified. Dumas v. Gagner, 137 Wn.2d 268,285, 971 P.2d 17 (1999). The burden of demonstrating that Obama is not eligible to hold the office of the Presidency is on plaintiffs. Baldwin v. Sisters of Providence, 112 Wn.2d 127, 135, 769 P.2d 298 (1989); see also Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana, 916 N.E.2d 678, 681 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009).
Plaintiffs rely exclusively on the fact record contained herein; namely the Birth Certificate of Barack Hussein Obama (Ex. 21) as posted on the White House website, and expressly adopted by Obama.
Here is the official statement from the White House website:
In 2008, in response to media inquiries, the President’s campaign requested his birth certificate from the state of Hawaii. The state sent the campaign the President’s birth certificate, the same legal documentation provided to all Hawaiians as proof of birth in state, and the campaign immediately posted it on the internet.
When any citizen born in Hawaii requests their birth certificate, they receive exactly what the President received. In fact, the document posted on the campaign website is what Hawaiians use to get a driver’s license from the state and the document recognized by the Federal Government and the courts for all legal purposes. That’s because it is the birth certificate. This is not and should not be an open question.
The President believed the distraction over his birth certificate wasn’t good for the country. It may have been good politics and good TV, but it was bad for the American people and distracting from the many challenges we face as a country. Therefore, the President directed his counsel to review the legal authority for seeking access to the long form certificate and to request on that basis that the Hawaii State Department of Health make an exception to release a copy of his long form birth certificate. They granted that exception in part because of the tremendous volume of requests they had been getting.
Here is the comment of Barack Hussein Obama concerning the release of this Birth Certificate:
We've posted the certification that is given by the state of Hawaii on the Internet for everybody to see.
Transcript of President’s remarks following the release of the long form Birth Certificate,
The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, April 27, 2011 at 9:48 a.m. PDT.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-...arks-president.
Federal Rules of Evidence, 804(3) provides for the admissibility of this evidence, and plaintiff submits that judicial notice should be taken thereof:
(3) Statement Against Interest. A statement that:
(A) a reasonable person in the declarant’s position would have made only if the person believed it to be true because, when made, it was so contrary to the declarant’s proprietary or pecuniary interest or had so great a tendency to invalidate the declarant’s claim against someone else or to expose the declarant to civil or criminal liability; and
(B) is supported by corroborating circumstances that clearly indicate its trustworthiness, if it is offered in a criminal case as one that tends to expose the declarant to criminal liability.
Because Plaintiffs [Defendant Obama?] have granted standing to bring this charge, and because the issue is justiciable in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, (see Marbury v Madison, op. cit.), this court must therefore consider the law regarding the precondition of facts as admitted by Barack Hussein Obama and consider whether he is actually able to hold the office of the Presidency.
a. Standing
Article III standing means an injury in fact that is fairly traceable to the challenged conduct and has some likelihood of redressability. Fleck and Assocs., Inc. v. City of Phoenix, 471 F.3d 1100, 1103-04 (9th Cir. 2006).
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 556-61, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992).
The Supreme Court has also recognized third-party standing in cases involving jury composition. See, e.g., Campbell v. Louisiana, 523 U.S. 392, 397- 400 (1998 ) (allowing a litigant to raise a claim on behalf of third parties where (1) the litigant has suffered an “injury in fact”; (2) he has a “close relationship” to the third parties; and (3) there is some hindrance to the third parties asserting their own rights); Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400, 410-15 (1991).
Plaintiffs have standing to raise this claim. Plaintiffs James Grinols andRobert Odden are Presidential Electors who have been deprived of their ability to cast a lawful vote for the Presidency, and Edward C. Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, and Keith Judd have been deprived of a lawful election for the office of the Presidency. Their claims are distinct, and the remedy sought herein will redress these claims by preventing the [confirmation] of an unlawful election.
b. Justiciability
The integrity of the election system in the state of California is not non-justiciable or purely a political issue. The Governor of California and its Secretary of State have a mandatory duty to discharge the office by supporting both the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of California.
“It is emphatically the duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must, of necessity, expound and interpret the rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the Court must decide on the operation of each.
"If courts are to regard the Constitution, and the Constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature, the Constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.” Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 1 Cranch 137, 137 (1803).
Furthermore, it is the duty of the Governor and the Secretary of State ofCalifornia, and all members of the Legislature, all public officers (including Electors) and employees, all executive, legislative, and judicial officers, to apply constitutional regimen in the governance of a statewide election, pursuant to their oath of office set forth here:
"I, ___________________________, do solemnly swear (or affirm)that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter.
"And I do further swear (or affirm) that I do not advocate, nor am I amember of any party or organization, political or otherwise, that nowadvocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means; that within the five years immediately preceding the taking of this oath (or affirmation) I have not been a member of any party or organization, political or otherwise, that advocated the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means except as follows:
(If no affiliations, write in the words "No Exceptions") and that during such time as I hold the office of
____________________________________________ I will not advocate nor become (name of office) a member of any party or organization, political or otherwise, that advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means." Article 20, Section 3, Constitution of the State of California.
Because the Governor of the State of California, the Secretary of State, and the Electoral College have a duty to preserve the integrity of the election system under the United States Constitution; because Obama is in criminal violation of federal laws concerning his identity, and because he has failed to establish
1) lawful citizenship;
2) a lawful name;
3) a lawful social security number identification;
4) a lawful registration for the selective service system;
5) natural born citizen status are required under Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the US Constitution;
plaintiffs have been deprived in
1) their ability to cast a lawful vote for the Presidency (elector plaintiffs) and
2) their candidacies for President.
This can be redressed by this court when the court enjoins the Electoral College from certifying its vote.
c. Mootness
The basic question in determining mootness is whether there is a present controversy as to which effective relief can be granted. Feldman v. Bomar, 518 F.3d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 2008 ). In this case, this court is the last bulwark between the life of the constitutional republic of the United States, and its demise. This court can and should fashion relief, and because such an opportunity exists for this court to enjoin the Electoral College from moving forward with the election of a candidate for President who cannot lawfully hold the post, the issue before the court is a present controversy and is not moot.
The cause of action is one which “arises under” the Federal Constitution.This complaint alleges that the certification of an ineligible candidate to the office of the Presidency deprives Plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Dismissal of the complaint upon the ground of lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter would is not justified, because the case can only be dismissed if the claim were “so attenuated and unsubstantial as to be absolutely devoid of merit," Newburyport Water Co. v. Newburyport, 193 U.S. 561, 579, or “frivolous,” Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678, 683. That the claim is unsubstantial must be “very plain.” Hart v. Keith Vaudeville Exchange, 262 U.S. 271, 274, 369 U.S. 186.
Furthermore, this court has a duty to enjoin an unlawful election in any manner it deems appropriate. Pursuant to 28 USC § 453, all members of the federal judiciary are required to take the following oath:
“I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”
At stake here [are] the Constitution and the laws of the United States. It is that simple. Defendant Obama is in criminal violation of statutes governing the identity of federal officers (18 USC § 1001), as this record amply demonstrates. There is one last opportunity to arrest the destruction of the constitutional republic, and it rests with this court.
Obama’s failure to properly register for the selective service system disqualifies him from ever holding a position in the Executive branch of the United States, pursuant to 5 USC § 3328. This court has a duty to uphold the federal law concerning this claim.
Plaintiffs face a substantial threat of irreparable damage or injury should an ineligible candidate be certified to the office of President.
It is the very essence of things American that the Presidency be occupied by a person who is not just an American citizen, but who can establish that he is in fact a lawful American and a natural born citizen of the United States. However, the critical harm here is the harm to the rule of law under the Constitution of the United States, the Constitution of the State of California, and the mandatory oath of office required by the statutes of the State of California for the Secretary of State, and the oath of office associated with this court.
All of these oaths will be violated if a candidate who is acting criminally to disguise his identity and who is not constitutionally authorized to hold the office of the Presidency is nonetheless certified by the Electoral College as duly elected.If Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the United States Constitution has no meaning, [then] any and every clause of the Constitution is at risk. That is a substantial threat of irreparable damage and injury.
Plaintiffs as electors (the Elector Plaintiffs) have a duty imposed on them to act lawfully in the casting of votes for the Presidency, and their lawful vote is vitiated entirely by electors who have voted for an illegal candidate for the office of President. Plaintiffs as candidates for the office of President, have been deprived of equal protection under the law and a free and fair election for the office that has been usurped by Defendant Obama who is acting in criminal violation of federal law and in violation of applicable constitutional provisions to assert a claim for the office of the President.
Even the President must be accountable to the laws of the land, particularly the eligibility clause of the U.S. Constitution.
The vision that the founding fathers had of rule of law and equality
before the law and no one above the law, that is a very viable vision,
but instead of that, we have quasi mob rule.
James Bovard.
The bedrock of our democracy is the rule of law and that means
wehave to have an independent judiciary, judges who can make
decisionsindependent of the political winds that are blowing.
Caroline Kennedy.
When freedom does not have a purpose, when it does not wish to
know anything about the rule of law engraved in the hearts of men
and women, when it does not listen to the voice of conscience,
it turns against humanity and society.
Pope John Paul II.
Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under
God is acknowledged.
Ronald Reagan.
We either believe in the dignity of the individual, the rule of law,
and the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, or we don't.
There is no middle ground.
Leon Panetta.
The American people have a right to [expect] that the rule of law will
guarantee that even if we don't like the policy, that it's done properly.
Darrell Issa.
I firmly believe in the rule of law as the foundation for all of our basic rights.
Sonia Sotomayor.
A judge can't have any preferred outcome in any particular case. The
judge's only obligation-and it's a solemn obligation-is to the rule of law.
Samuel Alito.
One thing, however, is certain. Although we may never know with
complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year’s presidential
election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the nation’s
confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.
John Paul Stevens.
Judges rule on the basis of law, not public opinion, and they should be
totally indifferent to pressures of the times.
Warren E. Burger.
The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on
Earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man,
but only to have the law of nature for his rule.
Samuel Adams.
The clearest way to show what the rule of law means to us in everyday
life is to recall what has happened when there is no rule of law.
Dwight D. Eisenhower.
A resilient people cherishing liberty and equality and the rule of law
will endure.
Nick Rahall.
I am convinced that the majority of American people do understand
that we have a moral responsibility to foster the concepts of opportunity,
free enterprise, the rule of law, and democracy. They understand that
these values are the hope of the world.
Richard Lugar.
We stand in the shadow of Jefferson who believed that a society
founded upon the rule of law and liberty was dependent upon
publiceducation and the diffusion of knowledge.
Matt Blunt.
Unfortunately, the true force which propels our endless political
disputes, our constant struggles for political advantage, is often
not our burning concern for democracy, it is often of our dedication
to the principle of the rule of law.
Olusegun Obasanjo.
The United States and the European Union do want to have
a rule oflaw, and that rule of law should be for a fair trial.
And that fair trial needs to have an impartial jury.
Maria Cantwell.
The rule of law should be upheld by all political parties.
They shouldneither advise others to break the law, nor
encourage others to do so even when they strongly disagree
with the legislation put forward by the government of the day.
James Callaghan.
The balance of harms weighs in favor of Plaintiff.
Plaintiffs have a right as electors and candidates for the Presidency to a free and fair election between eligible candidates, and this is a due process right guaranteed under the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The right to vote is regarded as a fundamental political right, because it is preservative of all rights." Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886). An ineligible candidate to an office has no articulable right in law or equity to that office, even if unanimously elected by the general population.
Plaintiffs, in strict reliance on the admissions against interest of Barack Hussein Obama as disclosed herein, and the record disclosed herein [the forged birth document], have demonstrated that as a matter of law, that Defendant Obama has acted criminally to hide his true identity, that Defendant Obama has violated applicable federal law governing the identity of federal officers, that Defendant Obama has completely failed to demonstrate 1) lawful citizenship; 2) a lawful name;
3) a lawful birth site; 4) a lawful selective service registration; 5) a lawful social security number; and 6) natural born citizenship. As a consequence, Defendant Obama does not meet the constitutional standards for eligibility. Therefore, Defendant Obama has no articulable harm as a matter of law. He simply returns to being a civilian.
The Court has more than once recognized the close nexus between the freedoms of speech and assembly. De Jonge v. Oregon, 299 U.S. 353, 364; Thomas v. Collins, 323 U.S. 516, 530. It is beyond debate that freedom is an inseparable aspect of the "liberty" assured by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which embraces freedom of speech.See Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652, 666; Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 324; Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296, 303; Staub v. City of Baxley, 355 U.S. 313, 321. Of course, it is immaterial whether the beliefs sought to be advanced pertain to political, economic, religious or cultural matters, and state action which may have the effect of curtailing the freedom to associate is subject to the closest scrutiny. NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449, 460-461 (1958 ).
In the domain of these indispensable liberties, whether of speech, press, orassociation, the decisions of this Court recognize that abridgment of such rights, even though unintended, may inevitably follow from varied forms of governmental action. NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449, 461 (1958 ).
The furtherance of an election that is fraudulent is violative of all liberty interests protected under the United States Constitution and creates an unimaginable harm to all political interests which have been protected in this nation since its founding, including the class of litigants sought to be certified hereunder.
The grant[ing] of an injunction would serve the public interest.
The public is served by having free and fair elections; elections where registered voters in California lawfully chose between candidates who are eligible to hold office.
ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS AND THIS COURT WILL BE GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE US CONSTITUTION, IF THE CERTIFICATE OF VOTE IS CERTIFIED AND CITIZEN OF INDONESIA BARACK OBAMA IS ALLOWED TO BECOME THE US PRESIDENT.
In 2008 the Plaintiffs did not have all the evidence which became available recently[;] however[,] recently obtained information shows that[:]
1. according to Obama's school records he is a citizen of Indonesia[;]
2. according to his mother's passport records his last name is Soebarkah[;]
3. he is using a forged birth certificate[;]
4. he is using a forged Selective Service [registration] Certificate[;]
5. he is using a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS[;]
6. available school pictures and documents from Kaelani school in Hawaii show him residing in Hawaii at least until January 1969. [But] his School records from [Fransiskus] Assissi School in Jakarta, Indonesia, show him under name Barry Soetoro residing in Indonesia from January [of] 1967. As one human being cannot reside in two countries at the same time for a period of two years, it is clear that there are two [distinct] individuals: Barry Obama, who resided in Hawaii[,] and Barry Soetoro, who resided in Indonesia[,] between 1967 and 1969. We have no idea which one of the two came back to the United States of America in and around 1971. Since all the IDs represent forgeries, all of the defendants and this court will be committing HIGH TREASON, if they certify as the legitimate President and Commander-in-Chief a foreign citizen with all forged IDs and a stolen/ fraudulently obtained Social Security number.
IF THE DEFENDANTS AND THIS COURT CERTIFY OBAMA AS A LEGITIMATE PRESIDENT, WHILE POSSESSING ALL OF THE DOCUMENTS AT HAND, THEY MAY BE LATER PROSECUTED AS BEING A PART OF A RICO, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD AMERICAN CITIZENS AND COMMIT [THE] FOLLOWING PREDICATE ACTS:
18, United States Code: section 1028 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents), section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1425 (relating to the procurement of citizenship or nationalization unlawfully), section 1426 (relating to the reproduction of naturalization orcitizenship papers), section 1427 (relating to the sale of naturalization or citizenship papers), section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal investigations), section 1511 (relating to the obstruction of State or local law enforcement), section 1542 (relating to false statement in application and use of passport), section 1543 (relating to forgery or false use of passport), section 1544 (relating to misuse of passport), section 1546 (relating to fraud and misuse of visas, permits and other documents), section 1952 (relating to racketeering), sections 2314 and 2315 (relating to interstate transportation of stolen property), section 2320 (relating to trafficking in goods or services bearing counterfeit marks), (F) any act which is indictable under the Immigration and Nationality Act, section 274 (relating to bringing in and harboring certain aliens), section 277 (relating to aiding or assisting certain aliens to enter the United States).
This Court should act AS TO THE DEFENDANTS from making an election where the candidate who prevailed is ineligible to serve. The preservation of the integrity of the voting system requires it.
CONCLUSION
The record before the court amply demonstrates that Defendant Obama is not eligible/not legitimate for the position of the U.S. Presidency.
Plaintiffs have met their burden to demonstrate that the evidence proffered by Defendant Obama to date is falsified, and amounts to criminal falsification under applicable federal law as set forth herein. Plaintiffs have also demonstrated that Obama’s failure to properly register for the [S]elective [S]ervice system has disqualified him from [ever] holding the office of the President. Plaintiffs have demonstrated and met their burden of proof to establish that Defendant Obama is operating under a fraudulent Social Security number. As a consequence, Defendant Obama does not meet the constitutional standards for eligibility. Therefore, Defendant Obama has no articulable harm as a matter of law. He simply returns to being a civilian.
Plaintiffs ask this court for extraordinary relief, in what can only be called extraordinary times. Never before has the nation faced such an audacious usurpation of its offices, its laws, its constitutional protections, its rights, its freedom, even its very life as a Constitutional Republic. While it is an extraordinary demand for relief, the times call for such extraordinary acts by this court as the very last bulwark of freedom in this country.
www.scribd.com/collections/3260742/Barack-Obama-Social-Security-Number-SSN-Fraudulent (pp. 7-35 of 198 )Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 04-16-2013 at 02:04 PM.
One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
-
04-30-2013, 12:53 PM #5304Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
[ED.: This courtesy of FOXNews by way of WorldNetDaily.com]
Fraud put Obama on '08 ballot: South Bend, Ind., jury convicts
[Two county] Democrat officials convicted of making up names for qualifying petition
Published by WorldNetDaily:: April 26, 2013
FOXNews Report video
http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/jury-fraud-put-obama-on-08-ballot/#ooid=11dXU3YjoE_l4wHDp22NBP4X6vGWxVCm
Two Democrats in Indiana have been found guilty of submitting [90] unauthorized names [out of 534] on the petition that placed then-Sen. Barack Obama on the 2008 presidential election primary ballot, meaning he likely did not qualify.
Fox News reports the jury in South Bend found guilty on all counts former longtime St. Joseph County Democratic Party chairman Butch Morgan Jr. and former county Board of Elections worker Dustin Blythe.
The two faced accusations of petition fraud and forgery, as well as falsely making a petition.
The verdicts raise anew questions about election fraud by Democrats, a subject that was analyzed after the 2012 election.
The report found vote fraud occurred in the 2012 presidential election and cumulatively was likely enough to decide the outcome.
“In reality, although no single instance or aspect of vote fraud was likely enough to tip the election for Obama, the aggregate of their [Democrats] corrupt activities – including illegal campaign donations, taking advantage of states without voter ID requirements, military ballots delivered too late … may well have been,” the analysis said.
Sign WND’s petition urging Congress to investigate fraud and abuse in America’s election system!
Fox News reported that two former Indiana elections board officials who pleaded guilty said Morgan told Democrat officials and workers to fake the names and signatures that Obama and Hillary Clinton needed to qualify for the presidential race.
Prosecutor Stan Levco told Fox, “I think this helped uphold the integrity of the electoral system. Their verdict of guilt is not a verdict against Democrats, but for honest and fair elections.”
Affidavits citing the testimony of former Board of Registration worker Lucas Burkett said the scheme was created in January 2008. Burkett reportedly was aboard the plan at first but later dropped out. Fox News reported he waited three years to reveal the scheme.
Fox News notes that if revelations about any forgeries were raised during the election, the petitions could have been challenged at that time.
A candidate who did not qualify with enough legitimate signatures at the time could have been removed from the ballot.
State law in Indiana requires candidates to have 500 signatures from each of the nine congressional districts to qualify. But in St. Joseph County, Obama qualified with only 534.
Prosecutors alleged that nine of the Obama petition pages apparently were forged, and each contained up to 10 names, bringing doubt on up to 90 names.
“If faked, [they] could have brought the Obama total below the legal limit required to qualify,” Fox News reported.
Fox reported it was told by “numerous voters” they did not sign their names, nor did they authorize their names to be used.
“That’s not my signature,” said Charity Rorie, a mother of four. “It’s scary, it’s shocking. It definitely is illegal.”
Added Robert Hunter Jr., “I did not sign for Barack Obama.”
