Thread: Iran prepares for their Messiah

Like everyone else, I wonder if we could be at war with Iran.... soon.
Could it happen at anytime and would we have warning the way we did with Iraq?

Because we are already at war, would President Bush just give an order to go there or does he have to discuss it in advance with Congress?

Originally Posted by LegalUSCitizen

Because we are already at war, would President Bush just give an order to go there or does he have to discuss it in advance with Congress?

LEGAL
Dropping some bunker busters to take out whatever areas we have identified is one thing. However, if the leaders were not finished off completely, the people would turn against us rather than rise up against their dictators & torturers.

Going INTO war in Iran is a horse of another color. And if this dipwad pulls that little trick now {should have done that rather than Iraq!} he should be locked in a nut house.

The time has past when it would have been a plus for us to level the little twits {not the populace, Liz--we're always strategic} and come out smelling sweet.

However, the other nagging problem is that we canNOT allow them to get nukes. You see, that's why we should have taken care of this a long time ago. Between Klinton giving our nuke secrets to China and Pakistan's Kahn getting the tech to China and N. Korea and them getting it to Iran, there's more than one player on the field now but it could have been defused quite a while ago.

Originally Posted by 2ndamendsis

Originally Posted by LegalUSCitizen

Because we are already at war, would President Bush just give an order to go there or does he have to discuss it in advance with Congress?

LEGAL
Dropping some bunker busters to take out whatever areas we have identified is one thing. However, if the leaders were not finished off completely, the people would turn against us rather than rise up against their dictators & torturers.

Going INTO war in Iran is a horse of another color. And if this dipwad pulls that little trick now {should have done that rather than Iraq!} he should be locked in a nut house.

The time has past when it would have been a plus for us to level the little twits {not the populace, Liz--we're always strategic} and come out smelling sweet.

However, the other nagging problem is that we canNOT allow them to get nukes. You see, that's why we should have taken care of this a long time ago. Between Klinton giving our nuke secrets to China and Pakistan's Kahn getting the tech to China and N. Korea and them getting it to Iran, there's more than one player on the field now but it could have been defused quite a while ago.

Well, we always have the option of having Israel do it. They are already at a point that they cannot be hated any more than they currently are by most Muslims.

Originally Posted by CrocketsGhost

Originally Posted by AmericanElizabeth

I was just commenting as some here have talked of using nukes in Iran. I know they may have said it simply out of a sense of frustration with the whole extremist Islamic issue and Iran's prez being a lunatic bent on destroying us.

Crop circles are almost certainly targeting tests of this system. If you want more information on this effect or the system, please make a request via PM.

Your belief in crop circles is, for a lack of a better term, interesting, but surely consistent with, say, your UCC delusions, which I shall address later today.

Originally Posted by CrocketsGhost

Originally Posted by 2ndamendsis

Originally Posted by LegalUSCitizen

Because we are already at war, would President Bush just give an order to go there or does he have to discuss it in advance with Congress?

LEGAL
Dropping some bunker busters to take out whatever areas we have identified is one thing. However, if the leaders were not finished off completely, the people would turn against us rather than rise up against their dictators & torturers.

Going INTO war in Iran is a horse of another color. And if this dipwad pulls that little trick now {should have done that rather than Iraq!} he should be locked in a nut house.

The time has past when it would have been a plus for us to level the little twits {not the populace, Liz--we're always strategic} and come out smelling sweet.

However, the other nagging problem is that we canNOT allow them to get nukes. You see, that's why we should have taken care of this a long time ago. Between Klinton giving our nuke secrets to China and Pakistan's Kahn getting the tech to China and N. Korea and them getting it to Iran, there's more than one player on the field now but it could have been defused quite a while ago.

Well, we always have the option of having Israel do it. They are already at a point that they cannot be hated any more than they currently are by most Muslims.

Crocket

We've muzzled Israel for our 'islamic buddies'........ain't that nice.
Also, with that other idiot that they have for Pres {forgot his name - Jerusalem's mayor} they cut their legs off at their knees. He can't handle it and would make a huge mess of it. He'd rather give the store away and placate their enemies. Sound familiar? Hopefully, someone with sense over there will take the reins.

Originally Posted by 2ndamendsis

Originally Posted by CrocketsGhost

Originally Posted by 2ndamendsis

Originally Posted by LegalUSCitizen

Because we are already at war, would President Bush just give an order to go there or does he have to discuss it in advance with Congress?

LEGAL
Dropping some bunker busters to take out whatever areas we have identified is one thing. However, if the leaders were not finished off completely, the people would turn against us rather than rise up against their dictators & torturers.

Going INTO war in Iran is a horse of another color. And if this dipwad pulls that little trick now {should have done that rather than Iraq!} he should be locked in a nut house.

The time has past when it would have been a plus for us to level the little twits {not the populace, Liz--we're always strategic} and come out smelling sweet.

However, the other nagging problem is that we canNOT allow them to get nukes. You see, that's why we should have taken care of this a long time ago. Between Klinton giving our nuke secrets to China and Pakistan's Kahn getting the tech to China and N. Korea and them getting it to Iran, there's more than one player on the field now but it could have been defused quite a while ago.

Well, we always have the option of having Israel do it. They are already at a point that they cannot be hated any more than they currently are by most Muslims.

Crocket

We've muzzled Israel for our 'islamic buddies'........ain't that nice.
Also, with that other idiot that they have for Pres {forgot his name - Jerusalem's mayor} they cut their legs off at their knees. He can't handle it and would make a huge mess of it. He'd rather give the store away and placate their enemies. Sound familiar? Hopefully, someone with sense over there will take the reins.

Time will tell. The fact is that Israel is about to be faced for the first time with an enemy calling for its annihilation that has the ability to carry out the threat.

Time will tell. The fact is that Israel is about to be faced for the first time with an enemy calling for its annihilation that has the ability to carry out the threat.

Yes, that is absolutely true, CROCKET.

Without leaders, true leaders, they're facing their greatest fear with their pants down around their ankles - tripping at every step.

The mess they made with Lebanon will be the albatross around their neck now. They managed to screw up what could have been a huge positive.
We sure can't be proud of our own State Dept. in this mess either.

No different than Iraq, one should never placate an enemy. Finish it quickly which, in turn, saves lives.

We should have crushed Iran 4 years ago and would have had their good people on their feet, functioning by now. The Persians, for the most part, are an educated people who want modernity.

Originally Posted by 2ndamendsis

Time will tell. The fact is that Israel is about to be faced for the first time with an enemy calling for its annihilation that has the ability to carry out the threat.

Yes, that is absolutely true, CROCKET.

Without leaders, true leaders, they're facing their greatest fear with their pants down around their ankles - tripping at every step.

The mess they made with Lebanon will be the albatross around their neck now. They managed to screw up what could have been a huge positive.
We sure can't be proud of our own State Dept. in this mess either.

No different than Iraq, one should never placate an enemy. Finish it quickly which, in turn, saves lives.

We should have crushed Iran 4 years ago and would have had their good people on their feet, functioning by now. The Persians, for the most part, are an educated people who want modernity.

I agree.

Whatever happened to "shock and awe"? That was the right idea. Devastate the enemy, get the fight over with, then (if necessary) rebuild in the midst of a people traumatized beyond resistance.

Originally Posted by CrocketsGhost

Originally Posted by 2ndamendsis

Time will tell. The fact is that Israel is about to be faced for the first time with an enemy calling for its annihilation that has the ability to carry out the threat.

Yes, that is absolutely true, CROCKET.

Without leaders, true leaders, they're facing their greatest fear with their pants down around their ankles - tripping at every step.

The mess they made with Lebanon will be the albatross around their neck now. They managed to screw up what could have been a huge positive.
We sure can't be proud of our own State Dept. in this mess either.

No different than Iraq, one should never placate an enemy. Finish it quickly which, in turn, saves lives.

We should have crushed Iran 4 years ago and would have had their good people on their feet, functioning by now. The Persians, for the most part, are an educated people who want modernity.

I agree.

Whatever happened to "shock and awe"? That was the right idea. Devastate the enemy, get the fight over with, then (if necessary) rebuild in the midst of a people traumatized beyond resistance.

CROCKET
Shock and Awe:
This mess lands in the lap of the CFR and James Baker {and his CFR institute}

There is an unbelievable amount of info concerning their "reports" but one of the telling and most amazing pieces was concerning destabilizing OPEC. This 'report' was written BEFORE we went into Iraq.

Baker and cabal are nothing more than the CFR waterboys, with the 'institute' out of Texas {as you already know} created to push the CFR policies en toto into the government.

Many questions concerning everything from Iraq to the SPP/NAU etc. can be answered among the papers from the Baker Institute.

It's massive and time consuming........but what I have researched is mind boggling. They have their hands in everything from science to ILLEGALS/open borders. Nothing, absolutely nothing is left out of their perview. Not a section of society has been untouched by the CFR policies thru Baker's cabal. Throw in Bush and gang's Carlyle, Klintons and their gang, add Kissinger and it encompasses the entire world and it's domination.