Thread: Tancredo confronts 'super-state' effort FINALLY

"It's time the Bush administration to come clean," Gilchrist told WND. "If President Bush's agenda is to establish a new North American union government to supersede the sovereignty of the United States, then the president has an obligation to tell this to the American people directly. The American public has a right to know."

Yea, that's right, but such a transformation of our government would have to come from the people not from he or anyone else as an elected official. It would be a felony to bypass Congress and the American people. If such a deal was signed by our President without going through the proper channels, then he should be brought up on charges. He's got a record now doing that. His back door decisions are treasonous.

IMPEACHMENT NOW!!

BTTT

This is from pg. 26 of the report from the May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report. This report has the objectives that the SPP working groups are working to achieve.

Just thought this was interesting!!!

www.cfr.org/content/publications/attach ... _final.pdf


Increase Labor Mobility within North America
People are North America’s greatest asset. Goods and services cross
borders easily; ensuring the legal transit of North American workers
has been more difficult. Experience with the NAFTA visa system
suggests that its procedures need to be simplified, and such visas should
be made available to a wider range of occupations and to additional
categories of individuals such as students, professors, bona fide frequent
visitors, and retirees.
To make the most of the impressive pool of skill and talent within
North America, the three countries should look beyond the NAFTA
visa system. The large volume of undocumentedmigrants fromMexico
within the United States is an urgent matter for those two countries
to address. A long-term goal should be to create a ‘‘North American
preference’’—new rules that would make it much easier for employees
to move and for employers to recruit across national boundaries within
the continent. This would enhance North American competitiveness,
Recommendations 27
increase productivity, contribute to Mexico’s development, and address
oneof the main outstanding issues ontheMexican-U.S. bilateral agenda.
Canada andtheUnited States should consider eliminating restrictions
on labor mobility altogether and work toward solutions that, in the
long run, could enable the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico
as well.
WHAT WE SHOULD DO NOW
• Expand temporary migrant worker programs. Canada and the
United States should expand programs for temporary labor migration
from Mexico. For instance, Canada’s successful model for managing
seasonal migration in the agricultural sector should be expanded to
other sectors where Canadian producers face a shortage of workers
and Mexico may have a surplus of workers with appropriate skills.
Canadian and U.S. retirees living in Mexico should be granted
working permits in certain fields, for instance as English teachers.
• Implement the Social Security Totalization Agreement
negotiated between the United States andMexico. This agreement
would recognize payroll contributions to each other’s systems,
thus preventing double taxation.
WHAT WE SHOULD DO BY 2010
• Create a ‘‘North American preference.’’ Canada, the United
States, and Mexico should agree on streamlined immigration and
labor mobility rules that enable citizens of all three countries to
work elsewhere in North America with far fewer restrictions than
immigrants from other countries. This new system should be both
broader and simpler than the current systemofNAFTAvisas. Special
immigration status should be given to teachers, faculty, and students
in the region.
• Move to full labor mobility between Canada and the United
States. To make companies based in North America as competitive
as possible in the global economy, Canada and the United States
should consider eliminating all remaining barriers to the ability of
their citizens to live and work in the other country. This free flow
28 Building a North American Community
of people would offer an important advantage to employers in both
countries by giving them rapid access to a larger pool of skilled labor,
and would enhance the well-being of individuals in both countries
by enabling them to move quickly to where their skills are needed.
In the long term, the two countries should work to extend this
policy to Mexico as well, though doing so will not be practical until
wage differentials between Mexico and its two North American
neighbors have diminished considerably.
• Mutual recognition of professional standards and degrees.
Professional associations in each of the three countries make decisions
on the standards to accept professionals from other countries. But
despite the fact thatNAFTA already encourages themutual recognition
of professional degrees, little has actually been done. The three
governments should devote more resources to leading and creating
incentives that would encourage the professional associations of each
of the three countries to develop shared standards that would
facilitate short-term professional labor mobility within North
America.

Originally Posted by ruthiela

I sent him the original document they signed. It has all their signatures on it. Bush, Condi Rice, Donald Rumsfeld among others.

do you have a link with the signatures on it?

thanks

Here is a link.........it's to a PDF file that I cannot copy, but you really need to read this.............wait till you get to page 49 of it..........it shows you what the US and Mexico has planned to do as far as immigration goes.
After you read this Task Force I know you will agree we HAVE to get Bush out of that office. Nobody is going to like what they are planning to do.

http://www.cfr.org/content/publications ... _final.pdf

Again! Tom Tancredo came threw for us! There is no one better suited to be our Next President, please support him people, Thanx!

When I went on the SPP site a lot of the rhetoric was security. I don't know how you are gaining security by opening yourself up for more ways to enter the US and threatening the interior with a port. How can an open door policy be safe? Also, I heard they want to share the US GPS system with Canada and Mexico and something else that is exclusive to our aviation industry. No thank you. Open our air space up to Mexican drug traffic!!!!!! We know how dangerous someone in an airplane can be. Not only that, we know how poorly Mexico maintains it's vehicles, can you think of the planes.

Believe me, there is more than one group. I went and looked at the Kansas City deal and there are multi groups working on it. Also, the City Council is involved. I'm concerned about my council too.

Also, you know wealthy people want to keep this quiet because they are the ones that will make the money off of it. Politicians have become the campaign funds puppets of wealth and big business. We have got to take our elective power back from the top 1% and big business.\

Dixie

Yes, Mamie.......here's the link

http://www.fac-aec.gc.ca/spp/spp-report.pdf

Originally Posted by ruthiela

Yes, Mamie.......here's the link

http://www.fac-aec.gc.ca/spp/spp-report.pdf

thanks, I can't get it to open but I did see the Canadian leaf in the address though

Mamie, you have to have Adobe reader to read it. You can get that free if you don't have it.