Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

If Obama Made This Up, Then What Else Is He Making Up?
May 5, 2012 byGary DeMar

A Huffington Post article asks, “Why Is Everyone Talking About Obama’s Composite Girlfriend?” Good question. In Obama’s autobiographical book Dreams from My Father, he describes an affair that he had with a white woman who he describes as his “New York girlfriend.” That’s not the real story. The real story is that Obama created a “composite” woman who he passed off as one woman.

Dreams from My Father was published in 1995. In the book he tells readers that the storyline contains “composites.” So how do we know what’s true or made up? Is a composite an accurate accounting of a person’s life? I don’t think it is. How hard can it be to describe events as they happened?

As usual, the leftist media have come to Obama’s defense. “He told us right in the book that some of the events were compressed into ‘composite’ stories. It’s no big deal,” media supporters of Obama are telling us.

You might recall the controversy surrounding the author James Frey. Frey appeared with Oprah in 2006 where they discussed his book A Million Little Pieces (2003). Investigators later “discovered that major elements of A Million Little Pieces, a purportedly autobiographical account of the author’s struggle with addiction, were untrue.” The difference, of course, is that Frey didn’t tell anybody about the fabrications. If he had, he wouldn’t have gotten to sit down with the Queen of daytime talk. The point is, people don’t like to be lied to even if they’re being told up from that what’s coming is not true.

The media have been diligent in keeping Obama’s ties to radicals under journalistic lock and key, treating them like they’re the secret Coke formula. There are significant questions about Obama’s background that only trickle out from alternative news sites. In January of this year, White House press secretary Jay Carney was asked why President Obama hasn’t released his college transcripts. He dodged the question.

A good amount of ink was spilled over Rick Perry’s college transcripts when it was learned that he was a C student at Texas A&M. Liberals saw this as a disqualification for a presidential candidate. At least we had the governor’s transcripts. George Bush’s transcripts were released by The New Yorker in November 1999, a year before the election. We shouldn’t forget the media frenzy over Bush’s National Guard records.

An organization called The Trenches “is offering a $10,000 reward to anyone who can provide an authentic copy of President Barack Obama’s course transcripts from his days at Occidental College, Harvard University or Columbia University.”

The media pundits know all about the “composite Obama.” His own book told them that he had things to hide. They don’t want us to know. They need Obama to bring down America.


If Obama Made This Up, Then What Else Is He Making Up? - Godfather Politics | Digg Politics

guess his birth certificate is a composite as well???? The composite President

The Huffington Post has anointed Sen. Marco Rubio as the Republican Vice Presidential candidate this November.

Originally Posted by Bill Schneider for the Huffington Post

Psssst... Marco Rubio Will Be on the Ticket

Posted: 08/29/11 11:50 AM ET

The Republican race for President is wide open. But the party has already settled on its vice presidential nominee: freshman Sen. Marco Rubio.

Rubio spoke at the Reagan Library last week at the personal invitation of Nancy Reagan. During his speech, he remarked, "The reality is, I'm not going to be the vice presidential nominee..." At which point a man in the audience shouted, "Wanna bet?" The audience responded with whoops and cheers.

If you asked a computer to design the perfect Republican candidate for vice president, it would come up with Rubio. He's got three big things going for him. He's a Tea Party favorite. He's Latino. And he's from Florida.

Plus a few smaller things. He's young (40 years old). He's the son of working-class immigrants. He's an impressive speaker. He's close to former Florida Governor Jeb Bush. In last year's Senate race, he defeated popular incumbent governor Charlie Crist (in fact, he drove Crist out of the Republican Party).

Then there's the 2012 Republican convention. It will be held in Tampa, Florida, where Rubio is certain to give a prime-time speech. When's the last time a prime-time convention speech propelled an obscure political figure into national stardom? That would be Barack Obama in 2004. And the time before that? John F. Kennedy in 1956.

There are some potential negatives, of course. Rubio doesn't have much of a legislative record even though he served in the Florida House of Representatives for nine years, two of them as Speaker. There are some lingering controversies over his financial records. And he's Cuban-American, not Mexican-American.

Cuban-Americans are only three percent of the nation's Latino population. Because they come from a communist country, Cuban-Americans enjoy a privileged immigration status. Like most Tea Party Republicans, Rubio takes a tough line on illegal immigration. That has opened him up to criticism from some Latino activists.

Continued at Bill Schneider: Psssst... Marco Rubio Will Be on the Ticket

Comments are closed for this entry

The U.S. Constitution, Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5, states. "No person except a natural born Citizen... shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Sen. Marco Rubio was born in the U.S., but his parents were not U.S. citizens at the time of his birth.

Therefore, he is a native-born citizen, but not a natural-born Citizen, one born in the country to parents who are citizens.

{See U.S. Supreme Court decisions Minor v. Happersett (1875); The Venus (1814); Shanks v. DuPont (1830); and U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898 ), in which Justice Gray quoted Minor.}

However, to thwart enforcement of the Constitution concerning Mr. Obama after his departure from office, TPTB absolutely must have a similarly ineligible candidate in the next administration, lest that administration be obliged to throw the whole sorry lot of complicit U.S. Judges, Representatives, and Senators into prison at Fort Leavenworth.

Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC

The Huffington Post has anointed Sen. Marco Rubio as the Republican Vice Presidential candidate this November.

The U.S. Constitution, Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5, states. "No person except a natural born Citizen... shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Sen. Marco Rubio was born in the U.S., but his parents were not U.S. citizens at the time of his birth.

Therefore, he is a native-born citizen, but not a natural-born Citizen, one born in the country to parents who are citizens.

{See U.S. Supreme Court decisions Minor v. Happersett (1875); The Venus (1814); Shanks v. DuPont (1830); and U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898 ), in which Justice Gray quoted Minor.}

However, to thwart enforcement of the Constitution concerning Mr. Obama after his departure from office, TPTB absolutely must have a similarly ineligible candidate in the next administration, lest that administration be obliged to throw the whole sorry lot of complicit U.S. Judges, Representatives, and Senators into prison at Fort Leavenworth.

There is only one choice Ron Paul!!!!

Obama's Conn. Social Security Number hits Rush

Caller on talk show warns of president's mysterious red flags

Published: 4 hours ago
by Joe Kovacs

Rush Limbaugh, the nation’s top-rated radio talk-show host, briefly brought up the issue of Barack Obama’s potentially criminal use of a Connecticut-based Social Security Number, since the president has never lived in the Constitution State.

While speaking with a caller named Rob about Obama’s alleged deception of citizens, Limbaugh tossed out the question: “What are your thoughts on the fact Obama’s Social Security Number is from Connecticut and he’s never been there?”

Rob responded, “That’s what you call a red flag. A red flag is also, ‘First of all, I don’t need to give you my birth certificate,’ and then finally, ‘I’ll give you a copy,’ Oh, that’s a modern copy … We don’t need copies, we need originals.”

Rob continued, “How about releasing all of your college papers and let’s see what you really thought about America when you were in college? He’s deceiving us.”
“That’s true,” said Limbaugh. “They don’t want [us] to see what those term papers, doctoral theses and so forth actually were about, nor do they want us to see the grades. They don’t want us to see the grades.”

Rob had originally focused on Obama’s birth certificate, which Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio has investigated and believes is a likely forgery.

Find out all there is to know about Obama’s Connecticut Social Security Number in Jerome Corsi’s “Where’s the Birth Certificate,” both in hardcover and an additional ebook.

And we also have the results of Sheriff Joe’s probe into Obama’s birth certificate!

“He says he was born in the United States,” said Rob. “He has not shown a genuine, authentic, viable, verifiable – in order to authenticate any document, you need to have the original.”

“Now wait just a second,” said Limbaugh. “They did release a birth certificate. Even Donald Trump said he’s satisfied with it.”

“The original? But a copy of anything you can’t be satisfied. You have to actually examine the original. … In order to have an expert authenticate it, you can’t go by a copy.

You actually have to go by the ink on the paper, as well as many other things.”

An audio clip of today’s Rush Limbaugh program concerning this topic has been posted on YouTube:



Obama’s Social Security Number was not discussed again in today’s radio exchange, but its mention is notable because few members of the national media have treaded near that subject.

As WND reported last August, Obama’s possibly criminal use of a Connecticut-based Social Security Number should become an important issue in his quest for re-election in 2012, said Alan Keyes, a former presidential candidate and ambassador in Ronald Reagan’s administration.

The first three digits of Obama’s SSN are 042. That code falls within the range of numbers for Connecticut, which according to the Social Security Administration has been 040 through 049.

“I believe that when you are confronted with a situation that is filled with these kinds of – what shall we call them – anomalies, disparities, it is reasonable common sense to want to try to get straight answers,” said Keyes.

“If you’re trying to ascertain whether or not somebody ought to be sitting with, as they used to say, their finger on the button of nuclear weapons that can blow up the world, their power extending to decisions that can collapse our economy, their influence extending to areas that can destroy the standards and moral conscience of our people in the eyes of the world, I think you might want to know who they were. It might be a good idea!”

Keyes’ comments came during an online interview with Stan Solomon, as he addressed an issue that has been avoided by the White House and almost completely ignored by national news agencies.

“Let’s say that you’re trying to establish someone’s identity for the purposes of an investigation and you come across a Social Security Number that has that person coming from a state that all the other records of their life indicate they’ve never been to,” Keyes explained.

“I think you would look at that as an anomaly that suggests, among other things, that you better probe a little harder to make sure that the identity that you’re dealing with is a real identity – that it’s not something that’s been in some sense fabricated for some particular purpose, because one of the things you want to do if you’re tracking somebody down is make sure you’re tracking them down, not following some phony figment down to dead ends. That’s common sense.”

2nd video: Dr. Alan Keyes Discusses Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number.- 8/9/11 - YouTube


Keyes thinks there are many Americans who are aware of this Social Security Number mystery and simply can’t understand why it’s not being addressed.

“Is it incompetence? Is it cowardice?” he asks rhetorically. “Is it just indifference and nonchalance of this elite in the courts and in politics, in the Congress and elsewhere?”
Steve Davis, police chief for Southport, Ind., was a co-host on the program, chiming in, “If anyone believes Barack Obama is gonna make an identity-theft commercial soon, forget it. It’s not gonna happen.”

Keyes then went on a scathing indictment of the current crop of political candidates and their apparent unwillingness to take on the issue.

“You know there’s hardly a one of them had the guts to stand forward and speak truly to the issues that are raised by these anomalies and to address the constitutional issues that are involved in [presidential] eligibility,” he said.

“And that, it seems to me, is a big strike against you because at the end of the day if you’re not willing to respect the requirements of integrity with regard to the most potently damaging office that it is in the gift of the American people to give, then I guess you’re willing to misinform and lie to them about just about anything. Because if you don’t care whether their vote for president – the most important vote they cast – can be cast with integrity, then you don’t care whether they’re represented or not.”

Keyes continued: “I know very few – I don’t care which party label they wear – who have had respect for the people, the respect for the Constitution, the respect for the requirements of real and true representation and choice in our elections to stand forward and deal with these matters forthrightly. They’ve allowed folks like myself and others who are outside the purview of government to kind of just twist in the wind. First they called us names and then they tried to tear us down, and as the facts and other things became evident and more and more people lined up, now they’re just silent and cowering in some dark corner, unable to voice their shame. And I think that’s where they belong, most of them.”

In June 2010, WND’s Washington correspondent, Les Kinsolving, asked former Obama Press Secretary Robert Gibbs specifically why Obama had a Connecticut-based SSN despite not having lived there, but Gibbs completely dodged the question and changed the subject, lamenting about inquiries over Obama’s birth certificate.

3rd Video: Robert Gibbs Is Asked About Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number.flv - YouTube

“There is obviously a case of fraud going on here,” said private investigator Susan Daniels. “In 15 years of having a private investigator’s license in Ohio, I’ve never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly.”

Just this week, a California lawyer who has been leading the legal effort to probe Obama’s SSN made some progress in Hawaii.

As WND reported, attorney Orly Taitz secured an order from United States District Court Magistrate Judge Richard L. Puglisi demanding representatives of the Hawaii Department of Health appear in federal court Sept. 14 to show why Taitzshould be prevented from seeing whatever original 1961 documents theagency has on record regarding Barack Obama’s birth.

To date, most national media have refused to even mention the question of Obama’s possibly fraudulent Social Security Number.

On April 27, 2011, the day Obama released a scanned image of what he claims to be his long-form birth certificate from Hawaii, MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell angrily shouted down California attorney Orly Taitz to prevent her from exposing on national television what she claims is Obama’s Social Security crime:

4th video: Taitz Thrown Off MSNBC For Bringing Up Obama's Social Security Number - YouTube

Also in April of last year, some 11 months after WND began publicizing Obama’s Connecticut-based SSN, Bill O’Reilly of the Fox News Channel briefly addressed the issue while reading his viewer mail on the air.

Unfortunately for O’Reilly, the news anchor falsely asserted the president’s father lived in Connecticut.

In his viewer email segment April 13, 2011, O’Reilly was asked: “What about Obama having a Connecticut Social Security Number? He never lived there.”

“His father lived in Connecticut for several years,” O’Reilly claimed, adding that “babies sometimes get numbers based on addresses provided by their parents.”

In reality, there is no evidence Barack Obama Sr. ever lived in Connecticut. He left Hawaii in 1962 to study at Harvard in Massachusetts and then returned to his home country of Kenya.

When WND publicized O’Reilly’s major error, the information vanished from the Fox News Channel’s website, as well as BillOReilly.com.

O’Reilly’s full explanation of the “truth” of Obama “myths” is here:

5th video: O'Reilly Lying About Obama's Social Security Number Fraud - 4/13/11 - YouTube

The BirtherReport.com website, responding to complaints by Fox podcast customers that O’Reilly’s Social Security claim, broadcast on Fox, had gone missing from the audio archive, trumpeted the headline: “Busted: Fox News scrubbed Bill O’Reilly’s 4/13 mailbag segment on Obama’s Social Security Number reserved for Connecticut applicants.” The site added, “Not only did Fox News scrub the podcast, they also left out the viewer email about Obama’s Social Security number at O’Reilly’s website. I report, you decide!”

Obama’s Conn. Social Security Number hits Rush

We do not have a valid Social Security No. application for Barack Obama II. Certain Obamapologists intuit a possible clerical error at the Social Security Administration, one of misreading ZIP Code "96826" as "06826", or "96814" as "06814", resulting in Barack Obama II being assigned a Connecticut Social Security number, an SSN beginning with 040 through 049.

However, we cannot inspect any such hypothetical Social Security No. application for Barack Obama II in order to check the ZIP Code. About 39 Social Security numbers are known to be linked to Barack Obama II's name and/or address. To the best of my limited knowledge, none is a valid SSN for Barack Obama II, none matches his name in an e-Verify check, and none was issued to him by the SSA . . . AFAIK. Therefore, any SSN application which led to the issue of any of these 39 SSNs bears a name other than Barack Obama II; and any SSN application which does bear the name of Barack Obama II points to yet another occult or buried SSN on top of the 39 SSNs he has which do not belong to him . . . or else such an Obama SSN application, yet to be revealed to the suspecting public, is totally bogus on the face of it.

Without an SSN application submitted before his first employment, his 1978 summer job at the Baskin-Robbins at 1633 King St. in Honolulu, the closest document for handwriting analysis is his Selective Service registration form. It was purportedly submitted two years later, but it bears an altered U.S.P.O. stamp (U.S.P.O. became U.S.P.S. in 1970) with a faked year ("08" rotated 180° and missing the "19"). Fake or not, it's all we've got showing how he wrote "9" on the ZIP Code line. The Social Security No. (#3) was redacted.



"80", or "90" with an "8" typed over the "9"?

1. On the above form provided by the Selective Service System in response to an FOIA request, the "9" in the ZIP Code is very legible and unmistakable, not readable as a "0" by an impartial observer under normal circumstances.

2. For the Hawaii ZIP Code provided, "96826", there is no corresponding Connecticut ZIP Code, "06826".

3. One could conceivably use "96814", a Honolulu, Hawaii, ZIP Code, nearby but not for 1617 S. Beretania Ave., to muddle through to "06814", a Danbury, Connecticut, ZIP Code. But "96814" for 1617 S. Beretania Ave. on a hypothetical SSN application in 1978 is not what was written on the above Selective Service registration form, purportedly from 1980. "96814" is more likely an Obamapologist fabrication pulled out of thin air, selected for reasons known only to the Obafabricator. In 1978, a USPS ZIP Code lookup of Beretania Ave. in Honolulu, Hawaii, might conceivably have returned "96814", but verification with a USPS lookup makes it all the less likely that the SSA clerk might have transcribed "06814" by mistake.

4. The enormous computer database at the Social Security Administration in Baltimore would surely have included a ZIP Code reasonableness test that would have kicked out "06814" as an invalid entry for Honolulu, HI. Now, there is always the possibility that the clerk intentionally typed "Honolulu, CT 06814" - thinking, of course, in 1980 that this would be the future President of the United States, and that he would surely need an SSN which indicated an established residence in one of the original 13 states, the Constitution State, instead of an SSN for a residence in Hawaii, only 21 years a state. But we shall leave such strawman conjectures to diehard Obots.

No matter how one explains away Mr. Obama's Social Security No. beginning with "042", he is linked to 38 other equally inexplicable Social Security numbers, and his mother, Stanley Ann Soetoro, also used numerous Social Security numbers not issued to her. The reasonable, logical, and obvious explanation for every one of these many instances of identity theft is that his grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, worked as a volunteer in the Honolulu Co. Judge of Probate Office. There Mrs. Dunham had easy access to thousands of Social Security numbers assigned to people from all over the country who had died in Honolulu Co..

Those numbers would never be used again, and the Social Security accounts were probably closed or soon would be. No one would ever submit a conflicting claim to use of such a number, and the identity thief did not have to use the number for employment purposes. All of that minimized his risk of being caught by the SSA. The perfect crime? We shall see.

Media coverup of two Obama scandals - 1 minute clip

Feds Destroyed Evidence on Obama’s Draft Registration?

Tuesday, May 8, 2012


Changes in the wording of Selective Service System record-keeping requirements, made days after the opening of an investigation into the alleged forgery of President Barack Obama’s selective service registration form, raise serious questions about U.S. Government intentions.

The new rules allow existing copies of documents that may be sought by investigators to be destroyed.

The Selective Service System’s new privacy rules were published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, September 20, 2011, four days after the September 16 announcement by World Net Daily that the Maricopa County (Arizona) Sheriff’s Office “Cold Case Posse” was opening an inquiry with full subpoena power into alleged forgery of several documents concerning Obama’s birth and draft registration.

The new rules, which constitute the first update to Selective Service System privacy regulations in eleven years, were published under the title, “Privacy Act of 1974; Publication of Notice of Systems of Records.”

Ongoing controversy surrounding allegations that some of Obama’s personal identification documents and records, including his Selective Service draft registration form, are forgeries came into sharp focus seven months ago. The “Cold Case Posse,” under the leadership of Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio, opened an inquiry in response to those allegations.


Post Continues on communities.washingtontimes.com
http://communities.washingtontimes.c...as-draft-card/



Feds Destroyed Evidence on Obama’s Draft Registration? – Patriot Update

This looks like a showdown between the federal government and the states, state governments, local governments, and the rest of us beyond the Beltway. But the rogue, out-of-control federal government is counting on some states saying, "That's not my problem," and others accepting a Cornhusker Kickback, so that it can divide and conquer, marginalize and demonize, states which refuse to surrender the Constitution to tyrants.

Originally Posted by Alan Jones at communities.washingtontimes.com

Brittany H. at NARA's National Personnel Records Center customer service department in St. Louis on Monday, May 7, [2012,] directed requests for selective service records for anyone born after 1960 to the Selective Service System in Arlington, Virginia.

Asked if NARA maintains any selective service records for anyone born after 1960 in long-term storage at any other NARA Federal Record Centers, she stated that "those records are not archived. The only long-term storage is at Selective Service."

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE SYSTEM,
INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:

September 21, 2000 Selective Service System Privacy Rules: State and local government agencies—to provide information which may constitute evidence of a violation of State or local law, for law enforcement purposes. WAS CHANGED TO: September 20, 2011 Selective Service System Privacy Rules: State and Local Governments—To provide data that may constitute evidence and facilitate the enforcement of state and local law.

If investigators with the Cold Case Posse were to argue that the Selective Service System was required to be responsive to a records request for the purpose of the Maricopa’s County Sheriff’s Office investigation or enforcement of any violation of federal law, such as mail fraud, wire fraud, identity theft, or violations of the Military Selective Service Act, the 2000 privacy rules might have permitted such a records release, under the four-word clause “for law enforcement purposes”.
[BUT the 2000 rules also restricted disclosure to "evidence of a violation of State or local law."]

The 2011 updated rules, however, appear to have narrowed the legal requirements under which the Selective Service System must release records to local and state law enforcement agencies engaged in “the enforcement of state and local law”.

The changes could be challenging to any local or state law enforcement agencies, including the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, seeking to obtain a selective service card as evidence in the investigation of federal crimes.

Lawyers seeking to prevent Obama’s registration records from being released again by the Selective Service System could conceivably argue that enforcement of federal law by a state or local agency is not a qualifying reason. Any possible legal ambiguity found in the 2000 rules appears to have been eliminated in the 2011 update, a preliminary analysis by Communities @WashingtonTimes.com has concluded.

Both the 2000 and 2011 versions of the Selective Service System’s privacy rules allow the FBI to request records when investigating possible violations of the Military Selective Service Act.

The question of President Obama's draft card: Has evidence been destroyed? | Washington Times Communities

The cessation of NARA archiving of Selective Service records issued in or after 1960, making it the exclusive purview of the Selective Service System (in Chicago, I presume?), is indeed a treacherous action by the Executive Branch of the Federal government. The Selective Service System in Arlington, Virginia, may be in possession of all Selective Service registration form original documents (doubtful). Records of the Selective Service System State Headquarters for Hawaii is in San Francisco, and HQ for Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin is in Chicago, within reach of the minions of the Chicago Machine. If SSS Chicago is now the only storage location for Mr. Obama's fraudulent Selective Service registration form, then it no longer exists in original document form.

The public rationale for the NARA contraction in storage services is to reduce expenses for duplicate services, but off-site archived storage has long been considered a justifiable expense for data security and recovery. That leaves Mr. Obama's registration of July 29, 1980, as the potentially εxplosivε record, and Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Sep. 16th announcement of his Cold Case Posse Investigation as the bµrning fµse, leading up to the rules change on Sep. 20th. Coincidence does not prove or indicate causation. But the fishy smell still lingers.

As for the wording of the 2000 privacy rules:

"To provide information which may constitute evidence of a violation of State or local law, for law enforcement purposes," changed on Sept. 20, 2011, to

"To provide data that may constitute evidence and facilitate the enforcement of state and local law,"

what's the difference?

Obama's Social Security Scandal Hits Big Time
Friday, May 11, 2012 7:49


Rush Limbaugh

Limbaugh tends to avoid the topic of Obama’s citizenship, but this week he talked about the president’s hazy personal history, including Obama’s “potentially criminal use of a Connecticut-based Social Security number” (FREE audio).

“Does this pass the smell test?” – Limbaugh also had fun with a news report claiming that “dinosaur farts and burps” contributed to global warming.

A climate change skeptic, Rush called the thesis “one of the most stupid assertions I have in encountered in 25-plus years of deep study of the environmentalist-wacko movement” (FREE audio).

Michael Savage

Savage was furious after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton praised Islam while addressing a Muslim audience in Bangladesh.

“Why does this administration find it necessary,” Savage wondered, “to bend over backwards and tell us a big lie about the wonders of Islam?”

America, he added, is now a “land where our worst enemies are praised but our allies are stiffed.”

Savage isn’t very impressed by the Republicans, either. He informed listeners that “a very highly placed individual who really knows the ins and outs of both parties … told me the Republicans really want to lose this election.”

Why? Because then “the Republicans can pretend to be against ‘big government’ while they dip their beaks into the public treasury like never before” (FREE audio).

Aaron Klein

Only Aaron Klein would interview a senior leader of al-Qaida in one segment and comedy legend Jackie Mason the next!

Rounding out Klein’s program this week: an exclusive interview with John Bolton. The Cold War may be over, but Bolton maintains that Russia still poses a threat to the United States.

Mark Levin

The results of the Wisconsin and West Virginia elections prove that “the Tea Party is alive and strong” and “the Reagan Democrats are back,” declared Mark Levin.

It’s no coincidence, Levin added, that Obama suddenly came out in support of gay “marriage” the day after these votes were cast. The president rightly senses that he and the Democrats need to rally their progressive base (FREE audio).

Levin also provided listeners with a history lesson, explaining precisely how the media has defended and protected corrupt Democrats, going back as far as JFK and LBJ, all the way up to the present day (FREE audio).

Laura Ingraham

Ingraham inadvertently angered some listeners this week, when she made fun of adults who line up to see comic book movies like “The Avengers” on opening weekends.

“You’re not an Avenger,” she wrote on her Facebook page. “Now go cut the grass and take care of your kids.”

Ironically, the angry, juvenile response to Ingraham’s offhand quip inadvertently proved her point about some people’s immaturity!

Also this week: Ingraham stuck mostly to politics, chatting with Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Haley Barbour and candidate Richard Mourdock, the day before his historic defeat of Indiana’s longtime senator Richard Lugar (FREE audio).

Glenn Beck

Glenn Beck may not be on television any longer, but he’s still on the radio, a medium he calls “the most powerful form of communication out there.”

Beck is featured in the MediaBistroTV series “My First Big Break,” talking about his childhood fascination with radio and how he broke into the broadcasting business (FREE video).

And now, from the left side of the dial …

Progressives live in the past. Even in the year 2012, so-called “progressives” remain obsessed by their glory days of the 1960s and 1970s, when they wielded enormous political and cultural power.

They see everything through this cracked rear view mirror, which may explain this bizarre screed by MSNBC radio host Mike Papantonio (FREE audio).

No doubt leaving younger listeners scratching their heads, Papantonio tried to equate Mitt Romney with Barry Goldwater. The 1964 GOP presidential candidate was fatally smeared by LBJ’s notorious “Daisy” ad, which strongly suggested that Goldwater was a trigger happy warmonger.

For better or worse, such fascinating footnotes are “ancient history” to many Americans (it doesn’t help that you’re using a highly visual TV commercial to make a point on the radio!).

It’s revealing that the harder they try to sound “relevant,” the more old fashioned and out of touch so many leftists sound.


Read more at WorldNetDaily News



Before It's News

On Feb.22nd, the Secretary of States office recieved MY COMPLAINT,
to remove Barack Obama from the States Ballot. Hell, even made the front page of our Newspaper, the meeting of the Elections Board (7 members) was at 10 am Friday, May 11th...
Well, thats is what I was told over the phone last monday ( the 7th). I ASKED the Staffer, is that Mnt.Time? Your time he said.
Well, it was a phone conference, I called at 9:50, and recieved this message after waiting 5 minutes... "Your conference call has Ended"... I called back, recording said your conference has ended 10 MINUTES AGO!!!!!!
Well, I figure it was a Democrat who called me and gave me the WRONG TIME! It was 10 am Central Time, 9 am Mountain.
As Furious as I was, I bit my tongue and called the Sec. of State and explained the situation to him... He thought it was FUNNY!
He told me my complaint had NO MERIT.
So, my next move is to SUE the Dem. Party of America, State of S.Dakota, Nancy Pelosi and Shariff Williams (Notary), for Voter Fraud. Baracks Constitutionality on the 2008 Ballot.
Statute of Limitations for Voter Fraud is 7 yrs... I'm sick of NOT HAVING A VOICE!!!!