Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

December 24, 2013

Did the White House just inadvertently confirm Obama ID fraud?

Jason Kissner

President Obama's personal data is "not in particular government data bases" so his identity cannot be [COLOR=#11B000 !important]verified. And this according to White House sources. Huh? What kind of data? And what kind of president cannot have his identity verified. And this little disclosure comes just as Americans are turning off the news to an extent that makes the classic "Friday afternoon data dump" look like publicity-seeking.

By way of the Gateway Pundit, Ed Henry of FoxNews:

We learned today from the White House... initially, they said he signed up for what they called a bronze plan, paying about four hundred dollars a month in premiums . But, then they came back to us and said - Wait, he didn't actually enroll. They said his staff did it and that's because of his unique circumstance [obviously] as Commander in Chief. That his personal information is not in particular government data bases. So healthcare.gov could not actually verify his identity, oddly enough... So his staff did it." [emphasis added]

Here are some simple questions:

Does Obama file his tax returns by way of sending staff to a DC IRS building?

If not, why not?

Doesn't the integrity of Obama's tax returns relate to security risks?

Or, is Obama's information in IRS databases and not other federal agency databases accessed by HHS?

If this is true, precisely what other databases accessed by HHS do not contain Obama's information, and why not if his information is in the IRS database?

Are these other databases less secure than IRS databases, and if so in what ways and why?

Alternatively, has the White House just inadvertently acknowledged that there are grave problems related to Obama's identity, and that it is intellectually and/or morally incapable of distinguishing these problems from "genuine" security issues?

Is Obama himself a "security issue" that for some reason doesn't implicate the IRS, and might this in turn have to do with the "phony" IRS scandal


Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/...#ixzz2oUmncTS1

Today's lesson, boys & girls, comes in the form of the finest "reduction ad absurdum," courtesy of the incomparable DOCTOR ZERO -- Bravissimo!!

To wit: The ∅bama Administration = GILBERT & SULLIVAN *FARCE*

OBAMA FINALLY SIGNS UP FOR OBAMACARE, SORT OF

http://www.humanevents.com/2013/12/2...acare-sort-of/ [~CH]


MINION_HORDE_SMALL

Even the Minions are confused

DOCTOR ZERO - CAPTAIN ZERO = Same Thing / Same Outcome

The D.C. Clothesline


Oklahoma Congressman Admits Obama ID Fraud... But Also Says "I don't even give a sh*t"

http://dcclothesline.com/2013/08/10/...en-give-a-sht/

Oklahoma Congressman Admits Obama ID Fraud... But Also Says "I don't even give a sh*t" |
dcclothesline.com
Freshman Congressman Markwayne Mullin took an oath to defend the constitution. We don’t defend the constitution only when it’s



Freshman Congressman Markwayne Mullin took an oath to defend the constitution. We don’t defend the constitution only when it’s convenient or when it will not embarrass us. We defend it all the time. Congressman Mullin (OK-2nd District) may be regretting his decision to schedule Town Hall meetings all over the State of Oklahoma for August 8th and 9th because it was at one of these small gatherings that he ran into the self-proclaimed “birther princess.”
The birther princess asked a simple question, “What do you know about Obama’s identification fraud?”
Mullin immediately went on the defensive and his stance is that, “We lost that argument November 6th.”
When the “birther princess” tried to present a copy of Mike Zullo’s 71-page affidavit, Mullin lost his cool momentarily as said “I don’t even give a shit.”


http://dcclothesline.com/2013/08/10/...en-give-a-sht/

Media Research Center added a new photo.

Something to think about...~Paladin

Breaking: Sen. Ted Cruz Hires Lawyers To Renounce His Canadian Citizenship

Sen. Ted Cruz Hires Lawyers

To Renounce His Canadian Citizenship

Hinterland Gazette reports: Birther Watch: Sen. Cruz Hires Lawyers to Renounce Canadian Citizenship

Sen. Ted Cruz said he has hired lawyers to renounce his Canadian citizenship and show his followers how “American” he really is, unlike the Kenyan Muslim Socialist in the White House. The Dallas Morning News reports that Sen. Cruz was “unaware of his dual nationality” until the newspaper reported it this past August.
[...] - Hinterland Gazette.

Dallas News reports: Ted Cruz says he’s hired lawyers to renounce Canadian citizenship

WASHINGTON — The junior senator from Texas is still a Canadian. But he’s working on it, eh?

Born in Alberta 43 years ago last Sunday, Sen. Ted Cruz was unaware of his dual nationality until The Dallas Morning News explored the issue in August.

Since then, he said in a recent interview, “I have retained counsel that is preparing the paperwork to renounce the citizenship.”

He expects to complete the process in 2014. That time frame jibes with predictions from Canadian legal experts.

He doesn’t dispute holding dual citizenship. “Not at this point,” he said. [...] Dallas Morning News.

REALITY: Constitutional Law Professor Explains What Natural Born Citizen Really Means - VIDEO HERE.
FLASHBACK: Fox News Declares Canadian-born Sen. Ted Cruz Ineligible To Be President - VIDEO HERE.

PREVIOUS REPORTS: http://www.birtherreport.com/search?q=Ted+Cruz

NBC FACTS: http://www.birtherreport.com/search?...l+Born+Citizen

FACTS DON'T LIE:

Irrefutable Proof That Foreign-Born Persons Not Eligible To Be POTUS by ObamaRelease YourRecords

Russ Cannon commented: Doesn't matter what he does as an adult as far as his citizenship. U have to be a natural born citizen at birth. U cannot become a natural born citizen as an adult. It's what u r at birth.
nbC = born here [on U.S. soil] to [U.S.] citizen parents.

www.birtherreport.com/2013/12/breaking-sen-ted-cruz-hires-lawyers-to.html

[ED.: Off topic, but related to removing Mr. Obama from the Office of President. I will delete it upon request by other than an Obot.]

Obama Lied About Syrian Sarin Gas Attack;
"Cherry-Picked" Facts To Justify
Military Action Against Assad

• Posted by Van Guard on December 10, 2013 at 10:08pm

Seymour Hersh, at Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas (Photo: Wikipedia)

Pulitzer Prize winning Investigative reporter Seymour Hersh has authored an article in the London Review of Books, in which he makes the case that Obama (and his Secretary of State, John Kerry) lied to the American people about allegations that the Syrian Assad regime had used Sarin gas against its own people, in order to justify taking military action against the Syrian regime. Hersh made the assertions in an article titled "Whose Sarin?" According to Hersh:

"...Barack Obama did not tell the whole story this autumn when he tried to make the case that Bashar al-Assad was responsible for the chemical weapons attack near Damascus on 21 August. In some instances, he omitted important intelligence, and in others he presented assumptions as facts. Most significant, he failed to acknowledge something known to the US intelligence community: that the Syrian army is not the only party in the country’s civil war with access to sarin, the nerve agent that a UN study concluded – without assessing responsibility – had been used in the rocket attack. In the months before the attack, the American intelligence agencies produced a series of highly classified reports, culminating in a formal Operations Order – a planning document that precedes a ground invasion – citing evidence that the al-Nusra Front, a jihadi group affiliated with al-Qaida, had mastered the mechanics of creating sarin and was capable of manufacturing it in quantity. When the attack occurred al-Nusra should have been a suspect, but the administration cherry-picked intelligence to justify a strike against Assad..."

The Hersh allegations add gasoline to the fire of widespread and growing public perceptions about Obama and his administration's diminished credibility due to his having lied to Americans about what they should have expected from ObamaCare, including the failed roll-out of the ObamaCare web site weeks ago, and a host of scandals that continue to plague the White House: The failed "Fast and Furious" Gun Running scandal; Benghazi; the IRS targeting of the Tea Party and Conservatives; the NSA Spying scandal; the Department of Justice spying on the media; the killing of Seal Team Operatives in Afghanistan by the Taliban; etc..

Hersh writes:

"...In his nationally televised speech about Syria on 10 September, Obama laid the blame for the nerve gas attack on the rebel-held suburb of Eastern Ghouta firmly on Assad’s government, and made it clear he was prepared to back up his earlier public warnings that any use of chemical weapons would cross a ‘red line’: ‘Assad’s government gassed to death over a thousand people,’ he said. ‘We know the Assad regime was responsible … And that is why, after careful deliberation, I determined that it is in the national security interests of the United States to respond to the Assad regime’s use of chemical weapons through a targeted military strike.’ Obama was going to war to back up a public threat, but he was doing so without knowing for sure who did what in the early morning of 21 August..."

. . .

Hersh reports that Obama's actions were in question by military and intelligence leaders, writing that:

"...in recent interviews with intelligence and military officers and consultants past and present, I found intense concern, and on occasion anger, over what was repeatedly seen as the deliberate manipulation of intelligence. One high-level intelligence officer, in an email to a colleague, called the administration’s assurances of Assad’s responsibility a ‘ruse’. The attack ‘was not the result of the current regime’, he wrote. A former senior intelligence official told me that the Obama administration had altered the available information – in terms of its timing and sequence – to enable the president and his advisers to make intelligence retrieved days after the attack look as if it had been picked up and analysed in real time, as the attack was happening. The distortion, he said, reminded him of the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident, when the Johnson administration reversed the sequence of National Security Agency intercepts to justify one of the early bombings of North Vietnam. The same official said there was immense frustration inside the military and intelligence bureaucracy: ‘The guys are throwing their hands in the air and saying, 'How can we help this guy' – Obama – 'when he and his cronies in the White House make up the intelligence as they go along?'..."

Hersh concludes that:

"...The administration’s distortion of the facts surrounding the sarin attack raises an unavoidable question: do we have the whole story of Obama’s willingness to walk away from his ‘red line’ threat to bomb Syria? He had claimed to have an iron-clad case but suddenly agreed to take the issue to Congress, and later to accept Assad’s offer to relinquish his chemical weapons. It appears possible that at some point he was directly confronted with contradictory information: evidence strong enough to persuade him to cancel his attack plan, and take the criticism sure to come from Republicans..."

patriotsforamerica.ning.com/profiles/blogs/obama-lied-about-syrian-sarin-gas-attack-cherry-picked-facts-to

Seymour M. Hersh's original article (very long - 5363 words):
www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n24/seymour-m-hersh/whose-sarin

[ED.: also off topic but similarly related:
I will delete it if so requested by a non-Obot.]

The Arrogant Audacity
Of A Tyrannical President

• Posted by Van Guard on September 5, 2013 at 2:14pm

To The Point:

• In typical doublespeak, The Tyrant seeks the approval of Congress to attack Syria. He wants Congress [to be] complicit in a move that could send the nation into a conflict that could start World War III.
• Yet The Tyrant states that he does not need Congressional approval. He says he has "statutory" authority to do whatever he wants, and if he does not get Congressional approval to attack Syria, he will do it anyway.
• Approval by Congress of an attack on Syria puts the United States on the same side with al-Qaeda, the terrorist group that murdered [nearly] 3000 Americans on 9/11. Our armed forces will have joined forces with the declared enemies of our people, enemies who have vowed to murder our people [and] conquer and subjugate our nation to their radical Is1amist tyranny.
• The Tyrant's Secretary of State has stated that Arab countries will be financing the attack on Syria. Apparently, the payment will be in money. But he does not state how the Arabs intend to pay for the blood spilled by American troops or the Lives Lost in battle. By stating that Arabs will "finance" a Syrian attack by the U.S., The Tyrant's Secretary of State believes that the U.S. Armed Forces and your support are for sale... that we are mercenaries that will ally ourselves with anyone who buys us, and [he] believes that we will sell ourselves to fight alongside al-Qaeda.
• The Arrogant, Audacious, Tyrannical President, who has stated that he does not need Congressional approval to attack Syria (and is going to do it anyway), pretended to foster and host a debate on this issue, when his hidden intent was not a debate for an approval he does not need, but a debate to DIVIDE Congressional representatives and to position himself as a "decisive" leader. Get that image? Congress is divided [or "divisive"]. He is "decisive."
• Already some in Congress who pretend to represent you, principally the so-called leaders of the "opposition" party, the Republicans, have joined with The Tyrant in his quest to attack Syria, because [the] Syrian Dictator, Assad, allegedly used "gas" to attack his own people. The message here is that it is o.k. for Syria to murder over 80,000 of its own people with guns, bullets, and bombs. It's just not o.k. to do it with gas.
  

While The Tyrant divides Congress and monopolizes the limelight of his adoring propaganda press, he diverts attention from the many scandals that plague his reign of failure and fiasco, to wit:

• His supplying drug cartel terrorists in Mexico with weapons with which they have killed hundreds of Mexicans and slain an American Border agent.
• His failure to render aid to four Americans in Benghazi, which resulted in the massacre of [the four and the wounding of two others,] and the subsequent cover-up of this atrocity which continues to this day.
• His use of Government agencies [e.g., the IRS,] to attack, intimidate, and subjugate political opponents, i.e., conservatives and Christians.
• His use of Government agencies [e.g., the NSA,] and private companies [e.g., the telephone networks,] to spy on Americans.
• His arrogant and careless "leaks" of secure communications and information, which resulted in the targeting and deaths of Special Forces/Seal Team operatives.
• His unilateral, unconstitutional, arrogant changing of existing "LAW" and bypassing Constitutional procedure, to exempt political supporters and special interest groups that he favors, specifically with regard to the Health Care legislation.
• His use of the Justice Department to enforce laws against [just] the states [where] he wishes to enforce [them], and to ignore and refuse to enforce existing laws that would protect Americans from invasive illegal immigration.
• His use of government agencies to shut down American industrial sectors and kill thousands of jobs for Americans, while channeling billions of dollars to businesses that have contributed to his political campaigns, yet whose business enterprises have failed miserably, i.e. the "Solyndra and others" scandals.
• And so on, and so forth.

The Tyrant must answer for his Tyranny and quit hiding behind the excuse that opposition to his anti-Constitutional agenda is because of the color of his skin or because of any racial or ethnic reason.

If you believe that Americans of all races and ethnic backgrounds must unite against the arrogant, tyrannical President, who now wants to lead us into a regional [conflict] and possibly a World War, and who continues to ignore and nullify the foundations and fundamentals of our nation, "sign" this message by sharing it and advancing opposition to the radical infringement of your rights and your Constitution by The Tyrant and his Administration of Failure and Fiasco.

Comment by Carolyn Hamilton on September 5, 2013, at 11:36pm:
This is exactly what Beck described when Obama was first elected. He was and is building a caliphate. Egypt didn't work for him, [so] now he has moved on to Syria. Why in God's name haven't the House and the Senate figured this out, or most or part of it? If this war starts, we are in for h___. This entire administration is pure evil. I don't like our ships over there. They are like sitting ducks. What a way to get rid of our military, [or] a large part of it. What are we to do now? It was just last night that I received an email that said al Jazeera had announced that Obama was in the Mus1im Brotherhood. Egypt is to announce something big on this soon. I also heard that Obama had ppl in Egypt that were trying to buy off this info.

patriotsforamerica.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-arrogant-audacity-of-a-tyrannical-president

AVN Goes There: Obama's Forged Birth Certificate & Social Security Number

31 Dec 2013

- Lt. Mike Zullo -

AVN Goes There: Obama's Forged

Birth Certificate & Social Security Number

VIDEO EXCERPT:

( Video via America's Voice Now. )

AmericasVoiceNow.org | facebook.com/AmericasVoiceNow

1: Obama Can't Get His ID Approved For Obamacare!

2: The TPP & TTIP Treaties Are Coming - Prepare To Defend Yourself America

3 Fed Workers Get Executive Order Payraise - Military Gets Cuts

4: Debtors Prisons - They're Back As Tyranny Flourishes

FULL VIDEO:

( Video via America's Voice Now. )

- Sheriff Joe Arpaio -

http://www.birtherreport.com/2013/12...rtificate.html


ClashDaily.com with Doug Giles


breaking: never before seen! http://clashdaily.com/






This has to be the joke of the new year!!!!

Obama Busted: Birth Cert Contains Words/Places That Did Not Exist In 1961! African American & Kenya



Thursday, January 2, 2014 13:51

4 Simple Questions from a New Jersey Attorney…1. Back in 1961 people of color were called ‘Negroes.’ So how can the Obama ’birth certificate’ state he is “African-American” when the term wasn’t even used at that time?

2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama’s birth as August 4, 1961 & Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right ? At the time of Obama’s birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama’s father was born in “Kenya , East Africa”.
This wouldn’t seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama’s birth, and 27 years after his father’s birth. How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet Exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the “British East Africa Protectorate”. (check it below)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya_
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya)

3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”. This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called ”KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity
Home”, respectively. The name did not change to Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?
(CHECK IT BELOW)
http://http/http/www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx
(http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx)
Why hasn’t this been discussed in the major media ?

4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama’s book on his father. He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I’m not a math genius, so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama’s “birth certificate” says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when Obama was born. That should have put his father’s date of birth approximately 1936 – if my math holds (Honest! I did That without a calculator!). Now we need a non-revised history book – one that hasn’t been altered to satisfy the author’s goals – to verify that WW II was basically between 1939 and 1945. Just how many 3 year olds fight in Wars? Even in the latest stages of WW II his father wouldn’t have been more than 9 years old. Does that mean that Mr. Obama is a liar, or simply chooses to alter the facts to satisfy his imagination or political purposes?

If you copy and paste the following into your search engine, you will see Obama making the statement that his father served in WWII.



Very truly yours,

RICHARD R. SILVERLIEB

Attorney at Law
354 Eisenhower Parkway
Livingston , NJ 07039
“A pen in the hand of this president is far more dangerous than a gun in the hands of 200 million law-abiding citizens.”