Results 41 to 50 of 180
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
03-25-2007, 06:53 AM #41
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- NJ
- Posts
- 12,855
Gratis, PHRED
Subtitle C - Cooperation With the Government of Mexico
Sec 123 (b) Cooperation Regarding Education On Immigration Laws
- US Sec of State to cooperate with Mexican officials to help educate citizens/nationals of Mexico about eligibility status and to help ensure they are not exploited while working in the US.
Isn't this the job of the Mexican government?
HOW ABOUT CANANDIAN CITIZENS IN THE US???
================================================== ===============
Subtitle C - Cooperation With the Government of Mexico
Pg 51
Sec 123 (d) Consultation Requirement
Multi-faceted cooperation/coordination with government of Mexico on issues related to border security, especially on building of structures, etc (eg. building the fence!)
This is unbelievably sneaky and flies in the face with our U.S. SOVEREIGNTY
> please post whatever else you feel is important from these sections so that we can use it in our Communications to the House & Senate.Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
03-25-2007, 10:55 AM #42AprilGuest
AmericanElizabeth wrote:
This is ridiculous, a bill just for one lawbreaker! Well it is definitely time to start taking note of all the traitors and start making sure they do not have a job come voting time.
-
03-25-2007, 11:53 AM #43
To download a PDF copy of H.R.1645 "The Strive Act of 2007" go here:
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin ... ih.txt.pdf
-
03-25-2007, 12:09 PM #44
Everything is focused on Mexico. What about "educating" all the other nations where illegals come from? Why would we ever consider consulting Mexico about security?? What the hell do they know about security in that corrupt hell hole?? Hooking up with Mexico is like a Wall Streeter marrying a street prostitute that's also a drug addict, thief and a child molester.
TOP TEN REASONS WE SHOULDN'T MARRY MEXICO
http://www.vdare.com/walker/070117_top_ten.htm
-
03-25-2007, 12:33 PM #45AprilGuest
WE MUST say NO LOUDLY to a political marriage between America and Mexico. This is all greed based!! We have not protested loudly enough, long enough and that is why our government thinks we can forced to accept this. Our numbers are great, our voice can be VERY LOUD. We must make our desire to be heard greater than their desire to silence us and force us into submission! WE CAN DO THIS!
-
03-25-2007, 12:54 PM #46
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Oregon (pronounced "ore-ee-gun")
- Posts
- 8,464
April: yeah, you got that right...
Anybody else reading through the bill?
Here's another nugget I noticed:
Subtitle H - Safe and Secure Detention
Pg 107 - Sec 177 Secure Alternatives Program
"Improved" ability for persons being held in Federal detention to be released prior to determination of case - with [supposed] improved ability to track people in the interim. New program: Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)
Why? - Do we need more absconders???
Stronger detention requirements are needed - not looser ones!Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
03-25-2007, 01:00 PM #47
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Oregon (pronounced "ore-ee-gun")
- Posts
- 8,464
Originally Posted by Bowman
Apparently, either the bill's authors or the Reps that had some say in defining the language KNOW VERY WELL the difference of using 'illegal alien' in the text of law and saying 'undocumented immigrant' in a public context for mass consumption [for certain groups of people].Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
03-25-2007, 01:36 PM #48AprilGuest
2ndamendsis wrote:
Let's keep unraveling this monsterous piece of refuse and throw it right back at them, one FACT at a time.
They can squirm, they can wiggle........but they're NOT getting away from our grip this time One FACT at a time
You got that right Sis, the more a person reads this refuse the angrier one gets! It is a load of ! How dare they think the American public is going to just stand by and let this happen!
-
03-25-2007, 02:06 PM #49AprilGuest
UNDER GUTIERREZ/FLAKE:
Analysis By Rosemary Jenks, NumbersUSA Director of Government Relations
Every illegal alien who could produce marginally plausible
“evidence” that he/she had been illegally present in the United
States since June 1, 2006, would get amnesty and be put on the
path to US citizenship.
In exchange for the highest honor our country has to bestow,
the illegal alien would have to pay $2,000, pass a criminal record
check, pay at least some of any income taxes he/she had chosen
not to pay while working illegally, and learn some English. The
already overburdened and error-prone U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) would be responsible for ensuring
that applicants meet these criteria and for handing out temporary
visas and work permits to 2-plus million illegal aliens.
After the no-longer‐illegal aliens had been in temporary status
for six years, USCIS would issue green cards to those who had
learned passable English and, in the case of some heads of
household, had traveled outside the United States (to any other
country, not necessarily their own) for a short time. Single heads
of household, children, the elderly, business owners, and those in
the military would be exempt from the travel requirement. (Any
criminals and terrorists whose fingerprints were not yet on file with
the FBI would then have official documents in whateve name they
chose to provide USCIS during the first phase of the amnesty.)
Lest any illegals be left out of the general amnesty, the
bill includes two others for which they could qualify: the AgJOBS
amnesty for those claiming to have performed agricultural work in
the United States (the fraud rate for a similar amnesty in 1986 is
estimated at 70% and resulted in at least one of the 1993 World
Trade Center bombers getting a green card, which he used to fly
to Afghanistan for terrorist training) and the DREAM Act amnesty for
those who received a US taxpayer-funded high school diploma or an equivalent.
To ensure a constant flow of cheap labor into the United
States, the bill would create a worker importation program for an
additional 400,000 foreign “guest” workers each year, all of whom
would be given the choice to stay permanently, as long as they
weren’t caught committing a crime or terrorist act before they applied. DHS would have to certify that it is capable of verifying
workers’ legal status before this new program could take effect.
As a bone to lawmakers who believe that the laws they pass should actually be enforced, the bill would mandate that all employers eventually verify the legal status of their workforce and it would increase penalties for those who fail to do so. It would also authorize an increase in the number of border enforcement
personnel and in enforcement technology.
Finally, as icing on this rich enforcement cake, the bill would create a “North American security perimeter” that would establish Mexico as our first—and only—line of defense against any security threat from the south.
http://morningglory2.wordpress.com/2007 ... rrezflake/
-
03-25-2007, 02:19 PM #50
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- NJ
- Posts
- 12,855
Lord but don't I feel just plum SECURE knowing that this toilet paper is the recommended IMMIGRATION REFORM by Congress!!!
Don't you?
Looking forward to feeding it to them one piece at a time
ENFORCE THE LAW cause this is going to be FLUSHEDJoin our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
Durbin pushes voting rights for illegal aliens without public...
04-25-2024, 09:10 PM in Non-Citizen & illegal migrant voters