Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Originally Posted by Peggy Keller, commenting at the 'Sacramento Bee'

No court in the united states would ever require any original document. A certified copy is acceptable. ... if you think Obama or any one else in this country has to show up with his original for any reason, you're delusional.

Ga. judge orders president to appear at hearing - Sacramento News - Local and Breaking Sacramento News | Sacramento Bee

And if you, Peggy Keller, think Mr. Obama's State of Hawaii birth documents, if such even exist, are safer in the custody of the Hawaii Dept. of Health and DOH Director Loretta Fuddy than in the custody of the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings and Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi... no, I won't take such a cheap shot.

Only the paper original can be verified as genuine by forensic examination, which involves feeling the embossed seal and examining the indentations for out-of-spec characteristics; weighing the sheet of paper, measuring the paper thickness, and comparing them to specifications; checking the ink penetration of signatures and examining the impression in the paper made by various typed (or copy-and-pasted) characters; estimating the age of the paper and trimming off an imperceptible sliver of the paper to determine fiber content, to expose anti-counterfeiting colored layers, and to be burned for destructive analysis; plus more tests than I wish to reveal to Obots.

And how does one validate a hologram, embossing, or even a watermark, with a certified copy? Hmmmm?

Document forgery analysts and counterfeit examiners do these tests every day, in addition to the tests every bank teller has to perform on every hundred dollar bill. And every day, courts in the U.S. demand original documents for forensic examination, e.g., for child custody, insurance claims, securities fraud, check kiting, disputed wills, contracts, and copyrights, military enlistments, security clearances, identity theft... the list of documents for which an original is required goes on and on and on.

Any novice can look at a three dollar bill - like the April 27, 2011, long form forgery, a computer picture fabricated with layers and kerned text printed by a computer, which a typewriter could not create - and recognize at a glance that it is, prima facie, as bogus as... a three dollar bill.

But only examination of the original can validate a document as authentic and legitimate.

Yet the Obama legal team will almost certainly attempt to confuse the two types, fake and original, to IMPLY and COMMUNICATE (without actually saying it under oath), "Any EXPERT can look at a picture of an original and validate it as authentic and legitimate." That will certainly be testimony with intent to deceive and a LIE under oath, a.k.a. PERJURY.

Wait for it... Watch for it... Expose it for what it is - felony perjury.

Re: Deputy Chief Judge Malihi, Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings

If or when Mr. Obama fails to comply with the court subpoena for proof of eligibility to be on the State of Georgia Democratic Primary ballot, what can Judge Malihi do?


Within the state of Georgia, State of Georgia Deputy Chief Judge Michael M. Malihi can do whatever the law directs.

If Mr. Obama fails to show, he can be declared ineligible by default for the Georgia ballot.

Or, if Mr. Obama does show and when he fails to prove his eligibility for the Office of President, he can be declared ineligible for the Georgia ballot.

Or, if Mr. Obama declares martial law in the state of Georgia and places the Georgia National Guard under federal authority, he can still be declared ineligible for the Georgia ballot.

Or, if Mr. Obama indefinitely detains as terrorists Judge Malihi and dissidents in Georgia when the NDAA takes effect on Feb. 29th, the State of Georgia can directly appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court about the transparently obvious unconstitutionality of the FY2012 NDAA (pp. 265-266), based on Amendments IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII,
and Mr. Obama can be declared ineligible for the Georgia ballot on general principles.



"Innocent until proven guilty" does not mean "eligible for the ballot until proven otherwise." In _Bute v. Illinois_ (333 U.S. 653), the U.S. Supreme Court opined,

"... the federal sphere of government has been largely limited to certain delegated powers. The burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States or the prohibition of power to the states is upon those making the claim."

The burden of proof of establishing a delegation of power to the government of the United States is upon Mr. Obama, the person making the claim for or unto himself of that delegation of federal power, viz., the Presidency.

Obama Presidential Eligibility - An Introductory Primer

http://www.forumsforums.com/3_9/arch...p/t-47271.html

Judge orders President to appear in court




Georgia judge orders Obama
to court on citizenship complaint

Atlanta Business Chronicle

A Georgia judge has ordered President Barack Obama to appear in court Thursday in Atlanta for a hearing on a complaint he isn’t a natural-born citizen and should not be on the state’s primary ballot in March, reports the Columbus Ledger-Enquirer.

A Georgia resident made the complaint that prompted the order. It is one of many such complaints made across the country. So far, none of the complaints have been successful.

An Obama campaign aide said any attempts to involve the president personally will fail and that such complaints have no merit, the newspaper reported.

Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi on Friday denied a motion by the president’s lawyer to quash a subpoena that requires Obama to show up, the Ledger-Enquirer said.

Read original here Georgia judge orders Obama to court on citizenship complaint - Atlanta Business Chronicle

I'm sure the President would prefer not to go, his lawyer put
forward a motion to quash the subpoena, but a Georgia judge has
denied the motion.

The hearing is on a complaint that Barack Obama is not a
natural-born citizen and should not be on the state's primary
ballot in March.

Now that the Obama has offered up a digitally altered version of a
birth certificate through the White House website, it should be
interesting to see what comes of this...

Video:

Obama Watch Judge orders President to appear in court

Goodman Green
- Brasscheck

P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and
videos with friends and colleagues.

That's how we grow. Thanks.

More articles at the link below


Meroni V ISBE is in Court!
Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:00 | Written by Sharon Meroni | PDF | Print | E-mail
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The issues involved in the US Citizenship challenge have been discussed before and can be found at this link. In summary, the process for getting on the ballot in Illinois does not provide proof or verification that candidates are US Citizens as required by the US and Illinois Constitutions. There is a 5 day objection period where a candidate’s application for ballot can be questioned by any registered voter in that candidate’s electoral jurisdiction.


Last December, I challenged all 5 candidates in both the 52nd House District and the 26th Senate District. These 4 Republicans and 1 Democrat applied for placement on the Primary ballot. Through our attorney, Steve Boulton, we challenged their placement on the ballot on grounds that their application did not provide proof that they are US Citizens. All 5 responded essentially that they had complied with the law and therefore they should be on the ballot.


In the circular reasoning that only politicians can spin in contorted election laws, the candidates were willing to show proof, but the Board of Elections cannot ask for it, because it is not mandated in the statues. There is literally no point in the process when a candidate’s citizenship is allowed to be questioned or verified. Candidates affirm in a signed and notarized statement that they are legally qualified. Proof of that statement is not available in the public record.



As expected, during the hearings before the Illinois State Board of Elections, our attorney, Steve Boulton, stipulated that the candidates could not provide proof, nor could the Board demand it. Based on the testimony of the lawyers representing the 5 candidates, the lawyers agreed the code is flawed because there is no verification of citizenship in the public record.


The Hearing officer, Barbara Goodman recommended the objections be overruled, and the candidates placed on the ballot. The Illinois State Board of Elections affirmed the decision. The law allows 5 days for the failed objector to file for a “Judicial Review to an Administrative Decision.”


Last week, Steve Boulton filed this petition, and we go to Court this afternoon at 2pm. Steve Boulton’s filing gets to the constitutional issues involved in this matter. In this action, we only included the two Senate candidates. This review takes place in the Cook County Court’s County Division. The petition can be read on Scribd.


Our next step is in Cook County Court. Tomorrow at 2pm, the Judge will set a fast paced schedule to hear arguments. I do not expect anything else to come from this court date.


For more information, Cal Skinner from McHenry County Blog has covered this issue.


This particular Defend the Vote action is co-sponsored by the US Justice Foundation which provides funding and legal expertise to assure this important constitutional issue is addressed.


Meroni V ISBE

Between Mr. Obama and attorney Michael Jablonski,
the scoffers' contempt for the law knows no bounds.

Obama attorney to boycott ‘birther’ hearing
January 25th, 2012, 4:26 pm · ·
posted by Martin Wisckol, Politics reporter, the Orange County Register, Santa Ana, Calif.

Scoffing at a judge’s call for Barack Obama to appear in court Thursday, Obama attorney Michael Jablonski says that not only will the president not be on hand but neither will Jablonski.

The lawsuit, in which several Georgia voters are represented by Laguna Niguel attorney Orly Taitz, calls for Obama to be removed from Georgia’s March 6 primary ballot on the grounds that he doesn’t meet the requirement of being a natural-born citizen.

Jablonski wrote Georgia’s secretary of state to intervene and dismiss the suit.

“All issues were presented to your hearing officer – the clear-cut decision to be on the merits, and the flagrantly unethical and unprofessional conduct of counsel – and he has allowed the plaintiffs’ counsel to run amok,” Jablonski wrote. “He has not even addressed these issues—choosing to ignore them.

“We await your taking the requested action, and as we do so, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26.”

Taitz responded promptly on her blog.

“He is acting like a 5-year-old brat, saying ‘I am afraid of Orly, I want the secretary of state of Georgia to act like my mommy and protect me from Orly,’” she wrote. “Some leader of a free world.”

On Friday, Taitz’s string of failed lawsuits challenging Obama’s birth status was interrupted by a rare – if incremental – courtroom victory when Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi dismissed Jablonski’s request to quash Taitz’s subpoena to have Obama appear.

Malihi wrote that Obama’s court filings fail to show why his attendance would be “unreasonable or oppressive” or why his testimony would be “irrelevant, immaterial or cumulative.”

The White House has announced that Obama would be amid a campaign swing through several states on Thursday. Georgia is not among the states listed.

The state Democratic Party also announced it would boycott the hearing.

“They can tilt at windmills on their own,” said state party spokesman Eric Gray, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution‘s Jim Galloway.

Obama attorney to boycott ‘birther’ hearing - Total Buzz - The Orange County Register : The Orange County Register

Michael Jablonski's contempt of court is like spitting in Judge Malihi's face, or like a poker player saying, "I call your raise, and I'll raise it to 'all in,' except for this 5 pounds of nickel-plated steel. Now, put up or shut up."

But he has a big problem. The judge is a representative of the law, and not the power of the law in his person. The U.S. Attorneys are unavailable to Mr. Obama as an individual civilian for his personal election dispute. Jablonski is only Mr. Obama's private attorney, but State of Georgia Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi has the backing of Governor Nathan Deal and the full weight of the state of Georgia. That's sorta like a bicycle playing chicken at a RR crossing with a 100 mph freight train.

Jablonski knows that he will lose. Listen to his quavering voice! He just doesn't want to go into a courtroom that he might not even be able to leave as a free man. In the future, he may have to avoid flying through Atlanta's Hartsfield Airport on his way to all points southeast.

Jablonski's failure to appear will cause Mr. Obama to lose ballot placement in Georgia BY DEFAULT... not that Mr. Obama has any hope of winning Georgia's 15 electoral votes, anyway. But their no-show speaks volumes about how defenseless on the merits Mr. Obama is.

If the sheeple propaganda agencies maintain media silence about this double no-show, then not appearing may be the best option for the White House Mob. Certainly no fine will cause them a moment's pause, and the loss of one state as a vacation destination shouldn't be a problem for a man who begins campaigning for Emperor of the World on Nov. 7th. Mr. Obama will lose access to some of the best golf courses, though - from Atlanta to Savannah, and from Augusta National to Saint Simons Island and Sea Island.

Even without the oath-bound truth, such consequences create a real motivation for patriots in other states to find a state judge who will subpoena Mr. Obama to appear in court. Can anyone locate judges with the courage of Georgia Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi in Hawaii, Illinois, and/or the District of Columbia?

Benjamin Franklin's letter to Charles William Frederic Dumas, thanking him for a copy of Vattel

Benjamin Franklin to To: Charles William Frederic Dumas

Dear Sir,
Philadelphia, 9 December, 1775.

I received your several favors, of May 18th, June 30th, and July 8th, by Messrs. Vaillant and Pochard;(1) whom if I could serve upon your recommendation, it would give me great pleasure. Their total want of English is at present an obstruction to their getting any employment among us; but I hope they will soon obtain some knowledge of it. This is a good country for artificers or farmers; but gentlemen of mere science in les belles lettres cannot so easily subsist here, there being little demand for their assistance among an industrious people, who, as yet, have not much leisure for studies of that kind.

I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the law of nations. Accordingly that copy, which I kept, (after depositing one in our own public library here, and sending the other to the College of Massachusetts Bay, as you directed,) has been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress, now sitting, who are much pleased with your notes and preface, and have entertained a high and just esteem for their author. Your manuscript "Idee sur le Gouvernement et la Royaute" is also well relished, and may, in time, have its effect. I thank you, likewise, for the other smaller pieces, which accompanied Vattel. "Le court Expose de ce qui s'est passe entre la Cour Britannique et les Colonies," bc. being a very concise and clear statement of facts, will be reprinted here for the use of our new friends in Canada. The translations of the proceedings of our Congress are very acceptable. I send you herewith what of them has been farther published here, together with a few newspapers, containing accounts of some of the successes Providence has favored us with. We are threatened from England with a very powerful force, to come next year against us.(2) We are making all the provision in our power here to oppose that force, and we hope we shall be able to defend ourselves. But, as the events of war are always uncertain, possibly, after another campaign, we may find it necessary to ask the aid of some foreign power.

Continued at Letters of delegates to Congress, 1774-1789, Volume 2, September 1775-December 1775

Georgia Sec. of State Brian P. Kemp reiterates the danger if Mr. Obama (or
his legal representative) fails to appear before Judge Malihi on Jan. 26, 2012:
"please understand that you do so at your own peril."

Originally Posted by Georgia Sec. of State Brian Kemp

Georgia Secretary of State
The Office of Secretary of State

January 25, 2012

VIA REGULAR MAIL & EMAIL
Michael Jablonski
260 Brighton Road, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
michael.jablonski at comcast dot com

RE: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings

Dear Mr. Jablonski:

I received your letter expressing your concerns with the manner in which the Office of State Administrative Hearings ("OSAH") has handled the candidate challenges involving your client and advising me that you and your client will "suspend" participation in the administrative proceeding. While I regret that you do not feel that the proceedings are appropriate, my referral of this matter to an administrative law judge at OSAH was in keeping with Georgia law, and specifically O.C.G.A. §21-2-5.

As you are aware, OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.17 cited in your letter only applies to parties to a hearing. As the referring agency, the Secretary of State's Office is not a party to the candidate challenge hearings scheduled for tomorrow. To the extent a request to withdraw the case referral is procedurally available, I do not believe such a request would be judicious given the hearing is set for tomorrow morning.

In following the procedures set forth in the Georgia Election Code, I expect the administrative law judge to report his findings to me after his full consideration of the evidence and law. Upon receipt of the report, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge. Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my
review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.

I certainly appreciate you contacting me about your concerns, and thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,


Brian P. Kemp


cc: Hon. Michael Malihi (c/o Kim Beal - kbeal at osah dot ga dot gov)
Van Irion, Esq. (van at libertylegalfoundation dot org)
Orly Taitz, Esq. (orly.taitz at gmail dot com)
Mark Hatfield, Esq. (mhatfield at wayxcable dot com)
Stefan Ritter, Esq. (sritter at law dot ga dot gov)
Ann Brumbaugh, Esq. (abrumbaugh at law dot ga dot gov)

214 State Capitol ● Atlanta, Georgia ● 30334 ● (404) 656-2881 ● (404) 656-0513 Fax
Georgia Secretary of State

http://www.scribd.com/doc/79405341/Obama-s-Attorney-Jaberwoki-Slapped-Down-By-Georgia-SOS-1-25-2012

Video of the hearings begins at 9 am EST.

THE FOLLOWING IS A RUNNING ACCOUNT OF THE CASE BROUGHT BY ATTY. ORLY TAITZ BEFORE JUDGE MICHAEL MALIHI IN GEORGIA ADMINISTATIVE STATE COURT ON JAN. 26, 2012.

10:16 am - The plaints brought by Atty. Van Irion and Atty. Mark Hatfield having been presented, Judge Michael Malihi introduces the case brought by Atty. Orly Taitz

There is no defense attorney present, so the testimony of the witnesses proceeds without objection.

Larry Farrar was to present a video of his evidence, but the judge said that he didn't need to hear that.

Strunk presents his evidence.

Susan Daniels presents the evidence of Social Security fraud on the SSN ending with "4425". SSN fraud is common among non-citizens wishing to pose as citizens.

10:30 am - Papa presents the evidence of fabrication on the April 27, 2011, purported Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth for Barack Obama II.

10:35 am - Jordan presents the evidence from e-Verify showing that the government does not recognize the number ending with "4425" as a valid SSN.

10:39 am - presents evidence about the technical problems in the purported Hawaii Certificate.

10:48 am - Hudson (?) presents evidence about the SSN being spurious and the purported Certificate having several disqualifying defects.

11:03 am - In the absence of objecting defense counsel, Atty. Orly Taitz takes the stand as a sworn witness to present Social Security fraud evidence.

11:04 am - Becoming bogged down in the details presented by Dr. Taitz, Judge Malihi directs that she present this to him in its written.form. The audience in the courtroom and those receiving the video feed are most likely quite familiar with the evidence she presents, but this does limit the public dissemination of the many, many pages of evidence against Mr. Obama.

11:10 am - There being no opposition, no objections, no cross-examination of witnesses, and no defense witnesses or testimony, the hearing lasts less than an hour. Without announcing when he would return his judgment, Judge Malihi declares the hearing concluded.
_______________________

Judge Malihi appeared to be impartial, in that he allowed the evidence to be entered into the record, yet he showed no favor to Dr. Taitz, and he required her to make her statements with legal rigor. That should help in case of an appeal to a superior court.

Dr. Taitz neither made an impassioned appeal nor did she tie together the witnesses' testimonies in a closing argument. Without a summation to logically organize all the information presented and to "tell them what she told them," her evidence had minimal impact.

Dr. Taitz had been seeking a translator for an Indonesian witness, who did not appear today. A translator may not have been available.

And Dr. Taitz's surprise witness was ... ???

here is a live feed link.

but he won't show he is in Las vegas as I write this

Georgia Live Stream Video | Article II Super PAC

Watched the whole proceeding but had difficulty with the audio quality. Surprise witness??