Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By JohnDoe2
  • 1 Post By nntrixie

Thread: Garfield Co. Sheriff releases statement on immigration enforcement

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040

    Garfield Co. Sheriff releases statement on immigration enforcement

    Garfield Co. Sheriff releases statement on immigration enforcement

    [IMG]http://media.graytvinc.com/images/810*465/GCSO4.jpg[/IMG]
    Posted: Mon 10:08 AM, Mar 06, 2017

    GARFIELD COUNTY, Colo. (KKCO/KJCT)-- The Garfield County Sheriff released the following statement on immigration enforcement entitled Immigration Enforcement: Just the Facts. Read the full statement below:

    I oppose "sanctuary" policies. I believe a public entity such as a town, city, state, school district or Sheriff who officially enact sanctuary policies should have sanctions imposed on them. I believe anyone who is in this country illegally and is committing crimes should be deported. I believe the United States has an absolute right and responsibility to secure its borders and protect its citizens. That should end the debate about where I stand on these topics.


    However, my personal feelings aren't always compatible with what I am legally allowed to enforce under the "rule of law". Although I took an oath to uphold the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Colorado, as well as enforce the laws of the state, there is a distinct difference between the US Constitution and federal statutory laws. My jurisdictional authority to enforce laws is limited to state and local laws. Peace officers in Colorado have no authority to enforce federal law. If I did, I would be busy arresting pot shop owners who are unquestionably violating federal narcotics laws and illegal aliens who are violating federal immigration statutes. However, as a law enforcement officer I am REQUIRED to comply with the laws as written and interpreted by the courts, regardless of my personal or political views. Public opinion, social media and stories and letters written in the local newspapers are not law, and cannot be the basis for law enforcement actions.

    With respect to federal immigration laws, the United States Supreme Court struck down Arizona's state immigration legislation on the basis that federal immigration laws preempted state law. The federal government has the authority to regulate immigration and aliens. Federal immigration officers, not state or local officers, have the authority to determine the immigration status of people in this country. Local and state law enforcement officers have no authority to enforce federal immigration laws.


    To dive deeper into this issue, the administrative ICE "detainers" signed by ICE agents (not judges) that were previously relied upon by Sheriffs to hold ICE detainees, violate the Fourth Amendment because ICE agents provide no probable cause for the detention and no judicial review is required. Several individuals, including illegal aliens, prevailed in federal civil lawsuits and received significant judgments against Sheriffs who held them against their will pursuant to an ICE detainer. The Constitution, including the Fourth Amendment, protects anyone on US soil, including illegal and undocumented individuals from an illegal arrest and detention. You and I may not like it, but I have to comply with it because I took an oath to uphold the US Constitution. I am also not willing to subject the taxpayers of Garfield County to lawsuits that could cost them hundreds of thousands of dollars because ICE lacks the facilities to hold their detainees and would rather transfer their responsibilities to county jails.


    Another layer of complexity is the fact that ICE can only request that a Sheriff hold their detainees because according to the courts, the "Anti-commandeering clause" in the Tenth Amendment (state's rights), says that the federal government lacks the authority to force local and state governments to use their resources on federal responsibilities (remember "a matter of federal concern"). It is the same principal as the Third Amendment that prohibits the federal government from quartering soldiers in your home against your will. The Feds oftentimes use the threat of withholding federal funds from the states in an attempt to gain compliance for a variety of issues, but they cannot force local governments to comply.

    Therefore, by accepting the responsibility of holding ICE detainees, the liability of civil litigation falls on me and the taxpayers of Garfield County, not ICE.


    Because ICE agents won't obtain a warrant signed by a judge establishing that they have probable cause that the person they want the Sheriff to detain committed a criminal offense (something local law enforcement officers are required to do with every arrest they make), they have conveniently shifted the burden of their responsibility to Sheriffs. The public misconception that Sheriffs don't want to cooperate with ICE, is a popular but incorrect talking point. We will detain anyone, given the proper legal authority. The Garfield County Sheriff's Office as well as most Sheriff's Offices across the state cooperate with ICE to the extent the laws allow us to, just as we do with any law enforcement agency, local, state or federal. For example, we have 3 deputies assigned to the local ICE office in a task force that focuses on illegal alien gang members.

    When someone is jailed, we notify ICE by submitting biometrics to them under the Secure Communities program. When ICE has an interest in an inmate, we keep them advised of that inmate's status and notify them of that inmate's release date and time and allow ICE to take custody of them. We can't detain them longer than is necessary to release them, but we give ICE ample time to do their job.


    The primary responsibility of ICE is immigration enforcement. Local law enforcement's primary responsibility is to enforce local and state laws, but cooperation amongst all law enforcement agencies should not be hampered by public policy or opinion.

    Anyone who works in any organization knows that they have a specific job description with different responsibilities from other people in the organization (the editor of the paper doesn't deliver papers, the circulation department does). The description of the local law enforcement officer does not include be an ICE agent.

    Although ICE is severely resource deficient, their resource issues are not mine. Due to limited manpower in our area, ICE agents are oftentimes unavailable or unable to work after hours or on weekends so they can't take custody of inmates being released during those times. By contrast, the Sheriff's Office works 24/7 and the fact that ICE doesn't, does not translate into refusing to cooperate. It translates into what I am Constitutionally allowed to do.


    In conclusion, despite my personal feelings as a citizen of the United States or the conflicting public opinions on immigration issues in this country, Sheriffs do not establish public policy or enact laws. That's what Legislatures and Congress do. Sheriffs enforce laws as written. We fully cooperate with ICE and all other law enforcement agencies, but that does not mean we have the legal authority to arrest or detain individuals accused of federal administrative violations.


    Lou Vallario
    Garfield County Sheriff

    http://www.nbc11news.com/content/new...415483413.html

    Beezer likes this.
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    7,377
    If he truly believed in enforcing the law, he could take action against all those who use fake DL. His oath allows and demands he does just that.

    Also if a federal bank robber came through his county - would he not have time to stop and detain them.

    How about a terrorists?

    I sort of skimmed this, but my first reaction was to the statement, 'if they are in this country illegally AND are committing crimes'. Isn't coming here and all the laws that are broken just by being here, working, driving, etc., not enough broken laws, for him to think they should be returned?, even if he feels he is not able to do it.

    Forgive me if I don't think he has any desire to help with the problem.
    Judy likes this.

  3. #3
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,710
    I'll probably be bombarded here for making this comment, but I think he makes some legitimate arguments and does an excellent job of explaining how he sees his responsibilities as a locally elected law enforcement official. Not saying I agree with everything he's saying, just that I feel he's making some legitimate arguments.

    Perhaps ICE could do a better job and become more efficient in their own duties.
    Of course what this sheriff and ICE can do all revolves around their manpower and financial resources. I firmly believe the Sheriff's Department should do all they can to aid and assist ICE wherever possible, however, I do understand there are limits.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  4. #4
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    Quote Originally Posted by nntrixie View Post
    If he truly believed in enforcing the law, he could take action against all those who use fake DL. His oath allows and demands he does just that.

    Also if a federal bank robber came through his county - would he not have time to stop and detain them.

    How about a terrorists?

    I sort of skimmed this, but my first reaction was to the statement, 'if they are in this country illegally AND are committing crimes'. Isn't coming here and all the laws that are broken just by being here, working, driving, etc., not enough broken laws, for him to think they should be returned?, even if he feels he is not able to do it.

    Forgive me if I don't think he has any desire to help with the problem.
    He's just dancing with the Dems, he's trying to look lawful and constitutional all the while selling Americans down river as fast as he can.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. ICE releases 2010 immigration enforcement report
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-02-2011, 01:25 AM
  2. ICE Releases Records on Immigration Enforcement
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-05-2011, 10:58 PM
  3. DHS RELEASES 2009 IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS REPORT
    By HAPPY2BME in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-18-2010, 03:03 PM
  4. Krentz family releases statement on ranchers death
    By ALIPAC in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-02-2010, 10:02 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •