Page 486 of 574 FirstFirst ... 386436476482483484485486487488489490496536 ... LastLast
Results 4,851 to 4,860 of 5732
Like Tree97Likes

Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

  1. #4851
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Quote Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan View Post
    MinuteMan, your logic (in answer to FlorGal) seems pure to me.
    HighlanderJuan, thank you for your fair assessment. Pure logic involves deduction, probable causes, induction, inference from outcome (of precursory events) and necessary prior steps to reach a given known conclusion, necessary consequences of established known events and insights and hunches that turn out to be required for established known events to have happened, and the like - not "just the facts."

    However, I'm concerned with how opponents will
    disregard the soundness of "pure logic," and pick the narrative apart for lack of historically recorded facts with which they concur, in order to mislead the masses, along with the one-minute readers, the marginally interested, and the psuedo-informed whose attention span is limited to thirty second sound bites from the lamestream media.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 03-11-2012 at 04:29 PM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  2. #4852
    Senior Member HighlanderJuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Longmont, CO
    Posts
    1,054
    MinuteMan, you're talking about a professional fraudster and with various elements of the new world order, including progressives, communists, banksters, multinational corporations, corrupt American politicians from both parties, two corrupt political parties, obama sycophants, and some really ignorant people. Oh, yeah, some of them are really stupid also.

    It's been a while since we've corresponded, but during the last three years I've been studying finance and economics, and one of the higher level courses I took was entitle 'Fraud Examination.' From that course, I picked up some rather sober statistics. About 30% of our population is hopelessly corrupt; about 30% are hopelessly honest, and about 40% are situationally corruptible. What we have in our government today are mostly the corrupt and the situationally corruptible, who use the tools of bribery or intimidation to maintain their control over the rest of the population.

    What I'm trying to say here is that we are dealing with miscreants and outlaws. Don't be concerned about their criticism, and in fact, if it comes your way, you must be doing something right.

    And because I know you have a lot of time available (that's my attempt at humor), here's a link to a paper on public fraud and corruption: John Sutherland - Public Fraud and Corruption. Enjoy.
    Last edited by HighlanderJuan; 03-11-2012 at 05:40 PM.
    In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, Brave, Hated, and Scorned. When his cause succeeds however,the timid join him, For then it costs nothing to be a Patriot. -- Mark Twain

  3. #4853
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Follow Up On Quo Warranto As It Relates To Removing Obama/Soetoro

    By Devvy Kidd
    3-11-12


    My column Wednesday May 11 has brought a ton of email with questions about a legal process known as Quo Warranto.
    I must repeat that I am not an attorney nor have I had any legal training. However, I can read and I have spent the equivalent of months in reading time on all the lawsuits filed regarding Obama/Soetoro's birth certificate and the issue of natural born citizen. There are many superb legal analysis dealing with the issue of standing for plaintiffs in those lawsuits. If a person really wants to understand this issue, you have to spend the time doing the research and evaluating the submissions by attorneys involved going back to 2008. There just isn't any other way to understand complicated legal issues.

    In my column yesterday, The Conundrum of Removing Obama/Soetoro From Office, I provided foot notes for very important legal analysis by lawyers who are experts in constitutional law and the subject matter. I selected those four as they were germane to that column. Once you read them, one can fully understand why I used them.
    Over the past 2 1/2 years, I have continued to read postings on the following sites: Leo Donofrio, Mario Apuzzo, Stephen Pidgeon and Dr. Orly Taitz, as well as filings by Cort Wrotnowski. All attorneys (except Cort) involved in cases against Barry Soetoro. Many of their filings in federal court have been posted so we can learn the arguments and law.
    To answer one question that came in via email:
    "An interesting point of view regarding Barry as a usurper rather than just a fraud. It made me wonder if the same method could be used to remove judges for ‘usurping’ all the power that they have stolen for themselves over the years."

    Many states allow recall as a method to remove judges except for their state Supreme Court. As for removing judges below the Supreme Court Level using a Quo Warranto, I'm not sure. Every state has oversight judicial committees which follow procedures; I guess that one is for future research.
    The Quo Warranto is available at the state and federal level. Activist federal judges in this country have been running amok on the bench for decades. The Outlaw Congress has the legal authority to remove federal judges, but that has been as rare as a blizzard in Miami. As I have said for at least a dozen years, one of the biggest failures of Congress after Congress is their refusal to remove biased, activist judges. Just look at the Ninth "Silly" Circuit Court. Their decisions are over turned more times than a gymnast on the mat, yet those same judges continue to sit on the bench for life while we pay them to make bad decisions higher courts throw out.

    Without the benefit of LexisNexis, I did some more research (I'm sure there are many lawyers out there who know of more) and found this interesting case:
    Lansing district judge sends heavyweights to fight AG’s ouster attempt

    "Brennan and Nolan want the Michigan Supreme Court to bypass the COA, which has original jurisdiction of Schuette’s quo warranto motion to unseat Clarke."

    Here in Texas as well as many states I randomly checked have a quo warranto statute:
    Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code - Chapter 66 Quo Warranto
    Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code Section 66.001 - Grounds
    "An action in the nature of quo warranto is available if: (1) a person usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or executes a franchise or an office, including an office in a corporation created by the authority of this state; (2) a public officer does an act or allows an act that by law causes a forfeiture of his office;"

    Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code Section 66.002 - Initiation Of Suit
    "(a) If grounds for the remedy exist, the attorney general or the county or district attorney of the proper county may petition the district court ..."

    Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code Section 66.003 - Judgment

    "If the person against whom the information is filed is found guilty as charged, the court: (1) shall enter judgment removing the person from the ..."

    As for removing an individual at the federal level using a quo warranto, as I pointed out you must be able to qualify under Newman v. United States ex Rel. Frizzell. (Please take the time to read the entire Footnote 1 below.) I would not qualify. Going back to my previous column, I also believe Dr. Orly Taitz does not qualify. But, I think former presidential candidates Chuck Baldwin and Alan Keyes would be able to as they were directly impacted by Obama/Soetoro's alleged election even though he was ineligible to appear on the ballot. Baldwin has declined, but I believe Dr. Keyes still could as I cited in my last column [emphasis mine]:
    "Quo warranto is intended to prevent a continuing exercise of an authority unlawfully asserted, and is not appropriate for moot or abstract questions. Where the alleged usurpation has terminated, quo warranto will be denied. (People v. City of Whittier (1933) 133 Cal.App. 316, 324; 25 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 223 (1955).) By the same token, because quo warranto serves to end a continuous usurpation, no statute of limitations applies to the action. (People v. Bailey (1916) 30 Cal.App. 581, 584-585.)"
    While that cite is from California law, I would think it could be argued the same applies at the federal level. Perhaps Dr. Keyes could sit down with some of the great attorneys involved in those citizenship cases like Stephen Pidgeon and Mario Apuzzo and discuss going for a straight federal Quo Warranto. They would be the ones to provide expert legal advice to Dr. Keyes.
    Let's look at Newman again:
    Newman v. United States ex Rel. Frizzell (Emphasis mine)
    "An interested person within the meaning of the provisions of the District Code in regard to quo warranto proceedings is one who has an interest in the office itself peculiar to himself whether the office be elective or appointive.
    "Unless the right to maintain quo warranto proceedings under the District Code were limited to persons actually and personally interested, every officer attached to the government at Washington would be subject to attack by persons having no claim in the office or interest therein different from that of every other citizen and taxpayer of the United States. "As §§ 1538-1540, Code District of Columbia, apply to actions in quo warranto instituted by authorized parties against national officers of the United States, they are general laws of the United States, and not merely local laws of the District of Columbia, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals of the District construing those sections is reviewable by this Court under § 250, Judicial Code."
    I know it's easy to accuse me of being an arm chair quarterback after the fact. A person who has no legal training, but that isn't the case. In my columns since early 2009, I have raised the legal issue of this 'thing' called a quo warranto by reading and learning from Leo Donofrio. As a matter of fact, there is another lawsuit that has run its course, meaning denied for hearing by the U.S. Supreme Court, you might find of interest: Rodearmel v. Clinton. That lawsuit was filed in January 2009 on behalf of a 19-year veteran of the Foreign Service Officer under the State Department, David Rodearmel, a retired Lt. Col. in the U.S. Army Reserve Judge Advocate General Corp. While I support and respect Judicial Watch in their pursuit of making sure no one is above the law, I simply did not understand why they didn't use the Quo Warranto for Rodearmel's case.

    The defendants (mother government) moved to dismiss and in their filing, there is an important footnote; number 6 at the bottom of page 25:
    6 "The D.C. Court of Appeals has observed that a plaintiff who seeks to directly attack the appointment of an official (as opposed to attacking an action of that official) will rarely if ever have standing. See Andrade v. Lauer, 729 F.2d 1475, 1496-97 (D.C. Cir. 1984). In the same case, the court suggested that the only proper way to assert such a direct attack is through an action for a writ of quo warranto. See id. at 1497 (citing cases). A quo warranto action may only be brought by the Attorney General of the United States or the United States Attorney or, if these Executive Branch officials decline a request, by a private party who has obtained leave of court. See D.C. Stat. §§ 16-3502-3503; see also Rae v. Johnson, 1993 WL 544295, at *1"
    Footnotes found in legal filings are very important. What the one above says is quite plain and easy enough for even me to understand; let's apply it to Rodearmel. He is attacking the appointment of an official (Hillary Clinton) which the court says "will rarely if ever have standing." Pretty straight forward.

    Exactly why the U.S. Supreme Court denied the writ of certiorari:
    (emphasis below is mine) "ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the District Court dismissed for lack of standing..."
    And:
    "The appeal is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction."

    Does that mean the Supreme Court is saying jurisdiction belongs to the District Court in Washington, DC, under a Quo Warranto? It seems to me that is the case if you read Footnote 6 above:
    "observed that a plaintiff who seeks to directly attack the appointment of an official....the court suggested that the only proper way to assert such a direct attack is through an action for a writ of quo warranto..."
    Going back to Newman v US ex Rel. Frizzell:
    "An interested person within the meaning of the provisions of the District Code in regard to quo warranto proceedings is one who has an interest in the office itself peculiar to himself whether the office be elective or appointive."
    Rodearmel most certainly has an interest in the office (Secretary of State) peculiar to himself (He is an employee of the State Department and the Secretary of State is Hillary Clinton) and it is appointive. But, that case is over and Madame Clinton is still running around the world playing big shot accomplishing nothing. Another "teflon Don" given a pass by the U.S. Senate when they confirmed her appointment even though it is in violation of the emoluments clause of the U.S. Constitution - which many of them knew during the confirmation process.

    If you read the links in my previous column and the ones below, I believe you can understand and possibly agree with me that time and dismissals points to the Quo Warranto as the only legal remedy to remove Obama/Soetoro from office; emphasis below are mine:.
    § 16-3501. Persons against whom issued; civil action.

    A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.
    § 16-3502. Parties who may institute; ex rel. proceedings.

    The Attorney General of the United States or the United States attorney may institute a proceeding pursuant to this subchapter on his own motion or on the relation of a third person. The writ may not be issued on the relation of a third person except by leave of the court, to be applied for by the relator, by a petition duly verified setting forth the grounds of the application, or until the relator files a bond with sufficient surety, to be approved by the clerk of the court, in such penalty as the court prescribes, conditioned on the payment by him of all costs incurred in the prosecution of the writ if costs are not recovered from and paid by the defendant.
    § 16-3503. Refusal of Attorney General or United States attorney to act; procedure.

    If the Attorney General or United States attorney refuses to institute a quo warranto proceeding on the request of a person interested, the interested person may apply to the court by certified petition for leave to have the writ issued. When, in the opinion of the court, the reasons set forth in the petition are sufficient in law, the writ shall be allowed to be issued by any attorney, in the name of the United States, on the relation of the interested person on his compliance with the condition prescribed by section 16-3502 as to security for costs. *End*

    There are a lot of very intelligent attorneys working on the citizenship issue, so I guess we'll have to wait and see what happens with any remaining legal proceedings still on-going as well as the firestorm I believe will hit with Dr. Jerome Corsi's new book due to be shipped May 17, 2011. At the risk of sounding like a broken record, the challenges to get Obama/Soetoro on state ballots in 2012 is probably going to result in more advanced lawsuits this time around, as well as possibly running up against any new laws passed by states requiring citizenship verification for a presidential candidate. Obama/Soetoro's handlers know it and we know it.
    One note in another case:
    Hornbeck v. Salazar: New Court Filings Related To Obama's Usurpation Including An Affidavit Regarding Obama's New Forged Birth Certificate
    "New court filings related to Obama's usurpation including an affidavit regarding his newly released forged birth certificate. The filings below were submitted on 5/11/2011 in Louisiana in the Hornbeck v. Salazar lawsuit which is regarding Obama's order to shut down offshore oil drilling. If the media did their job we would know what happened at yesterday's oral arguments for this case.

    "UPDATE: Via atty. Taitz; Yesterday I had a an oral argument in Hornbeck v Salazar. This case deals with the fact that Obama administration de facto destroyed oil and gas industry in the gulf of Mexico by placing a moratorium and later, when the federal judge placed an injunction on the moratorium, Obama regime continued destroying the oil and gas industry by refusing to grant drilling permits. Most of the rigs left the region and moved to Brazil. Recently Obama visited Brazil and congratulated them on their offshore deep water drilling and stated that US will be their biggest customer, showing him as the the most antiAmerican president this nation ever saw.
    "My argument was that the damages suffered in the case at hand were rooted in the same problem: antiAmerican usurper in the White House, who got there by virtue of fraud and use of a forged birth certificate and invalid Social Security number, issued to another individual in another state."

    This posting is from someone who says he/she attended the oral arguments in the case above; click here. It's my understanding the documents scanned at this link were also submitted in the above case.

    Footnote One


    Links:

    1 - Constitutional Authority of Oregon Judges Challenged Why the "Quo Warranto" issue just will not go away!
    2 - NH Rep. Laurence Rappaport speaks with The Post & Email about Eligibility, the Constitution, and State Sovereignty
    3 - Judge Arthur J. Gonzalez claims right to commit fraud
    4 - THE SCRUBBING OF AMERICA:
    How Professor Lawrence Solum Disgraced Himself To Protect Obama’s Eligibility

    5 - Jeffrey Toobin Issued False Legal Statements to Anderson Cooper Regarding Vattel and the 14th Amendment.
    ---- http://www.devvy.com. You may also sign up for her free email alerts.
    Follow Up On Quo Warranto
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4854
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,266
    Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio says
    President Obama's documents are not authentic




    Sheriff Joe Arpaio exposes forgery of Obama's Selective Service registration

    By FLOYD AND MARY BETH BROWN
    nj.com

    In less than an hour, Arpaio's team laid out a compelling case that individuals working under the President of the United States have engaged in criminal forgery. And most interestingly, the case isn't just about Obama's birth certificate.

    The case against Obama was made with simple, clear videos describing the techniques the forgers used to falsifying important documents released by Obama's team. It was obvious that the law enforcement professionals doing the actual investigation are real pros. If you want the details of the techniques used you can watch the videos on westernjournalism.com.

    The investigation by document forensic experts systematically showed how the document could not be real and is part of a criminal conspiracy to commit fraud.

    But we found the most interesting information presented to have nothing to do with the Obama nativity story. Instead it had to do with the selective service records. Forensic document analysis proved this document was also a forgery. Intensive documentation proving that Postal indicia on the form was forged was particularly damaging, as this type of postal fraud is a federal felony.

    In the days ahead, it will be interesting to see if the mainstream media provides any coverage of the event's allegations. Sitting in the room we were overwhelmed by the professionalism of these sworn officers of the law. They clearly used the best experts in their investigation. Finally a legitimate law enforcement official has looked at the evidence and found, as Arpaio said, "probable cause that a felony has been committed."

    Going forward, Arpaio said that he would continue to investigate. Allusions were made to the existence of over 200 sworn depositions by witnesses in the case, including a witness that, when he met Barack Obama was introduced to him, as a foreign exchange student.

    Read entire article here
    Sheriff Joe Arpaio exposes forgery of Obama's Selective Service registration, the Browns report | NJ.com


    Obama Watch Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio says President Obama's documents are not authentic

  5. #4855
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Quote Originally Posted by Get It Done at orlytaitzesq.com
    Prediction: You know what Joe’s going to do with the findings of his cold case posse? Let it grow cold.

    Watch the official INaction Arpaio takes with those findings. Arpaio will do nothing LEGAL or OFFICIAL with them. Only press conferences and personal appearances. But nothing OFFICIAL, like filing a legal report with the District Attorney, or testifying under oath in a court of law, or anything else of consequence.
    Sheriff Joe has called for a CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION, not for a hearing before a court of law or reporting to the District Attorney. After 80 or so court appearances, we all should realize that the federal criminal justice system is NONFUNCTIONAL about Mr. Obama's Constitutional ineligibility for office.

    In order
    to convince judges to "see things the Chicago way," if visits by the FBI, the Secret Service, or unidentified "Gestapo" agents; threats of audit by the IRS, burial under lawsuits by the U.S. Attorneys, or revocation of licensing by government regulatory agencies; media assassination, destroying of reputation, or defamation by fictitious criminal records and psychiatric history; wrecking of credit and withholding of financing, malicious editing of medical records and insurance history, blacklisting and identity theft, are insufficient persuaders, then the goons may resort to physical coercion or strong-arming. Judges get fittings for "concrete boots," so to speak, in preparation for watery graves; their homes and assets are invisibly but indelibly marked "Condemned"; their wives and children are "painted" with laser targets and huge X's, and their grandchildren are marked for disfigurement and dismemberment.

    Even a Marine, U.S. District Judge David O. Carter, was no match for such evil. Even Dr. Terry Lakin, medical attaché to Army Chief of Staff Gen. Casey,
    was forced to recant his accusations of Mr. Obama's ineligibility, which he knew to be factual and true. LTC Lakin was humiliated during the star chamber inquisition carried out by his own defense attorney, Neil Puckett, in a trial where military judge Col. Denise Lind denied LTC Lakin the opportunity to present his defense, because she ruled his defense argument about an unlawful Commander-in-Chief was beyond the purview of her court (or words to that effect).

    THE COURT SYSTEM IS BROKEN, PEOPLE!!!

    The court system is a dead end for us. There will be no justice for us in federal courts overruled by the Dictator-in-Chief.

    Last night, in a town hall meeting, I challenged a U.S. Representative, "Will you support and defend the U.S. Constitution, Article ii, § 1, ¶ 5, which states that no person except a natural born Citizen... shall be eligible to the Office of President?" He stated twice that he will do so. I repeated strongly, "Will you execute your sworn duty to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5, the natural born Citizen clause?"

    He replied, "I know what you're talking about, but you're not going to win that battle. But, yes, I will support and defend the Constitution."

    I wanted to say, "Lead, follow, or get out of the way! If you're not going to defend the Constitution, INCLUDING Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5, then resign! And let someone else take your place who will do his sworn duty." But I knew it was futile - he had already announced defeat and surrendered the battle - so I just shut up and sat down.

    There will not be free, fair, and honest elections on Nov. 6th... or later in the year, for that matter. The 2008 elections were the closest to chaos ever seen in this country: 99 million registered voters cast 133 million ballots. Not to mention the Al Franken fiasco, where the Democrats lost, but they kept finding and bringing forth ballot boxes with Franken majority counts until Franken "won". Then there were the New Black Panthers physically intimidating Philadelphia voters. A
    nd then again, there was the trashing of absentee votes of deployed military personnel, a traditionally conservative group.

    If that was the state of the elections in 2008, when the Republicans were in power, how much worse will it be this November with the Democrats in control of the government: specifically, the Federal Election Commission, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Dept. of Justice, and the military, unleashed by Sec. 1022 of the FY2012 NDAA
    ?

    The usurpation consists of communists, Is|amists, and those who reject the right and choose lawlessness. Expect more Occupy demonstrations to blossom and flower on May Day, the Hispanic street rallies to be la fiesta del sábado of choice on Cinco de Mayo, and the millions of students who can't find jobs to take to the streets around the first of June.

    With all the (un)civil unrest roiling out and about, the police and the national guards may be overwhelmed before the end of summer, resulting in declaration of martial law and the deployment of the U.S. military troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan in U.S. cities to maintain law and order and restrain looting and burning, using their new FY2012 NDAA authority to unleash armed force against civilians on U.S. streets and in their homes, and against U.S. citizens anywhere, even in the Hindu Kush.

    Expect martial law on Nov. 6th; do NOT expect free, fair, and honest elections. Communists haven't been working since 1920 to take over the United States, just to let go of power without a huge fight.

    Lord, we repent and turn from our wicked ways; we seek Your face.
    Please forgive us and deliver America from destruction.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 03-14-2012 at 01:25 AM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  6. #4856
    Senior Member florgal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,386
    Obama's Presidency Illegal?

    An exhaustive six-month criminal probe into Barack Obama's background has concluded that his Hawaiian birth certificate is fake! That's the sensational result of the investigation by Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse. This issue of GLOBE reveals the shocking proof, and why experts say Obama could be booted from office.



    Globe Magazine - Celebrity, Photos and News

  7. #4857
    Senior Member TexasBorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Getyourassoutahere, Texas
    Posts
    3,783
    No article as you suggested at the link florgal.
    ...I call on you in the name of Liberty, of patriotism & everything dear to the American character, to come to our aid...

    William Barret Travis
    Letter From The Alamo Feb 24, 1836

  8. #4858
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,266

  9. #4859
    Senior Member florgal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,386
    Quote Originally Posted by kathyet View Post
    Thanks kathyet, that's the link. I tried -to no avail - to post the picture of the front of the magazine.

    It's not the actual article as one would have to subscribe to the paper for that. Globe does, however, print what most of the mainstream print media won't, which is acknowledgment of legitimate issues/contradictions/fraud with Obama's documents.

  10. #4860
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Tashman at rightwingwatch.org, an arm of People for the American Way (PFAW)
    Congressman Trent Franks (R-AZ) has been warning anyone who will listen that if President Obama wins re-election he will “crush” religious freedom and “abrogate” the Constitution...
    That would be so "last term."
    Typically, second term presidents
    consolidate their gains from playing nice
    and implement their real agendas at any price.

    Mr. Obama would rather build upon his
    foundation and concretize his legacy by:
    • 1) negotiating a covenant between the nation of Israel and the Ummah of Is|am for seven years of peace, in exchange for a return to the 1967 (or is it 1949?) borders, including surrender of East Jerusalem and the Temple Mount in perpetuity;
    • 2) incrementally implementing a dual legal system of Shari'a law for the faithful and the dhimmis, with automatic, peremptory judgments in favor of the faithful in their conflicts with the kafir, while allowing an exception for common law among the infidels in the case of a legal conflict which is only among themselves.
    • 3) assessing the infidels and dhimmis for U.S. federal liabilities ($15½ Trillion) and unfunded future obligations ($120+ Trillion) *, while parting out (for hard currency) the remaining assets of the United States as spoils:

    the Federal Reserve and its constituent banks to the European financiers, except the printing equipment in the Federal Bureau of Engraving, which is designated for sale to North Korea, following the demise of the Federal Reserve Note and the cessation of the printing of currency by the United States;

    the U.S. armed forces bearing U.S. military armaments, hired out or sold to the highest bidders at auction;

    federal government buildings, military and NASA installations,
    National Monuments, and the utilities infrastructure - water and sewer, electricity, Internet, natural gas, telephone relays and communications satellites - to the highest bidders at auction;

    the National Parks to the Japanese;

    the Interstate Highway System and the ¼-mile wide swath for the NAFTA/SPP Supercorridor, connecting the deep-water port China is building at Lázaro Cárdenas, Mexico, with the inland Port of Entry at Kansas City, Kansas, plus extensions to Winnipeg and other points north, east, and west, to the entrepreneurs and administrators of Spain (e.g. Zachary-Cintras), who (along with the Macquarie Group, based in Australia,) currently lease and maintain the Indiana Turnpike toll road;

    the North Slope of Alaska and its associated oil drilling rights
    to the Russians;

    offshore drilling rights in the Gulf of Mexico
    to Brazil, Venezuela, Mexico, OPEC, and other non-U.S. entrepreneurs;

    the opiate concession to the Taliban, the Myanmar junta, and the existing la Famiglia distribution channel in the West;

    the human trafficking, cocaine, marijuana, methamphetamine, Ecstasy, and illicit prescription drug concession to the Hispanic drug cartels;

    the revived and expanded slave labor trade to the traditional traders in such commodities;

    and to the American people, honest and good, belongs all the gold in Fort Knox.

    There is no mention of the media, which already belong to enemies of the United States, and have for a long, long time.

    The above is, of course, a fictional and conjectural account, which may or may not have anything to do with fact, which should not be relied upon as medical or market advice, which has no other value than for entertainment, and which, if not addressed to you personally, may be permanently deleted from your storage media and your memory. /sarc

    * There is no rush to panic about the astronomical numbers depicting U.S. debt. Just last week, U.S. Rep. I. M. Inthedark stated publicly that if something isn't done soon to balance the budget, the Social Security trust fund will run out in 2041, or was it 2047? Said it with a straight face, he did.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 03-15-2012 at 06:51 PM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •