Thread: WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE???

Bill Clinton Defends Hillary On Benghazi - Brings up Diplomats Murdered Under Bush

Brendan Bordelon May 14, 2014

Former President Bill Clinton defended Hillary Clinton’s handling of the Benghazi attacks during her tenure as secretary of state, noting that “most Americans don’t even know how many American diplomatic personnel were killed when President Bush was president.”

Clinton spoke Wednesday at the Peter G. Peterson Foundation’s fiscal summit — portions of which were aired on MSNBC’s “Ronan Farrow Daily” — frequently mentioning his wife as the Democratic power couple gears up for a Hillary presidential campaign in 2016.

The former Arkansas governor laughed off speculation, touched off earlier this week by Karl Rove, that Hillary might be in poor health. “First they said she faked her concussion, and now they say she’s auditioning for a part on ‘The Walking Dead,’” he cracked.

“You can’t be too upset about it,” he continued. “This is just the beginning, they’ll get better and better at it. I mean, you know — I’m still waiting for them to admit there was nothing to Whitewater.”

But Bill became more serious when discussing Benghazi, somberly asserting that his wife did the best she could in a tough circumstance.

“In my opinion, Hillary did what she should of done,” he said, noting the former secretary of state quickly empaneled a committee to look into diplomatic security.

“They made 29 recommendations — she took them and started implementing them,” Clinton claimed. “And they established the fact that, whether it was right or wrong, in the past secretaries of state never were involved directly in these security decisions.”

The former president also pointedly suggested the Republican investigation is largely driven by politics. “Most Americans don’t even know how many American diplomatic personnel were killed when President Bush was president,” he said.

Ambassador Chris Stevens, murdered in Benghazi during the September 11, 2012 attack, was the first ambassador to be killed in the line of duty since 1979.

Much of the Republican questions on the attack concern the administration’s changing narrative and what the State Department was doing in Benghazi when most other Western outposts had already retreated from the dangerous city.

Source
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.
You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/05/bi...poLCosD2uwC.99

Excuses Excuse Excuses...give it up!!!! Maybe we need to ask this man and his wife about the Obama election, and how they both protected the American People and this Country so well. And also what did they know and when did they know about Obama !!!!!

The More We Learn via Gowdy’s Benghazi Investigation – The Closer We are to Martial Law

Tony Elliott 13 mins ago

The attack on the US Consultant in Benghazi, Libya on September 11,2012 which killed Ambassador J Christopher Stevens and US Foreign Service information Management Officer Sean Smith, 2 CIA operatives (confirmed by then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton), and two Navy SEALs, SO1 Glen Doherty and SOCS Ty Woods was carried out by terrorist groups related to Al Qaeda.

The whole scenario of the Benghazi incident seems cut and dry to most Americans, our Consulate was attacked by terrorists, resulting in the deaths of 6 Americans. So why the lies and cover up from the Obama Administration?

The answer is because there is a lot more to Benghazi than meets the eye. First of all, this was a blatant attack on Americans, not a protest that got out of hand in connection with the YouTube video, Innocence of Muslims, as we were told by the Administration shortly after the incident.
Secondly, we all know the Administration was aware of what was going on from the beginning. Yet, President Obama lied by saying the Administration was unaware of the attack until after the fact.

Thirdly, pleas for help were ignored.

Lastly, the Administration continues to cover up and dodge questioning concerning the events in Benghazi.

The real answer to why the Obama Administration is covering this up isn't just because of the seemingly incompetent reaction to the incident at the time, but because the Administration is trying to keep their acts of treason from going public.

Since Trey Gowdy was appointed to head up an investigation into the Benghazi incident, President Obama has since hired a criminal attorney. This in itself shows us that he knows this is going to be trouble big time.

The Obama Administration couldn't very well help the Americans under siege in Benghazi because the very terrorist organization, Al Qaeda, responsible for it was at the time being helped by the US in the form of receiving arms, billions of dollars in aid, and actual military help. This had been going on since 2010 and really kicked in 3-19-2011 when US lead NATO forces invaded Libya, helping terrorist factions as Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood oust the Muammar Gaddafi regime.

The entire Arab Spring demonstrations and rise to power of terrorist organizations throughout the Mid-East during this time can be attributed to the US involvement.

The same is happening with the situation in Ukraine presently.

The Obama Administration's rush to bomb Syria's Bashar al-Assad Regime in the fall of 2013 was also to help his terrorist friends into power. These are the same terrorist organizations responsible for the deaths of Americans in Benghazi.

The fact that the Obama Administration was helping these terrorist organizations during the time of the Benghazi massacre and because the two Navy SEALs protecting the compound refused to stand down as told by the Administration also answers the question of why the military purge of top brass in 2013. The truth is Obama could not have the people in charge of making decisions at the top level who were privy to his acts of treason in Benghazi.

The closer to the truth we get via the Gowdy investigations, the closer we get to Martial Law. Benghazi and the Administration's overall support of terrorist organizations around the world are the reasons for all the Executive Orders giving Obama complete control over all domestic activity. It's also why such Socialist laws as National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), giving the President complete control of everything, similar to a Dictatorship, was signed into law on 12/26/2013.

The President's treasonous acts are also the reason we American citizens are the focal point in the NSA and CIA domestic spying over the last few years. We are the threat Obama has to keep an eye on because we, as citizens, will not tolerate having him in office when we know the extent of his involvement in traitorous activity around the world.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/05/le...ladhs3qgrxS.99

We need to call it what it is it is treason, and demand action.... wake up America!!!

Lyndon LaRouche Webcast, May 16th, 2014



Published on May 17, 2014
The Full length webcast from May 9th, 2014.

For more information go to http://larouchepac.com/ or call 800-929-7566.
Follow us at http://www.facebook.com/LaRouchePAC & http://twitter.com/larouchepac

http://www.alipac.us/f19/lyndon-laro...office-302524/

Thank you AirborneSapper7

This is a good video the only problem is he like's Bill and Hillary.....They are not the solution but they surely are part of the problem!!!


Thoreau them out!


Don’t just “throw” the bums out. THOREAU THEM OUT!






http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/

Watch This Video Of Trey Gowdy's Greatest Hits That's Going Viral!

Click to watch...

Hillary Clinton – The Apple Doesn’t Fall Far from the Tree

The Common Constitutionalist 1 hour ago

We all know the old saying: "The apple doesn't fall far from the tree." I hope we all know its meaning; that despite our best efforts and intentions, most of us grow up to morph into our parents. We develop similar habits, similar traits.

It's also true that a good kid is usually a reflection of good parents and a bad kid is the result of bad parenting. Apparently this is true of Hillary Clinton.

Hillary's much anticipated (tongue in cheek) memoir is being released in a few weeks. In it, she paints quite a rosy picture of her dear sainted mother, Dorothy Rodham.

This is a bit strange and at odds with what author Jerry Oppenheimer wrote of mama Rodham in his Clinton biography more than 10 years ago.
Oppenheimer learned of Hillary's rewrite of history from an excerpt of Hillary's memoir recently published in Vogue magazine.

He granted an interview with MailOnline where he told them that according to his research – this was not the same Dorothy Rodham he documented in the biography. "It just isn't a true picture of a woman who, like most everyone, also had a dark side, which emerged in interviews with family members who knew her well."

Witnesses told Oppenheimer that Dorothy Rodham would often say, "Oh, those damn Jews are so cheap" and "That Jew has to watch every dime." It's odd that Dorothy Rodham's father was Jewish and her own mother often called her husband a "cheap Jew bastard." Wow – nice family!

Now, we've all known people that don't seem to be happy unless they're miserable – always angry about something.

Well, according to Oppenheimer – that is Hillary's mother. One of Dorothy Rodham's nephews told Oppenheimer that, "It seems like she [Dorothy] can't get along in life and why she's really pissed at someone."

Hillary's cousin Oscar Dowdy says, "Hillary is Dorothy's daughter. It's unfortunate. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree. To me, Hillary and Dorothy have a lot of likenesses."

And we have been witness to this from her treatment of Israel, as Secretary of State, to are often reported "hot temper" behind closed doors in the White House, to her obstinate arrogance directed at Congress during the Benghazi hearings.

Dowdy added: "I don't think they take anybody's feelings into consideration. What's good for them is good – nothing else matters."

And this is what we want in our next president? Yet another angry, self-centered, megalomaniacal leftist. Yet, another president who cares only about themselves, not the country. A president who cares only about his or her progressive legacy. As we've seen in Obama, this is not a recipe for success.

Although, if the measure of success is to tear the country down and rebuild it in one's image, I guess you could say this is a success.

In my opinion, one Obama in a lifetime is more than enough.

And as awful as Obama is – Hillary, I fear, would likely be even worse, if that's possible.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/05/hi...yCYd8mop3Z2.99

But as far as Hillary thinks "What difference does it make".