WND’s extensive report on fraud in the 2012 race looked at claims that Obama, in some districts, got 100 percent of the vote, questions about absentee ballots and efforts by Democrats to prevent poll watchers from observing the election.
Some of the issues that were uncovered:
- Seventy-five GOP vote inspectors were ordered to leave Philadelphia poll locations by Democrat poll judges. One judge was caught on audio. A court order sent them back but it’s unknown what happened when they were gone. These poll locations were all within the 59 precincts where Romney received no votes.
: - In Philadelphia, the Community Voters Project, an ACORN clone that employs some former ACORN workers, shredded Republican voter registrations. It’s not the first time they have been in trouble.
: - The Florida AFL-CIO threatened True the Vote and Tampa Fair Vote with legal action for submitting voter registration challenges.
: - Maryland Representative Elijah Cummings issued a highly publicized threat against True the Vote and Election Integrity Maryland just for checking voter rolls. EIM found 11,000 questionable registrations, including 1,566 dead voters. The Maryland Board of Elections took no action.
: - Cummings also attacked the Ohio Voter Integrity Project with the same baseless claims.
: - Think Progress falsely claimed True the Vote was “under investigation” by Rep. Cummings, when in fact he has no legal authority to do so.
: - Despite overwhelming nonpartisan public support for voter ID laws, Attorney General Eric Holder’s Justice Department and liberal jurists have delayed, emasculated or defeated ID laws in Texas, Wisconsin, South Carolina, Arizona and Pennsylvania.
:
- Holder has vowed to fight voter ID laws as restricting voters’ rights.
:
- The Obama administration “spiked investigations” of eight states that had major voter roll problems.
: - The Holder Justice Department conspired with Project Vote on National Voter Registration Act (aka Motor Voter) enforcement lawsuits, which force state and local agencies to become, essentially, low income voter registration drives.
: - In 2009 DOJ announced to its attorneys that it would not enforce voter roll maintenance laws because it wouldn’t increase voter turnout.
The report also found the election rolls nationwide in shambles. Pew Research Center published a report revealing election rolls in a shambles nationwide. It found:
- 24 million invalid or inaccurate voter registrations
: - 1.8 million deceased voters
: - 2.75 million registered in multiple states.
. . .
There were a number of complaints about electronic voting machines that tallied votes for Democrats despite a Republican vote and a few instances of the opposite case.
- Voters in Pueblo County, Colo., complained that their votes were being changed to Obama, reported local NBC affiliate KOAA.
: - Maryland congressional candidate and veteran investigative journalist Ken Timmerman reported many voters claiming this happened to them, lodging complaints with vote judges. Timmerman has requested to see voting machine records.
: - Maryland Delegate Kathy Afzali and Carroll County Commissioner Richard Rothschild have requested the FBI impound two electronic voting machines suspected of switching votes based on complaints from other voters, including a state official.
: - Robert Ashcroft, a Republican poll watcher in Allentown, Pa., reported that about 5 to 10 percent of electronic votes would “change the selection back to default – to Obama.”
: - EVM problems were also reported to have occurred in Ohio, Nevada, North Carolina and Texas.
: - A 2008 Fox News report showed how electronic voting machines can be infected with a computer virus to change votes.
A Princeton University study in 2006 found the same thing.
And the fraud didn’t go unnoticed. A few of the higher-profile cases:
- Patrick Moran, son of longtime U.S. Rep. Jim Moran, was caught on video by James O’Keefe’s Veritas Project, telling an undercover journalist how to commit vote fraud.
: - Other Veritas videos showed Obama campaign officials in Texas, New Jersey and New York providing multiple forms to journalists posing as voters so that they could vote in two or more states.
: - On Election Day, Veritas reporters recorded poll officials on camera telling voters not to vote for Romney.
: - The Obama campaign continues to accept illegal donations from other countries. WND’s Aaron Klein proved it by donating to the Obama campaign twice under the name “Osama bin Laden” using a Pakistani web address.
: - WND has filed a complaint with the FEC demanding an investigation of overseas donations to the Obama campaign.
: - In 2008, the Obama campaign accepted almost $30,000 from Palestinian donors.
: - A Korean interpreter in Flushing, N.Y., directed Korean voters to vote Democrat. He was expelled from the poll.
: - Two cases of forged votes were reported in Poughkeepsie, N.Y., by Republicans who discovered their votes had already been made.
: - Non-citizens were charged with voting illegally in Austin, Minn.
: - Cases of double voting in Ohio are being investigated.
: - Non-citizen allegedly voted in Iowa
: - Double voting is being investigated in North Carolina
: - NBC reported dead voters voting in California
: - Mentally disabled were coaxed to vote for Obama in North Carolina
: - Widespread absentee vote fraud is being investigated in South Texas
: - A non-English-speaking, under-18 youth reported he was “told he can vote.”
: - Many other cases
Sign WND’s petition urging Congress to investigate fraud and abuse in America’s election system!
http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/jury-fraud-put-obama-on-08-ballot/One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
-
05-02-2013, 11:51 AM #5305Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
Here is some really good news, although the final chapter has yet to be written. The video-recorded voter intimidation by two New Black Panther Party members in Philadelphia on Nov. 4, 2008, and the Holder Dept. of Justice dismissing the already-won lawsuit, have wrought such a hue and cry from the American public as to bring the Office of the Inspector General down on the DOJ.
