Thread: Fresno State student body president is an illegal alien

RELATED

What makes California great?

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-212046.html

Text of Proposition 187
This initiative measure is submitted to the people in accordance with the provisions of Article II, Section 8 of the Constitution.

This initiative measure adds sections to various codes; therefore, new provisions proposed to be added are printed in {+ italic type +} to indicate that they are new.

PROPOSED LAW

SECTION 1. Findings and Declaration.

The People of California find and declare as follows:

That they have suffered and are suffering economic hardship caused by the presence of illegal aliens in this state.

That they have suffered and are suffering personal injury and damage caused by the criminal conduct of illegal aliens in this state.

That they have a right to the protection of their government from any person or persons entering this country unlawfully.

Therefore, the People of California declare their intention to provide for cooperation between their agencies of state and local government with the federal government, and to establish a system of required notification by and between such agencies to prevent illegal aliens in the United States from receiving benefits or public services in the State of California.

SECTION 2. Manufacture, Distribution or Sale of False Citizenship or Resident Alien Documents: Crime and Punishment.

Section 113 is added to the Penal Code, to read:

{+ 113. Any person who manufactures, distributes or sells false documents to conceal the true citizenship or resident alien status of another person is guilty of a felony, and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for five years or by a fine of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000). +}

SECTION 3. Use of False Citizenship or Resident Alien Documents: Crime and Punishment.

Section 114 is added to the Penal Code, to read:

{+ 114. Any person who uses false documents to conceal his or her true citizenship or resident alien status is guilty of a felony, and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for five years or by a fine of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). +}

SECTION 4. Law Enforcement Cooperation with INS.

Section 834b is added to the Penal Code, to read:

{+ 834b. (a) Every law enforcement agency in California shall fully cooperate with the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service regarding any person who is arrested if he or she is suspected of being present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws. +}

{+ (b) With respect to any such person who is arrested, and suspected of being present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws, every law enforcement agency shall do the following: +}

{+ (1) Attempt to verify the legal status of such person as a citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted as a permanent resident, an alien lawfully admitted for a temporary period of time or as an alien who is present in the United States in violation of immigration laws. The verification process may include, but shall not be limited to, questioning the person regarding his or her date and place of birth, and entry into the United States, and demanding documentation to indicate his or her legal status. +}

{+ (2) Notify the person of his or her apparent status as an alien who is present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws and inform him or her that, apart from any criminal justice proceedings, he or she must either obtain legal status or leave the United States. +}

{+ (3) Notify the Attorney General of California and the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service of the apparent illegal status and provide any additional information that may be requested by any other public entity. +}

{+ (c) Any legislative, administrative, or other action by a city, county, or other legally authorized local governmental entity with jurisdictional boundaries, or by a law enforcement agency, to prevent or limit the cooperation required by subdivision (a) is expressly prohibited. +}

SECTION 5. Exclusion of Illegal Aliens from Public Social Services.

Section 10001.5 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:

{+ 10001.5. (a) In order to carry out the intention of the People of California that only citizens of the United States and aliens lawfully admitted to the United States may receive the benefits of public social services and to ensure that all persons employed in the providing of those services shall diligently protect public funds from misuse, the provisions of this section are adopted. +}

{+ (b) A person shall not receive any public social services to which he or she may be otherwise entitled until the legal status of that person has been verified as one of the following: +}

{+ (1) A citizen of the United States. +}

{+ (2) An alien lawfully admitted as a permanent resident. +}

{+ (3) An alien lawfully admitted for a temporary period of time. +}

{+ (c) If any public entity in this state to whom a person has applied for public social services determines or reasonably suspects, based upon the information provided to it, that the person is an alien in the United States in violation of federal law, the following procedures shall be followed by the public entity: +}

{+ (1) The entity shall not provide the person with benefits or services. +}

{+ (2) The entity shall, in writing, notify the person of his or her apparent illegal immigration status, and that the person must either obtain legal status or leave the United States. +}

{+ (3) The entity shall also notify the State Director of Social Services, the Attorney General of California, and the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service of the apparent illegal status, and shall provide any additional information that may be requested by any other public entity. +}

SECTION 6. Exclusion of Illegal Aliens from Publicly Funded Health Care.

Chapter 1.3 (commencing with Section 130) is added to Part 1 of Division 1 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:

{+ Chapter 1.3. Publicly-Funded Health Care Services +}

{+ 130. (a) In order to carry out the intention of the People of California that, excepting emergency medical care as required by federal law, only citizens of the United States and aliens lawfully admitted to the United States may receive the benefits of publicly-funded health care, and to ensure that all persons employed in the providing of those services shall diligently protect public funds from misuse, the provisions of this section are adopted. +}

{+ (b) A person shall not receive any health care services from a publicly-funded health care facility, to which he or she is otherwise entitled until the legal status of that person has been verified as one of the following: +}

{+ (1) A citizen of the United States. +}

{+ (2) An alien lawfully admitted as a permanent resident. +}

{+ (3) An alien lawfully admitted for a temporary period of time. +}

{+ (c) If any publicly-funded health care facility in this state from whom a person seeks health care services, other than emergency medical care as required by federal law, determines or reasonably suspects, based upon the information provided to it, that the person is an alien in the United States in violation of federal law, the following procedures shall be followed by the facility: +}

{+ (1) The facility shall not provide the person with services. +}

{+ (2) The facility shall, in writing, notify the person of his or her apparent illegal immigration status, and that the person must either obtain legal status or leave the United States. +}

{+ (3) The facility shall also notify the State Director of Health Services, the Attorney General of California, and the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service of the apparent illegal status, and shall provide any additional information that may be requested by any other public entity. +}

{+ (d) For purposes of this section "publicly-funded health care facility" shall be defined as specified in Sections 1200 and 1250 of this code as of January 1, 1993. +}

SECTION 7. Exclusion of Illegal Aliens from Public Elementary and Secondary Schools.

Section 48215 is added to the Education Code, to read:

{+ 48215. (a) No public elementary or secondary school shall admit, or permit the attendance of, any child who is not a citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted as a permanent resident, or a person who is otherwise authorized under federal law to be present in the United States. +}

{+ (b) Commencing January 1, 1995, each school district shall verify the legal status of each child enrolling in the school district for the first time in order to ensure the enrollment or attendance only of citizens, aliens lawfully admitted as permanent residents, or persons who are otherwise authorized to be present in the United States. +}

{+ (c) By January 1, 1996, each school district shall have verified the legal status of each child already enrolled and in attendance in the school district in order to ensure the enrollment or attendance only of citizens, aliens lawfully admitted as permanent residents, or persons who are otherwise authorized under federal law to be present in the United States. +}

{+ (d) By January 1, 1996, each school district shall also have verified the legal status of each parent or guardian of each child referred to in subdivisions (b) and (c), to determine whether such parent or guardian is one of the following: +}

{+ (1) A citizen of the United States. +}

{+ (2) An alien lawfully admitted as a permanent resident. +}

{+ (3) An alien admitted lawfully for a temporary period of time. +}

{+ (e) Each school district shall provide information to the State Superintendent of Public Instruction, the Attorney General of California, and the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service regarding any enrollee or pupil, or parent or guardian, attending a public elementary or secondary school in the school district determined or reasonably suspected to be in violation of federal immigration laws within forty-five days after becoming aware of an apparent violation. The notice shall also be provided to the parent or legal guardian of the enrollee or pupil, and shall state that an existing pupil may not continue to attend the school after ninety calendar days from the date of the notice, unless legal status is established. +}

{+ (f) For each child who cannot establish legal status in the United States, each school district shall continue to provide education for a period of ninety days from the date of the notice. Such ninety day period shall be utilized to accomplish an orderly transition to a school in the child's country of origin. Each school district shall fully cooperate in this transition effort to ensure that the educational needs of the child are best served for that period of time. +}

SECTION 8. Exclusion of Illegal Aliens from Public Postsecondary Educational Institutions.

Section 66010.8 is added to the Education Code, to read:

{+ 66010.8. (a) No public institution of postsecondary education shall admit, enroll, or permit the attendance of any person who is not a citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted as a permanent resident in the United States, or a person who is otherwise authorized under federal law to be present in the United States. +}

{+ (b) Commencing with the first term or semester that begins after January 1, 1995, and at the commencement of each term or semester thereafter, each public postsecondary educational institution shall verify the status of each person enrolled or in attendance at that institution in order to ensure the enrollment or attendance only of United States citizens, aliens lawfully admitted as permanent residents in the United States, and persons who are otherwise authorized under federal law to be present in the United States. +}

{+ (c) No later than 45 days after the admissions officer of a public postsecondary educational institution becomes aware of the application, enrollment, or attendance of a person determined to be, or who is under reasonable suspicion of being, in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws, that officer shall provide that information to the State Superintendent of Public Instruction, the Attorney General of California, and the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. The information shall also be provided to the applicant, enrollee, or person admitted. +}

SECTION 9. Attorney General Cooperation with the INS.

Section 53069.65 is added to the Government Code, to read:

{+ 53069.65. Whenever the state or a city, or a county, or any other legally authorized local governmental entity with jurisdictional boundaries reports the presence of a person who is suspected of being present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws to the Attorney General of California, that report shall be transmitted to the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. The Attorney General shall be responsible for maintaining on-going and accurate records of such reports, and shall provide any additional information that may be requested by any other government entity. +}

SECTION 10. Amendment and Severability.

The statutory provisions contained in this measure may not be amended by the Legislature except to further its purposes by statute passed in each house by rollcall vote entered in the journal, two-thirds of the membership concurring, or by a statute that becomes effective only when approved by the voters.

In the event that any portion of this act or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect any other provision or application of the act, which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to that end the provisions of this act are severable.

Originally Posted by JohnDoe2

RELATED

What makes California great?

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-212046.html

California, a Failed State California is facing economic failure resulting from years of a liberal legislature pursuing a liberal version of utopia. The liberal utopia has become the Forgotten Man's hell. California has been at the forefront of many trends in America including a tax revolt that led to Proposition 13. Is it time for a repeat?


Californians have just given the raspberry to the state's legislature's plan to fix the current budget deficit. Had the initiatives passed, California would only be under water by $15B as opposed to the current $21B, and that number is sure to rise as unemployment in the state rises. The plan was inadequate and the 22% of the voters who saw fit to vote saw through the charade of the ballot initiatives for what they were -- which was a band aid to cover the twin cancers of structural tax deficiencies and partisan politics masquerading as thoughtful dialog.


The Golden State has lost its luster. California ranks 48th out of 50 in business tax climate according to the Tax Foundation. Only the beacons of limited government found in New York and New Jersey scored lower than California. The states bordering California scored much better in terms of business climate.


•- Oregon - ranked 9th
•- Nevada - ranked 3rd
•- Arizona - ranked 21st
From a personal tax level, the tax burden for individuals as measured as personal income tax income per capita, California ranks 6th according to the Tax Foundation. Again, we can look at the neighboring states. The lower the ranking, the higher the income tax burden.


•- Oregon - ranked 9th
•- Nevada - no personal income tax.
•- Arizona - ranked 39th
Capital and jobs are mobile and will seek the best returns. California receives 50% of its personal income tax revenue from 1% of the tax filers. Businesses are not expanding in California -- or they are leaving the state. The good news for Nevada is that there is growth in jobs due to the friendly business climate. The bad news for Nevada is that Californians are migrating to Nevada to seek a better future. There goes the neighborhood.


The good news for California with regard to tax burden is that thanks to Proposition 13, the per capita property tax burden ranks California 28th.


California's budget for K-12 education was 42.1B in 2007/2008 up from the 2002/2203 budget of $28.8B. This is an increase of 46% during the period of time that inflation as measured by the CPI grew by 12.7%. During the period from 2002 to 2005 (sorry, the CA Dept of Education has not posted K-12 statistics more recently than 2005), the California K-12 population has risen 1%. If the increased education spending were limited to inflation + increase in student population, over $8B could have been saved.


California is controlled by unions, specifically the CTA (California Teachers Assoc.), and the California state employee unions, who have a willing Democrat- controlled legislature in their pockets and demand more money. Just as the unions have broken the auto industry, the unions in California are breaking the state. California has made the same decisions to placate the unions as GM and Chrysler did, and we know how that story ends. Could a bailout of California be far behind?


The people of California have spoken, and we shall see if the Governator and the miscreants in the state house get the message.


Below is an outline of how to address the state's budget problem.


•Reduce the sensitivity of the personal income taxes to economic conditions. This requires making the tax less progressive, and more broad based. This means no earner is exempted from income tax. Every citizen of the state needs to be a stakeholder in the state's financial well-being.
•Incentives should be given for reduced tax burden on returns of capital. The economically freest place in the world is Hong Kong, and it has no capital gains tax. Eliminating taxes on capital would help create jobs in California.
•Go to a zero based budget with 2002 as the base year. Spending should be limited to inflation + population growth relative to the base year.
•Eliminate social benefits for illegal immigrants and allow illegal immigrants residing in the state to self-deport as the gravy train ends.
•Eliminate defined-benefit retirement benefits for state employees and move solely to defined-contribution plans.
•Redistrict all legislative districts to eliminate ‘safe' districts.
California must move away from its entitlement mentality and liberal orthodoxy in order to fix the budget. California can do the country a service and serve as the spark to start the revolt against flagrant spending.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/ ... state.html

Originally Posted by MontereySherry

JohnDoe2 is absolutely correct. This has been a long battle for Californians. The rest of America didn't care or pay attention until it started spreading to their home states. We have not only had to fight the battle alone but have had to endure the insults thrown at us by our fellow Americans.

Californians that have long history and roots in this state have stayed to fight while newbies have fled. We are outnumbered and fustrated as we are watching our state being destroyed.

As a Californian I tell you here and now we are Americans. We need your support and aid, not your condemnation. The choice is yours abandon us or rally around us and help us take our state back.

I'm with you Sherry.
I'll be here fighting for MY City, MY County, MY State and MY Country.
I love them all and I'll never give up the fight.

California receives 50% of its personal income tax revenue from 1% of the tax filers

I am not rich, so why am I in that 1% category?

RELATED

San Diego's lower crime rate reflected in annual survey

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-218997.html

RELATED

CA. Bay Area activist working to put Arizona-style immigration law on California ballot

Fighting for our state until we win.

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-219166.html

California college related.

http://collive.com/show_news.rtx?id=8982

Originally Posted by JohnDoe2

Originally Posted by Ratbstard

MS I believe when our members speak badly about CA they are referring to the politicians, liberal elites there. No-one means to slight actual, caring citizen residents.

That isn't what this sounds like to people who live in CA.

All I can say is California cannot go bankrupt fast enough, maybe it will kick some sense into their addled liberal mush for brains.

People don't seem to understand that when they attack any state they are actually attacking their fellow AMERICANS and their fellow ALIPAC members.

Yes, I hope California keeps that in mind as they boycott, attack and try to bankrupt Arizona for enforcing US immigration law. I hope Obama, ICE, DHS and the DOJ keep that in mind too as they attack and sue the people of Arizona for enforcing US immigration law.

Originally Posted by Judy

Originally Posted by JohnDoe2

Originally Posted by Ratbstard

MS I believe when our members speak badly about CA they are referring to the politicians, liberal elites there. No-one means to slight actual, caring citizen residents.

That isn't what this sounds like to people who live in CA.

All I can say is California cannot go bankrupt fast enough, maybe it will kick some sense into their addled liberal mush for brains.

People don't seem to understand that when they attack any state they are actually attacking their fellow AMERICANS and their fellow ALIPAC members.

Yes, I hope California keeps that in mind as they boycott, attack and try to bankrupt Arizona for enforcing US immigration law. I hope Obama, ICE, DHS and the DOJ keep that in mind too as they attack and sue the people of Arizona for enforcing US immigration law.

RELATED

CA. Bay Area activist working to put Arizona-style immigration law on California ballot

Fighting for our state until we win.


http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-219166.html