Thread: Public schools can not ask students about their immigration status

I don't take anything Obamaites said in 2011 about what can or can't be done about education and immigration seriously. There is no federal law that says you can't ask about immigration status. There's no federal law that says states have to admit any student into their schools. There's no federal law that even requires them to be open or even exist. States can close them all down if they want to. They can privatize them, sell the properties, do any damn thing they want to do.

They can shut them all down and sell books by grade at the grocery store and Walmart. Oh my God, think about how much money we'd save. Over $600 billion a year. $6 trillion every 10 years.

New federal guidelines ban schools from conducting immigration checks on kids

By Evan Perez, CNN
Updated 10:25 AM ET, Thu May 8, 2014

Story highlights

• New legal guidance issued to school districts, states from Justice and Education departments
• Schools can't ask for proof of citizenship or block students if parents can't prove legal residency
• Obama administration issued guidance on the matter in 2011, but problems persist

The Obama administration issued guidelines Thursday to ensure children can enroll in public schools even if they or their parents are living illegally in the United States.

The legal guidance from the Justice and Education departments allow school districts and states to ask for proof of students' age or that they are residents in the jurisdictions where they attend school. But schools can't require proof of citizenship or block students if parents can't prove their legal residency.

Attorney General Eric Holder said the legal guidance is in reaction to reports from around the country that some school districts have identification requirements that create hurdles for undocumented children to enroll in public schools, in violation of federal law.

Holder cited a 1982 Supreme Court decision that ordered states to provide education to any child living in their jurisdiction. "Public school districts have an obligation to enroll students regardless of immigration status and without discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin," the attorney general said.

Schools have to be flexible about the proof of residency they can ask of parents, the guidelines issued Thursday say.

Administrators can ask for utility bills or apartment lease agreements to show a student lives in the district where they are attending school. They may ask for a parent's driver's license. But only to establish residency, not to determine legal immigration status, the guidelines say.

They also may ask for legal certification to show a child's age. But schools can't turn away students who can't provide a birth certificate or whose parents refuse to provide a Social Security number for the child or parent.

The Obama administration issued legal guidance to states and school districts in 2011, but some problems have persisted.

"We want to be sure every school leader understands the legal requirements under the Constitution and federal laws, and it is our hope that this update will address some of the misperceptions out there," Education Secretary Arne Duncan said in a statement.

The rules also are intended to help remove hurdles for children who are homeless and whose parents may not be able to prove their residency in a school district, the departments said.

Deportations: Missing parents, scared kids

http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/08/us/sch...ration-checks/

Obamaites are disgusting. Stupid, vile, evil and dangerous people. But hey, nevermind them, lets beat up on Trump some more.

School orders boy to "tolerate" undressing with girl and make it "natural"

By Todd Starnes
Published March 22, 2017 FoxNews.com

(iStock)

A teenage boy was told by school leaders that he had to “tolerate” undressing in front of a female student and to make it as “natural” as possible, according to a blockbuster lawsuit filed in a Pennsylvania federal district court.

The lawsuit, filed Tuesday by Alliance Defending Freedom and Independence Law Center, alleges the Boyertown Area School District shamed the teenage boy and violated his personal privacy. They are also alleging sexual harassment.

“No school should rob any student of this legally protected personal privacy,” ILC attorney Randall Wenger said. “We trust that our children won’t be forced into emotionally vulnerable situations like this when they are in the care of our schools because it’s a school’s duty to protect and respect the bodily privacy and dignity of all students.”

In the case of “Joel Doe” – they clearly ignored that duty.

Last Fall, the teen boy was standing in his underwear inside a locker room at Boyertown Area High School preparing to change for a physical education class.

“He suddenly realized there was a member of the opposite sex changing with him in the locker room, who was at the time, wearing nothing but shorts and a bra,” the lawsuit states.

The boy, along with several of his classmates reported the incident to Assistant Principal, named as a defendant.

“Dr. Foley indicated that the legality was up in the air but that students who mentally identify themselves with the opposite sex could choose the locker room and bathroom to use, and physical sex did not matter,” the lawsuit states.

The teenage boy asked the assistant principal if there was anything that could be done to protect him from the situation.

“Dr. Foley told Joel Doe to ‘tolerate’ it and to make it as ‘natural’ as he possibly can,” the lawsuit states.

As the boy got up to leave the office, the assistant principal allegedly told the youngster to again “be as natural as possible.”

Even more disturbing, parents were not told of the school district’s decision to let students of one sex use the locker rooms and bathrooms of students of the opposite sex.

“The District’s directive to Joel Doe was that he must change with students of the opposite sex, and make it as natural as possible, and that anything less would be intolerant and bullying against students who profess a gender identity with the opposite sex,” the lawsuit states.

The young man’s parents made an appointment to school leaders and were told that the district is “all-inclusive.”

The lawsuit alleges that Foley told the boy’s parents their son could use the nurse’s office to change – if he had a problem changing in front of girls.

Principal Brett Cooper, also a defendant, backed up the assistant principal’s solution.

Supt. Richard Faidley suggested if “Joel Doe was uncomfortable changing with those of the opposite sex, or with using the nurse’s office, then he could just withdraw from school and be home schooled.”

The school district has yet to respond to the lawsuit.
Should the school district be found guilty, they should immediately fire Faidley, Cooper and Foley. Their alleged behavior is beyond repulsive.

But the lawsuit clearly illustrates the radical sex and gender narrative being forced on every public school locker room in the nation.

And as evidenced by the school district’s behavior, resistance to this perverse indoctrination seems to be futile.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/...t-natural.html

William Gheen to Maryland lawmakers: You're responsible for crimes of illegals

William Gheen's open letter message to Maryland lawmakers 3/23/2017 (Sent by email to the Maryland State House members at 9:43am)

https://www.alipac.us/f8/maryland-la...crimes-345179/