The March 2013 OIG report on the DOJ covers injustices at Justice, from the mishandling of the NBPP civil rights lawsuit to the politicization of responses to FOIA requests. It is 299 pages of good bedside reading, which should give you pleasant dreams about a fair and righteous America, with equal justice for all.
I hope and pray this OIG report will not meet the same fate as did Mr. Gerald Walpin, former Inspector General of the Corporation for National and Community Service. Mr. Obama, who is over the Office of the Inspector General, fired him because of his findings while investigating Americorps and Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson..
Offtopic, but funny, in a creepy, "Tell me it ain't so" sort of way
(ALERT - objectionable profanity):
Eric Holder: Organized Crime’s Man of the Year
That's not entirely true. I saw a LOT of people on their way to work this morning. Originally Posted by George Mantor
Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 05-02-2013 at 01:13 PM.
One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
-
05-02-2013, 02:51 PM #5306Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
May 1, 2013 by Tim Brown
Multiple Obama Birth Certificates
Surface In Alabama Eligibility Case
Not that we are surprised, but now there are multiple copies of Barack Hussein Obama’s “real” birth certificate that are surfacing, and they are clearly indicating fraud. In a rare move, the Alabama Democrat Party has submitted an amicus brief in the McInnish Goode v Chapman Appeal case. The reason ... is most likely because the Alabama Supreme Court has Chief Justice Roy Moore presiding over it. The Alabama Democrat Party just submitted a completely different birth certificate than the one that was posted at the White House website in 2011.
Larry Klayman, the plaintiff’s counsel, submitted the forgery of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate that was posted to whitehouse.gov on 4-27-2001 (seen below). Fogbow/Jack Ryan obot group produced another bogus one. Still a third birth certificate has been submitted by Alabama Democrats to the [Alabama] Supreme Court.
Remember, this court is being presided over by Chief Justice Roy Moore, who supported Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, when he believed Obama to be a usurper and [refused to follow] orders to deploy to Iraq until Obama proved his eligibility as part of keeping his oath (ironically Lakin was not supported by Mr. Oathkeeper Stewart Rhodes). Another justice on the court by the name of Tom Parker will also hear the case. He has stated in a previous case:
“McInnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the “short form” and the “long form” birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”
While the Alabama Democrats attacked the merits of the appeal, calling the evidence by McInnish “inadmissible and not worthy of belief,” they also stated “A county sheriff from Arizona is not an ‘official source’ of anything in Alabama.”
But what stands out in their brief is something very new, Barack Hussein Obama’s long form birth certificate that has a different backing, something never before seen. It’s on page 33 in the document below.
SCOAL 2013-04-24 McInnish|Goode v Chapman APPEAL – ADP Amicus Brief
Apparently there are hundreds of layers to this one. According to Adobe expert Mara Zebest, who has explained how layers work and demonstrates the layers of the forged birth certificate here, said,
"The fact that the document displays another permutation of the Obama birth certificate should come as no surprise. In fact, this recent variation actually proves the argument that the layers displayed in the White House PDF released as Obama’s “official” birth certificate file — are in fact — a big ***** deal (to quote Joe Biden). This variation not only proves the point that manipulation occurred to create Obama’s PDF, but is further proof that – due to the layers — it is easy for manipulation to continue to occur."
Notice there is no raised seal, which must be on the document to be official. Notice the differences below.
The Birther Report provided this PDF copy, which was e-filed by the Alabama Democrat Party with the Alabama Supreme Court. [NOTE:] the diamond pattern [seen in the copy below] is not found [i.e., does not exist] on this e-filing.
Obama Birth Certificate No Seal – Alabama Supreme Court – Fogbow Upload – 4/24/2013
Pixel Patriot analyzed the document and demonstrated that the security paper background extended on the right side farther than the visible area of the PDF copy.
All of this is going to make certain people a little uneasy who think this is just a “birther issue.” It’s not.My fellow Americans, the Democrats are telling on themselves left and right. They are openly lying to you about the man in the Oval Office, and everyone thinks there is something more important? I don’t think so. Yes, Benghazi is important. Yes, Fast and Furious is important. However, it appears that for the first time we have a man in the White House that we cannot really say is even from this country, and apparently there [are] some serious felonies taking place in attempts to cover up what should be the biggest story covered in America, and that is to expose a usurper to the office of President of the United States.
It’s a criminal issue. It’s a national security issue.
In case you are still thinking this doesn’t matter, might I suggest you consider how this would impact things, versus impeachment for Benghazi or Fast and Furious? Understand that this would potentially nullify every law he has signed, every executive order he has given, and every Supreme Court appointment he has made. While many are saying that Benghazi is bigger than Watergate, and it most definitely is, the Obama eligibility issue is bigger than all Obama’s scandals, in my opinion, because of the tentacles around things that it affects.
H/T Pat Dollard
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/05/mu...gibility-case/Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 05-02-2013 at 03:07 PM.
One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
-
05-02-2013, 05:31 PM #5307Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
- Posts
- 117,696
Inside Edition Helps Prove Obama Indonesian Citizen Named Barry Soetoro?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=HY_Of1CKgXAJoin our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
05-02-2013, 08:38 PM #5308Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Posts
- 1,553
I agree, it could of all been taken care of long ago and should of.
-
05-04-2013, 09:21 AM #5309Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
Welcome, Posylady, to the ALIPAC Barack Obama ineligibility topic. I hope something you read here will give you an idea about how to free ourselves and our native land from the enemy occupation that is upon us.
Dear Reader, do not miss the unmistakable in the following article: that Mr. Fredrick is joking when he writes "just happened" and "coincidences". Plain as day, I know, but quite often someone manages to overlook the obvious.
Originally Posted by Don Fredrick at theobamatimeline.com
One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
-
05-05-2013, 01:00 AM #5310Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
- Posts
- 117,696
For Immediate Release
May 3, 2013:
America has fallen! The Constitution has been rendered DEAD!
There is not a single former American citizen willing to state the obvious… that America has fallen… and the Constitution has been rendered DEAD!
It has been a battle for the last 5 five years (since the 2008 Primary election) regarding two non-eligible Americans running for President. The first instance was with John McCain. McCain was born in the foreign city of Colon, Panama while his father was stationed across the bay at the U.S. Naval station. Colon was not a part of the Panama Canal and could not be considered U.S. soil.
The U.S. Senate did a mediocre investigation into the matter, and lied and deceived the American people when they passed Senate Resolution 511 declaring McCain a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. This was in direct violation of Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) which said:
"We need not discuss Appellants’ contention that “the original common law definition of an Article II ‘natural born Citizen’ . . . is a child born in the country to a United States citizen mother and father" . . .
For five years now the courts, County, State, and Federal have refused to hear our petitions. The courts have dismissed our challenges against the illegal alien that now sits as the U. S. Commander in Chief. Not a single court in Amerika has given any petitioner a fair hearing, fair discovery, nor been given “standing” in the matter of challenging the citizenship of Mr. Barry Soetoro (aka BHO).
I had a Federal Court Chief Judge tell me recently that I should have filed a Writ of Mandate in Sacramento if I had problems with the eligibility of Soetoro. Little did this j****** moron know, I DID FILE SUCH A WRIT OF MANDATE! I filed under Election Code - Section 13314 that says:
13314. (a) (1) An elector may seek a writ of mandate alleging that an error or omission has occurred, or is about to occur, in the placing of a name on, or in the printing of, a ballot, sample ballot, voter pamphlet, or other official matter, or that any neglect of duty has occurred, or is about to occur.
(2) A peremptory writ of mandate shall issue only upon proof of both of the following:
(A) That the error, omission, or neglect is in violation of this code or the Constitution.
The Sacramento Judge (Michael P. Kenny) denied me a legal remedy, because he accepted the Secretary of State's (Debra Bowen) argument that she didn't have a Constitutional duty to insure the Constitution was being followed.
There is a small hope that the Alabama Supreme Court Chief Judge Roy Moore will hear the petition that will soon come before him in open court. You can read about the upcoming hearing at:
I do not put much faith in this upcoming proceeding. Something will happen that will douse our hopes once more. The legal system has become too corrupt and “fallen” to ever be a bastion that We the People can/could use as a stronghold for shelter during a battle.
So here we sit!
We have a Sodomite-Commander-in-Chief that is an illegal alien. We have an un-eligible thug that refuses to provide proper identification for the office he holds. He fraudulently photoshopped a birth certificate, he fraudulently photoshopped a selective service registration card, he stole several social security numbers and he has trafficked in various drugs, has been a former sodomite, but most offensive, he denies Christendom and instead embraces the Muslim religion which is incompatible with the U.S. Constitution.
It is distressing to witness the fact that over half of the Sodomite-loving people of the United States voted for this vile excuse for a human being, and they all happily welcome the Marxist government that Soetoro is anxiously building (as long as they get their free food stamps and free medical care).
The Sodomite-Soetoro has refused to avenge the Sodomite Ambassador Stevens that was murdered in the Libyan Embassy seven months ago. Our Sodomite-in-Chief states it happened too long ago and the failures that Soetoro committed seven months ago should be forgotten and forgiven.
So I say… AMERICA HAS FALLEN! We no longer live under the Constitution that we once did. Instead, we live in a nation that is now being occupied by DE FACTO Muslims & Sodomites that control our churches and our church leaders. Few church leaders are standing up against the Sodomites in the military, in our public schools, in our universities, in our colleges, and in our government. Church leaders are AWOL and have joined the Luciferian forces that have taken over our nation.
All I need to say is "Boy Scouts" to prove that churches will soon be having Gay Boy Scout Jamborees! This is Duty to God?
And another thing that is distressing is that if even 1% of what the Alabama Supreme Court is going to hear from Attorney Larry Klayman (founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch) then the Constitution has been assassinated by the Soetoro regime, and it is all over. And there is nothing that the Alabama Supreme Court (state court) can do to resurrect our dead federal constitution. And too, if the constitution is dead, then the federal government is dead - - as well as all 50 state governments. All State Constitutions get their power from the U.S. Constitution and if the Federal government has been usurped by the Soetoro/Soros/Bilderberg/New World Order/etc, then Alabama has no remedy to oust the illegal shadow government that has taken over and who now occupies our Constitutional Republic.
If what is said in ANY of the nearly 400 ballot challenges throughout the Corporation of the U.S. is true then no Federal office has any constitution authority to function… because the Constitution is dead - therefore any constitutional offices are dead as well - that includes especially the illegal alien that acts as the Commander in Chief. And it applies to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to the Supreme Court, to the Congress and each and every officer of any of the 50 occupied states of America... down to the county dog catcher!
Read a couple of the attempts at challenging the eligibility of Soetoro” on these following websites:
You can read mine at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/130127447/Grinols-Motion-to-Reconsider-De... .
In this court document we say, "This is the matter of the most egregious crime ever committed against the United States of America and People of the United states of America and the most serious breach of the U.S. National Security, namely usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a citizen of Indonesia, born in Kenya, Barack (Barry) Soebarkah, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Harrison J. Bounel, aka Barack Hussein Obama, using all forged IDs and a stolen CT Social Security number as a basis of eligibility and as a basis of his U.S. citizenship. Plaintiffs submitted with their original complaint and subsequent pleadings some 150 pages of sworn affidavits of top law enforcement officers and experts, showing Obama committing massive fraud and using a stolen Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, forged birth certificate and a forged selective service certificate. This represents suspension of all civil rights an deprivation of all civil rights of the U.S. citizens, as the top position in the executive branch is being usurped by a foreign citizen, who has no allegiance to this nation and who is using forged and stolen IDs as a basis of his eligibility."
Here, my attorney, Orly Taitz argues that Soetoro is a Felon and has committed grievous crimes.
In another case, Voeltz v Obama - Florida Supreme Court, Case No.: SC13-560 Voleltz re-states the felonies committed by Soetoro:
Credible Evidence That Respondent Obama's Birth Certificate Is Fraudulent
"Petitioner also presented credible evidence from an official source, by affidavit of Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joseph Arpaio, who conducted an official government investigation that the "birth certificate" of Barack Hussein Obama, posted at the WhiteHouse.gov website is entirely fraudulent. No one on the mainland has touched that document and felt the supposed “raised seal,” as it only exists in cyberspace. If a “raised seal,” as required by Hawaiian law is required to be deemed valid, then there is no validity to a picture of that document on the computer. Petitioner cannot show the U.S. Post Office a picture of his birth certificate on a laptop and receive a passport. As such, Barack Hussein Obama cannot even prove that he is at least thirty-five years old, much less a natural born citizen. If a baby-faced seventeen-year-old attempted to be on the presidential ballot in Florida, claiming to be 35, would the Secretary demand his birth certificate?"
Here, Attorney Larry Klayman (also representing this plaintiff in Florida) pretends that the Florida Supreme Court is still in business and their constitutional employment is legitimate. But if this present occupying government is not a CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT then the Florida Supreme Court has no constitutional authority to make any rulings of any sort.
What has really happened is that the courts no longer enforce the Constitution. The present “eligibility issue” is proof. Therefore, if the Constitution is no longer enforced, then we are in total chaos and we have no legitimate representatives in office…ANYWHERE! Instead, we have a police state standing guard over us, and as seen in Boston (and before in New Orleans) this police state recently invaded homes without warrants, and martial law being declared. And the unconstitutional organizations named DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms (ATF) have been cruising our streets for several years now, and the newest police state actions involve military drones flying overhead proving that this is no longer the nation of the "Constitutionally Free."
So if the courts are corrupt and our "redress of grievances" will NOT be heard, what is the remedy? It is sad to note that many of you who are reading this haven’t the foggiest idea! But the answer is in one of our founding documents. The first document provides the remedy. I would suggest you re-read the Declaration of Independence. And in the second document (the U.S. Constitution) you need only to read the 2ND AMENDMENT. This tells you how to remedy a rogue government. Since we cannot get a remedy in the court setting, then the 2nd Amendment is the only answer.
In his service,
(s) Edward C. Noonan
Founder & National Committee Chairman:
American Resistance Party
Former 2006-2008 State Party Chairman - American Independent Party
2002 Winner - AIP CA Primary - Secretary of State
2006 Winner - AIP CA Primary - Governor
2010 Winner - AIP CA Primary - US Senate
2012 Winner - AIP CA Primary - US President
http://www.americanresistanceparty.org
http://americanresistanceparty.blogspot.com
http://patriotaction.net/profiles/bl...a-has-fallen-1Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
Reply With QuoteTags for this Thread
arpaio,
article ii,
barack hussein obama,
barry soebarkah,
barry soetoro,
barry soto,
barry soto obama,
birth certificate,
birther,
birther articles,
birther info,
constitution,
dual citizen,
fake news,
happersett,
hawaii,
hoax,
hussein obama,
ineligibility,
internet fake news,
kenya,
natural born citizen,
obama,
taitz,
trashing,
trump,
vattel,
wong kim ark
Watch: Paul, Hawley Torch Mayorkas To His Face On Laken Riley's...
04-19-2024, 02:32 PM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports